RESUMEN
Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a globally increasing health concern, and there is a growing focus on early screening and prevention efforts. However, the availability of data on CKD prevalence in Pakistan, particularly in the urban area of Lahore district, is limited. The objective of the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) Lahore was to assess the prevalence of CKD in a high-risk population residing in the urban area of Lahore, Pakistan. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 254 participants, who were over 18 years old and belonged to a high-risk population according to the pre-defined operational definitions. The participants were randomly selected from various towns in Lahore. Screening camps were set up to measure serum creatinine levels and urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR), and then the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD Epidemiology Collaboration 2021 (CKD EPI) equation. Results Out of the total 254 participants, a diagnosis of CKD was made in 62 (24.2%) individuals. Significant associations were found between CKD and risk factors including hypertension, diabetes, family history of CKD, ischemic heart disease (IHD) or congestive heart failure (CHF), intake of painkillers, and herbal medicines. However, no association was found between obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and CKD. Participants diagnosed with CKD had a mean age of 49.9 years and a mean serum creatinine level of 1.2 mg/dL, while non-CKD participants had a mean age of 43.7 years and a mean serum creatinine level of 0.7 mg/dL. Conclusion Our study revealed that CKD was prevalent in about one-fourth of the participants from the high-risk population of Lahore, indicating a high prevalence of the disease within society. Moreover, hypertension, diabetes, family history of CKD, heart disease, painkillers, and the use of herbal medicines were all significantly linked to CKD in the surveyed sample population.
RESUMEN
With improved survival, adults living with HIV (ALHIV) are increasingly likely to experience age-related and HIV-related comorbidities, including renal insufficiency. Other risk factors for renal insufficiency (high blood pressure (BP), obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia) are also growing more common among ALHIV. To determine the prevalence of renal insufficiency (defined as an eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and factors associated with reduced eGFR, we conducted a cross-sectional study at six HIV clinics in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. We applied multivariable (MV) ordinal logistic regression models to identify factors associated with reduced eGFR and examined the interaction of age with BP levels. Among the 450 ALHIV on ART analyzed [26% males; median age 43 (IQR: 18-72) years; 89% on tenofovir-containing ART; 88% HIV viral load ≤50 copies/mL], 34 (7.5%) had renal insufficiency. Prevalence was higher among males (12%) vs. females (6%), p = 0.03; ALHIV ≥50 (21%) vs. <50 years (2.5%), p < 0.001; those with high [≥130/80 mmHg (15%)] vs. normal [<120/80 mmHg (4%)] BP, p < 0.01 and those with dyslipidemia (10%) vs. those without (4.5%), p < 0.03. After adjusting for covariates, age (in years) was the only covariate with a statistically significant association with reduced eGFR (OR = 1.09 (1.07-1.12), p < 0.001). No significant interaction between age and BP was found. Interventions to increase routine screening for renal insufficiency, especially among older ALHIV, and improve BP control are critical to reducing kidney disease-related morbidity and mortality.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Life participation has been established as a critically important core for trials in kidney transplantation. We aimed to validate a patient-reported outcome measure for life participation in kidney transplant recipients. Methods: A psychometric evaluation of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology life participation (SONG-LP) measure was conducted in adult kidney transplant recipients. The measure includes 4 items of life participation (leisure, family, work, and social) each with a 5-point Likert scale. Each item is scored from 0 (never) to 4 (always) and the summary measure score the average of each item. Results: A total of 249 adult kidney transplant recipients from 20 countries participated. The SONG-LP instrument demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.87; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.83-0.90, baseline) and test-retest reliability over 1 week (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.62; 95% CI: 0.54-0.70). There was moderate to high correlation (0.65; 95% CI: 0.57-0.72) with the PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Short Form 8a that assessed a similar construct, and moderate correlation with measures that assessed related concepts (i.e., EQ5D 0.57; 95% CI: 0.49-0.65), PROMIS Cognitive Functional Abilities Subset Short Form 4a (0.40; 95% CI: 0.29-0.50). Conclusion: The SONG-LP instrument is a simple, internally consistent, reliable measure for kidney transplant recipients and correlates with similar measures. Routine incorporation in clinical trials will ensure consistent and appropriate assessment of life participation for informed patient-centered decision-making.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For adults living with HIV (ALHIV) and comorbidities, access to comprehensive healthcare services is crucial to achieving optimal health outcomes. This study aims to describe lived experiences, challenges, and coping strategies for accessing care for hypertension and/or diabetes (HTN/DM) in HIV care and treatment clinics (CTCs) and other healthcare settings. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a qualitative study that employed a phenomenological approach between January and April 2022 using a semi-structured interview guide in six HIV CTCs in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. We purposively recruited 33 ALHIV with HTN (n = 16), DM (n = 10), and both (n = 7). Thematic content analysis was guided by the 5As framework of access to care. FINDINGS: The majority of the participants were females, between the ages of 54-73, and were recruited from regional referral hospitals. HIV CTCs at regional referral hospitals had more consistent provision of HTN screening services compared to those from district hospitals and health centers. Participants sought HTN/DM care at non-CTC health facilities due to the limited availability of such services at HIV CTCs. However, healthcare delivery for these conditions was perceived as unaccommodating and poorly coordinated. The need to attend multiple clinic appointments for the management of HTN/DM in addition to HIV care was perceived as frustrating, time-consuming, and financially burdensome. High costs of care and transportation, limited understanding of comorbidities, and the perceived complexity of HTN/DM care contributed to HTN/DM treatment discontinuity. As a means of coping, participants frequently monitored their own HTN/DM symptoms at home and utilized community pharmacies and dispensaries near their residences to check blood pressure and sugar levels and obtain medications. Participants expressed a preference for non-pharmaceutical approaches to comorbidity management such as lifestyle modification (preferred by young participants) and herbal therapies (preferred by older participants) because of concerns about side effects and perceived ineffectiveness of HTN/DM medications. Participants also preferred integrated care and focused patient education on multimorbidity management at HIV CTCs. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight significant barriers to accessing HTN/DM care among ALHIV, mostly related to affordability, availability, and accessibility. Integration of NCD care into HIV CTCs, could greatly improve ALHIV health access and outcomes and align with patient preference.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Infecciones por VIH , Hipertensión , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Masculino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Tanzanía/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/terapia , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , ComorbilidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures have become an essential component of quality measurement, quality improvement, and capturing the voice of the patient in clinical care. In 2004, the National Institutes of Health endorsed the importance of PROs by initiating the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS), which leverages computer-adaptive tests (CATs) to reduce patient burden while maintaining measurement precision. Historically, PROMIS CATs have been used in a large number of research studies outside the electronic health record (EHR), but growing demand for clinical use of PROs requires creative information technology solutions for integration into the EHR. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the introduction of PROMIS CATs into the Epic Systems EHR at a large academic medical center using a tight integration; we describe the process of creating a secure, automatic connection between the application programming interface (API) which scores and selects CAT items and Epic. METHODS: The overarching strategy was to make CATs appear indistinguishable from conventional measures to clinical users, patients, and the EHR software itself. We implemented CATs in Epic without compromising patient data security by creating custom middleware software within the organization's existing middleware framework. This software communicated between the Assessment Center API for item selection and scoring and Epic for item presentation and results. The middleware software seamlessly administered CATs alongside fixed-length, conventional PROs while maintaining the display characteristics and functions of other Epic measures, including automatic display of PROMIS scores in the patient's chart. Pilot implementation revealed differing workflows for clinicians using the software. RESULTS: The middleware software was adopted in 27 clinics across the hospital system. In the first 2 years of hospital-wide implementation, 793 providers collected 70,446 PROs from patients using this system. CONCLUSION: This project demonstrated the importance of regular communication across interdisciplinary teams in the design and development of clinical software. It also demonstrated that implementation relies on buy-in from clinical partners as they integrate new tools into their existing clinical workflow.
Asunto(s)
Computadores , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Programas Informáticos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el PacienteRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) stands as an accurate imaging modality for esophageal cancer staging, however utilization of EUS in early-stage cancer management remains controversial. Identification of non-applicability of endoscopic interventions with deep muscular invasion with EUS in pre-intervention evaluation of early-stage esophageal cancer is compared to endoscopic and histologic indicators. AIM: To display the role of EUS in pre-intervention early esophageal cancer staging and how the index endoscopic features of invasive esophageal malignancy compare for prediction of depth of invasion and cancer management. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent pre-resection EUS after a diagnosis of esophageal cancer at a tertiary medical center from 2012 to 2022. Patient clinical data, initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy/biopsy, EUS, and final resection pathology reports were abstracted, and statistical analysis was conducted to assess the role of EUS in management decisions. RESULTS: Forty nine patients were identified for this study. EUS T stage was concordant with histological T stage in 75.5% of patients. In determining submucosal involvement (T1a vs T1b), EUS had a specificity of 85.0%, sensitivity of 53.9%, and accuracy of 72.7%. Endoscopic features of tumor size > 2 cm and the presence of esophageal ulceration were significantly associated with deep invasion of cancer on histology. EUS affected management from endoscopic mucosal resection/submucosal dissection to esophagectomy in 23.5% of patients without esophageal ulceration and 6.9% of patients with tumor size < 2 cm. In patients without both endoscopic findings, EUS identified deeper cancer and changed management in 4.8% (1/20) of cases. CONCLUSION: EUS was reasonably specific in ruling out submucosal invasion but had relatively poor sensitivity. Data validated endoscopic indicators suggested superficial cancers in the group with a tumor size < 2 cm and the lack of esophageal ulceration. In patients with these findings, EUS rarely identified a deep cancer that warranted a change in management.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the original SPRINT article, age was categorized at 75 years, which was contrary to many previous clinical trials which is at 60 years. METHODS: The SPRINT trial randomized 9,361 hypertensive patients to a target blood pressure of <120 vs. <140 mm Hg (intensive vs. standard treatment, respectively). Age was re-categorized as <60 and ≥60 years and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: Intensive treatment reduced primary outcome significantly in both <60 and ≥60 years of age subgroups with a relative risk reduction (RRR) of 36% and 22%, respectively, and HR of 0.58 [95% CI, 0.36-0.94] and 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93], respectively. Although the intensive treatment rendered no effect on myocardial infarction (MI) in the overall comparison, it significantly reduced MI in patients <60 years of age with an RRR of 58% and HR of 0.39 [95% CI, 0.17-0.91]. In the ≥60-year age subgroup, reduced heart failure incidence was noted after intensive treatment, including death from other cardiovascular causes; however, these were not observed in the <60-year age subgroup. Intensive treatment resulted in significant hypotension, syncope, acute renal failure, or acute kidney injury in the ≥60-year age group; conversely, the risk of these adverse effects in patients <60 years of age did not increase. CONCLUSIONS: Intensive blood pressure control is beneficial for elderly patients (age ≥60 years), albeit with increased risk of adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hipertensión , Hipotensión , Infarto del Miocardio , Anciano , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Presión Sanguínea , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background: Ageing adults living with HIV (ALHIV) have increased risk of cardiovascular diseases as a result of HIV-infection-related chronic immune activation and inflammatory responses. Cardiovascular health index (CVHI) is a valid and relatively simple index for assessing the cardiovascular health (CVH) of the general population. Use of this index among ALHIV in Sub Saharan Africa, a resource-restricted setting where it could be mostly beneficial, remains limited. Understanding of the distribution and associated factors may inform the design of optimal interventions to improve CVH of ALHIV. Objective: We aimed to assess the distribution and factors associated with CVHI scores among ALHIV in an urban setting in Tanzania. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among ALHIV on antiretroviral therapy at six HIV clinics in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania. We summed the score of each of the seven CVHI metric to obtain the overall CVHI score and assessed the distribution of the score by sex. We then categorized the overall score into ideal (5-7), intermediate (3-4) and poor (<3) CVH categories and performed ordinal regression to identify CVHI score associated factors. Results: In all, 629 ALHIV [mean age of 43.5(SD ± 11.2) years] were enrolled. Most had ideal levels of blood glucose (96.2%) and smoking status (83.4%) while less than half had ideal BMI (48.1%), blood pressure (BP) (43.9%) and dietary intake (7.8%). Less than half (47.6%) showed ideal CVH, while less than 1% had all seven metrics at ideal level. Older age (0.96(95%CI:0.95-0.97), p-value < 0.001), being retired/unemployed (0.59(95%CI:0.43-0.81), p-value < 0.01), being employed (0.76(95%CI:0.62-0.94), p-value = 0.01) alcohol use (0.41(95%CI:0.21-0.80), p-value = 0.01) and presence of non-communicable disease comorbidities (0.68(95%CI:0.48-0.97), p-value = 0.04) had significant lower odds of ideal CVH. Conclusion: Based on our findings, interventions to improve CVH of ALHIV should target BP management, health education on diet for BMI control and reduction in alcohol consumption, particularly among ageing ALHIV with comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Estado de Salud , Adulto , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Tanzanía/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Presión Sanguínea , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Social relationships are a critical context for children's socioemotional development and their quality is closely linked with concurrent and future physical and emotional wellbeing. However, brief self-report measures of social relationship quality that translate across middle childhood, adolescence, and adulthood are lacking, limiting the ability to assess the impact of social relationships on health outcomes over time. To address this gap, this article describes the development and testing of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox Pediatric Social Relationship Scales, which were developed in parallel with the previously-reported Adult Social Relationship Scales. METHODS: Item sets were selected from the NIH Toolbox adult self-report item banks in the domains of social support, companionship, and social distress, and adapted for use in preadolescent (ages 8-11 years) and adolescent (ages 12-18 years) cohorts. Items were tested across a U.S. community sample of 1,038 youth ages 8-18 years. Classical test and item response theory approaches were used to identify items for inclusion in brief unidimensional scales. Concurrent validity was assessed by comparing resultant scales to established pediatric social relationship instruments. RESULTS: Internal reliability and concurrent validity were established for five unique scales, with 5-7 items each: Emotional Support, Friendship, Loneliness, Perceived Rejection, and Perceived Hostility. CONCLUSIONS: These brief scales represent developmentally appropriate and valid instruments for assessing the quality of youth social relationships across childhood and adolescence. In conjunction with previously published adult scales, they provide an opportunity for prospective assessment of social relationships across the developmental spectrum.
Asunto(s)
Relaciones Interpersonales , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aims to assess the effect of bariatric surgery on patient-reported outcomes of bowel and bladder function. We hypothesized that bariatric surgery does not worsen bowel and bladder function. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A retrospective review was conducted of a prospectively maintained surgical quality database. We included patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at a single institution between 2012 and 2020, excluding revisional procedures. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) bowel and bladder function questionnaires at time of pre-operative consult and routine post-operative follow-up visits through 2 years. Data were analyzed using a statistical mixed effects model. RESULTS: 573 patients (80.6% female) were identified with completed SOMS questionnaire data on bowel and bladder function. Of these, 370 (64.6%) underwent gastric bypass, 190 (33.2%) underwent sleeve gastrectomy, and 13 (2.3%) underwent either gastric banding or duodenal switch. Compared to pre-operative baseline scores, patients reported a transient worsening of bowel function at 2-weeks post-op (p = 0.009). However, by 3-months post-op, bowel function improved and was significantly better than baseline (p = 0.006); this improvement was sustained at every point through 2-year follow-up (p = 0.026). Bladder function scores improved immediately at 2-weeks post-op (p = 0.026) and showed sustained improvement through 1-year follow-up. On subgroup analysis, sleeve patients showed greater improvement in bowel function than bypass patients at 1-year (p = 0.031). Multivariable analysis showed significant improvement in bowel function associated with greater total body weight loss (TBWL) (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery does not worsen patient-reported bowel or bladder function. In fact, there is overall improvement from pre-operative scores for both bowel and bladder function by 3-months post-op which is sustained through 2-year and 1-year follow-up, respectively. Most encouragingly, a greater TBWL is significantly associated with improved bowel function after bariatric surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Cirugía Bariátrica/métodos , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: An individual's understanding of disease risk factors and outcomes is important for the ability to make healthy lifestyle choices and decisions about disease treatment. Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a condition with increasing global prevalence and high risk of adverse patient outcomes. This study seeks to understand the adequacy of disease understanding in patients with PAD. METHODS: This was an observational study of patients with PAD recruited from vascular surgery outpatient clinic and PAD clinical studies at a single academic medical center over an 8-month period. A 44-item paper survey assessed demographic and socioeconomic information, knowledge of personal medical history, PAD risk factors, consequences of PAD, and health education preferences. Patients with documented presence of PAD were offered the survey. Patients unable to complete the survey or provide informed consent were not considered eligible. Disease "awareness" was defined as correct acknowledgement of the presence or absence of a disease, including PAD, in the personal medical history. "PAD knowledge score" was the percentage of correct responses to questions on general PAD risk factors and consequences. Of 126 eligible patients, 109 participated. Bivariate analysis was used to study factors associated with awareness of PAD diagnosis. Factors associated with the PAD knowledge score were studied using the Pearson correlation coefficient, two-sample t test, or one-way analysis of variance. P value < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The mean participant age was 69.4 ± 11.0 years, and 39.4% (n = 43) were female. Most participants (78.9%; n = 86) had critical limb-threatening ischemia. Only 65.4% (n = 70) of participants were aware of a diagnosis of PAD, which was less than their awareness of related comorbidities. Factors positively associated with PAD diagnosis awareness were female sex (81.4% vs 54.7%; P = .004) and history of percutaneous leg revascularization (78.6% vs 47.9%; P = .001). Among 17 patients who had undergone major leg amputation, 35% (n = 6) were unaware of a diagnosis of PAD. PAD knowledge scores correlated positively with an awareness of PAD diagnosis (59.1% vs 48.7%; P = .02) and negatively with a history of hypertension (53.4% vs 68.1%; P = .001). Most participants (86.5%; n = 90) expressed a desire to be further educated on PAD. The most popular education topics were dietary recommendations, causes, and treatment for PAD. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD have deficits in their awareness of this diagnosis and general knowledge about PAD. Future research priorities should further define these deficits and their causes in order to inform new strategies that foster information-seeking behavior and effective educational programs for PAD.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We assessed long-term patient-reported dysphagia and xerostomia outcomes following definitive surgical management with transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in patients with oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) via a cross-sectional survey study. METHODS: Patients with OPC managed with primary oropharyngeal surgery as definitive treatment at least 1 year ago between 2015 and 2019 were identified. The M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and Xerostomia Inventory (XI) scores were compared across treatment types (i.e., no adjuvant therapy [TORS-A] vs. adjuvant radiotherapy [TORS+RT] vs. adjuvant chemoradiotherapy [TORS+CT/RT]). RESULTS: The sample had 62 patients (10 TORS-A, 30 TORS+RT, 22 TORS+CT/RT). TORS-A had clinically and statistically significantly better MDADI scores than TORS+RT (p = 0.03) and TORS+CT/RT (p = 0.02), but TORS+RT and TORS+CT/RT were not significantly different. TORS-A had clinically and statistically significantly less XI than TORS+RT (p < 0.01) and TORS+CT/RT (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OPC who have undergone TORS+RT or TORS+CT/RT following surgery face clinically worse dysphagia and xerostomia outcomes relative to patients who undergo TORS-A.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Xerostomía , Estudios Transversales , Trastornos de Deglución/epidemiología , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Xerostomía/epidemiología , Xerostomía/etiologíaRESUMEN
In its original publication, an erroneous version of Fig. 2d was included in the manuscript. The corrected figure has now been added.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Living donor kidney transplant (LDKT) imparts the best graft and patient survival for most end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. Yet, there remains variation in post-LDKT health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Improved understanding of post-LDKT HRQOL can help identify patients for interventions to maximize the benefit of LDKT. METHODS: For 477 LDKT recipients transplanted between 11/2007 and 08/2016, we assessed physical, mental, social, and kidney-targeted HRQOL pre-LDKT, as well as 3 and 12 months post-operatively using the SF-36, Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF), and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index 19 item version (FKSI-19). We then examined trajectories of each HRQOL domain using latent growth curve models (LGCMs). We also examined associations between decline in HRQOL from 3 months to 12 months post-LDKT and death censored graft failure (DCGF) using Cox regression. RESULTS: Large magnitude effects (d > 0.80) were observed from pre- to post-LDKT change on the SF-36 Vitality scale (d = 0.81) and the KDQOL-SF Burden of Kidney Disease (d = 1.05). Older age and smaller pre- to post-LDKT decreases in serum creatinine were associated with smaller improvements on many HRQOL scales across all domains in LGCMs. Higher DCGF rates were associated with worse physical [e.g., SF-36 PCSoblique hazard ratio (HR) 1.18; 95% CI 1.01-1.38], mental (KDQOL-SF Cognitive Function HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.00-1.62), and kidney-targeted (FKSI-19 HR: 1.18; 95% CI 1.00-1.38) HRQOL domains. CONCLUSION: Clinical HRQOL monitoring may help identify patients who are most likely to have failing grafts and who would benefit from post-LDKT intervention.
Asunto(s)
Estado de Salud , Trasplante de Riñón/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Receptores de Trasplantes/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Donadores Vivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Psicometría , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Measurement-based care has important implications across multiple avenues in mental and behavioral health care, including clinical care, quality improvement, and accountability. Using measurement-based care to demonstrate that quality care is being provided within the context of cost-efficient care could strengthen the position of mental and behavioral health providers as critical members of the health care system. Yet when measurement-based care is used to assess performance of providers, and then that performance influences reimbursement, it must be done with great care and deliberation so as not to result in unintended consequences such as punishing providers. Given psychology's expertise in measurement, the American Psychological Association (APA) and its members are uniquely suited to be leaders in promoting measurement-based care to assess quality and value. In this policy analysis paper, we examine the importance of measurement-based behavioral and mental health care across a variety of public service populations. We describe the increased federal regulatory focus on promoting quality and cost efficient care, the importance of defining and measuring quality care, and introduce an important resource being developed by APA to promote provider engagement in measurement-based care and effective participation in payment reform efforts in health care. We conclude with specific recommendations for how the field can move forward with using measurement-based care to assess accountability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Psicología , Psicometría , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Sociedades Científicas , Atención a la Salud/economía , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Atención a la Salud/normas , Humanos , Psicología/economía , Psicología/organización & administración , Psicología/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/economía , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Sistema de Registros/normas , Sociedades Científicas/normasRESUMEN
Social support is a key component of transplantation evaluation in the United States. Social support definitions and evaluation procedures require examination to achieve clear, consistent implementation. We surveyed psychosocial clinicians from the Society for Transplant Social Workers and American Society of Transplant Surgeons about their definitions and evaluation procedures for using social support to determine transplant eligibility. Bivariate statistical analysis was used for quantitative data and content analysis for qualitative data. Among 276 psychosocial clinicians (50.2% response rate), 92% had ruled out patients from transplantation due to inadequate support. Social support definitions varied significantly: 10% of respondents indicated their center lacked a definition. Key domains of social support included informational, emotional, instrumental, motivational, paid support, and the patient's importance to others. Almost half of clinicians (47%) rarely or never requested second opinions when excluding patients due to social support. Confidence and perceived clarity and consistency in center guidelines were significantly associated with informing patients when support contributed to negative wait-listing decisions (P = .001). Clinicians who excluded fewer patients because of social support offered significantly more supportive health care (P = .02). Clearer definitions and more supportive care may reduce the number of patients excluded from transplant candidacy due to inadequate social support.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Trasplante de Órganos , Selección de Paciente , Psiquiatría , Psicología , Apoyo Social , Trabajadores Sociales , Actividades Cotidianas , Familia , Femenino , Apoyo Financiero , Amigos , Vivienda , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Características de la Residencia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Transportes , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Integrating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) into electronic health records (EHRs) can improve patient-provider communication and delivery of care. However, new system implementation in health-care institutions is often accompanied by a change in clinical workflow and organizational culture. This study examines how well an EHR-integrated PRO system fits clinical workflows and individual needs of different provider groups within 2 clinics. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Northwestern Medicine developed and implemented an EHR-integrated PRO system within the orthopedics and oncology departments. We conducted interviews with 11 providers who had interacted with the system. Through thematic analysis, we synthesized themes regarding provider perspectives on clinical workflow, individual needs, and system features. RESULTS: Our findings show that EHR-integrated PROs facilitate targeted conversation with patients and automated triage for psychosocial care. However, physicians, psychosocial providers, and medical assistants faced different challenges in their use of the PRO system. Barriers mainly stemmed from a lack of actionable data, workflow disruption, technical issues, and a lack of incentives. DISCUSSION: This study sheds light on the ecosystem around EHR-integrated PRO systems (such as user needs and organizational factors). We present recommendations to address challenges facing PRO implementation, such as optimizing data collection and auto-referral processes, improving data visualizations, designing effective educational materials, and prioritizing the primary user group. CONCLUSION: PRO integration into routine care can be beneficial but also require effective technology design and workflow configuration to reach full potential use. This study provides insights into how patient-generated health data can be better integrated into clinical practice and care delivery processes.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In the United States, patients wear a one-piece, reusable cloth gown during colonoscopy procedures. Many patients report embarrassment related to bodily exposure during colonoscopy. This may limit participation in colorectal cancer screening programs. AIMS: To assess whether the use of a novel, disposable patient garment (Privacy Pants, Jackson, MS), which increases patient coverage, can reduce embarrassment related to bodily exposure and increase colonoscopy acceptance rates. METHODS: Patients were offered a novel gown, and they completed questionnaires before and after colonoscopy. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients participated. 54% were female and 82% were Caucasian. The novel gown had high overall satisfaction (8.3) and was associated with a sense of respect during the procedure (9.4). 67% (80) of the patients had a prior colonoscopy, and of these, 76% would request a novel gown over a traditional gown for future procedures. Among all study participants, a high rate of acceptability for repeat colonoscopy if recommended by their doctors was reported (mean of 9.4). Nonwhites were more likely to have a concern for embarrassment addressed by using novel gowns as compared to whites (P value 0.02). CONCLUSION: All participants, particularly women and nonwhite participants, reported high rates of respect and satisfaction and decrease in embarrassment utilizing the novel gown during colonoscopy. Patients who had prior colonoscopy with a traditional gown preferred the novel garment. A novel procedure gown may enhance colonoscopy acceptance by minimizing embarrassment.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network/Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate Symptom Index-17 (NFPSI-17) are 2 commonly used measures for patient-reported outcomes in prostate cancer trials. Their use may be enhanced by a better understanding of how change scores on the measures should be interpreted. METHODS: Using data from the phase 3 Alpharadin in Symptomatic Prostate Cancer Patients trial, this study estimated important change scores on the FACT-P and the NFPSI-17 via a combination of distribution- and anchor-based methods. These data were also used to establish evidence for the validity of the NFPSI-17. RESULTS: The available data suggested the following important difference ranges: 2 to 4 points for the Prostate Cancer Subscale, 5.5 to 8.5 points for the Trial Outcome Index, 1 to 1.5 points for the 3-item Pain Scale, 1 to 2 points for the 4-item Pain Scale, 4 to 6 points for the NFPSI-17, 2 to 3.5 points for NFPSI-Disease-Related Symptoms-Physical, 0.5 points for NFPSI-Disease-Related Symptoms-Emotional, 1 to 1.5 points for NFPSI-Treatment Side Effects, and 0.5 to 1 point for NFPSI-Function/Well-Being. The internal consistency reliability of the NFPSI-17 and most of its subscales was good to excellent (>.70). Significant support was also found for the known groups validity of the NFPSI-17 (and most of its subscales) on the basis of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, the total alkaline phosphatase, the presence of a skeletal-related event during treatment, and the prostate-specific antigen response before the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The secondary analysis supports the continued use of the FACT-P, the NFPSI-17, and its related subscales in future research on the quality of life of patients with symptomatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Radio (Elemento)/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Humanos , Masculino , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Pruebas Psicológicas , Psicometría , Radioisótopos/uso terapéutico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether use of self-fixating mesh during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) impacts postoperative quality of life (QoL). We hypothesize patients receiving self-fixating mesh during totally extraperitoneal (TEP) LIHR will report less pain and improved QoL compared to those receiving non-fixating mesh. METHODS: An IRB-approved, single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients with primary, unilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to receive either non-fixating (control) or self-fixating mesh. Clinical visits were conducted 3 weeks and 1 year after LIHR. A validated Surgical Outcomes Measurement System (SOMS) instrument was used to assess patients' QoL preoperatively and postoperatively along with Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS) at 3 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Comparisons between self-fixating and non-fixating mesh groups were made using Chi-square, Wilcoxon rank-sum or independent samples t tests. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy patients were enrolled (137 non-fixating vs 133 self-fixating). Preoperatively, there was no difference in mean age, BMI, or median hernia duration between groups (57.9 vs 56.6 years, p = 0.550; 26.1 vs 26.8, p = 0.534; 3.0 vs 3.0 months, p = 0.846). Median operative times (34 vs 34 min, p = 0.545) and LOS were similar. More patients in the non-fixating group received tacks (43 vs 19, p = 0.001). Patients receiving non-fixating mesh recorded better mean SOMS scores for the first 3 days following surgery (Day 1: p = 0.005; Day 2: p = 0.002; Day 3: p = 0.024, Table 1) indicating less pain. No differences in pain were seen 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. There were zero recurrences found during clinical follow-up in either of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving self-fixating mesh report worse postoperative pain in the first 2-3 days than those receiving non-fixating mesh. The groups showed no differences across QoL metrics (SOMS and CCS) at 3 weeks or 1 year postoperatively. Self-fixating mesh does not appear to positively impact QoL after TEP LIHR.