Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 66
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 29: e172, 2020 Oct 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33028455

RESUMEN

AIMS: To test the impact of using different idioms in epidemiological interviews on the prevalence and correlates of poor mental health and mental health service use. METHODS: We conducted a randomised methodological experiment in a nationally representative sample of the US adult population, comparing a lay idiom, which asked about 'problems with your emotions or nerves' with a more medical idiom, which asked about 'problems with your mental health'. Differences across study arms in the associations of endorsement of problems with the Kessler-6 (a validated assessment of psychological distress), demographic characteristics, self-rated health and mental health service use were examined. RESULTS: Respondents were about half as likely to endorse a problem when asked with the more medical idiom (18.1%) than when asked with the lay idiom (35.1%). The medical idiom had a significantly larger area under the ROC curve when compared against a validated measure of psychological distress than the lay idiom (0.91 v. 0.87, p = 0.012). The proportion of the population who endorsed a problem but did not receive treatment in the past year was less than half as large for the medical idiom (7.90%) than for the lay idiom (20.94%). Endorsement of problems differed in its associations with age, sex, race/ethnicity and self-rated health depending on the question idiom. For instance, the odds of endorsing problems were threefold higher in the youngest than the oldest age group when the medical idiom was used (OR = 3.07; 95% CI 1.47-6.41) but did not differ across age groups when the lay idiom was used (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.43-1.36). CONCLUSION: Choice of idiom in epidemiological questionnaires can affect the apparent correlates of poor mental health and service use. Cultural change within populations over time may require changes in instrument wording to maintain consistency in epidemiological measurement of psychiatric conditions.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Servicios de Salud Mental/provisión & distribución , Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Percepción , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
2.
Psychiatry ; 81(2): 130-140, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To test associations between perceived discrimination based on mental health status and impaired functioning in a population sample with psychological distress. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with a sample of respondents to the California Health Interview Survey with mild, moderate, or severe psychological distress. Perceived discrimination was assessed using 14 items covering four domains in which discrimination is reported: social, partner, institutional, and work. Associations of perceived discrimination scores (total score and domain scores) with impaired functioning, measured by the likelihood and number of days out of role, were estimated with statistical adjustment for demographic characteristics and serious psychological distress. RESULTS: Discrimination domain scores are significantly correlated (r ranging from .34 to .65).Total discrimination score is associated with having days out of role (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.10-1.30) and with number of days out of role (5.5 days) after adjustment for demographics and psychological distress. The high correlation among the domain scores makes the attribution of association to particular domains uncertain. Removal of the effect of discrimination using model-based simulation reduces past-year days out of role by 39.4 (SE 11.3) days. CONCLUSIONS: This observational study supports the suggestion that discrimination against people with mental illness contributes to their impaired functioning in a diverse range of social roles. The results provide preliminary evidence that reduction in discrimination against people with mental illness could improve social functioning and work productivity. Correlations among domain scores make it difficult to draw conclusions about domain-specific associations.


Asunto(s)
Rol , Discriminación Social/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Percepción Social , Adulto Joven
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 16(9): 625-33, 2001 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11556944

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To distinguish the effects of drug abuse, mental disorders, and problem drinking on antiretroviral therapy (ART) and highly active ART (HAART) use. DESIGN: Prospective population-based probability sample of 2,267 (representing 213,308) HIV-infected persons in care in the United States in early 1996. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported ART from first (January 1997-July 1997) to second (August 1997-January 1998) follow-up interviews. Drug abuse/dependence, severity of abuse, alcohol use, and probable mental disorders assessed in the first follow-up interview. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) estimated from weighted models for 1) receipt of any ART, and 2) receipt of HAART among those on ART. RESULTS: Of our study population, ART was reported by 90% and HAART by 61%. Over one third had a probable mental disorder and nearly half had abused any drugs, but drug dependence (9%) or severe abuse (10%) was infrequent. Any ART was less likely for persons with dysthymia (AOR, 0.74; CI, 0.58 to 0.95) but only before adjustment for drug abuse. After full adjustment with mental health and drug abuse variables, any ART was less likely for drug dependence (AOR, 0.58; CI, 0.34 to 0.97), severe drug abuse (AOR, 0.52; CI, 0.32 to 0.87), and HIV risk from injection drug use (AOR, 0.55; CI, 0.39 to 0.79). Among drug users on ART, only mental health treatment was associated with HAART (AOR, 1.57; CI, 1.11 to 2.08). CONCLUSIONS: Drug abuse-related factors were greater barriers to ART use in this national sample than mental disorders but once on ART, these factors were unrelated to type of therapy.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Anti-VIH/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/complicaciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Terapia Antirretroviral Altamente Activa/métodos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/psicología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/complicaciones
4.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(8): 721-8, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11483137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There have been no previous nationally representative estimates of the prevalence of mental disorders and drug use among adults receiving care for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease in the United States. It is also not known which clinical and sociodemographic factors are associated with these disorders. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We enrolled a nationally representative probability sample of 2864 adults receiving care for HIV in the United States in 1996. Participants were administered a brief structured psychiatric instrument that screened for psychiatric disorders (major depression, dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorders, and panic attacks) and drug use during the previous 12 months. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with screening positive for any psychiatric disorder and drug dependence were examined in multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Nearly half of the sample screened positive for a psychiatric disorder, nearly 40% reported using an illicit drug other than marijuana, and more than 12% screened positive for drug dependence during the previous 12 months. Factors independently associated with screening positive for a psychiatric disorder included number of HIV-related symptoms, illicit drug use, drug dependence, heavy alcohol use, and being unemployed or disabled. Factors independently associated with screening positive for drug dependence included having many HIV-related symptoms, being younger, being heterosexual, having frequent heavy alcohol use, and screening positive for a psychiatric disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Many people infected with HIV may also have psychiatric and/or drug dependence disorders. Clinicians may need to actively identify those at risk and work with policymakers to ensure the availability of appropriate care for these treatable disorders.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Política de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Muestreo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
5.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(8): 729-36, 2001 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11483138

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The need for mental health and substance abuse services is great among those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but little information is available on services used by this population or on individual factors associated with access to care. METHODS: Data are from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study, a national probability survey of 2864 HIV-infected adults receiving medical care in the United States in 1996. We estimated 6-month use of services for mental health and substance abuse problems and examined socioeconomic, HIV illness, and regional factors associated with use. RESULTS: We estimated that 61.4% of 231 400 adults under care for HIV used mental health or substance abuse services: 1.8% had hospitalizations, 3.4% received residential substance abuse treatment, 26.0% made individual mental health specialty visits, 15.2% had group mental health treatment, 40.3% discussed emotional problems with medical providers, 29.6% took psychotherapeutic medications, 5.6% received outpatient substance abuse treatment, and 12.4% participated in substance abuse self-help groups. Socioeconomic factors commonly associated with poorer access to health services predicted lower likelihood of using mental health outpatient care, but greater likelihood of receiving substance abuse treatment services. Those with less severe HIV illness were less likely to access services. Persons living in the Northeast were more likely to receive services. CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of mental health and substance abuse care provided to those with known HIV infection is substantial, and challenges to providers should be recognized. Inequalities in access to care are evident, but differ among general medical, specialty mental health, and substance abuse treatment sectors.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Muestreo , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 40(5): 588-94, 2001 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11349704

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe the amount and nature of violence exposure and examine the relationship between violence exposure and distress symptoms among children in foster care. METHOD: Violence exposure and distress symptoms were evaluated in interviews, conducted between July 1996 and March 1998, of 300 children from Los Angeles County living in out-of-home placement. RESULTS: Interviews were successfully completed in 91% of eligible children. The majority of children (85%) reported having been a witness to violence, and 51% had been a victim of violence during their lifetime. Of these youths, 54% and 41%, respectively, reported having been exposed to such violence in the past 6 months. Girls, victims of assaultive violence and weapon related violence, and those reporting exposure to mild violence were more likely (p < .05) to have higher levels of distress symptoms than those without such characteristics, after age was controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: Children in foster care continue to have high levels of violence exposure, even after removal from their biological parents' home. The relationship between violence exposure and distress symptoms underscores the need for clinicians to inquire about multiple forms of violence exposure among children living in out-of-home placement.


Asunto(s)
Violencia Doméstica/psicología , Cuidados en el Hogar de Adopción , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/etiología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/epidemiología
7.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 40(3): 315-24, 2001 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11288773

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To validate the prototype Adolescent Treatment Outcomes Module (ATOM), examine its sensitivity to clinical change, and determine its feasibility for administration in routine clinical settings. METHOD: A sample of 67 adolescents, aged 11 through 18, was selected from new patients at two inpatient and two outpatient mental health programs. Adolescents and parents completed the ATOM and validating instruments at intake, 1 week postintake, and again at 6 months. RESULTS: Nine self-report symptoms predicted positive diagnoses of oppositional defiant, conduct, anxiety, and depressive disorders on the basis of structured diagnoses, with sensitivities of 0.7 to 0.8. Test-retest correlations for outcome scales were largely excellent (>0.70). Scales that measured functioning at home, in school, and in the community were moderately correlated in the expected direction with global functioning. Decreases in symptom severity and functional impairment were generally associated with decreases in validating instruments. Administration time averaged 25 minutes for adolescents and 28 minutes for parents. CONCLUSIONS: Both parents and adolescents readily completed the ATOM. Module scales demonstrated excellent reliability and good to fair concurrent validity. The ATOM was able to detect change and its absence.


Asunto(s)
Síntomas Afectivos/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Actividades Cotidianas , Adolescente , Conducta del Adolescente , Síntomas Afectivos/psicología , Niño , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Calidad de Vida , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Health Serv Res ; 34(5 Pt 1): 969-92, 1999 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10591268

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The design and implementation of a nationally representative probability sample of persons with a low-prevalence disease, HIV/AIDS. DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: One of the most significant roadblocks to the generalizability of primary data collected about persons with a low-prevalence disease is the lack of a complete methodology for efficiently generating and enrolling probability samples. The methodology developed by the HCSUS consortium uses a flexible, provider-based approach to multistage sampling that minimizes the quantity of data necessary for implementation. STUDY DESIGN: To produce a valid national probability sample, we combined a provider-based multistage design with the M.D.-colleague recruitment model often used in non-probability site-specific studies. DATA COLLECTION: Across the contiguous United States, reported AIDS cases for metropolitan areas and rural counties. In selected areas, caseloads for known providers for HIV patients and a random sample of other providers. For selected providers, anonymous patient visit records. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: It was possible to obtain all data necessary to implement a multistage design for sampling individual HIV-infected persons under medical care with known probabilities. Taking account of both patient and provider nonresponse, we succeeded in obtaining in-person or proxy interviews from subjects representing over 70 percent of the eligible target population. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to design and implement a national probability sample of persons with a low-prevalence disease, even if it is stigmatized.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación , Recolección de Datos , Servicios de Salud/economía , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Modelos Estadísticos , Selección de Paciente , Prevalencia , Probabilidad , Distribución Aleatoria , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Tamaño de la Muestra , Estados Unidos
9.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 18(5): 22-31, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10495589

RESUMEN

Equity of mental health care relative to general medical care is a long-standing policy issue in the mental health field, which in recent years has been debated as an issue of parity in insurance benefits. The shift toward managed mental health care makes the parity debate less controversial, because feared cost increases are an unlikely consequence under managed care. We argue, however, that managed care also makes benefit parity less relevant to the goals of achieving fairness in the delivery of mental health services. A broader policy perspective is required to encompass concerns about fairness under managed care.


Asunto(s)
Beneficios del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Servicios de Salud Mental/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/economía , Control de Costos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Predicción , Humanos , Beneficios del Seguro/economía , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/economía , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapia , Estados Unidos
10.
Inquiry ; 36(2): 221-33, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10459376

RESUMEN

There is a shortage of data to inform policy debates about the quickly changing health care system. This paper describes Healthcare for Communities (HCC), a component of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Health Tracking Initiative that was designed to fill this gap for alcohol, drug abuse, and mental health care. HCC bridges clinical perspectives and economic/policy research approaches, links data at market, service delivery, and individual levels, and features a household survey of nearly 9,600 individuals with an employer follow-back survey. Public use files will be available in late 1999.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/organización & administración , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/métodos , Trastornos Mentales , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/organización & administración , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/economía , Recolección de Datos , Fundaciones , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro Psiquiátrico , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Factores Socioeconómicos , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias/economía , Estados Unidos
11.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol ; 33(10): 514-20, 1998 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9780816

RESUMEN

In this paper we compare rates of mental disorders (major depression, dysthymia, cognitive impairment, and schizophrenia) among homeless people in Madrid and Los Angeles (LA) and examine the ordering of the onset of both conditions (i.e., homelessness and mental disorders). In the Madrid study, 262 homeless persons were interviewed using the CIDI. In the LA study, 1563 homeless persons were interviewed with the DIS. To make an item-by-item comparison, we companied the databases from both studies to submit a single database to statistical analyses. Results showed no significant differences in DSM-III-R life-time prevalence rates of mental disorders between both samples. However, the Madrid sample showed higher 12-month prevalence rates of dysthymia and cognitive impairment as compared to the LA sample. Most subjects across both cities first experienced symptoms of their mental disorders before first becoming homeless. The only significant difference was that all of the depressed adults in Madrid experienced depression prior to first becoming homeless, whereas this was the case for only 59.1% of LA depressed homeless people. We discuss the reasons for these cultural differences and their implications for cross-national public health research and intervention.


Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastornos Mentales/etnología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/etnología , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Etnicidad/psicología , Femenino , Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Humanos , Incidencia , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , España/epidemiología
12.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 55(7): 611-7, 1998 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9672051

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Consumers and policy makers are increasingly interested in measuring treatment quality. We developed a standardized approach to measuring the quality of outpatient care for schizophrenia and used it to evaluate routine care. METHODS: We randomly sampled 224 patients in treatment for schizophrenia at 2 public mental health clinics. Appropriate medication management was defined according to criteria derived from national treatment recommendations, and focused on recent management of symptoms and side effects. Adequate psychosocial care was defined as the recent provision of case management or family management to patients for whom it is indicated. Care was evaluated using patient interviews and medical records abstractions. RESULTS: Although patients at the 2 clinics had similar illnesses, the treatment they received was quite different. In total, 84 (38%) of patients received poor-quality medication management, and 117 (52%) had inadequate psychosocial care. Clinics differed in the proportion of patients receiving poor-quality medication management not attributable to patient factors (28% vs 16%). The clinic with better-quality medication management provided case management to fewer severely ill patients (48% vs 81%). More than half of the cases of poor care would not have been detected if we had used only medical records data. CONCLUSIONS: At these clinics, many schizophrenic patients were receiving poor-quality care and most poor care was likely due to factors that can be modified. One approach to improving care begins by developing systems that monitor quality. These systems may require improved medical records and patient-reported symptoms and side effects.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Esquizofrenia/terapia , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo de Caso/normas , Centros Comunitarios de Salud Mental/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Registros Médicos/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos
13.
Eval Health Prof ; 20(1): 65-80, 1997 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10183313

RESUMEN

The health care delivery system faces continually increasing pressure to be accountable for the historically unparalleled amount of resources it utilizes. This article discusses one set of recently developed tools known as outcomes modules that are used to assess how treatment affects outcomes in patients with a given disorder. These tools currently are being used to inform administrative decisions about how to improve the quality of care, and can potentially influence decisions by patients, providers, and payers of care as well. The critical components of outcomes modules, as well as their administration and applications are described, using modules for psychiatric conditions as examples.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/normas , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Recolección de Datos/normas , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/métodos , Desarrollo de Programa , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
14.
Clin Ther ; 18(5): 979-92, 1996.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8930436

RESUMEN

The Medical Outcomes Trust is a depository and distributor of high-quality, standardized, health outcomes measurement instruments to national and international health communities. Every instrument in the Trust library is reviewed by the Scientific Advisory Committee against a rigorous set of eight attributes. These attributes consist of the following: (1) conceptual and measurement model; (2) reliability; (3) validity; (4) responsiveness; (5) interpretability; (6) respondent and administrative burden; (7) alternative forms; and (8) cultural and language adaptations. In addition to a full description of each attribute, we discuss uses of these criteria beyond evaluation of existing instruments and lessons learned in the first few rounds of instrument review against these criteria.


Asunto(s)
Indicadores de Salud , Estado de Salud , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
J Health Soc Behav ; 37(1): 44-58, 1996 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8820310

RESUMEN

Relations between objective life circumstances and life satisfaction were examined using structural equation modeling of two waves of data obtained from homeless and mentally ill homeless participants (N = 298) in the Course of Homelessness Study (COH). Cross-sectional analyses revealed that objective indexes of life quality were primarily associated with domain-specific, rather than general, life satisfaction. Results could not be attributed to the covariation of life satisfaction with other indexes of subjective well-being (i.e., psychological symptoms and perceived self-mastery). In addition, significant direct ("causal") cross-lagged effects were found linking initial objective housing status with subsequent income and subsequent satisfaction with housing. By contrast, neither life satisfaction nor any other index of subjective well-being exerted a direct impact on subsequent life quality as assessed by objective indexes. Finally, we found no support for previous claims that perceived self-mastery mediates the impact of objective life circumstances on subsequent life satisfaction. Findings are discussed with reference to the utility of a hierarchical model of life satisfaction that incorporates domain-specific, as well as global, satisfaction.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Satisfacción Personal , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Los Angeles , Masculino , Modelos Psicológicos , Distribución Aleatoria
17.
Am J Public Health ; 85(12): 1642-9, 1995 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7503338

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This effort used data from the Course of Homelessness study and comparative secondary data on the general population to identify negative childhood and family background experiences that may increase risk for adult homelessness. METHODS: Frequencies of negative childhood experiences were examined among a probability sample of 1563 homeless adults. Differences in risk for such experiences were calculated by sex, age cohort, and racial/ethnicity status. Where possible, rates of negative childhood experiences among the homeless were compared with the general population. RESULTS: Substantial numbers of this sample experienced multiple problems as children across several domains: poverty, residential instability, and family problems. Women and Whites disproportionately reported experiences suggestive of personal or family problems; non-Whites disproportionately reported experiences suggestive of personal or family problems; non-Whites disproportionately reported experiences suggestive of poverty. Homeless adults were at increased risk of childhood out-of-home placement, tenure in public housing, and homelessness, but not at greater risk for physical abuse. Women appeared to be at greater risk for sexual abuse. CONCLUSIONS: The problems that homeless individuals experience as adults have very clear analogs in their childhoods. Vulnerability to homelessness stems from factors unevenly distributed across age, sex, and race/ethnicity groups.


Asunto(s)
Protección a la Infancia , Salud de la Familia , Personas con Mala Vivienda/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Los Angeles/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dinámica Poblacional , Pobreza , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
18.
Med Care ; 33(4): 350-64, 1995 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7731277

RESUMEN

This study compares severity of depression for patients of general medical clinicians, psychiatrists, and nonphysician therapists receiving prepaid or fee-for-service care. Cross-sectional severity comparisons were conducted among 715 outpatients with current major depression or dysthymia, by independent assessment. Severity was assessed by counts of current and lifetime depressive symptoms, prognostic and treatment response indicators, and global measures of psychological and physical sickness. Patients of psychiatrists were the most psychologically ill, patients of nonphysician therapists were intermediate, and general medical patients were least ill; but even in the general medical sector, depression severity was at least ill; but even in the general medical sector, depression severity was at least moderate. No differences in global physical sickness by specialty remained after demographic adjustment. General medical patients whose depression had been detected were only slightly sicker than undetected cases. Type of payment was not consistently related to either psychological or physical aspects of sickness, and payment did not interact with specialty. Mental health specialists, especially psychiatrists, encountered more severely depressed patients, but patients in all sectors were sick enough to warrant treatment. Even undetected patients in the general medical sector were relatively sick, raising questions about gatekeeper policies. There was no evidence of a greater severity gradient by specialty in prepaid care. Because payment was unrelated to severity, treatment implications are similar under prepaid and fee-for-service care. Implications for clinical practice, public policy, and outcomes research design are discussed.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/fisiopatología , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Planes de Salud de Prepago/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Trastorno Depresivo/clasificación , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicina , Servicios de Salud Mental/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Factores Socioeconómicos , Especialización , Estados Unidos
19.
J Addict Dis ; 14(4): 111-34, 1995.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8929936

RESUMEN

Homeless adults with both a serious mental illness and substance dependence (N = 276) were randomly assigned to: (1) a social model residential program providing integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment; (2) a community-based nonresidential program using the same social model approach; or (3) a control group receiving no intervention but free to access other community services. Interventions were designed to provide 3 months of intensive treatment, followed by 3 months of nonresidential maintenance. Subjects completed baseline interviews prior to randomization and reinterviews 3, 6, and 9 months later. Results showed that, while substance use, mental health, and housing outcomes improved from baseline, subjects assigned to treatment conditions differed little from control subjects. Examination of the relationship between length of treatment exposure and outcomes suggested that residential treatment had positive effects on outcomes at 3 months, but that these effects were eroded by 6 months.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Mala Vivienda/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/rehabilitación , Admisión del Paciente , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/rehabilitación , Adulto , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental , Diagnóstico Dual (Psiquiatría) , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Apoyo Social , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Am J Psychiatry ; 151(12): 1777-84, 1994 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7977885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the clinical significance of depressive symptoms below the threshold for depressive disorder in outpatient samples. METHOD: The subjects were 775 adult patients with current depressive disorder, 1,420 patients with subthreshold depression, and 1,767 hypertensive patients with and without depression, all of whom were visiting the offices of mental health specialists and general medical care providers in three U.S. cities. Data on demographic characteristics, severity of depression, extent of psychiatric and medical comorbidity, family psychiatric history, and treatment history for the patients with depressive disorder and those with subthreshold depression were compared. RESULTS: The percentage of patients with subthreshold depression who had a family history of depression (41%) was nearly as high as that of the patients with depressive disorder (59%). The two groups of patients had similar levels of medical and psychiatric comorbidity except for anxiety disorders, which were greater among the patients with depressive disorder. Among the hypertensive patients in the general medical sector, those with subthreshold depression were more similar to those with depressive disorder than to the nondepressed hypertensive patients. Treatment rates were considerably lower for patients with subthreshold depression than for patients with depressive disorder in the general medical sector, but they were similar in the mental health specialty sector. CONCLUSIONS: In these outpatients, subthreshold depression appeared to be a variant of affective disorder and was treated as such in the mental health specialty sector but not in the general medical sector. The findings emphasize the importance of treatment outcome studies of patients with subthreshold depression.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Depresión/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Comorbilidad , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Familia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/terapia , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA