Phase I trial of gemcitabine and CPT-11 given weekly for four weeks every six weeks.

BACKGROUND: Our previous studies have shown that the in vitro cytotoxicity of gemcitabine and SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan (CPT-11), is synergistic in human tumor cell lines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with solid tumors, refractory to standard chemotherapy or for whom no effective therapy existed (age range 31-74; 7 female, 17 male; ECOG PS 0 = 12, 1 = 11, 2 = 1), received gemcitabine and CPT-11 weekly for four weeks out of every six weeks. Fifty courses of treatment (median 2, range 1-8) were given through five dose levels of gemcitabine/CPT-11 (600/75, 800/75, 800/100, 1000/100, 1000/125 mg/m2). RESULTS: Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in eight and two patients, respectively. Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in one and three patients, respectively. Hematologic toxicity resulted in > or = 2 missed doses of treatment in two out of six patients and was therefore dose limiting at gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and CPT-11 125 mg/m2. Grade 3 and 4 diarrhea occurred in two and one patients, respectively. Other moderate non-hematologic toxicities included alopecia, anorexia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and weight loss. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose for this study recommended for phase II testing is gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and CPT-11 100 mg/m2. A partial response was seen in transitional cell carcinoma.

A Phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors.

BACKGROUND: New agents with antitumor activity in patients with neuroendocrine tumors are sorely needed. A Phase II study of high-dose paclitaxel in patients with metastatic carcinoid and islet cell tumors was performed at the Mayo Clinic. Granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) also was administered to ameliorate neutropenia. METHODS: Twenty-four patients (14 with carcinoid tumors, 9 with islet cell tumors, and 1 with an anaplastic tumor) were enrolled on this Phase II study of paclitaxel given as a 24-hour continuous infusion at a dose of 250 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks plus GCSF at a dose of 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously, beginning 24 hours after the completion of the paclitaxel dose and continuing until the absolute neutrophil count was > 10,000/microL. RESULTS: All 24 patients were evaluable for analysis. The overall response rate was 8% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0-0.11). At last follow-up all patients except 1 had developed disease progression, with an estimated median time to disease progression of 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.6-6.0 months). The estimated median survival was 1.5 years (95% CI, 1.0-1.8 years). Hematologic toxicity was significant with 12 of 24 patients developing Grade 4 (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria scale) neutropenia; however, there were no septic deaths reported. There were 17 episodes of Grade 4 neutropenia in these 12 patients and the duration of these events ranged from 2-5 days. More common nonhematologic toxicities included arthralgia (21 patients), anorexia (15 patients), nausea (15 patients), diarrhea (12 patients), and allergic reactions (2 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Given the lack of antitumor activity of paclitaxel and the significant hematologic toxicity observed despite the use of GCSF support in the current study cohort of patients with neuroendocrine tumors, further studies of this combination in this particular patient population are not recommended.

Phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin for advanced urothelial cancer.

PURPOSE: We examined the role of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first line therapy for metastatic urothelial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this study, and all were eligible for treatment and assessable for response. Patients received 135 mg./m.2 paclitaxel intravenously for 3 hours followed by 70 mg./m.2 cisplatin for 2 hours every 3 weeks to a maximum of 6 cycles. RESULTS: Of the patients 70% experienced a major response to treatment, which was partial/regression in 38% and complete in 32%. Toxicity was manageable with no episodes of grade 4 leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. Nonhematological toxicities included primarily nausea, anorexia and neuropathy, which rarely were severe. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen of paclitaxel and cisplatin is effective, safe and convenient to administer in an outpatient setting for advanced urothelial cancer.

Phase II evaluation of continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, mitomycin-C, and oral dipyridamole in advanced measurable pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Trial.

At present there remains a need for more effective systemic therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Some studies have suggested that infusional chemotherapy schedules and biomodulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) may improve the therapeutic outcome in advanced colon cancer. One such regimen that uses continuous infusion 5-FU, weekly leucovorin, daily dipyridamole, and intermittent mitomycin-C has activity in both colon and unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. The intent of this trial was to test the effectiveness of this four-drug regimen in advanced pancreatic cancer. Patients received 5-FU 200 mg/m2 daily by continuous infusion, leucovorin 30 mg/m2 IV weekly, mitomycin-C 10 mg/m2 day 1, and dipyridamole 75 mg orally four times daily for 5 weeks. After a 1-week break, treatment cycles were repeated every 6 weeks. Eligibility included biopsy-proven advanced measurable pancreatic cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 and 2, and no prior systemic chemotherapy. Of 46 evaluable patients, 9 partial responses and 1 complete tumor response were seen, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval 11-36%). The median survival in the group of 50 patients registered to this trial was 4.6 months, with a range of 0.33 to 40.2 months. Toxicity was manageable, with the most common toxicities (> or =grade III National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria) being anorexia (13%), stomatitis (17%), and hand-foot syndrome (13%). Of note, little severe hematologic toxicity and no significant headaches were reported. Although some patients did respond, the therapeutic results are not encouraging enough to take this regimen to phase III testing.

Phase III evaluation of octreotide versus chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced exocrine pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.

There continues to be a need for new systemic approaches for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor activity of the somatostatin analogue octreotide to 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy in a Phase III setting. Eighty-four patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 and limited tumor volume were randomized to receive octreotide 200 microg three times daily or 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin. After the first 12 patients had been randomized to octreotide, we increased the dose in the remaining patients to 500 microg three times daily. This change was based on early reports in other studies, suggesting that our original dose may not have been effective and that higher doses of octreotide were well tolerated. A planned interim analysis performed after 84 patients were enrolled demonstrated inferior time to progression and survival for the patients randomized to octreotide. Further accrual to the octreotide arm of this protocol was therefore terminated. Octreotide in doses of 200-500 microg three times daily does not delay progression or extend survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer compared with treatment with 5-fluorouracil with or without leucovorin.

A North Central Cancer Treatment Group phase II trial of topotecan in relapsed gliomas.

Current systemic treatment options for patients with relapsed gliomas are limited. The topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan has demonstrated broad antitumor activity in both preclinical studies as well as a number of phase I and II trials in humans. Studies in primates have shown good cerebrospinal fluid levels of topotecan following systemic administration. We therefore performed this phase II trial in patients who developed evidence of progressive glioma after definitive radiation therapy. Patients were treated with 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 consecutive days repeated every three weeks. For patients who had received prior nitrosourea-containing chemotherapy, the starting dose was 1.25 mg/m2. Thirty-three patients were entered on this study. All patients were eligible and evaluable for both response and toxicity. Seven patients experienced grade 4 leukopenia with 2 of these patients dying of infection-related complications. Six of these seven patients were not taking anticonvulsants during treatment. Nine patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia, seven of whom were not taking anticonvulsants. Nonhematologic side effects were infrequent and manageable. One patient experienced a partial response to this treatment for an overall response rate of 3% (95% binomial confidence interval 0.3%-20.4%). The median time to progression was 14.9 weeks and median survival 19.9 weeks. Topotecan at this dose and schedule showed no substantial activity in relapsed gliomas.

Renal cell carcinoma metastatic to the pancreas: clinical and radiological features.

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical features, computed tomographic (CT) appearance, and treatment outcomes in a case series of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastatic to the pancreas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 23 patients (15 men and 8 women) with RCC metastatic to the pancreas, detected by CT examination between 1986 and 1996. All patients had undergone a previous nephrectomy for RCC. RESULTS: Isolated mild elevation in liver function test results (in 5 patients) or in serum amylase level (in 8 patients) was observed. New-onset diabetes was detected in 3 patients. The CT characteristics of the pancreatic metastases generally resembled those of primary RCC with well-defined margins and greater enhancement than normal pancreas with a central area of low attenuation. The mean interval between resection of the primary RCC and detection of the pancreatic metastases was 116 months (range, 1-295 months). In 18 patients (78%), the pancreatic metastases were diagnosed more than 5 years after nephrectomy. The pancreas was the initial metastatic site in 12 patients (52%). Survival was shortened with higher tumor grade (mean survival time of 41 months and 10 months in patients with grade 2 and 3, respectively). Surgical resection was carried out in 11 patients (7 distal and 3 total pancreatectomies and 1 distal pancreatectomy followed 4 years later by total pancreatectomy), with 8 patients alive at a mean follow-up of 4 years, 6 of whom remained free of recurrence. Overall, 12 patients (52%) were alive at a mean of 42 months after diagnosis of metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: The appearance of metastatic RCC lesions in the pancreas closely resembles the appearance of primary RCC on CT images. Pancreatic metastases from RCC are frequently detected many years after nephrectomy. Patient survival correlates with tumor grade. Histologic analysis of pancreatic masses in patients with a history of resected primary RCC is important since the prognosis for RCC metastatic to the pancreas is much better than that for primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Priming tissue-specific cellular immunity in a phase I trial of autologous dendritic cells for prostate cancer.

We attempted to induce therapeutic immunity against prostate-derived tissues in patients suffering from progressive hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. Thirteen patients were treated with two infusions, 1 month apart, of autologous dendritic cells (APC8015) preexposed ex vivo to PA2024, a fusion protein consisting of human granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and human prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). The infusions were followed by three s.c. monthly doses of PA2024 without cells. Three groups of patients each received PA2024 at 0.3, 0.6, or 1.0 mg/injection. All Ps were two-sided. Treatment was well tolerated. After infusions of APC8015, patients experienced only mild (grade 1-2) short-lived fever and/or chills, myalgia, pain, and fatigue. One patient developed grade 3 fatigue. Four patients developed mild local reactions to s.c. PA2024. Twelve patients were evaluable for response to treatment. Circulating prostate-specific antigen levels dropped in three patients. T cells, drawn from patients after infusions of APC8015, but not before, could be stimulated in vitro by GM-CSF (P = 0.0004) and PAP (P = 0.0001), demonstrating broken immune tolerance against these two normal proteins. Injections of PA2024 did not influence the reactivity of T cells against PAP and GM-CSF. However, antibodies to GM-CSF and, to a much lesser extent, to PAP reached maximum titers only after two or even three injections of PA2024, showing that directly injected PA2024 was involved in stimulation of humoral immunity. Dendritic cells exposed to antigen ex vivo can induce antigen-specific cellular immunity in prostate cancer patients, warranting further studies of this mode of immunotherapy.

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) using a once-every-three-week dosing schedule for patients with advanced solid tumor malignancy.

A Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) and its active metabolites when given on a once-every-3-week schedule. Thirty-four patients with advanced refractory solid malignancies were treated with CPT-11 (240-340 mg/m2) administered as a 90-min i.v. infusion every 3 weeks. Patients were divided into two groups: those with and those without prior abdominal/pelvic (AP) radiotherapy. Gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) and hematological toxicity (leukopenia and neutropenia) were dose-limiting side effects. Other common toxicities included anorexia, asthenia, and acute cholinergic symptoms (abdominal cramps, diaphoresis, and lacrimation). For patients with no prior AP radiation therapy, the MTD was determined to be 320 mg/m2, whereas those with prior AP radiation therapy had a MTD of 290 mg/m2. Dose-proportional increases in the mean area under the concentration-time curves for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were not observed over the narrow dose range studied. Mean values of terminal phase half-life, clearance, terminal phase volume of distribution, and steady-state volume of distribution for CPT-11 were 12.4 +/- 1.8 h, 13.0 +/- 3.8 liters/h/m2, 234 +/- 83 liters/m2, and 123 +/- 38 liters/m2, respectively. The pharmacodynamic analyses indicated the strongest correlation to be between SN-38 area under the concentration-time curves and neutropenia (p = 0.60; P = 0.001). A total of five responses (one complete response and four partial responses) were observed in the cohort of 32 patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. In conclusion, gastrointestinal toxicity and hematological toxicity were the dose-limiting toxicities of CPT-11 when administered as a 90-min infusion every 3 weeks. In this trial, the recommended Phase II starting dose for patients with no prior AP radiation therapy was found to be 320 mg/m2; for patients with prior AP radiation, the recommended Phase II starting dose was 290 mg/m2. This once-every-3-week schedule has been incorporated into a Phase I trial of CPT-11 combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin.

Prolonged disease-free survival after orthotopic liver transplantation plus adjuvant chemoirradiation for cholangiocarcinoma.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) alone for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma is often associated with early disease relapse and limited survival. Because of these discouraging results, most programs have abandoned OLT for cholangiocarcinoma. However, a small percentage of patients have achieved prolonged survival after OLT, suggesting that adjuvant approaches could perhaps improve the survival outcome. Based on these concepts, a protocol was developed at the Mayo Clinic using preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy for patients with cholangiocarcinoma. We report our initial results with this pilot experience. Patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma above the cystic duct without intrahepatic or extrahepatic metastases were eligible. Patients initially received external-beam irradiation plus bolus fluorouracil (5-FU), followed by brachytherapy with iridium and concomitant protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. 5-FU was then administered continuously through an ambulatory infusion pump until OLT. After irradiation, patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy to exclude metastatic disease. To date, 19 patients have been enrolled onto the study and have been treated with irradiation. Eight patients did not go on to OLT because of the presence of metastasis at the time of exploratory laparotomy (n = 6), subsequent development of malignant ascites (n = 1), or death from intrahepatic biliary sepsis (n = 1). Eleven patients completed the protocol with successful OLT. Except for 1 patient, all had early-stage disease (stages I and II) in the explanted liver. All patients who underwent OLT are alive, 3 patients are at risk at 12 months or less, and the remaining 8 patients have a median follow-up of 44 months (range, 17 to 83 months; 7 of 9 patients > 36 months). Only 1 patient developed tumor relapse. OLT in combination with preoperative irradiation and chemotherapy is associated with prolonged disease-free and overall survival in highly selected patients with early-stage cholangiocarcinoma.

Results of irradiation or chemoirradiation following resection of gastric adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of postoperative irradiation +/- chemotherapy for carcinoma of the stomach and gastroesophageal junction. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of 63 patients who underwent resection for stomach cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-five patients had complete resection with no residual disease but with high-risk factors for relapse. Twenty-eight had microscopic residual and 10 had gross residual disease. Doses of irradiation ranged from 39.6 to 59.4 Gy with a median dose of 50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions. Fifty-three of the 63 (84%) patients received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median duration of survival was 19.3 months for patients with no residual disease, 16.7 months for those with microscopic residual disease, and 9.2 months for those with gross residual disease (p = 0.01). The amount of residual disease also significantly impacted locoregional control (p = 0.04). Patients with linitis plastica did significantly worse in terms of survival, locoregional control, and distant control than those without linitis plastica. The use of 4 or more irradiation fields was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of Grade 4 or 5 toxicity when compared to the patients treated with 2 fields (p = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: There was a significant association between survival and extent of residual disease after resection as well as the presence of linitis plastica. Distant failures are common and effective systemic therapy will be necessary to improve outcome. The toxicity of combined modality treatment appears to be reduced by using greater than 2 irradiation fields.

Results of irradiation or chemoirradiation for primary unresectable, locally recurrent, or grossly incomplete resection of gastric adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of irradiation +/- chemotherapy for patients with unresectable gastric carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 60 patients with a gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and a locally advanced unresectable primary (n = 28), a local or regional recurrence (n = 21), or gross residual disease following incomplete resection (n = 11) were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were treated with external beam irradiation (EBRT) alone or external beam plus intraoperative irradiation (IOERT), and 55 of the 60 (92%) patients received 5-FU based chemotherapy. RESULTS: The median survival for the entire cohort was 11.6 months. There was no significant difference in median survival between each of the three treatment groups. In examining the extent of disease there was a significant difference in survival based on the number of sites involved. Nine patients with disease limited to a single non-nodal site appeared to represent a favorable subgroup compared to the rest of the patients (median survival of 21.8 months vs. 10.2 months,p = 0.03). In the patients with recurrent disease, the number of sites involved (p = 0.05), and total dose adding external beam dose to IOERT dose (> 54 Gy vs. < or =54 Gy, p = 0.06) were of borderline significance in regard to survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with either primary unresectable, locally or regionally recurrent, or incompletely resected gastric carcinoma, the overall survival is similar, and related to the extent of disease based on the number of regional sites involved. The patients with a single non-nodal site of disease represent a favorable subgroup and patients with recurrent disease may benefit from total irradiation doses > 54 Gy.

North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase II study of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose levamisole for gastric and gastroesophageal cancer using survival as the primary endpoint of efficacy.

At present there is no established standard chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Combination regimens have yielded response rates at times exceeding 50% but with no improvement in survival compared to single agents. This study examined the role of 5-fluorouracil and high-dose levamisole in a phase II setting using survival as the main endpoint. Patients with advanced carcinomas of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction were treated with 5-fluorouracil, 450 mg/m2 IV days 1 to 5, and levamisole, 100 mg/m2 orally three times daily on days 1 to 3, and 50 mg/m2 tid days 4 to 5 every 5 weeks. To allow more rapid accrual and to study a population that more accurately reflects the makeup of patients treated in clinical practice, patients with both measurable and nonmeasurable disease were entered in this study. Two of fifteen (13%) patients with measurable disease experienced a partial response to treatment. The adjusted 1-year survival rate for the 44 patients entered was 29.6%, which is similar to the historical 1-year survival of 30% observed in a group of nearly 400 patients treated in prior North Central Cancer Treatment Group studies. This regimen offers no improvement in therapeutic activity for advanced gastric cancer. This study design, however, allows rapid screening of phase II regimens in patients who would usually be candidates for phase III trials.

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil administered by protracted venous infusion, leucovorin, and pelvic radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the toxicity of pelvic radiation therapy, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered by protracted venous infusion, and leucovorin. METHODS: Pelvic radiation therapy consisted of 50.4-54 gray (Gy) administered in 28-30 fractions. Systemic treatment consisted of leucovorin (10 mg daily) administered orally and protracted venous infusion of 5-FU. The initial daily 5-FU dose was 150 mg/m(2). Dose escalations were planned in increments of 25 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Forty eligible patients were registered, of whom 37 were evaluable for chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity secondary to radiation therapy, protracted venous infusion of 5-FU, and leucovorin occurred in 2 of 17 patients at a daily 5-FU dose of 150 mg/m(2), in 5 of 10 patients at a daily 5-FU dose of 175 mg/m(2), and in 5 of 10 patients at a daily 5-FU dose of 200 mg/m(2). Diarrhea was dose-limiting in 7 of 8 patients with Grade 4 toxicity. Venous thrombosis, a treatment-related complication not directly related to chemotherapy or radiation therapy, occurred in 5 of the 40 patients entered into this study. Four thromboses occurred at the site of a central catheter. No thrombotic complications occurred in the last 7 patients, who were given warfarin orally (1 mg daily) during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Toxicity due to radiation therapy, protracted venous infusion of 5-FU, and leucovorin when 5-FU is given daily at a dose of 150 mg/m(2) is similar to that observed in current chemoradiotherapy regimens for patients with rectal carcinoma. This regimen will be considered as a possible investigational treatment arm of a future trial of adjuvant therapy for rectal carcinoma patients.

Pilot evaluation of venlafaxine for the treatment of hot flashes in men undergoing androgen ablation therapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Hot flashes may be a significant clinical problem in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy with gonadotropin releasing hormone analogues, oral antiandrogens and/or surgical bilateral orchiectomy. Anecdotal information suggests that a low dose of the relatively new antidepressant venlafaxine may abrogate this clinical problem. We developed the current pilot trial to investigate further whether venlafaxine alleviates hot flashes in such men. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included men in whom substantial hot flashes were associated with androgen deprivation therapy. Hot flash data were collected by daily diary questionnaires during a 1-week baseline period when no therapy was given for hot flashes, as well as for the next 4 weeks when study participants received 12.5 mg. venlafaxine orally twice daily. Questionnaires completed during the 4 weeks ofvenlafaxine therapy also documented data on potential drug toxicity. RESULTS: Of the 16 evaluable patients who completed the study 10 (63%) had a greater than 50% decrease in hot flash score, as determined using the formula, frequency x severity, by week 4 of treatment versus the baseline week. Median weekly hot flash scores decreased 54% from baseline during week 4 of venlafaxine therapy. Average incidence of severe and very severe hot flashes was reduced from 2.3 daily at baseline to 0.6 daily at study end (p = 0.003). Therapy was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Venlafaxine hydrochloride appears to represent an efficacious new method for alleviating hot flashes in men undergoing androgen ablation therapy. Further evaluation of this compound for alleviating hot flashes is indicated.

Phase II North Central Cancer Treatment Group study of 2-cholorodeoxyadenosine in patients with recurrent glioma.

There is no standard treatment for patients with recurrent gliomas, and their prognosis remains poor. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine is a purine analogue that has significant activity in many low-grade lymphoproliferative disorders. The authors conducted a phase II study to determine the efficacy of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in patients with recurrent gliomas. Patients with a histologically confirmed primary brain tumor with evidence of progression after radiation therapy were eligible. Protocol treatment consisted of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine 7.0 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 through 5 every 28 days. For those with a history of prior nitrosourea therapy, the dose of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine was reduced to 5.6 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5. Treatment was continued until progression or a maximum of 12 cycles. Fifteen patients with recurrent astrocytomas or oligoastrocytomas of all grades were entered in the study. Treatment was well tolerated. Major toxicities were myelosuppression and neurotoxicity. No responses were seen. The authors conclude that although 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine is well tolerated, no demonstrable activity in patients with recurrent gliomas was established.

Topotecan in previously treated advanced urothelial carcinoma: an ECOG phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: [corrected] Chemotherapeutic agents are playing an increasing role in the management of urothelial carcinoma. Despite recent advances in the treatment of this disease there continues to be a need to identify new active agents and their toxicity spectra. Topotecan is an agent as yet unstudied in bladder cancer. METHODS: Ambulatory patients with progressive advanced urothelial carcinoma following prior systemic chemotherapy were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) daily for 5 days every three weeks for 6 cycles. Doses were modified for leukopenic fever, thrombocytopenic bleeding, and any grade 3 or 4 (NCI common toxicity criteria) toxicity. RESULTS: Forty-four eligible patients entered the trial. There were 4 partial responses for an overall response rate of 9.1% (exact 95% two-stage binomial CI, 2.9% to 25.5%). Major identified toxicities were gastrointestinal and myelosuppression. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan at this dose and schedule has minimal activity in previously treated patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Toxicities can be severe but are manageable.

A phase II study of high-dose cimetidine and the combination 5-fluorouracil, interferon alpha-2A, and leucovorin in advanced renal cell adenocarcinoma.

Cimetidine is an H2-receptor antagonist used in the management of peptic ulcer disease and other hypersecretory gastrointestinal disorders. This agent has intriguing immunomodulatory characteristics. A phase II trial of cimetidine in 19 patients with advanced malignant melanoma yielded an objective response rate of 16%. Having demonstrated that cimetidine is active in malignant melanoma, the authors conducted a phase II trial of cimetidine, 800 mg twice daily by mouth, in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Among the 31 eligible patients, only one (3.2%) achieved a regression. It was a partial regression lasting 93 days. Median time to treatment failure was 83 days. The combination of interferon alpha-2A (IFL-RA) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been shown to be synergistic against experimental cell lines in vitro. Citrovorum factor (CF) added to 5-FU has been shown to improve objective tumor response compared with single-agent 5-FU in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Fluorinated pyrimidines have shown some activity against renal cell cancer. We conducted a phase II trial of the combination of CF at 20 mg/m2 intravenous push followed by 5-FU at 325 mg/m2 intravenously daily for 5 days every week with interferon alpha-2A 5 x 10(6) units/m2 subcutaneously on days 1, 3, 5 in patients with advanced renal cell cancer. Among the 31 eligible patients, only two (6.5%) achieved a regression. Both were partial regressions. Median time to treatment failure was 84 days. Neither regimen is recommended for further testing in patients with advanced renal cell adenocarcinoma.