Iatrogenic necropolitics: forced anal examinations and state-sanctioned homophobia.

In 2016, Human Rights Watch, an international human rights organisation, published a report on the use of forced anal examinations to identify and prosecute putative 'homosexuals'. The report provided detailed descriptions and first-person accounts of these examinations in several countries in the Middle East and Africa. Drawing on theories of iatrogenesis and queer necropolitics, this paper uses these accounts and other reports of forced anal examinations to explore the role of medical providers in the 'diagnosis' and prosecution of homosexuality. The goal of these medical examinations is explicitly punitive rather than therapeutic, making them quintessential examples of iatrogenic clinical encounters which harm rather than heal. We argue that these examinations naturalise socioculturally derived beliefs about bodies and gender that construct homosexuality as 'readable' on the body through close medical inspection. These acts of inspection and 'diagnosis' reveal broader hegemonic state narratives of heteronormative gender and sexuality, both within countries as well as internationally as different state actors circulate and share these narratives. This article highlights the entanglement of medical and state actors, as well as contextualises the practice of forced anal examination within its colonial roots. Our analysis offers the potential for advocacy and holding medical professions and states accountable.

Handbooks and health interpreters: How men are assets for their pregnant partners in Senegal.

INTRODUCTION: Global health researchers often approach fatherhood initiatives from a deficit-based perspective, assuming men need sensitization, education, or correction. Senegalese men, which some global health and development organizations have determined to be uninvolved, are part of a team of prenatal and postpartum support called the "entourage" and have a very specific role to play as ad hoc health interpreters. METHODS: The findings of this article come from 12 months of ethnographic research in Dakar, Senegal in 2018. In addition to participant-observation in three maternity wards across the city, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 pregnant women, 27 expectant fathers, and numerous family members, midwives, physicians, and governmental and nongovernmental organization employees. Data were coded and evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULTS: In Senegal, the Handbook of Mother and Child Health is distributed in state-funded maternity wards. The Handbook outlines what pregnant women should know about pregnancy and how to appropriately engage with clinical services. Male partners of pregnant women commonly read the book for and to their pregnant partners. Men are placed in the unique position of intermediary between pregnant women and the State and as such, they learn a lot about pregnancy and childbirth, as well as prenatal and postpartum care. CONCLUSIONS: Our ethnographic insights challenge global health rhetoric that frames men as uninvolved in women and children's health and this study demonstrates that future interventions should take an asset-based approach to men's involvement. Senegalese men are uniquely positioned by gendered expectations to act as health interpreters for their pregnant partners. We conclude with specific, actionable recommendations for the Senegalese case.