Evaluation of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity (TLICS) Score Over a Two-Year Period at a Level One Trauma Center.

Introduction The use of the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Score (TLICS) and other classification systems for guiding the management of traumatic spinal injuries remains controversial. TLICS is one of the few classifications that provides treatment recommendations.We sought to analyze intervention modality selection based on the TLICS scoring system. Methods A retrospective review of patients presenting with traumatic thoracolumbar fractures at a level 1 trauma center over a two-year period was performed. Primary endpoints for comparison analysis included visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Cobb angles during follow-up. Results There were 272 patients with thoracolumbar fractures, of whom 212 had TLICS of ≤3, six with TLICS of 4, and 54 with TLICS of ≥5. Of the 272 total patients, 59 were treated via surgery and 213 via non-surgical conservative methods. The VAS scores significantly decreased from presentation to last follow-up in both surgically treated and conservative groups (p<0.0001). This remained consistent in subgroup analyses of TLICS ≤ 3, TLICS = 4, and TLICS ≥ 5 (p<0.0001). Burst fractures treated conservatively had larger fracture Cobb angles versus those treated via surgery at the last follow-up, although this was not significantly associated (p=0.07). The only significant relationship with Cobb angles was in distraction fractures of the TLICS > 4 conservative group, who had significantly lower Cobb angles at the last follow-up than the TLICS > 4 surgical group (p<0.04). The "surgeon's choice" for TLICS = 4 was surgical intervention (4/6 patients, 66.7%). Conclusion Using the TLICS score, thoracolumbar injuries in a level 1 trauma center are more commonly TLICS ≤ 3. For patients with TLICS = 4, the surgeon's choice was most commonly surgical repair. VAS scores decreased over time from presentation between surgically and conservatively managed patients (as well as within-group analyses). The data concerning Cobb angles were more ambiguous, as larger Cobb angles in burst fractures treated conservatively did not show statistically significant differences with surgery.

Predictors of revision surgery after bedside subdural drain placement for chronic subdural hematomas.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: For chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), bedside subdural drains (SDD) provide a useful alternative to more invasive neurosurgical techniques, including evacuation through multiple burr holes or formal craniotomy. However, no scale currently exists adequately predicting SDD candidacy or treatment response. The present study sought to characterize predictors of revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD for cSDH. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case control study of cSDH patients treated with bedside SDD at a level one trauma center between 2018 and 2022. Binomial regression was used to compare SDD patients and generate odds ratios associated with revision surgery, which were compared using a binary random effects model. RESULTS: Ninety six cSDH patients were included, of whom 13 (13.5%) required a revision surgery after initial treatment failure with bedside SDD. Patients requiring revision surgery demonstrated an increased male predominance (84.6% vs. 69.9% of SDD patients not requiring revision surgery), tended to be younger (67.8 vs. 70.5 years) with a greater body mass index (28.7 vs. 25.6 kg/m2), and have a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on presentation of 12.5 (versus 14). Patients with an initial GCS score less than 13 (OR 11.0 95% CI 2.8 - 43.3), midline shift greater than 10 mm on CT (OR 6.5 95% CI 1.7 - 25.7), or duration of SDD placement longer than 3 days (OR 10.5 95% CI 2.6 - 41.9) demonstrated a greater likelihood of needing a revision surgery after initial treatment with bedside SDD. CONCLUSION: Among patients treated with SDD, we identified 3 independent factors predicting the need for revision surgery: GCS score, midline shift, and duration of drain placement. Craniotomy may be favored over bedside SDD in patients presenting with a GCS score less than 13 or midline shift greater than 10 mm and for SDD patients demonstrating inadequate clinical response after 3 days.

National trends in endovascular thrombectomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute ischemic stroke: A study using National Inpatient Sample data from 2006 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke is a frequently encountered neurologic process with wide-spanning impact. A dreaded complication is "malignant" cerebral edema, necessitating decompression to reduce herniation risk. Following the publication of several landmark trials in 2015, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) with novel clot-removal devices has emerged as an effective treatment for proximal large vessel disease. Herein, we examine recent national trends in EVT and decompressive craniectomy (DC) rates for acute stroke. METHODS: National Inpatient Sample data were abstracted from 2006 to 2016. Primary outcomes were EVT and DC rates, compared using Cochrane-Armitage test of trend. Chi-square test was also used to compare data from 2015 to 2016. Secondary outcomes included inpatient mortality and home discharge rates. RESULTS: EVT rates steadily increased from 2006 to 2016, with most change occurring from 2014 to 2016 (1.36% in 2014, 2.29% in 2016). DC rates similarly increased from 2006 to 2015, though a sharp decline was observed in 2016 (0.42% in 2015, 0.22% in 2016). Test of trend from 2006 to 2016 for both variables was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.001); DC rate change from 2015 to 2016 was also statistically significant (p < 0.01). Mortality rate and home discharge rate steadily improved over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Recent innovation in stroke treatment has led to increased EVTs. While DC rate initially followed this same trend, a significant decline was noted in 2016, around the time that wider adoption of novel EVT technologies were instituted in clinical practice.

Parkinson Disease, Dysphagia, and Cervical Spine Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: An analysis of a National Database. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the rate of dysphagia for Parkinson disease (PD) patients undergoing cervical spine surgery for cervical myelopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is an increasingly common problem in the aging population. Several surgical options exist to treat this condition including anterior, posterior and combined surgical approaches. Each approach carries its own set of postoperative complications. Little is known of the of outcomes after cervical spine surgery in PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Inpatient sample was queried 1998 to 2016, all elective admissions with CSM were identified. Surgical treatments were identified as either: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior laminectomies, posterior cervical fusion or combined anterior/posterior surgery. Preexisting PD was identified. Endpoints included mortality, length of stay (LOS), swallowing dysfunction measured by placement of feeding tube (NGT), and postprocedure pneumonia. RESULTS: A total of 73,088 patients underwent surgical procedures for CSM during the study period. Of those, 552 patients (7.5%) had concomitant PD. The most common procedure was ACDF. Patients with PD had a higher rate of dysphagia (NGT placement) after surgery compared with those without PD (P<0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed that PD patients had a higher risk of having NGT placement or developing pneumonia [odds ratio 2.98 (1.7-5.2), P<0.001] after surgery.Patients with PD who underwent ACDF, posterior laminectomies or posterior cervical fusion had a longer LOS compared with those who did not have PD (P<0.001). There was no difference in LOS for patients who underwent combined anterior/posterior surgery. Inpatient mortality was higher in patients with PD who underwent ACDF or combined surgery (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: While ACDF is the most commonly performed procedure for CSM in patients with PD, it is associated with longer LOS, higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia, and postprocedural pneumonia, as well as higher inpatient mortality compared with posterior cervical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation of the Nucleus Ventralis Intermedius for Essential Tremor Using Indirect Targeting and Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Single-Institution Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Literature on asleep deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventralis intermedius (Vim) nucleus in essential tremor is relatively sparse. Furthermore, controversy exists as to whether indirect ("consensus" or "atlas-based") targeting of the Vim requires physiologic adjustment for effective clinical outcomes in DBS surgery. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of asleep Vim DBS using indirect coordinates and real-time interventional magnetic resonance imaging guidance. METHODS: Retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed to identify patients with essential tremor undergoing asleep Vim DBS using interventional magnetic resonance imaging guidance. Stereotactic and clinical outcomes were abstracted and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 12 consecutive patients were identified, all of whom were available for 6-month clinical follow-up. Stereotactic (radial) error was 0.5 ± 0.2 mm on the left and 0.5 ± 0.3 mm on the right. Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor scores in the treated limb(s) decreased by 71.2% ± 31.0% (P = 0.0088), The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living improved by 74.9% ± 23.7% (P < 0.0001), and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance improved by 64.3 ± 16.2% (P = 0.0004). Surgical complications were mild and generally transient. Stimulation-related side effects were similar to those reported in historical series of awake Vim DBS. CONCLUSIONS: Asleep Vim DBS using indirect targeting and interventional magnetic resonance imaging-guided placement is safe and effective, with 6-month clinical results similar to those achieved with awake placement. These data support the use of asleep surgery in essential tremor and represent a baseline for comparison with future studies using more advanced targeting techniques.

Neuroprotective efficacy of aminopropyl carbazoles in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

We previously reported the discovery of P7C3, an aminopropyl carbazole having proneurogenic and neuroprotective properties in newborn neural precursor cells of the hippocampal dentate gyrus. We have further found that chemicals having efficacy in this in vivo screening assay also protect dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra following exposure to the neurotoxin 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine, a mouse model of Parkinson disease. Here, we provide evidence that an active analog of P7C3, known as P7C3A20, protects ventral horn spinal cord motor neurons from cell death in the G93A-SOD1 mutant mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). P7C3A20 is efficacious in this model when administered at disease onset, and protection from cell death correlates with preservation of motor function in assays of walking gait and in the accelerating rotarod test. The prototypical member of this series, P7C3, delays disease progression in G93A-SOD1 mice when administration is initiated substantially earlier than the expected time of symptom onset. Dimebon, an antihistaminergic drug with significantly weaker proneurogenic and neuroprotective efficacy than P7C3, confers no protection in this ALS model. We propose that the chemical scaffold represented by P7C3 and P7C3A20 may provide a basis for the discovery and optimization of pharmacologic agents for the treatment of ALS.