Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 14 de 14
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(15)2023 Aug 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37568498

RESUMEN

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a prevalent medical condition associated with high mortality and morbidity rates. Despite the high clinical burden, sex-based differences among PAD patients are not well defined yet, in contrast to other atherosclerotic diseases. This study aimed to describe sex-based differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes among hospitalized patients affected by PAD. This was a retrospective study evaluating all patients with a diagnosis of PAD admitted to the Emergency Department from 1 December 2013 to 31 December 2021. The primary endpoint of the study was the difference between male and female PAD patients in cumulative occurrence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACEs) and Major Adverse Limb Events. A total of 1640 patients were enrolled. Among them, 1103 (67.3%) were males while females were significantly older (median age of 75 years vs. 71 years; p =< 0.001). Females underwent more angioplasty treatments for revascularization than men (29.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.04); males were treated with more amputations (19.9% vs. 15.3%; p = 0.012). A trend toward more MALEs and MACEs reported in the male group did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.27 [0.99-1.64]; p = 0.059) (OR 0.75 [0.50-1.11]; p = 0.153). However, despite lower extremity PAD severity seeming similar between the two sexes, among these patients males had a higher probability of undergoing lower limb amputations, of cardiovascular death and of myocardial infarction. Among hospitalized patients affected by PAD, even if there was not a sex-based significant difference in the incidence of MALEs and MACEs, adverse clinical outcomes were more common in males.

2.
J Clin Med ; 11(2)2022 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35054133

RESUMEN

Acute Heart Failure (AHF)-related hospitalizations and mortality are still high in western countries, especially among older patients. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and predictors of in-hospital mortality of older patients hospitalized with AHF. We conducted a retrospective study including all consecutive patients ≥65 years who were admitted for AHF at a single academic medical center between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2018. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality. We also analyzed deaths due to cardiovascular (CV) and non-CV causes and compared early in-hospital events. The study included 6930 patients, mean age 81 years, 51% females. The overall mortality rate was 13%. Patients ≥85 years had higher mortality and early death rate than younger patients. Infections were the most common condition precipitating AHF in our cohort, and pneumonia was the most frequent of these. About half of all hospital deaths were due to non-CV causes. After adjusting for confounding factors other than NYHA class at admission, infections were associated with an almost two-fold increased risk of mortality, HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.10-2.71 in patients 65-74 years (p = 0.014); HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.34-2.49 in patients 75-84 years (p = 0.001); HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.19 in patients ≥85 years (p = 0.001). In conclusion, among older patients with AHF, in-hospital mortality rates increased with increasing age, and infections were associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality. In contemporary patients with AHF, along with the treatment of the CV conditions, management should be focused on timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment of non-CV factors, especially pulmonary infections.

3.
J Clin Med ; 12(1)2022 Dec 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36614856

RESUMEN

Dementia is associated with high rates of admission to hospital, due to acute illness, and in-hospital mortality. The study aimed to investigate the impact of dementia on in-hospital mortality and identify the predictors of in-hospital mortality in these patients. This was a retrospective study evaluating all the patients ≥65 years consecutively admitted to our Emergency Department (ED). We compared the clinical outcomes of the patients with dementia at ED admission with those who did not have dementia, using a propensity score-matched (PSM) paired cohort of controls. The patients were matched for age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index value, and clinical severity at presentation (based on NEWS ≥ 5). The primary study endpoint was all-cause in-hospital death. After the PSM, a total of 7118 patients, 3559 with dementia and 3559 in the control group, were included in the study cohort. The mean age was 84 years, and 59.8% were females. The overall mortality rate was higher for the demented patients compared with the controls (18.7% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.002). The multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) showed that dementia was an independent risk factor for death (HR 1.13 [1.01−1.27]; p = 0.033). In the patients with dementia, respiratory failure (HR 3.08 [2.6−3.65]), acute renal failure (HR 1.64 [1.33−2.02]; p < 0.001), hemorrhagic stroke (HR 1.84 [1.38−2.44]; p < 0.001), and bloodstream infection (HR 1.41 [1.17−1.71]; p = 0.001) were significant predictors of worse outcomes. Finally, the comorbidities and severity of illness at ED admission negatively influenced survival among the patients with dementia (CCI HR 1.05 [1.01−1.1] p = 0.005; NEWS ≥ 5 HR 2.45 [1.88−3.2] p < 0.001). In conclusion, among the hospitalized older patients, dementia was associated with a higher risk of mortality. Furthermore, among the older patients with dementia, respiratory failure and bloodstream infections were independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality.

4.
Aging Clin Exp Res ; 33(8): 2335-2343, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34216379

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 experienced an increased risk of venous thromboembolism. AIMS: To evaluate the effect of chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) therapy, both with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), on prognosis of COVID-19 older patients. METHODS: Single-center prospective study conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of a teaching hospital, referral center for COVID-19 in central Italy. We evaluated all the patients ≥ 65 years, consecutively admitted to our ED for confirmed COVID-19. We compared the clinical outcome of those who were on chronic OAC at ED admission with those who did not, using a propensity score matched paired cohort of controls. The primary study endpoint was all-cause in-hospital death. Patients were matched for age, sex, clinical comorbidities, and clinical severity at presentation (based on NEWS ≥ 6). Study parameters were assessed for association to all-cause in-hospital death by a multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify independent risk factor for survival. RESULTS: Although overall mortality was slightly higher for anticoagulated patients compared to controls (63.3% vs 43.5%, p = 0.012), the multivariate adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death was not significant (HR = 1.56 [0.78-3.12]; p = 0.208). Both DOACs (HR 1.46 [0.73-2.92]; p = 0.283) and VKAs (HR 1.14 [0.48-2.73]; p = 0.761) alone did not affect overall survival in our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients hospitalized for COVID-19, chronic OAC therapy was not associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital death. Moreover, our data suggest similar outcome both for patients on VKAs or in patients on DOACs.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vitamina K
5.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 57(2)2021 Feb 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33669753

RESUMEN

Background and Objectives: Fever is one of the most common presenting complaints in the Emergency Department (ED). The role of serum procalcitonin (PCT) determination in the ED evaluation of adults presenting with fever is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate if, in adults presenting to the ED with fever and then hospitalized, the early PCT determination could improve prognosis. Materials and Methods. This is a retrospective, mono-centric study, conducted over a 10-year period (2009-2018). We analyzed consecutive patients ≥18 years admitted to ED with fever and then hospitalized. According to quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) at admission, we compared patients that had a PCT determination vs. controls. Primary endpoint was overall in-hospital mortality; secondary endpoints were in-hospital length of stay, and mortality in patients with bloodstream infection and acute respiratory infections. Results. The sample included 12,062 patients, median age was 71 years and 55.1% were men. In patients with qSOFA ≥ 2 overall mortality was significantly lower if they had a PCT-guided management in ED, (20.5% vs. 26.5%; p = 0.046). In the qSOFA < 2 group the mortality was not significantly different in PCT patients, except for those with a final diagnosis of bloodstream infection. Conclusions. Among adults hospitalized with fever, the PCT evaluation at ED admission was not associated with better outcomes, with the possible exception of patients affected by bloodstream infections. However, in febrile patients presenting to the ED with qSOFA ≥ 2, the early PCT evaluation could improve the overall in-hospital survival.


Asunto(s)
Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina , Sepsis , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos
6.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr ; 95: 104383, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33676091

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: To date, mainly due to age-related vulnerability and to coexisting comorbidities, older patients often face a more severe COVID-19. This study aimed to identify at Emergency Department (ED) admission the predictors of in-hospital mortality and suitable scores for death risk stratification among COVID-19 patients ≥ 80 years old. METHODS: Single-centre prospective study conducted in the ED of an university hospital, referral center for COVID-19 in central Italy. We included 239 consecutive patients ≥ 80 years old with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. The primary study endpoint was all-cause in-hospital mortality. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed on significant variables at univariate analysis to identify independent risk factor for death. Overall performance in predicting mortality of WHO severity scale, APACHE II score, NEWS score, and CURB-65 was calculated. RESULTS: Median age was 85 [82-89] and 112 were males (46.9%). Globally, 77 patients (32.2%) deceased. The presence of consolidations at chest x-ray and the hypoxemic respiratory failure were significant predictors of poor prognosis. Moreover, age ≥ 85 years, dependency in activities of daily living (ADL), and dementia were risk factors for death, even after adjusting for clinical covariates and disease severity. All the evaluated scores showed a fairly good predictive value in identifying patients who could experience a worse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients ≥ 80 years old hospitalized with COVID-19, not only a worse clinical and radiological presentation of the disease, but also the increasing age, dementia, and impairment in ADL were strong risk factors for in-hospital death, regardless of disease severity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Intern Emerg Med ; 16(6): 1477-1486, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33389448

RESUMEN

Low thyroid function has been widely recognized as a potential cause of heart failure (HF), but the evidence about a possible association with in-hospital, all-cause mortality in patients with acute HF (AHF) is not consistent. This study sought to investigate the prevalence and prognostic role of hypothyroidism, overt and subclinical, and of low free-triiodothyronine (fT3) levels in patients hospitalized with AHF. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive 1018 patients who were hospitalized for AHF in a single academic medical center [Fondazione Policlinico A.Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy] between January 1st 2016, and December 31st 2018. Patients were divided into three groups: normal thyroid function (n = 798), subclinical hypothyroidism (n = 105), and overt hypothyroidism (n = 115). The outcome was in-hospital, all-cause mortality. Patients were 81 years of age, 55% were females and nearly two-thirds of the patients were on New York Heart Association functional class III. The three most common cardiovascular comorbidities were coronary artery disease, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation with no differences across the three groups. Overall, 138 patients (14%) died during the hospital stay. The mortality rate was 27% among patients with overt hypothyroid, 17% among those with subclinical hypothyroidism, and 11% among euthyroid patients (p < 0.001). At a multivariate Cox regression model, overt hypothyroidism (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.2) and fT3 levels < 1.8 pg/mL (HR 3.4, 95% CI 2.3-5.1) were associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital death. No association was found with subclinical hypothyroidism. Among patients hospitalized with AHF, overt hypothyroidism and low fT3 levels are independent predictors of all-cause mortality during the hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Hipotiroidismo/diagnóstico , Pronóstico , Triyodotironina/análisis , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis de Varianza , Área Bajo la Curva , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/sangre , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipotiroidismo/epidemiología , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Curva ROC , Ciudad de Roma/epidemiología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Triyodotironina/sangre
9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 69(1): 37-43, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33197278

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Several scoring systems have been specifically developed for risk stratification in COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: We compared, in a cohort of confirmed COVID-19 older patients, three specifically developed scores with a previously established early warning score. Main endpoint was all causes in-hospital death. SETTING: This is a single-center, retrospective observational study, conducted in the Emergency Department (ED) of an urban teaching hospital, referral center for COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed the clinical records of the confirmed COVID-19 patients aged 60 years or more consecutively admitted to our ED over a 6-week period (March 1st to April 15th, 2020). A total of 210 patients, aged between 60 and 98 years were included in the study cohort. MEASUREMENTS: International Severe Acute Respiratory Infection Consortium Clinical Characterization Protocol-Coronavirus Clinical Characterization Consortium (ISARIC-4C) score, COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score (COVID-GRAM), quick COVID-19 Severity Index (qCSI), National Early Warning Score (NEWS). RESULTS: Median age was 74 (67-82) and 133 (63.3%) were males. Globally, 42 patients (20.0%) deceased. All the score evaluated showed a fairly good predictive value with respect to in-hospital death. The ISARIC-4C score had the highest area under ROC curve (AUROC) 0.799 (0.738-0.851), followed by the COVID-GRAM 0.785 (0.723-0.838), NEWS 0.764 (0.700-0.819), and qCSI 0.749 (0.685-0.806). However, these differences were not statistical significant. CONCLUSION: Among the evaluated scores, the ISARIC-4C and the COVID-GRAM, calculated at ED admission, had the best performance, although the qCSI had similar efficacy by evaluating only three items. However, the NEWS, already widely validated in clinical practice, had a similar performance and could be appropriate for older patients with COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Anciano , COVID-19/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Ultrasound Med ; 40(3): 521-528, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32815618

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The 2019 novel coronavirus (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) is causing cases of severe pneumonia. Lung ultrasound (LUS) could be a useful tool for physicians detecting a bilateral heterogeneous patchy distribution of pathologic findings in a symptomatic suggestive context. The aim of this study was to focus on the implications of limiting LUS examinations to specific regions of the chest. METHODS: Patients were evaluated with a standard sequence of LUS scans in 14 anatomic areas. A scoring system of LUS findings was reported, ranging from 0 to 3 (worst score, 3). The scores reported on anterior, lateral, and posterior landmarks were analyzed separately and compared with each other and with the global findings. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled. A higher prevalence of score 0 was observed in the anterior region (44.08%). On the contrary, 21.05% of posterior regions and 13.62% of lateral regions were evaluated as score 3, whereas only 5.92% of anterior regions were classified as score 3. Findings from chest computed tomography performed in 16 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 correlated with and matched the distribution of findings from LUS. CONCLUSIONS: To assess the quantity and severity of lung disease, a comprehensive LUS examination is recommended. Omitting areas of the chest misses involved lung.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
11.
Intern Med J ; 50(12): 1483-1491, 2020 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33022124

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among hypertensive patients, the association between treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) and the clinical severity of COVID-19, remains uncertain. AIMS: To determine whether hypertensive patients hospitalised with COVID-19 are at risk of worse outcomes if on treatment with ACEI or ARB compared to other anti-hypertensive medications. METHODS: This is a retrospective study conducted at a single academic medical centre (Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy) from 1 to 31 March 2020. We compared patients on treatment with an ACEI/ARB (ACEI/ARB group) to patients receiving other anti-hypertensive medications (No-ACEI/ARB group). The end-points of the study were the all-cause in-hospital death and the combination of in-hospital death or need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. RESULTS: The sample included 166 COVID-19 patients; median age was 74 years and 109 (66%) were men. Overall, 111 (67%) patients were taking an ACEI or ARB. Twenty-nine (17%) patients died during the hospital stay, and 51 (31%) met the combined end-point. After adjustment for comorbidities, age and degree of severity at the presentation, ACEI or ARB treatment was an independent predictor neither of in-hospital death nor of the combination of in-hospital death/need for ICU. No differences were documented between treatment with ACEI compared to ARB. CONCLUSIONS: Among hypertensive patients hospitalised for COVID-19, treatment with ACEI or ARB is not associated with an increased risk of in-hospital death.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Echocardiography ; 36(11): 2122-2125, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31573705

RESUMEN

We report the case of a 74-year-old male, with a medical history of cor triatriatum, admitted with a 10-day history of intermittent fever. Three sets of blood cultures were positive for Providencia rettgeri. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogram excluded infective endocarditis, but revealed a congenital accessory tissue adhering to the mitral valve, causing supravalvular mitral stenosis. Cor triatriatum sinistrum is a rare congenital cardiac anomaly, even more uncommon in adults, and quite exceptional when associated with mitral valve disease. Because the patient had no symptoms related to the heart valve disease, no surgical indication was given and he was managed conservatively.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples , Corazón Triatrial/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografía Tridimensional/métodos , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica/métodos , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico , Válvula Mitral/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Válvula Mitral/anomalías , Estenosis de la Válvula Mitral/congénito , Enfermedades Raras
14.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 96(50): e9197, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29390335

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Fever of unknown origin (FUO) can be determined by different conditions among which infectious diseases represent the main cause. PATIENT CONCERNS: A young woman, with a history of aortic stenosis, was admitted to our unit for a month of intermittent fever associated with a new diastolic heart murmur and splenomegaly. Laboratory tests were negative for infectious screening. The total body computed tomography (CT) scan excluded abscesses, occulted neoplasia, or lymphadenopathy. DIAGNOSES: The transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiogram showed an aortic valve vegetation. Three sets of blood cultures were negative for all microorganisms tested. According to these findings, Bartonella endocarditis was suspected and the serology tests performed were positive. Finally, real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detected Bartonella henselae DNA on tissue valve. INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent heart valve surgery and a treatment of Ampicillin, Gentamicin, and oral Doxycycline was prescribed for 16 days and, successively, with Doxycycline and Ceftriaxone for 6 weeks. OUTCOMES: After surgery and antibiotic therapy, patient continued to do well. LESSONS: Bartonella species are frequently the cause of negative blood culture endocarditis. Molecular biology techniques are the only useful tool for diagnosis. Valvular replacement is often necessary and antibiotic regimen with Gentamicin and either Ceftriaxone or Doxycycline is suggested as treatment.Echocardiogram and blood cultures must be performed in all cases of FUO. When blood cultures are negative and echocardiographic tools are indicative, early use of Bartonella serology is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad por Rasguño de Gato/diagnóstico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad por Rasguño de Gato/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad por Rasguño de Gato/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ecocardiografía , Endocarditis Bacteriana/tratamiento farmacológico , Endocarditis Bacteriana/cirugía , Femenino , Fiebre de Origen Desconocido , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa , Esplenomegalia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...