Explorando la opinión de los especialistas españoles acerca de la utilidad de la radiómica en el área oncológica / Exploring the opinion of Spanish medical specialists about the usefulness of radiomics in oncology

Objetivo Describir el conocimiento y la opinión de los profesionales sanitarios relacionados con la oncología acerca de la radiómica. Métodos Se elaboró un cuestionario de 12 preguntas (respuestas de selección múltiple, de escala tipo Likert y respuesta abierta), dirigido a profesionales relacionados con el diagnóstico/tratamiento de enfermedades oncológicas (oncología, radiodiagnóstico, medicina nuclear, oncología-radioterápica, hematooncología, radiofísica y anatomía patológica). Los participantes se clasificaron en dos grupos según su grado de formación: adjuntos y residentes. Resultados Un total de 114 profesionales completaron la encuesta (54% residentes, principalmente de las especialidades medicina nuclear y radiodiagnóstico). Los adjuntos obtuvieron un mejor desempeño en el área de conocimiento respecto a los residentes. En ambos grupos los encuestados respondieron estar de acuerdo con la utilidad de la radiómica para ayudar a realizar diagnósticos más precisos, facilitando el trabajo de los equipos médicos. Las ideas más frecuentes relacionadas con las desventajas del uso de la radiómica se relacionaron con la falta de sistematización en la adquisición de imágenes y la extracción de parámetros, la necesidad de entrenamiento de los profesionales y la inquietud sobre el reemplazo del trabajo humano por herramientas tecnológicas. Conclusiones La radiómica es un campo de estudio novedoso, cuyos aspectos más generales son conocidos por los profesionales sanitarios. Los profesionales encuestados son optimistas en cuanto a los beneficios que entregan esta y otros tipos de herramientas. El principal problema detectado fue la falta de sistematización en su implementación. El reemplazo de los profesionales y la pérdida de trabajo es una preocupación presente, pero menos prevalente y que puede responder a un fenómeno generacional (AU)

Aim To describe the knowledge and opinion of health professionals regarding the usefulness of radiomics in oncology. Methods A 12-question questionnaire (multiple-choice responses, Likert-type scale, and open response) was developed and sent to professionals related to diagnosis/treatment of oncological diseases (Oncology, Radiodiagnosis, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Hematology-Oncology, Radiophysics and Pathology). Participants were classified into two groups according to their level of training: attending physicians and residents. Results 114 professionals completed the survey (54% residents, mostly from Nuclear Medicine and Radiodiagnostic specialties). Attending physicians obtained a better performance in the area pf knowledge compared to residents. Both groups of respondents agreed regarding the usefulness of radiomics to help make more accurate diagnoses and promoting the work of medical teams and the most frequent disadvantages were related to the lack of systematization in the acquisition of images and extraction of parameters, the need for the training of professionals and concern about the replacement of human work by technological tools. Conclusions Radiomics is a novel field and the most general aspects are known by health professionals. The professionals surveyed were optimistic about the benefits provided by radiomics and other types of tools. The main problem detected was the lack of systematization in its implementation. The replacement of professionals and job loss is a concern, albeit less prevalent, and may respond to a generational phenomenon (AU)

Progreso y utilidad actual de la radiómica dentro del estudio PET/TC en cáncer de mama no metastásico: una revisión sistemática / Progress and current utility of radiomics in PET/CT study of non-metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review

Objetivo Sintetizar la evidencia actual sobre la utilidad de la radiómica en el análisis de la imagen PET/TC en cáncer de mama local o localmente avanzado y evaluar la calidad metodológica de los estudios radiómicos publicados al respecto. Material y métodos Revisión sistemática de artículos en distintas bases de datos hasta 2021 utilizando los términos «PET», «radiomics», «texture», «breast». Se seleccionaron solo artículos con datos humanos y que incluyeran una imagen de PET en su análisis. Se excluyeron estudios con datos de pruebas y menos de 20 pacientes. De cada artículo se extrajo el tamaño muestral, el radiotrazador utilizado, la técnica de imagen y las características de imagen extraídas. Se determinó la calidad metodológica de los estudios mediante el instrumento QUADAS-2. Resultados Se seleccionaron 18 artículos. El diseño retrospectivo fue el más utilizado. La característica radiómica más estudiada fue el SUVmax. Diversos parámetros radiómicos se correlacionaron con la caracterización tumoral, y la heterogeneidad tumoral demostró utilidad para predecir el curso de la enfermedad y la respuesta al tratamiento. La mayoría de los artículos mostraron un alto riesgo de sesgo, derivado principalmente de la selección de pacientes. Conclusiones Se observó una alta probabilidad de sesgo en los artículos publicados. La radiómica es un campo aún en desarrollo y son necesarios más estudios para demostrar su utilidad en la práctica clínica habitual. La herramienta QUADAS-2 permite la valoración crítica de la calidad metodológica de la evidencia disponible. Pese a las limitaciones, la radiómica se muestra como una herramienta que puede ayudar a conseguir un manejo oncológico personalizado en el cáncer de mama (AU)

Aim To synthesize the current evidence of the usefulness of radiomics in PET/CT image analysis in local and locally advanced breast cancer. Also, to evaluate the methodological quality of the radiomic studies published. Methods Systematic review of articles in different databases until 2021 using the terms «PET», «radiomics», «texture», «breast». Only articles with human data and that included a PET image were included. Studies with simulated data and with less than 20 patients were excluded. The sample size, radiotracer used, imaging technique, and radiomics characteristics were extracted from each article. The methodological quality of the studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. Results Eighteen articles were selected. The retrospective design was the most used. The most studied radiomic characteristic was SUVmax. Several radiomic parameters were correlated with tumor characterization, and tumor heterogeneity proved useful for predicting disease course and response to treatment. Most articles showed a high risk of bias, mainly from the patient selection. Conclusions A high probability of bias was observed in most of the published articles. Radiomics is a developing field and more studies are needed to demonstrate its usefulness in routine clinical practice. The QUADAS-2 tool allows critical assessment of the methodological quality of the available evidence. Despite its limitations, radiomics is shown to be an instrument that can help to achieve personalized oncologic management of breast cancer (AU)

Exploring the opinion of Spanish medical specialists about the usefulness of radiomics in oncology.

AIM: To describe the knowledge and opinion of health professionals regarding the usefulness of radiomics in oncology. METHODS: A 12-question questionnaire (multiple-choice responses, Likert-type scale, and open response) was developed and sent to professionals related to diagnosis/treatment of oncological diseases (Oncology, Radiodiagnosis, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Oncology, Hematology-Oncology, Radiophysics and Pathology). Participants were classified into two groups according to their level of training: attending physicians and residents. RESULTS: 114 professionals completed the survey (54% residents, mostly from Nuclear Medicine and Radiodiagnostic specialties). Attending physicians obtained a better performance in the area pf knowledge compared to residents. Both groups of respondents agreed regarding the usefulness of radiomics to help make more accurate diagnoses and promoting the work of medical teams and the most frequent disadvantages were related to the lack of systematization in the acquisition of images and extraction of parameters, the need for the training of professionals and concern about the replacement of human work by technological tools. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics is a novel field and the most general aspects are known by health professionals. The professionals surveyed were optimistic about the benefits provided by radiomics and other types of tools. The main problem detected was the lack of systematization in its implementation. The replacement of professionals and job loss is a concern, albeit less prevalent, and may respond to a generational phenomenon.

Progress and current utility of radiomics in PET/CT study of non-metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review.

AIM: To synthesize the current evidence of the usefulness of radiomics in PET/CT image analysis in local and locally advanced breast cancer. Also, to evaluate the methodological quality of the radiomic studies published. METHODS: Systematic review of articles in different databases until 2021 using the terms "PET", "radiomics", "texture", "breast". Only articles with human data and that included a PET image were included. Studies with simulated data and with less than 20 patients were excluded. Were extracted sample size, radiotracer used, imaging technique, and radiomics characteristics from each article. The methodological quality of the studies was determined using the QUADAS-2 tool. RESULTS: 18 articles were selected. The retrospective design was the most used. The most studied radiomic characteristic was SUVmax. Several radiomic parameters were correlated with tumor characterization, and tumor heterogeneity proved useful for predicting disease course and response to treatment. Most articles showed a high risk of bias, mainly from the patient selection. CONCLUSIONS: A high probability of bias was observed in most of the published articles. Radiomics is a developing field and more studies are needed to demonstrate its usefulness in routine clinical practice. The QUADAS-2 tool allows critical assessment of the methodological quality of the available evidence. Despite its limitations, radiomics is shown to be an instrument that can help to achieve personalized oncologic management of breast cancer.