Impact of a Visual Support Dedicated to Prognosis on Symptoms of Stress of ICU Family Members: A Before-and-After Implementation Study.

Family members commonly have inaccurate expectations of patient's prognosis in ICU. Adding to classic oral information, a visual support, depicting day by day the evolution of the condition of the patient, improves the concordance in prognosis estimate between physicians and family members. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of this tool on symptoms of anxiety/depression of family members. DESIGN: Bicenter prospective before-and-after study. SETTING: A nonacademic and a university hospital. SUBJECTS: Relatives of consecutive patients admitted in the two ICUs. INTERVENTIONS: In the period "before," family members received classic oral information, and in the period "after," they could consult the visual support in the patient's room. The primary endpoint was the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score of relatives at day 5. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of symptoms of anxiety (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale score > 7) and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale score > 7) at day 5 and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score at day 90. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 140 patients and their referent family members were included (77 in period before and 63 after). Characteristics of patients of the two groups were similar regarding age, reason for admission, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II at admission, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at day 5. At day 5, median Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score was 17 (9-25) before and 15 (10-22) after the implementation of the visual support (p = 0.43). The prevalence of symptoms of anxiety and depression was similar in the two groups (66.2% and 49.4% before and 68.3% and 36.5% after [not significant], respectively). At day 90, median Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score was 11 before (7-16) and 9 (5-16) after the implementation of the tool (p = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the use of a visual support tool dedicated to prognosis did not modify the level of stress of family members.

Impact of a visual aid on discordance between physicians and family members about prognosis of critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a visual aid on the discordance about prognosis between physicians and family members. METHODS: The study was performed in a general intensive care department with two 6-bed units. In the unit A, family members could consult a visual aid depicting day by day the evolution of global, hemodynamic, respiratory, renal and neurological conditions of the patient on a 10-point scale. In the unit B, they only received oral medical information. On day 7 of the ICU stay, the physician and family members estimated the prognosis of the patient among four proposals (life threatened; steady state but may worsen; steady state, should heal; will heal). Then we compared the rate of discordance about prognosis between physicians and family members in the two units. RESULTS: Seventy-nine consecutive patients admitted in the intensive care department and still present at day 7, their family members and physicians, were enrolled. Patients in the two units were comparable in age, sex ratio, reason for admission, SAPS II at admission and SOFA score at day 7. In the unit A, physician-family members discordance about prognosis occurred for 12 out of 39 patients (31%) vs. 22 out of 40 patients (55%) in the unit B (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: In our study, adding a visual aid depicting the evolution of the condition of critically ill patients day by day to classic oral information allowed the family to have an estimate of the prognosis less discordant with the estimate of the physician.