RESUMEN
We present a 64-year-old woman with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease and hepatic cysts admitted to our hospital for high fever, intense coughing and right abdominal pain. The chest X-ray showed right pleural effusion suggestive of pneumonia. An abdominal ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) were done but did not show evidence of cyst infection or other abdominal complications. A gallium-67-citrate single-photon emission CT/CT, a relatively cheaper technique than positron emission tomography/CT was performed. This revealed an infected kidney cyst that was the cause of the right pleural effusion and fever.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is an important technique providing relevant information to guide diagnosis and treatment in renal disease. As an invasive procedure it has complications. Most studies up to date have analysed complications related to bleeding. We report the largest single-center experience on routine Doppler ultrasound (US) assessment post PRB, showing incidence and natural history of arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) post PRB. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 327 consecutive adult PRB performed at Ramon Cajal University Hospital between January 2011 and December 2014. All biopsies were done under real-time US guidance by a trained nephrologist. Routine Doppler mapping and kidney US was done within 24 h post biopsy regardless of symptoms. Comorbidities, full blood count, clotting, bleeding time and blood pressure were recorded at the time of biopsy. Post biopsy protocol included vitals and urine void checked visually for haematuria. Logistic regression was used to investigate links between AVF, needle size, correcting for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: 46,5% were kidney transplants and 53,5% were native biopsies. Diagnostic material was obtained in 90,5% (142 grafts and 154 native). Forty-seven AVF's (14.37%) were identified with routine kidney Doppler mapping, 95% asymptomatic (n = 45), 28 in grafts (18.4%) and 17 natives (9.7%) (p-value 0.7). Both groups were comparable in terms of comorbidities, passes, cylinders or biopsy yield (p-value NS). 80% were <1 cm in size and 46.6% closed spontaneously in less than 30 days (range 3-151). Larger AVF's (1-2 cm) took a mean of 52 days to closure (range 13-151). Needle size was not statistically significant factor for AVF (p-value 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to historical data published, AVF's are a common complication post PRB that can be easily missed. Routine US Doppler mapping performed by trained staff is a cost-effective, non-invasive tool to diagnose and follow up AVF's, helping to assess management.
Asunto(s)
Fístula Arteriovenosa/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Arteriovenosa/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia con Aguja/efectos adversos , Biopsia con Aguja/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/patología , Trasplante de Riñón/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
No disponible
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Educación Médica/tendencias , Seguridad del Paciente , Simulación de PacienteRESUMEN
Healthcare for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) on conservative treatment very often poses healthcare problems that are difficult to solve. At the end of 2011, we began a program based on the care and monitoring of these patients by Primary Care Teams. ACKD patients who opted for conservative treatment were offered the chance to be cared for mainly at home by the Primary Care doctor and nurse, under the coordination of the Palliative Care Unit and the Nephrology Department. During 2012, 2013, and 2014, 76 patients received treatment in this program (mean age: 81 years; mean Charlson age-comorbidity index: 10, and mean glomerular filtration rate: 12.4 mL/min/1.73 m²). The median patient follow-up time (until death or until 31 December 2014) was 165 days. During this period, 51% of patients did not have to visit the hospital's emergency department and 58% did not require hospitalization. Forty-eight of the 76 patients died after a median time of 135 days in the program; 24 (50%) died at home. Our experience indicates that with the support of the Palliative Care Unit and the Nephrology Department, ACKD patients who are not dialysis candidates may be monitored at home by Primary Care Teams.
RESUMEN
Introducción: La atención sanitaria de los pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica avanzada (ERCA) bajo tratamiento conservador plantea con gran frecuencia problemas asistenciales de difícil solución. Muchos de ellos son enfermos añosos, con dificultad de movilidad, en los que los desplazamientos al centro hospitalario suponen una gran dificultad. A finales del año 2011 iniciamos un programa basado en la asistencia y el control de estos enfermos por los equipos de Atención Primaria. Material y métodos: A los pacientes con ERCA que han elegido tratamiento conservador, se les ofrece la posibilidad de recibir una asistencia fundamentalmente domiciliaria por el médico de Atención Primaria, bajo la coordinación de la Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos y del Servicio de Nefrología. Resultados: Durante los años 2012 y 2013, 50 enfermos recibieron tratamiento en este programa. Edad media: 81 años, índice edad-comorbilidad de Charlson: 10, y filtrado glomerular medio 11,8 ml/min/1,73 m². El tiempo de seguimiento medio por enfermo (hasta el fallecimiento o hasta el 31/12/2013) fue de 184 días. Durante este período, el 44 % de los enfermos no tuvo que acudir al Servicio de Urgencias del hospital, y el 58 % no precisó ingreso hospitalario. Fallecieron 29 de los 50 enfermos, tras un tiempo medio de permanencia en el programa de 163 días; en 14 de ellos (48 %), el sitio de fallecimiento fue su domicilio. Conclusiones: Nuestra experiencia indica que con soporte de la Unidad de Cuidados Paliativos y del Servicio de Nefrología, el paciente con ERCA no candidato a diálisis puede ser controlado en su domicilio por Atención Primaria (AU)
Introduction: Healthcare for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) on conservative treatment very often poses healthcare problems that are difficult to solve. Many patients are elderly and have mobility problems, and it is very difficult for them to travel to hospital. At the end of 2011, we began a programme based on the care and monitoring of these patients by Primary Care teams. Material and method: ACKD patients who opted for conservative treatment were offered the chance to be cared for mainly at home by the Primary Care doctor, under the coordination of the Palliative Care Unit and the Nephrology Department. Results: During 2012 and 2013, 50 patients received treatment in this programme. Mean age: 81 years, Charlson age-comorbidity index: 10 and mean glomerular filtration rate: 11.8ml/min/1.73.m². The mean patient follow-up time (until death or until 31/12/2013) was 184 days. During this period, 44% of patients did not have to visit the hospitals Emergency Department and 58% did not require hospitalisation. 29 of the 50 patients died after a mean time of 163 days on the programme; 14 (48%) died at home. Conclusions: Our experience indicates that with the support of the Palliative Care Unit and the Nephrology Department, ACKD patients who are not dialysis candidates may be monitored at home by Primary Care (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos/organización & administración , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Healthcare for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) on conservative treatment very often poses healthcare problems that are difficult to solve. Many patients are elderly and have mobility problems, and it is very difficult for them to travel to hospital. At the end of 2011, we began a programme based on the care and monitoring of these patients by Primary Care teams. MATERIAL AND METHOD: ACKD patients who opted for conservative treatment were offered the chance to be cared for mainly at home by the Primary Care doctor, under the coordination of the Palliative Care Unit and the Nephrology Department. RESULTS: During 2012 and 2013, 50 patients received treatment in this programme. Mean age: 81 years, Charlson age-comorbidity index: 10 and mean glomerular filtration rate: 11.8ml/min/1.73.m². The mean patient follow-up time (until death or until 31/12/2013) was 184 days. During this period, 44% of patients did not have to visit the hospital’s Emergency Department and 58% did not require hospitalisation. 29 of the 50 patients died after a mean time of 163 days on the programme; 14 (48%) died at home. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that with the support of the Palliative Care Unit and the Nephrology Department, ACKD patients who are not dialysis candidates may be monitored at home by Primary Care.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Anticuerpos Anticitoplasma de Neutrófilos/sangre , Glomerulonefritis Membranoproliferativa/sangre , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/sangre , Anciano , Glomerulonefritis Membranoproliferativa/complicaciones , Glomerulonefritis Membranoproliferativa/inmunología , Humanos , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/complicaciones , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/inmunología , MasculinoRESUMEN
We describe an unusual case of subphrenic abscess complicating a central venous catheter infection caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a 59-year-old woman undergoing hemodialysis. The diagnosis was made through computed tomography, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from the purulent drainage of the subphrenic abscess, the catheter tip and exit site, and the blood culture samples. A transesophageal echocardiography showed a large tubular thrombus in superior vena cava, extending to the right atrium, but no evidence of endocarditis or other metastatic infectious foci. Catheter removal, percutaneous abscess drainage, anticoagulation, and antibiotics resulted in a favourable outcome.
RESUMEN
SVCS constitutes a serious clinical problem and often represents a definitive loss of vascular access for haemodialysis (HD). The patients must suffer numerous interventions in order to obtain a permanent vascular access for HD. Treatment of SVCS requires endovascular intervention or complex surgical revascularization. We present three patients with SVCS associated with central indwelling catheters for HD who were switched to peritoneal dialysis (PD) due to complete HD blood access failure, and discuss the evolution on PD.