Association Between the Seed Storage Proteins 2S Albumin and 11S Globulin and Severe Allergic Reaction After Flaxseed Intake.

BACKGROUND: Given the increased popularity of flaxseed in meals, several cases of allergy to these seeds have been reported. Little is known about the allergens implicated in hypersensitivity reactions to flaxseed. The present study aimed to identify the allergens involved in IgE-mediated reactions in 5 patients with a clinical history of severe systemic symptoms after flaxseed consumption. METHODS: Proteins that were potential allergens with IgE-binding capacity were purified from flaxseed extract using chromatography and identified via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Immunoassays were performed using the 5 allergic patients' sera tested individually and as a pool. RESULTS: Immunoblotting of the flaxseed extract revealed a low-molecular-mass protein (around 13 kDa) in 4 of the 5 patients, while a protein of approximately 55 kDa was detected in 2 patients. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as flaxseed 2S albumin, which is included in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature as Lin u 1, and 11S globulin. Inhibition assays revealed in vitro IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between Lin u 1 and peanut and cashew nut proteins, while IgE-mediated recognition of 11S globulin by patients' sera was partially inhibited by several plant-derived sources. CONCLUSIONS: Seed storage proteins from flaxseed were involved in the development of severe symptoms in the 5 patients studied and exhibited cross-reactivity with other allergenic sources. Besides the severity of flaxseed allergy in patients sensitized to 2S albumin, this is the first time that 11S globulin has been identified as a potential allergen. Taking these data into account should ensure a more accurate diagnosis.

Unraveling the Diagnosis of Kiwifruit Allergy: Usefulness of Current Diagnostic Tests.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the usefulness of the in vitro and in vivo methods used in the diagnosis of kiwifruit allergy and to specifically assess the impact of seed proteins on sensitivity. METHODS: We performed skin prick tests (SPTs) using various commercial extracts, homemade pulp, and seed extracts and prick-prick tests with kiwifruit on 36 allergic patients. The presence of specific IgE (sIgE) was assessed using the ImmunoCAP (kiwifruit extract), ELISA (Act d 1, Act d 2), ISAC, and FABER assays. Immunoblotting of seed extract was carried out, and a single-blind oral food challenge was performed with whole seeds in seed-sensitized individuals. RESULTS: The prick prick test with kiwifruit demonstrated the highest diagnostic capacity (81.8% sensitivity and 94.1% specificity) among the in vivo tests. The sIgE levels measured using ImmunoCAP (kiwifruit extract) showed a similar sensitivity to that of global ISAC and FABER (63.9%, 59.5%, and 58.3%, respectively). Act d 1 was the major allergen. Sensitization to Act d 1 was associated with positive sIgE results to whole kiwifruit extract detected by ImmunoCAP (P<.000). A positive SPT result to kiwifruit seeds was associated with severe symptoms induced by kiwifruit (P=.019) as a marker of advanced disease, but not with clinically relevant sensitization. Challenge testing with kiwifruit seeds performed on 8 seed-sensitized patients yielded negative results. CONCLUSION: Sensitization to Act d 1 is associated with a positive result in conventional diagnostic techniques, whereas kiwifruit seed sensitization does not increase the sensitivity of the diagnostic techniques evaluated.

Association Between the Seed Storage Proteins 2S Albumin and 11S Globulin and Severe Allergic Reaction After Flaxseed Intake

Background: Given the increased popularity of flaxseed in meals, several cases of allergy to these seeds have been reported. Little is known about the allergens implicated in hypersensitivity reactions to flaxseed. The present study aimed to identify the allergens involved in IgE-mediated reactions in 5 patients with a clinical history of severe systemic symptoms after flaxseed consumption. Methods: Proteins that were potential allergens with IgE-binding capacity were purified from flaxseed extract using chromatography and identified via MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Immunoassays were performed using the 5 allergic patients’ sera tested individually and as a pool. Results: Immunoblotting of the flaxseed extract revealed a low-molecular-mass protein (around 13 kDa) in 4 of the 5 patients, while a protein of approximately 55 kDa was detected in 2 patients. The proteins were identified by mass spectrometry as flaxseed 2S albumin, which is included in the WHO/IUIS allergen nomenclature as Lin u 1, and 11S globulin. Inhibition assays revealed in vitro IgE-mediated cross-reactivity between Lin u 1 and peanut and cashew nut proteins, while IgE-mediated recognition of 11S globulin by patients’ sera was partially inhibited by several plant-derived sources. Conclusions: Seed storage proteins from flaxseed were involved in the development of severe symptoms in the 5 patients studied and exhibited cross-reactivity with other allergenic sources. Besides the severity of flaxseed allergy in patients sensitized to 2S albumin, this is the first time that 11S globulin has been identified as a potential allergen. Taking these data into account should ensure a more accurate diagnosis. (AU)

Antecedentes: Dada la creciente popularidad de la linaza en las comidas, se han notificado varios casos de alergia a estas semillas. La información acerca de los alérgenos implicados en las reacciones de hipersensibilidad a estas semillas es escasa. El presente trabajo pretende identificar los alérgenos implicados en las reacciones mediadas por IgE en cinco pacientes con una historia clínica de síntomas sistémicos graves tras el consumo de linaza. Métodos: Las proteínas susceptibles de ser alérgenos con capacidad de unir IgE se purificaron a partir del extracto de linaza mediante técnicas cromatográficas. Su identificación se realizó mediante espectrometría de masas MALDI-TOF. Se realizaron inmunoensayos con los sueros de los cinco pacientes alérgicos, utilizados de forma individual o como mezclas. Resultados: Cuatro de los cinco pacientes reconocieron una proteína de baja masa molecular (alrededor de 13 kDa) en inmunoensayos con extracto de linaza, mientras que dos pacientes reconocieron una proteína de aproximadamente 55 kDa. Se identificaron por espectrometría de masas como albúmina 2S de linaza, incluida en la nomenclatura de alérgenos de la OMS/IUIS como Lin u 1, y globulina 11S, respectivamente. Los ensayos de inhibición in vitro revelaron la existencia de reactividad cruzada de la Lin u 1 con las proteínas del cacahuete y del anacardo, mientras que el reconocimiento por parte de la IgE de la globulina 11S por parte de los sueros de los pacientes fue parcialmente inhibido por varias fuentes vegetales. Conclusiones: Las proteínas de almacenamiento de las semillas de lino estaban implicadas en el desarrollo de síntomas graves en cinco individuos y mostraron una reactividad cruzada con otras fuentes alergénicas. Además de la gravedad de la alergia a la linaza en los pacientes sensibilizados a la albúmina 2S, es la primera vez que se identifica la globulina 11S como un alérgeno potencial.

Unraveling the Diagnosis of Kiwifruit Allergy: Usefulness of Current Diagnostic Tests

Objectives: To determine the usefulness of the in vitro and in vivo methods used in the diagnosis of kiwifruit allergy and to specificallyassess the impact of seed proteins on sensitivity.Methods: We performed skin prick tests (SPTs) using various commercial extracts, homemade pulp, and seed extracts and prick-prick testswith kiwifruit on 36 allergic patients. The presence of specific IgE (sIgE) was assessed using the ImmunoCAP (kiwifruit extract), ELISA(Act d 1, Act d 2), ISAC, and FABER assays. Immunoblotting of seed extract was carried out, and a single-blind oral food challenge wasperformed with whole seeds in seed-sensitized individuals.Results: The prick prick test with kiwifruit demonstrated the highest diagnostic capacity (81.8% sensitivity and 94.1% specificity) amongthe in vivo tests. The sIgE levels measured using ImmunoCAP (kiwifruit extract) showed a similar sensitivity to that of global ISAC andFABER (63.9%, 59.5%, and 58.3%, respectively). Act d 1 was the major allergen. Sensitization to Act d 1 was associated with positivesIgE results to whole kiwifruit extract detected by ImmunoCAP (P<.000). A positive SPT result to kiwifruit seeds was associated withsevere symptoms induced by kiwifruit (P=.019) as a marker of advanced disease, but not with clinically relevant sensitization. Challengetesting with kiwifruit seeds performed on 8 seed-sensitized patients yielded negative results.Conclusions: Sensitization to Act d 1 is associated with a positive result in conventional diagnostic techniques, whereas kiwifruit seedsensitization does not increase the sensitivity of the diagnostic techniques evaluated (AU)

Objetivos: Determinar la rentabilidad diagnóstica de las técnicas in vitro e in vivo utilizadas en el diagnóstico de alergia al kiwi y estudiarla influencia de las proteínas alergénicas de las semillas en su sensibilidad.Métodos: Se seleccionaron 36 pacientes alérgicos a kiwi. Se les realizó prick test con cuatro extractos comerciales diferentes y prick-prickcon kiwi. Se determinó IgE específica mediante ImmunoCAP (extracto de kiwi), ELISA (Act d 1, Act d 2), las micromatrices ISAC y FABER eImmunoblotting de extracto de semilla de kiwi. Se realizó exposición oral simple ciego frente a semilla de kiwi en pacientes sensibilizadosa la semilla.Resultados: El prick-prick de kiwi fue la prueba in vivo con mayor rendimiento (sensibilidad 81,8%, especificidad 94,1%). El ImmunoCAPde extracto de kiwi mostró una sensibilidad similar a la global del ISAC y del FABER (63,9%, 59,5% y 58,3%, respectivamente). Act d 1fue el alérgeno mayoritario. Se encontró asociación entre los niveles de IgE específica frente a Act d 1 (ISAC) y el extracto de kiwi medianteImmunoCAP (p <0,000). La prueba cutánea positiva con semilla se asoció con mayor gravedad de síntomas frente a kiwi (p = 0,019),como marcador de enfermedad avanzada, pero no como sensibilización clínicamente relevante. La prueba de provocación con semillasfue negativa en los ocho pacientes provocados.Conclusiones: La sensibilización a Act d 1 se asocia con resultados positivos con las técnicas diagnósticas convencionales. La sensibilizaciónfrente a semillas no mejora el rendimiento de las técnicas evaluadas (AU)

First electrochemical immunosensor for the rapid detection of mustard seeds in plant food extracts.

This paper describes the first biosensor reported to date for the determination of mustard seed traces. The biosensor consists of an amperometric immunosensing platform able to sensitively and selectively determine Sin a 1 content, the major allergen of yellow mustard and the most abundant protein of these seeds. The immunosensing platform exploits the coupling of magnetic microbeads (MBs) modified with sandwich-type immune complexes, comprising polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies, selective to the target protein for its capturing and detection, respectively. In addition, a HRP-conjugated secondary antibody was used for enzymatic labelling of the monoclonal antibody, and amperometric transduction was made at screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) using the hydroquinone (HQ)/H2O2 system. The electrochemical immunosensor allows the simple and fast detection (a single 1-h incubation step) of Sin a 1 with a limit of detection of 0.82 ng mL-1 (20.5 pg of protein in 25 µL of sample) with high selectivity against structurally similar non-target allergenic proteins (such as Pin p 1 from pine nut). The developed immunoplatform was successfully used for the analysis of peanut, rapeseed, cashew, pine nut and yellow mustard extracts, giving only positive response for the yellow mustard extract with a Sin a 1 content, in full agreement with that provided by conventional ELISA methodology.