Can edoxaban be used at extremes of bodyweight and in patients with a creatinine clearance ≥95 ml/min? - A population pharmacokinetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical evidence surrounding edoxaban use in patients weighing <50 kg and >120 kg is lacking. The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee suggests avoiding edoxaban in patients >120 kg. Additionally, concerns exist regarding decreased efficacy in patients prescribed edoxaban for atrial fibrillation with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) >95 ml/min, a finding of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial when edoxaban was compared to warfarin. OBJECTIVE: To derive a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model using clinical practice data, to understand the impact of bodyweight and renal function on edoxaban pharmacokinetics. METHOD: Edoxaban plasma concentrations and patient characteristics were collated from King's College Hospital anticoagulation clinics between 11/2016 and 08/2022. A PopPK model was developed using non-linear mixed effects modelling and used to simulate edoxaban concentrations at the extremes of bodyweight and with varying renal function. RESULTS: Data from 409 patients (46 < 50 kg, 34 > 120 kg and 123 with a CrCl > 95 ml/min) provided 455 edoxaban plasma concentrations. A one-compartment model with between-subject variability on clearance with a proportional error model best described the data. The most significant covariates impacting on edoxaban exposure were CrCl and bodyweight. Our work suggests that edoxaban exposure in patients weighing up to 140 kg is comparable to those weighing 75 kg. Edoxaban exposure is reduced in patients weighing <50 kg due to the recommended dose reductions. There is also a reduction in AUCss when CrCl > 95 ml/min compared to CrCl 80 ml/min. CONCLUSIONS: Our population PK model for edoxaban suggests that renal function is a key driver for overall edoxaban exposure. Further clinical outcome data is required to understand clinical effectiveness and adverse outcomes.

Fixed dose rivaroxaban can be used in extremes of bodyweight: A population pharmacokinetic analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emerging safety and efficacy data for rivaroxaban suggest traditional therapy and rivaroxaban are comparable in the morbidly obese. However, real-world data that indicate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters are comparable at the extremes of body size are lacking. The International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardisation Committee (ISTH SSC) suggests avoiding the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients weighing >120 kg or with a body mass index >40 kg/m2 and gives no recommendation on the use of DOACs in those <50 kg. OBJECTIVES: To generate a population PK model to understand the influence of bodyweight on rivaroxaban exposure from clinical practice data. METHOD: Rivaroxaban plasma concentrations and patient characteristics were collated between 2013 and 2018 at King's College Hospital anticoagulation clinic. A population PK model was developed using a nonlinear mixed effects approach and then used to simulate rivaroxaban concentrations at the extremes of bodyweight. RESULTS: A robust population PK model derived from 913 patients weighing between 39 kg and 172 kg was developed. The model included data from n = 86 >120 kg, n = 74 BMI >40 kg/m2 , and n = 30 <50 kg. A one-compartment model with between-subject variability on clearance and a proportional error model best described the data. Creatinine clearance calculated by Cockcroft-Gault, with lean bodyweight as the weight descriptor in this equation, was the most significant covariate influencing rivaroxaban exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Our work demonstrates rivaroxaban can be used at extremes of bodyweight provided renal function is satisfactory. We recommend that the ISTH SSC revises the current guidance with respect to rivaroxaban at extremes of body size.

Progress in the monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant therapy.

The availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has led to a paradigm shift in the field of anticoagulation, with DOACs increasingly being prescribed for patients in preference to vitamin K antagonists and low molecular weight heparin. Despite good experience with the use of these agents at fixed doses, there are clinical scenarios where monitoring is recommended. Data from phase III studies of the DOACs and small real-world studies suggest a relationship between DOAC concentration and clinical events. The DOACs have differing impacts on the common tests of haemostasis and it is important that clinicians are familiar with the sensitivity of the reagents used in their laboratory to individual DOACs. The specific DOAC drug concentrations can be assayed in the laboratory, when required, to guide appropriate clinical decision-making. Studies from the real world with sufficient numbers evaluating the association of DOAC concentrations with outcomes should be a research priority in order to understand if we could do better through dose individualisation.