Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 16(9): 825-841, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37526068

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Older adults are the most vulnerable population to the effects of influenza. These patients have age-related characteristics that make response to both infection and therapeutics different than younger patients. AREAS COVERED: Influenza vaccination and antiviral therapy are the foundational approaches to preventing and treating influenza in geriatric patients. Older adults should receive one of the three enhanced vaccines before influenza season beings. There are five antivirals used in influenza. Geriatric patients have been under-enrolled in antiviral studies but have been included in small numbers. Oseltamivir has the most abundant evidence, including in the hospital and long-term care (LTC) facilities, and the strongest evidence for reducing mortality and complications. Peramivir offers the shortest time for symptom alleviation, while baloxavir is best tolerated. EXPERT OPINION: Oseltamivir has the most versatility in preventing and treating influenza in geriatric patients. Parenteral peramivir and zanamivir are second-line alternatives for complicated influenza when oseltamivir cannot be used. Single-dose peramivir and baloxavir are attractive alternatives to oseltamivir in uncomplicated influenza but will not increase in utilization until more evidence is available regarding mortality and complications, particularly in hospitalized and LTC patients. More studies, including comparative trials, are required to elucidate the role in therapy for each therapeutic in the geriatric population.


Asunto(s)
Gripe Humana , Humanos , Anciano , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Oseltamivir/efectos adversos , Antivirales
4.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 59(5): 678-685, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31307964

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To comparatively assess potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and subsequent impact on clinical outcomes among older adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) by means of 3 different screening criteria for PIMs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: DCH Regional Medical Center ICU. Patients 65 years of age and older admitted to the medical ICU in 2014 (n = 346). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PIMs were identified with the use of the Beers criteria (2015 and 2012 versions) and the Screening Tool of Older People's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP). The proportions of PIM use at admission and discharge and proportions of in-hospital mortality and ICU and hospital readmission within 2014 among patients with PIM use were compared among the 3 criteria. Multivariable Poisson regression models assessed the associations of PIMs at admission with hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS). Statistical significance was considered to be indicated at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The proportions of patients with at least 1 PIM identified through 3 different criteria (2015 Beers, 2012 Beers, and STOPP, respectively; at admission: 68.5%, 58.1%, and 44.5%; at discharge: 77.4%, 63.6%, and 42.9%) were significantly different from each other (2012/2015 Beers vs. STOPP: P < 0.01). PIM use at admission as determined by STOPP was significantly associated with longer ICU stay (relative risk [RR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.38) and hospital LOS (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.33). However, PIMs identified through the Beers criteria (2015 and 2012 versions) were associated with shorter ICU and hospital LOS. No differences were found in proportions of in-hospital mortality and ICU and hospital readmission among patients with PIM use identified through the 3 different criteria. CONCLUSION: Although the Beers criteria demonstrated the ability to identify PIMs more frequently in the ICU setting, PIM use identified by means of STOPP was associated with longer ICU and hospital LOS. Clinical interventions aiming to reduce PIMs identified by STOPP in inpatient or ICU settings may decrease patients' inpatient or ICU LOS.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 10(10): 1055-1072, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28891346

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease affecting up to 90,000 people worldwide. Approximately 73% of patients are homozygous for the F508del cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator [CFTR] mutation. Traditionally treatment has only included supportive care. Therefore, there is a need for safe and effective novel therapies targeting the underlying molecular defects seen with CF. Areas covered: In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Commission approved LUM/IVA (Orkambi), a CFTR modulator that includes both a CFTR corrector and potentiator, for CF patients homozygous for the F508del CFTR mutation. This article reviews the pharmacologic features, clinical efficacy, and safety of LUM/IVA and summarize the available pre-clinical and clinical data of LUM/IVA use. Expert commentary: LUM/IVA showed modest, but significant improvements from baseline in percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) as well as a reduction in pulmonary exacerbations by 35% It was shown to be safe for short- and long-term use. Currently, LUM/IVA is the only oral agent in its class available and represents a milestone the development of therapies for the management of CF. Nonetheless, pharmacoeconomic data are necessary to justify its high cost before is use becomes standard of care.


Asunto(s)
Aminofenoles/uso terapéutico , Aminopiridinas/uso terapéutico , Benzodioxoles/uso terapéutico , Regulador de Conductancia de Transmembrana de Fibrosis Quística/genética , Fibrosis Quística/tratamiento farmacológico , Quinolonas/uso terapéutico , Aminofenoles/efectos adversos , Aminofenoles/farmacología , Aminopiridinas/efectos adversos , Aminopiridinas/farmacología , Animales , Benzodioxoles/efectos adversos , Benzodioxoles/farmacología , Fibrosis Quística/genética , Fibrosis Quística/fisiopatología , Combinación de Medicamentos , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Mutación , Quinolonas/efectos adversos , Quinolonas/farmacología
7.
Pharmacotherapy ; 36(7): 797-822, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27196747

RESUMEN

Approximately 16-31% of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) have an alcohol use disorder and are at risk for developing alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Patients admitted to the ICU with AWS have an increased hospital and ICU length of stay, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, higher costs, and increased mortality compared with those admitted without an alcohol-related disorder. Despite the high prevalence of AWS among ICU patients, no guidelines for the recognition or management of AWS or delirium tremens in the critically ill currently exist, leading to tremendous variability in clinical practice. Goals of care should include immediate management of dehydration, nutritional deficits, and electrolyte derangements; relief of withdrawal symptoms; prevention of progression of symptoms; and treatment of comorbid illnesses. Symptom-triggered treatment of AWS with γ-aminobutyric acid receptor agonists is the cornerstone of therapy. Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are most studied and are often the preferred first-line agents due to their efficacy and safety profile. However, controversy still exists as to who should receive treatment, how to administer BZDs, and which BZD to use. Although most patients with AWS respond to usual doses of BZDs, ICU clinicians are challenged with managing BZD-resistant patients. Recent literature has shown that using an early multimodal approach to managing BZD-resistant patients appears beneficial in rapidly improving symptoms. This review highlights the results of recent promising studies published between 2011 and 2015 evaluating adjunctive therapies for BZD-resistant alcohol withdrawal such as antiepileptics, baclofen, dexmedetomidine, ethanol, ketamine, phenobarbital, propofol, and ketamine. We provide guidance on the places in therapy for select agents for management of critically ill patients in the presence of AWS.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Etanol/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Baclofeno/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Fenobarbital/uso terapéutico
8.
Infection ; 44(3): 357-9, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26216470

RESUMEN

Drug-induced anaphylaxis is an unpredictable adverse reaction. Although it may occur with any medication, antibiotics induce more cases of anaphylaxis than any other medication class with most cases being induced by ß-lactam antibiotics. Clindamycin is an antibiotic with good gram-positive and anaerobe coverage which is often used in patients with ß-lactam allergies. We report the case of a 46-year-old female who experienced anaphylaxis after a dose of intravenous (IV) clindamycin. Following treatment with methylprednisolone, epinephrine, diphenhydramine, and albuterol, the patient stabilized. The patient's score on the Naranjo's algorithm was 8 (probable); a score of 9 (definite) limited only by absence of drug re-challenge. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a clindamycin-induced anaphylaxis where the patient was not exposed to any other agent that may have triggered the response, the first case in the United States, and only the third documented case in the literature. Clinicians should be aware of the potential for drug-induced anaphylaxis in all medications.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Clindamicina/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Administración Intravenosa , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Anafilaxia/fisiopatología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clindamicina/administración & dosificación , Clindamicina/uso terapéutico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Absceso Periodontal/tratamiento farmacológico
9.
Hosp Pharm ; 51(2): 134-141, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38746768

RESUMEN

Background: Prior to 2012, The Joint Commission (TJC) pneumonia core measure (PN-5) required antibiotic administration for suspected community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) within 6 hours of arrival to the emergency room (ER). In 2012, TJC issued PN-6 requiring antibiotic administration within 24 hours of presentation. Though PN-6 was anticipated to reduce overuse and inappropriate antibiotic use and improve appropriate antibiotic selection, the impact of PN-5 and PN-6 on optimizing care for CAP in the ER remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the impact of TJC pneumonia core measures on antibiotic use in the ER for suspected CAP. Methods: In this single-center study, medical records of patients 18 years old and older diagnosed with CAP in the ER during 2011 (PN-5) and 2012 (PN-6) and admitted for 1 day or longer were reviewed. Exclusion criteria included criteria for health care-associated pneumonia. Comparisons between groups were performed using descriptive statistics and contingency table analysis with chi-square or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 and SAS version 9.4. Results: Antibiotic use was comparable between PN-5 and PN-6. Approximately half of patients in each group received an appropriate empiric CAP regimen (52% vs 54%; P = .807). Among inappropriate regimens, the most common reason was use of a beta-lactam alone (69% vs 83%; P = .26). More patients had an ultimate diagnosis of CAP with PN-6 (78% vs 86%; P = .3). Conclusion: Changes in pneumonia core measure requirements did not have a significant impact on appropriate antibiotic use in the ER.

10.
Consult Pharm ; 30(6): 346-51, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26048465

RESUMEN

Approximately 20% to 30% of older adults use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) daily. While some NSAIDs are known to cause adverse central nervous system effects, the risk of falls associated with NSAID use in older adults has not been as closely scrutinized as it has with other pain medications. This article reviews 16 studies evaluating NSAID use by older adults and subsequent fall risk. In the majority of evaluated studies, geriatric patients using NSAIDs had a higher occurrence of falls compared with those not takinG NSAIDS. It is important for pharmacists to understand this potential hazard of NSAID use by older adults to minimize the risk of falls by providing patient education, adjusting dosages, discontinuing medications, and closely monitoring patients.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes por Caídas/prevención & control , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Riesgo
12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25452705

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Iodine is a naturally occurring element commercially available alone or in a multitude of products. Iodine crystals and iodine tincture are used in the production of methamphetamine. Although rarely fatal, iodine toxicity from oral ingestion can produce distressing gastrointestinal symptoms and systemic symptoms, such as hypotension and tachycardia, from subsequent hypovolemia. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this case report is to describe a case of iodine toxicity from suspected oral methamphetamine ingestion. CASE REPORT: A male in his early 20's presented with gastrointestinal symptoms, chills, fever, tachycardia, and tachypnea after orally ingesting a substance suspected to be methamphetamine. The patient had elevated levels of serum creatinine, liver function tests, and bands on arrival, which returned to within normal limits by day 4 of admission. Based on the patient's narrow anion gap, halogen levels were ordered on day 3 and indicated iodine toxicity. This is thought to be the first documented case of iodine toxicity secondary to suspected oral methamphetamine abuse. CONCLUSION: Considering that the incidence of methamphetamine abuse is expected to continue to rise, clinicians should be aware of potential iodine toxicity in a patient with a history of methamphetamine abuse.

13.
Pharmacotherapy ; 34(12): 1341-54, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25359244

RESUMEN

The objective of this opinion paper was to identify and describe potential clinical pharmacists' services for the prevention and management of patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV). The goals of this paper are to guide the establishment and development of pharmacy services for patients infected with HCV and to highlight HCV research and educational opportunities. Recommendations were based on the following: a review of published data on clinical pharmacist involvement in the treatment and management of HCV-infected patients; a consensus of clinical pharmacists who provide direct patient care to HCV-infected patients and practice in different pharmacy models, including community-based and academic settings; and a review of published guidelines and literature focusing on the treatment and management of HCV infections. The recommendations provided in this opinion paper define the areas of clinical pharmacist involvement and clinical pharmacy practice in the treatment and management of patients with HCV. Clinical pharmacists can promote preventive measures and education about reducing HCV transmission, improve medication adherence, assist in monitoring clinical and adverse effects, recommend treatment strategies to minimize adverse effects and drug interactions, and facilitate medication acquisition and logistics that positively improve patient outcomes and reduce the health care system costs.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Servicios Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos
14.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) ; 54(5): 530-7, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25216883

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe primarily implicit instruments for assessing medication use in older adults. DATA SOURCES: Literature was identified via PubMed (1966-2014) and Google Scholar using the following search terms: geriatric/medication use, implicit criteria, inappropriate medication use, inappropriate prescribing, older adults/medication use, and polypharmacy. Reference citations from identified publications were also reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: All articles in English identified from data sources were evaluated. Instruments applicable to pharmacy and multiple medication classes were included. We excluded instruments developed for a single medication or medication class, for a single condition or disease state, as primarily an academic instrument, using primarily explicit criteria, for use primarily by health care practitioners other than pharmacists, or for regulatory purposes. DATA SYNTHESIS: Seven instruments were reviewed by evaluating characteristics, components of prescribing and medication use addressed, and settings in which they have been evaluated and validated. Screening Medications in the Older Drug User (SMOG) is a six-question instrument developed specifically for community pharmacists. The Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI); Assess, Review, Minimize, Optimize, Reassess (ARMOR) tool; and Tool to Improve Medications in the Elderly via Review (TIMER) are more comprehensive instruments, but they require clinical judgment and are time intensive. Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders-3 (ACOVE-3) and the Good Palliative-Geriatric Practice Algorithm (GPGPA) are useful in determining need for medication continuation in older adults who are closer to the end of life. The Assessment of Underutilization (AOU) is an implicit tool to guide medication initiation. CONCLUSION: Each instrument is unique in design, which may be beneficial in some pharmacy practice settings and present barriers in others. The use of multiple instruments may be necessary to optimize therapy in this vulnerable patient population.


Asunto(s)
Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Algoritmos , Humanos , Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Polifarmacia
15.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 6(1): 9-22, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23272789

RESUMEN

Fentanyl pectin nasal spray is a novel intranasal formulation for the management of breakthrough cancer pain in patients taking and tolerant to opioids for persistent cancer pain. The pectin-based delivery modulates the product's transmucosal absorption. Nasal delivery allows fentanyl pectin nasal spray to achieve a greater maximum plasma concentration than oral transmucosal fentanyl products and at a much faster rate. Compared with intranasal fentanyl compounded with aqueous solutions, the pectin-based system decreases the maximum plasma concentration and prolongs exposure to more closely match the time course of a typical breakthrough cancer pain episode. Throughout all phases of clinical studies, it was shown to be safe and effective in doses between 100 and 800 µg per breakthrough pain episode. Fentanyl pectin nasal spray is the only proprietary intranasal fentanyl formulation in the USA and one of two in Europe. Owing to the medication's delivery system, the pharmacokinetics and subsequent dosing are unique to this product and should not be interchanged with any other proprietary or compounded fentanyl product.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Portadores de Fármacos , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Rociadores Nasales , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Pectinas/química , Administración Intranasal , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
16.
J Pharm Pract ; 25(3): 352-67, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22544624

RESUMEN

One of the most difficult challenges health care providers encounter is drug selection for pregnant patients. Drug selection can be complex as efficacy and maternal side effects must be weighed against potential risk to the embryo or fetus. Verification of an individual drug's fetal safety is limited as most evidence is deduced from epidemiologic, prospective cohort, or case-control studies. Medication selection for the pregnant inpatient is a particularly complex task as the illnesses and conditions that require hospitalization mandate different medications, and the risk versus benefit ratio can vary significantly compared to the outpatient setting. Some degree of acute pain is not uncommon among inpatients. Acetaminophen is generally considered the drug of choice in pregnancy for mild to moderate acute pain, while most opioids are thought to be safe for short-term use to manage moderate to severe pain. Providing sedation is particularly challenging as the few options available for the general population are further limited by either known increased risk of congenital malformations or very limited human pregnancy data. Propofol is the only agent recommended for continuous sedation, which has a Food and Drug Administration classification as a pregnancy category B medication. Treatment of infections in hospitalized patients requires balancing the microbiology profile against the fetal risk. Older antimicrobials proven generally safe include beta-lactams, and those with proven fetal risks include tetracyclines. However, little to no information regarding gestational use is available on the newer antimicrobials that are frequently employed to treat resistant infections more commonly found in the inpatient setting. Management of maternal blood pressure is based on the severity of blood pressure elevations and not the hypertensive classification. Agents generally considered safe to use in hypertensive pregnant patients include methyldopa, labetolol, and hydralazine, while angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, hydrochlorothiazide, and atenolol should be avoided.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/inducido químicamente , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/epidemiología , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/epidemiología , Efectos Tardíos de la Exposición Prenatal/prevención & control
17.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 4(4): 417-27, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22114852

RESUMEN

Ulipristal acetate (UPA) is a newly developed emergency contraceptive currently available in the USA and Europe. It is approved as a 30 mg one-time dose taken within 120 h (5 days) of unprotected intercourse or failed contraception. This selective progesterone receptor modulator appears to be more effective than the levonorgestrel-containing emergency contraceptive, which must be taken within 72 h of unprotected intercourse. According to pharmacodynamic trials, UPA delays follicular maturation and ovulation. In addition, UPA may modulate the endometrium. Both Phase III clinical trials found that UPA does not lose efficacy within the 120-h dosing interval. Throughout all phases of clinical studies, UPA was shown to be well tolerated with only minimal adverse drug reactions, all of which are similar to competitor therapies.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Poscoito/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos Poscoito/farmacocinética , Norpregnadienos/administración & dosificación , Norpregnadienos/farmacocinética , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Anticonceptivos/administración & dosificación , Anticonceptivos/farmacocinética , Interacciones Farmacológicas/fisiología , Femenino , Interacciones Alimento-Droga/fisiología , Humanos , Receptores de Progesterona/fisiología , Sexo Inseguro/efectos de los fármacos , Sexo Inseguro/fisiología
18.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 4(6): 685-92, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22111853

RESUMEN

Sipuleucel-T is a therapeutic cancer vaccine approved for the treatment of castration- or hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Through a novel process, it activates the body's own antigen-presenting cells to induce an immune response to prostatic acid phosphatase, a protein found on prostate cancer cells. A treatment course consists of three total infusions spread 2 weeks apart. Throughout all phases of clinical trials, sipuleucel-T has been shown to be safe and well tolerated. Sipuleucel-T has demonstrated an ability to increase overall survival by approximately 4 months when compared with placebo. However, sipuleucel-T has not shown any improvement in affecting patients' time to disease progression.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra el Cáncer/administración & dosificación , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/prevención & control , Extractos de Tejidos/administración & dosificación , Fosfatasa Ácida , Animales , Vacunas contra el Cáncer/inmunología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/enzimología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Proteínas Tirosina Fosfatasas/inmunología , Extractos de Tejidos/inmunología , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol ; 3(5): 601-12, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22111741

RESUMEN

Tolvaptan is a new vasopressin antagonist developed for the treatment of hypervolemic or euvolemic hyponatremia. It has greater affinity for the V(2) receptor than native vasopressin or any other vasopressin antagonist. Blockade of the V(2) receptor induces solute-free water excretion without affecting normal electrolyte excretion. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tolvaptan are suitable for once-daily dosing. Throughout all phases of clinical studies, it was shown to be safe for short- and long-term use. Tolvaptan effectively increases serum sodium levels in patients with heart failure, cirrhosis and syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. In patients hospitalized owing to heart failure, tolvaptan decreased bodyweight, increased urine output and improved dyspnea compared with placebo. However, tolvaptan has not proven to be beneficial for the long-term management of heart failure. Currently, tolvaptan is the only oral agent in its class available in the USA and Europe.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...