Condylar constrained and rotating hinged implants in revision knee arthroplasty show similar survivorship and clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: In revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) ligament instability and bone defects might require more constraint implants such as a condylar constrained knee (CCK) or rotating hinged knee (RHK). When both implants are suitable, the choice remains controversial. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survivorship and clinical outcome between CCK and RHK in revision TKA. METHODS: Systematic literature research was performed. Studies analysing the clinical outcome and/or survivorship of CCK and/or RHK in revision TKA were included. Clinical outcomes included the Knee Society Score, both clinical (KSCS) and functional (KSFS), range of motion (ROM) and reoperations. Survival was defined as the time free from removal or revision of the femoral and/or tibial component. RESULTS: A total of 40 articles analysing 4.555 knees were included. Survival did not differ between RHK and CCK implants (p = 0.6058), with, respectively, 91.6% and 89.8% survival after 5 years. Postoperative KSCS and KSFS were, respectively, 79.2 (SD 10.7) and 61.1 (SD 21.8) for the CCK group. Similar scores were noted for the RHK group with a KSCS of 80.2 (SD 14.1) and KSFS of 58.5 (SD 17.3). Postoperative ROM was similar for CCK (105.3°, SD 17.1°) and RHK patients (104.1°, SD 16.9°). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis revealed that both survivorship and clinical outcome are similar for CCK and RHK patients for whom both designs are technically suitable and indicated. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Anterior Tibiotalar Fat Pad Involvement in Ankle Osteoarthritis: MRI Features in Patients 1 Year After a Lateral Ankle Sprain.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the characteristics of the anterior tibiotalar fat pad (ATFP) in the ankle joint in a population of patients 1 year after an ankle sprain and its correlation with systemic factors and local articular pathology. DESIGN: The study is a secondary analysis of an observational case-control study. We included 206 patients who were followed 6-12 months after ankle sprain. T1 MRI scans were assessed for signal intensity and area of ATFP by mapping the fat pad using dedicated imaging software (Mimics 18.0). Quantitative values of intensity and area were generated. Linear regression analysis was used to examine the association between both local and systemic factors and the ATFP. Variables with a P value <0.2 were entered in 5 stepwise multivariate models: (1) age-sex-body mass index (BMI); (2) anamnesis; (3) physical examination; (4) radiographic findings; and (5) MRI findings. Predictors in these separate models were entered in the final model. RESULTS: The final multivariate model showed a significant positive association between age (P = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13 ± 1.06), BMI (P = 0.05; 95% CI = 3.61 ± 3.53), and sex (P < 0.01; 95% CI = -49.26 ± 30.04) with T1 intensity. The final model also showed a significant negative association between age (P < 0.01; 95% CI = -0.57 ± 0.34), diffuse cartilage loss in the lateral talus (P = 0.03; 95% CI = -0.71 ± 0.63), and Kellgren and Lawrence score in the tibiotalar joint (P < 0.01; 95%CI = -21.61 ± 7.24) and ATFP area. A positive association was found between BMI (P < 0.01; 95% CI = 2.25 ± 1.15) and ATFP area. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a correlation between ATFP and both systemic factors and local pathology in the ankle joint.

Comparison of Different Strategies in Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee with Severe Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In revision total knee arthroplasty large bone lesions can jeopardize correct implant orientation and fixation. Different strategies have been proposed to tackle this issue. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the midterm clinical and survivorship results of porous cones and porous-coated sleeves compared to morselized and structural grafts. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the literature on the different strategies targeting moderate to large metaphyseal bone defects. The literature was evaluated for methodological quality. We analyzed results on survivorship using logistic regression correcting for follow-up time and number of knees. We compared these results using forest plots for early and midterm follow-up. Clinical outcome was evaluated by comparing standardized mean difference of patient-related outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 77 articles analyzing 4,391 knees were included. The logistic regression curve showed a nonsignificant odds ratio (OR) at 10 years of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.699-1.192, P = .49) for failure comparing all porous implants with all grafting procedures. The available clinical reports show a bigger standardized mean difference increase for tantalum cones (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.71-4.37) than for porous sleeves (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.88-2.57). CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that the size and quality of the literature on metaphyseal bone defects is progressively improving. Porous implants are effective in tackling metaphyseal bone defects showing good survivorship outcome at midterm follow-up. In younger patients with less constrained prosthetic implants, surgeons might still consider the use of grafts without risking worse outcomes.

Correction: Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Prevent or Delay Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156183.].

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Prevent or Delay Progression of Knee Osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Meniscal tears are common knee injuries. Meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) has been advocated to alleviate symptoms and delay osteoarthritis (OA) after meniscectomy. We investigated (1) the long-term outcome of MAT as a treatment of symptomatic meniscectomy, (2) most important factors affecting survivorship and (3) OA progression. METHODS: From 1989 till 2013, 329 MAT were performed in 313 patients. Clinical and radiographic results and MAT survival were evaluated retrospectively. Failure was defined as conversion to knee arthroplasty (KA) or total removal of the MAT. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 33 years (15-57); 60% were males. No-to-mild cartilage damage was found in 156 cases, moderate-to-severe damage in 130. Simultaneous procedures in 118 patients included cartilage procedures, osteotomy or ACL-reconstruction. At a mean follow-up of 6.8 years (0.2-24.3years), 5 patients were deceased and 48 lost (14.6%), 186 MAT were in situ (56.5%) whilst 90 (27.4%) had been removed, including 63 converted to a KA (19.2%). Cumulative allograft survivorship was 15.1% (95% CI:13.9-16.3) at 24.0 years. In patients <35 years at surgery, survival was significantly better (24.1%) compared to ≥35 years (8.0%) (p = 0.017). In knees with no-to-mild cartilage damage more allografts survived (43.0%) compared to moderate-to-severe damage (6.6%) (p = 0.003). Simultaneous osteotomy significantly deteriorated survival (0% at 24.0 years) (p = 0.010). 61% of patients underwent at least one additional surgery (1-11) for clinical symptoms after MAT. Consecutive radiographs showed significant OA progression at a mean of 3.8 years (p<0.0001). Incremental Kellgren-Lawrence grade was +1,1 grade per 1000 days (2,7yrs). CONCLUSIONS: MAT did not delay or prevent tibiofemoral OA progression. 19.2% were converted to a knee prosthesis at a mean of 10.3 years. Patients younger than 35 with no-to-mild cartilage damage may benefit from MAT for relief of symptoms (survivorship 51.9% at 20.2 years), but patients and healthcare payers and providers should be aware of the high number of surgical re-interventions.