Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Open Heart ; 9(2)2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36192035

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of real-world data assessing the association of operator volumes and mortality specific to primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). METHODS: Demographic, clinical and outcome data for all patients undergoing PPCI in Leeds General Infirmary, UK, between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, and 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2013, were obtained prospectively. Operator volumes were analysed according to annual operator PPCI volume (low volume: 1-54 PPCI per year; intermediate volume: 55-109 PPCI per year; high volume: ≥110 PPCI per year). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were undertaken to investigate 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality, adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: During this period, 4056 patients underwent PPCI, 3703 (91.3%) of whom were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. PPCI by low-volume operators was associated with significantly higher adjusted 30-day mortality (HR 1.48 (95% CI 1.05 to 2.08); p=0.02) compared with PPCI performed by high-volume operators, with no significant difference in adjusted 12-month mortality (HR 1.26 (95% CI 0.96 to 1.65); p=0.09). Comparisons between low-volume and intermediate-volume operators, and between intermediate and high-volume operators, showed no significant differences in 30-day and 12-month mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Low operator volume is independently associated with higher probability of 30-day mortality compared with high operator volume, suggesting a volume-outcome relationship in PPCI at a threshold higher than current recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Open Heart ; 6(1): e000951, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31328001

RESUMEN

Background: There is a paucity of real-world outcome data comparing clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We sought to assess the association of choice of oral P2Y12-receptor inhibitor with clinical outcomes following PPCI for STEMI in a large consecutive patient series. Methods: Demographic, procedural and 12-month outcome data were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing PPCI in Leeds, UK, between 01 January 2009 and 31 December 2011, and 01 January 2013 and 31 December 2013. Clinical endpoints were 30-day and 12-month all-cause mortality, recurrent MI and 30-day HORIZONS-major bleeding. Logistic regression analyses were undertaken to adjust for confounding factors. Results: Prasugrel (n=1244) was associated with lower adjusted 30-day (OR 0.53 (0.34-0.85)) and 12-month (OR 0.55 (0.38-0.78)) mortality, and 12-month MI (OR 0.63 (0.42-0.94)) compared with clopidogrel (n=1648). Importantly, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality (OR 0.51 (0.29-0.91)) compared with ticagrelor (n=811). Lower 30-day (OR 0.40 (0.17-0.94)) and 12-month (OR 0.54 (0.32-0.93)) MI were observed in ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel, an association absent in comparison with prasugrel. Adjusted bleeding were not statistically significantly different among the P2Y12-receptor inhibitors. Conclusion: In this large consecutive real-world series, prasugrel was associated with lower adjusted 30-day mortality compared with ticagrelor and clopidogrel, and lower adjusted 12-month mortality compared with clopidogrel. Both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with lower recurrent MI following PPCI compared with clopidogrel, with no overall increase in adjusted bleeding.

3.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 8(3): 264-272, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28980483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Female sex and South Asian race have been associated with poor clinical outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) but remain understudied in large real-world series. We therefore investigated the association of sex and race with clinical outcomes following PPCI. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of all patients undergoing PPCI for STEMI between January 2009 and December 2011 at a large UK cardiac centre. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared according to sex and race using Chi-square test, independent samples Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test. Primary and secondary outcomes were 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) - defined as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and unplanned revascularization, analysed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. RESULTS: Three thousand and forty-nine patients were included. Women ( n=826) were older than men ( n=2223) (median age 69 vs. 60 years, p <0.01). Mortality (hazard ratio 1.48 (1.15-1.90)) and MACE (hazard ratio 1.40 (1.14-1.72)) were higher in women in univariable analysis. However, there were no significant sex-differences in mortality or MACE after age-stratification alone. Multivariable analysis also showed no significant differences in outcomes between sexes. South Asians ( n=297) were younger but had a higher prevalence of most risk factors than White patients ( n=2570). Mortality and MACE did not differ significantly between South Asian and White patients in univariable or multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: MACE and mortality was not greater in women, or in South Asian patients following PPCI after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors including age, which was most strongly associated with both outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etnología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etnología , Anciano , Causas de Muerte/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiología
4.
EuroIntervention ; 9(1): 118-24, 2013 May 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23410540

RESUMEN

AIMS: Within a clinical trial population, direct thrombin inhibition using bivalirudin in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with a reduction in mortality and major bleeding compared to heparin/glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibition (GPI), but a higher incidence of acute stent thrombosis (ST), particularly in the absence of pre-procedural heparin. The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in an all-comer, real-world primary PCI setting is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: 968 consecutive STEMI patients (mean age 63 years, 72% male, 42% anterior STEMI, 3.7% cardiogenic shock) undergoing primary PCI with bivalirudin as the recommended anticoagulation, and with heparin/GPI (abciximab) as an alternative, were prospectively followed. Bivalirudin was administered as a bolus, high-dose procedural infusion and, unlike the HORIZONS-AMI trial, as a low-dose infusion for four hours post-PCI. Additional heparin was not routinely given. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major bleeding and ST were assessed at 30 days. Initial antithrombotic therapy was bivalirudin in 885 patients (91%), of whom 123 (13.9%) received additional antithrombin therapy, and 114 (11.8%) "bail-out" GPI. Outcomes for bivalirudin-treated patients were; mortality 5.2%, MACE 7.5%, major bleeding 3.8%. The incidence of acute ST was 1.0%, including in the absence of additional heparin (1.2%). Most cases of acute ST (7/9) occurred in the first four hours post-PCI. There was no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated with bivalirudin versus heparin/GPI. CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of bivalirudin in a real-world primary PCI population was associated with good 30-day outcomes. Acute stent thrombosis was infrequent, even without additional heparin. A continued low-dose infusion of bivalirudin did not appear to offer protection against very early stent thrombosis.


Asunto(s)
Antitrombinas/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Fragmentos de Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Antitrombinas/administración & dosificación , Antitrombinas/efectos adversos , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Trombosis Coronaria/prevención & control , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hirudinas/administración & dosificación , Hirudinas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/mortalidad , Oportunidad Relativa , Fragmentos de Péptidos/administración & dosificación , Fragmentos de Péptidos/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/efectos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...