Multidisciplinary Endocrine Tumor Board: Assessment of the Patient Experience.

Research surrounding tumor boards has focused on patient outcomes and care coordination. Little is known about the patient experience with tumor boards. This survey examined aspects of the patient experience for patients presented at our multidisciplinary endocrine tumor board (ETB). A 15-item survey was distributed via the online patient portal to patients over the age of 18 whose case had been discussed at our ETB over an 18-month period. Descriptive statistics were reported, and a Fisher's exact test was used to examine relationships between variables. A total of 47 patients completed the survey (46%). A majority (72%) report their provider explained what the ETB is, and 77% report being informed their case would be discussed. Most patients were satisfied their case was being discussed (72%). A number of patients did report moderate or severe anxiety knowing their case was being discussed (15%). Sixty-four percent of patients report the ETB recommendations were clearly explained; however, satisfaction with the recommendations was slightly lower (53%). Despite the somewhat low satisfaction with the recommendations, 75% of patients felt more confident in their treatment plan knowing their case was discussed. Finally, if given the chance, 66% responded that they would have been interested in participating in their own ETB discussion. This study provides some insight into the patient experience surrounding tumor board discussions. Overall, patients are satisfied when their case is discussed at ETB. Patients can also experience anxiety about these discussions, and many patients desire to be present for their own discussions.

Writing Is Thinking: Implementation and Evaluation of an Internal Medicine Residency Clinical Reasoning and Documentation Curriculum.

With increasingly complicated patients and faster throughput, time for thorough critical thinking and thoughtful clinical documentation is limited, especially in the training environment. Advocating for the value of clinical documentation as a robust opportunity for critical thinking, we describe the implementation and evaluation of a clinical reasoning and documentation curriculum for internal medicine residents. Our curriculum employed facilitated discussion, practical application, and a resident-as-teacher model. Resident surveys showed improved perceptions of the clinical and educational value of clinical documentation. Residents reported increased feedback to interns about their documentation and more appreciation of documentation as a venue for critical thinking. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-022-01570-5.

Impact of an Interprofessional Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Inappropriate Thyroid Function Testing.

Background: Published data show that thyroid function laboratory tests are often ordered inappropriately in the acute care setting, which leads to unnecessary costs and inappropriate therapy decisions. Pilot data at our institution indicated that approximately two-thirds of the thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) laboratories were unnecessary, correlating to a potential cost avoidance of more than $20,000 annually. The purpose of this study was to improve the appropriateness of thyroid function test ordering with a multipronged initiative. Methodology: This controlled, single-center, before and after study included inpatients or emergency department (ED) patients at Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center who were at least 18 years of age and had a TSH level ordered during the study period. Patients with a history of thyroid cancer were excluded. The initiative included an electronic ordering intervention, direct education of providers (medical residents, attendings, and clinical pharmacists), and distribution of pocket information cards with appropriate ordering criteria. The primary outcome was the number and percentage of inappropriate TSH tests ordered before and after implementing the 3 interventions. Secondary outcomes included cost savings, inappropriate changes in thyroid therapy based on improperly ordered tests, and the number of free T4 lab tests ordered on patients with a TSH within the therapeutic range. Results: All 3 interventions were implemented, except for education of ED residents and faculty, who chose to forgo the direct education component. Inappropriate ordering of TSH levels decreased from 63 to 50 (13% reduction, P = .062) after implementation. Inappropriate TSH ordering decreased across all services, except in the ED. Inappropriate Free T4 orders decreased from 191 to 133 (30% reduction, P = .01). There were no therapy changes based on inappropriate TSH orders. Extrapolated annual cost savings were approximately $6,000. Conclusion: This multipronged interprofessional collaborative quality improvement initiative was associated with a nonstatistically significant reduction in inappropriate TSH orders, statistically significant reduction in inappropriate free T4 orders, and cost savings. There was a reduction in inappropriate ordering across all services except the ED, which may have been due the ED not participating in the direct education component of the initiative.

Harm Reduction in Male Patients Actively Using Anabolic Androgenic Steroids (AAS) and Performance-Enhancing Drugs (PEDs): a Review.

Anabolic androgenic steroid (AAS) and performance-enhancing drug (PED) use is a prevalent medical issue, especially among men, with an estimated 2.9-4 million Americans using AAS in their lifetime. Prior studies of AAS use reveal an association with polycythemia, dyslipidemia, infertility, hypertension, left ventricular hypertrophy, and multiple behavioral disorders. AAS withdrawal syndrome, a state of depression, anhedonia, and sexual dysfunction after discontinuing AAS use, is a common barrier to successful cessation. Clinical resources for these patients and training of physicians on management of the patient using AAS are limited. Many men are hesitant to seek traditional medical care due to fear of judgment and lack of confidence in physician knowledge base regarding AAS. While proposed approaches to weaning patients off AAS are published, guidance on harm reduction for actively using patients remains sparse. Medical education regarding the management of AAS use disorder is paramount to improving care of this currently underserved patient population. Management of these patients must be non-judgmental and focus on patient education, harm reduction, and support for cessation. The approach to harm reduction should be guided by the specific AAS/PEDs used.

Stress-Dosed Glucocorticoids and Mineralocorticoids Before Intensive Endurance Exercise in Primary Adrenal Insufficiency.

Patients with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) require increased doses of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids during stressors, such as surgery, trauma, and sepsis. Although current guidelines exist for dose adjustments in these situations, there is no accepted dosing regimen for patients with PAI participating in intensive endurance exercise. Given the extensive physiologic stress of events, such as marathons, triathlons, and similar events, it is likely that a "stress-dose" of adrenal replacement therapy will not only prevent adrenal crisis, but also improve performance. A 50-year-old male endurance athlete with known PAI reported severe fatigue, nausea, and malaise after competing in prior marathons and intensive endurance exercise. After supplementing with glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids before competition, he experienced decreased symptoms and improved performance. To better care for these patients, further studies should be conducted to provide safe and effective glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid dose adjustments before intensive endurance exercise.

Preclinical medical student observations associated with later professionalism concerns.

PURPOSE: Professionalism is a core physician competency and identifying students at risk for poor professional development early in their careers may allow for mentoring. This study identified indicators in the preclinical years associated with later professionalism concerns. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of observable indicators in the preclinical and clinical years was conducted using two classes of students (n = 226). Relationships between five potential indicators of poor professionalism in the preclinical years and observations related to professional concerns in the clinical years were analyzed. RESULTS: Fifty-three medical students were identified with at least one preclinical indicator and one professionalism concern during the clinical years. Two observable preclinical indicators were significantly correlated with unprofessional conduct during the clinical years: Three or more absences from attendance-required sessions (odds ratio 4.47; p=.006) and negative peer assessment (odds ratio 3.35; p=.049). CONCLUSIONS: We identified two significant observable preclinical indicators associated with later professionalism concerns: excessive absences and negative peer assessments. Early recognition of students at risk for future professionalism struggles would provide an opportunity for proactive professional development prior to the clinical years, when students' permanent records may be affected. Peer assessment, coupled with attention to frequent absences, may be a method to provide early recognition.