Rapid and automated risk stratification by determination of the aortic stiffness in healthy subjects and subjects with cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; thus, simple, rapid and preferably automated techniques are indispensable for pursuing a global risk stratification approach. We present an oscillometric technique for determination of the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), including the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, with emphasis on the training curve and procedural duration. METHODS: In a single-centre crossover study, we evaluated subjects free of known cardiovascular disease (CVD), subjects with CVD and a subgroup of subjects with peripheral artery disease (PAD) in terms of ankle-brachial index (ABI) and PWV measurements determined by oscillometry compared to tonometry. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to assess the relationship of the PWV measurements determined by both methods. Moreover, the time and cost of the examinations were compared. RESULTS: A total of 176 study subjects underwent assessments to obtain oscillometric and tonometric PWV measurements. The CVD-free subjects (n = 59) were younger (60.4±15.6 vs. 67.5±12.9 years, p = 0.003) than the subjects with CVD (n = 117). The PWV measurements showed significant correlations in CVD-free subjects (r = 0.797, p<0.001), in subjects with CVD (r = 0.817, p<0.001) and in the subgroup of subjects with PAD (r = 0.807, p<0.001). The examination duration was shorter for the oscillometric method than the tonometric method (4.4±0.5 vs. 9.2±0.8 min, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Using a simple and rapid automated oscillometric method, we achieved good diagnostic accuracy for the determination of aortic stiffness through the PWV in both subjects with and without CVD. This method might be helpful in daily practice in terms of saving time and reducing procedural complexity for screening for cardiovascular morbidities and vascular damage in cases of atherosclerosis.

Risk marker profiles in patients treated with percutaneous septal ablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY OBJECTIVE: Different studies have shown a good long-term survival with improvement of symptoms and hemodynamics after percutaneous septal ablation (PTSMA), similar to myectomy considered to be the therapeutic "gold standard" for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). Furthermore, desobliteration of left ventricular (LV) outflow may modify features of the disease considered to be risk-relevant, such as magnitude of LV hypertrophy, outflow gradient, and left atrial (LA) size. The aim oft this study was to examine predictors of long-term mortality in a large cohort of patients with HOCM treated with PTSMA. METHODS AND RESULTS: 497 consecutive patients with symptomatic HOCM (mean age 55.4 ± 14.4 years, NYHA class: 2.9 ± 0.4) who underwent PTSMA between 1996 and 2014 were studied. Periprocedural mortality was 1% (five patients). During a follow-up time of 64.5 ± 53.2 months (range 0.1-207), 51 patients died, of these 25 due to cardiovascular problems, while 26 deaths were attributed to non-cardiac causes. Overall survival rates were 89.4% (± 1.7) after 5 and 80.6% (± 2.7) after 10 years. Among the baseline variables, advanced age, recurrent syncope, and magnitude of LV thickening were risk markers correlated to long-term post-procedural survival. The only mortality predictor that could be identified during follow-up was post-procedural NYHA class. Neither the other classical HCM risk markers nor other clinical or echocardiographic parameters predicted cardiac or all-cause mortality in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the risk profile after septal ablation may differ from that of HOCM patients without an outflow desobliteration.