Advance Care Planning in South Africa.

South Africa (SA), an upper middle-income country, faces significant challenges, including severe inequality, poverty, high unemployment rates, unequal access to basic services, and a long history of human rights violations. It is a diverse nation with eleven official languages. The country also bears a heavy burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases, with many patients seeking healthcare services too late. Despite the pressing need, palliative care is still an emerging field in South Africa, with limited funding allocated for its integration. Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a recommended practice in SA for patients with serious illnesses while they are still in good health and can function independently. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) in SA have played a significant role in integrating ACP planning within their settings through advocacy and training. ACP has been included in both formal academic training and training programs offered by NGOs. Additionally, research has been initiated to evaluate the acceptability and validity of the Serious Illness Conversation Guide within the cultural diversity and complexities of the SA context. Acceptance of ACP amongst SA healthcare workers and the public faces many challenges. Many South Africans still have a low level of trust and acceptance towards the public healthcare system. In many South African cultures discussing death and dying is considered culturally taboo. Traditional cultures interpret and apply the concept of individual autonomy differently. The philosophy of "Ubuntu", which translates to "I am because we are", is widely endorsed in the country, prioritising community needs over individual needs. It is, therefore, essential for healthcare professionals engaging in ACP conversations not to make assumptions about a person's preferences for communication, decision-making and care, based on external attributes. Instead, they should respectfully explore these preferences and be adaptable in their approach to ACP. The implementation of ACP in SA is still in its early stages, requiring further research to inform culturally sensitive approaches to advance care planning.

Position paper on undergraduate Palliative Medicine education for doctors in South Africa.

BACKGROUND:  Basic palliative care teaching should be included in training curricula for health care providers (HCPs) at all levels of the health service to ensure that the goal set by the South African (SA) National Policy Framework and Strategy for Palliative Care, to have an adequate number of appropriately trained HCPs in South Africa, is achieved. Furthermore, palliative learning objectives for nurses and doctors should be standardised. Many SA medical schools have integrated elements of Palliative Medicine (PM) teaching into undergraduate medical training programmes for doctors; however, the degree of integration varies widely, and consensus and standardisation of the content, structure and delivery of such PM training programmes are not yet a reality. AIM:  This joint position paper aims to describe the current state of undergraduate medical PM teaching in South Africa and define the PM competencies required for an SA generalist doctor. SETTING:  Palliative Medicine programme leads and teachers from eight medical schools in South Africa. METHODS:  A survey exploring the structure, organisation and content of the respective medical undergraduate PM programmes was distributed to PM programme leads and teachers. RESULTS:  Responses were received from seven medical schools. Through a process of iterative review, competencies were defined and further grouped according to suitability for the pre-clinical and clinical components of the curriculum. CONCLUSION:  Through mapping out these competencies in a spiralled medical curriculum, the authors hope to provide guidance to medical curriculum designers to effectively integrate PM teaching and learning into current curricula in line with the goals of the SA National Policy Framework and Strategy on Palliative Care (NPFSPC).

A Delphi study to guide the development of a clinical indicator tool for palliative care in South Africa.

BACKGROUND:  The South African National Policy Framework and Strategy on Palliative Care (NPFSPC) recommends that when integrating palliative care (PC) into the health system, a PC indicators tool should be used to guide clinicians to recognise a patient who should receive PC. The policy document recommends 'a simple screening tool developed for use in South Africa that would assist healthcare professionals (HCPs) to recognise patients who may have unmet palliative care needs'. AIM:  This research study sought to develop South African consensus on indicators for PC to assist clinicians to recognise a patient in need of PC. SETTING:  The South African healthcare setting. METHODS:  A Delphi study was considered suitable as a methodology to develop consensus. The methodology was based on the Conducting and REporting of DElphi studies (CREDES) guidance on Delphi studies to ensure rigour and transparency in conducting and reporting. Six different Delphi rounds were used to develop consensus. Each round allowed participants to anonymously rate statements with predefined rating scales. RESULTS:  Cognisant of the disparities in healthcare provision and access to equitable healthcare in South Africa, the expert advisory group recommended, especially for South Africa, that 'this tool is for deteriorating patients with an advanced life-limiting illness where all available and appropriate management for underlying illnesses and reversible complications has been offered'. The expert advisory group felt that disease-specific indicators should be described before the general indicators in the South African indicators tool, so all users of the tool orientate themselves to the disease categories first. This study included three new domains to address the South African context: trauma, infectious diseases and haematological diseases. General indicators for PC aligned with the original Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) tool. CONCLUSION:  The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool for South Africa (SPICTTM-SA) is a simple screening tool for South Africa that may assist HCPs to recognise patients who may have unmet PC needs.

Decisional Conflict is Associated with Treatment Modality and not Disease Knowledge in South African Men with Prostate Cancer: Baseline Results from a Longitudinal Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Decisional conflict (DC) is a psychological construct that an individual experiences in making a decision that involves risk, loss, regret, or challenges to one's values. This study assessed DC in a cohort of South African men undergoing curative treatment for localised prostate cancer (LPC). The objectives were to (1) to examine the association between DC and prostate cancer knowledge (PCK), demographics, state anxiety, prostate cancer anxiety and time to treatment and (2) to compare levels of DC between treatment groups [prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation (RT)]. METHOD: Data, comprising the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), Prostate Cancer Knowledge (PCK), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer (MAX-PC) and demographic data from 83 participants of a larger prospective longitudinal observational study examining depression, anxiety and health related quality of life (DAHCaP) were analysed. RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 63 years (RP 61yrs and RT 65yrs; p< 0.001). Most were of mixed ancestry (72.3%). The total DCS scores between the treatment groups (RP 25.00 and RT 18.75; p = 0.037) and two DCS sub-scores-uncertainty (p = 0.033), and support (p = 0.048), were significantly higher in the RP group. A statistically significant negative correlation was observed between state anxiety and time between diagnosis and treatment in the RP group (Spearman's rho = -0.368; p = 0.030). There was no correlation between the DCS score and PCK within each treatment group (Spearman's rho RP = -0.249 and RT = -0.001). CONCLUSION: Decisional conflict was higher in men undergoing RP. Men were more anxious in the RP group regarding the time treatment was received from diagnosis. No correlation was observed between DC and PCK. Pre-surgical management of DC should include shared decision making (SDM) which is cognisant of patients' values facilitated by a customised decision aid.

Identification of Palliative Care Needs in Cancer Patients in a Surgical Emergency Center.

BACKGROUND: Advanced cancer is associated with a significant symptom burden, and timely identification of palliative care (PC) needs, and provision of appropriate PC can improve treatment outcomes, reduce healthcare cost, and enhance patient and family satisfaction with care. Several tools have been used to identify PC needs in different clinical settings and patient groups. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to determine the prevalence and associated characteristics of PC needs among cancer patients admitted to the surgical emergency center (SEC) of a large academic hospital in South Africa (SA). The association between PC needs and early death were explored as a secondary outcome. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional observational study that included all patients with known malignancy admitted through the SEC for acute surgical emergencies. The validated Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™) was applied to patients' files on admission to the SEC. In addition, attending physicians were asked to estimate the 1 year survival probability of these patients by answering The Surprise Question (SQ). SETTING: A tertiary level, public, academic hospital in Cape Town, SA. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve admissions were included with a median age of 58 years. Fifty-two admissions (46.4%) were for metastatic patients and 60.7% were known with palliative treatment intent. The prevalence of SPICT- and SQ-defined PC needs was 46.4% and 54.7% respectively. Pain was the most prevalent presenting symptom and bowel obstruction the most prevalent presenting diagnosis. SPICT-positivity was a significant predictor of death before discharge and death within 6 months of first admission. Proportional agreement in predicting for PC needs of greater than 70% was shown between the two tools. CONCLUSION: Patients with PC needs comprise a significant proportion of SEC cancer admissions. This study shows the clear need for investment in staff and infrastructure to provide integrated palliative and end-of-life care as part of surgical services. The SPICTTM and SQ were shown to predict for early death in this cohort. Further validation of PC needs assessment tools is needed to guide the cost-effective implementation of PC services in low resource settings.

COVID-19 Related Anxiety in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer at Tertiary Hospitals in Cape Town, South Africa

INTRODUCTION: The health profile of older adults places them at risk of infirmity and death from COVID-19 which may induce anxiety or exacerbate pre-existing anxiety. We examined COVID-19 related anxiety in men undergoing treatment for prostate cancer (CaP). METHOD: This study was conducted between July and September 2020. Sixty participants from a larger prospective, longitudinal study assessing depression, anxiety and health related quality of life in men with localized prostate cancer (DAHCaP) were included. COVID-19 related anxiety was measured at a single time point using, the Corona Virus Anxiety Scale (CAS). In addition, the following, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S), the Connor-Davidson Resilience (CD-RISC) scale and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) that form part of the DAHCaP study were used in the analysis. We extracted pre-pandemic data for the STAI-S. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent had diabetes, 62.3% had hypertension and 24.6% had cardiac diseases, all known risk factors for severe COVID-19. Only 3% scored ≥9 on the CAS, indicating COVID 19 anxiety dysfunction. Half knew of family or friends that had contracted COVID-19 especially those scoring higher on the CAS (P = 0.042). There was a significant decrease in STAI-S scores pre-pandemic to the pandemic phase (34.7 to 29.8, P = 0.003). No correlation was observed between CAS and STAI-S (rho = 0.08), CD-RISC (rho = -0.06) or MSPSS (rho = -0.15). There was a weak positive correlation between the CAS and monthly income (rho = 0.33; P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 did not induce significant anxiety in men being treated for CaP nor did it place an additional psychological burden, nor was there any correlation with state anxiety, resilience or social support.

Treatment of advanced AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma in resource-limited settings: a three-arm, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment regimens for AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma, a frequent contributor to morbidity and mortality among people with HIV, have not been systematically evaluated in low-income and middle-income countries, where the disease is most common. In this study, we aimed to investigate optimal treatment strategies for advanced stage disease in areas of high prevalence and limited resources. METHODS: In this open-label, non-inferiority trial, we enrolled people with HIV and advanced stage AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma attending 11 AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites in Brazil, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Uganda, and Zimbabwe. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) with a centralised computer system to receive either intravenous bleomycin and vincristine or oral etoposide (the investigational arms), or intravenous paclitaxel (the control arm), together with antiretroviral therapy (ART; combined efavirenz, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and emtricitabine). The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) at week 48, using a 15% non-inferiority margin to compare the investigational groups against the active control group. Safety was assessed in all eligible treated study participants. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01435018. FINDINGS: 334 participants were enrolled between Oct 1, 2013, and March 8, 2018, when the study was closed early due to inferiority of the bleomycin and vincristine plus ART arm, as per the recommendations of the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB). The etoposide plus ART arm also closed due to inferiority in March, 2016, following a DSMB recommendation. Week-48 PFS rates were higher in the paclitaxel plus ART arm than in both investigational arms. The absolute differences in PFS were -30% (95% CI -52 to -8) for the comparison of paclitaxel plus ART (week 48 PFS 50%, 32 to 67; n=59) and etoposide plus ART (20%, 6 to 33; n=59), and -20% (-33% to -7%) for the comparison of paclitaxel plus ART (64%, 55 to 73; n=138) and bleomycin and vincristine plus ART (44%, 35 to 53; n=132). Both CIs overlapped the non-inferiority margin. The most common adverse events, in 329 eligible participants who began treatment, were neutropenia (48 [15%]), low serum albumin (33 [10%]), weight loss (29 [9%]), and anaemia (28 [9%]), occurring at similar frequency across treatment arms. INTERPRETATION: Non-inferiority of either investigational intervention was not shown, with paclitaxel plus ART showing superiority to both oral etoposide plus ART and bleomycin and vincristine plus ART, supporting its use in treating advanced AIDS-associated Kaposi sarcoma in resource-limited settings. FUNDING: US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health.

Audits of oncology units - an effective and pragmatic approach.

BACKGROUND: Audits of oncology units are part of all quality-assurance programmes. However, they do not always come across as pragmatic and helpful to staff. OBJECTIVE: To report on the results of an online survey on the usefulness and impact of an audit process for oncology units. METHODS: Staff in oncology units who were part of the audit process completed the audit self-assessment form for the unit. This was followed by a visit to each unit by an assessor, and then subsequent personal contact, usually via telephone. The audit self-assessment document listed quality-assurance measures or items in the physical and functional areas of the oncology unit. There were a total of 153 items included in the audit. The online survey took place in October 2016. The invitation to participate was sent to 59 oncology units at which staff members had completed the audit process. RESULTS: The online survey was completed by 54 (41%) of the 132 potential respondents. The online survey found that the audit was very or extremely useful in maintaining personal professional standards in 89% of responses. The audit process and feedback was rated as very or extremely satisfactory in 80% and 81%, respectively. The self-assessment audit document was scored by survey respondents as very or extremely practical in 63% of responses. The feedback on the audit was that it was very or extremely helpful in formulating improvement plans in oncology units in 82% of responses. Major and minor changes that occurred as a result of the audit process were reported as 8% and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The survey findings show that the audit process and its self- assessment document meet the aims of being helpful and pragmatic.