Efficacy and Safety of the Preserflo Microshunt With Mitomycin C for the Treatment of Open Angle Glaucoma.

PRCIS: The Preserflo Microshunt (PSM) is a safe and effective glaucoma microfiltering implant that significantly reduces the intraocular pressure (IOP), either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, during the first year after surgery. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the PSM for the treatment of open angle glaucoma with 0.2 mg/mL mitomycin C, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery. METHODS: A retrospective, open-label study of 64 eyes with primary open angle glaucoma that underwent PSM implantation and were followed up for at least 9 months. Success was defined as IOP 6-17 mm Hg and a reduction of at least 20%, complete without hypotensive medication, and qualified with medication. Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included mean hypotensive medications, visual acuity, and incidence of needling and surgical revision. RESULTS: A total of 51 eyes underwent PSM alone and 13 underwent PSM+phacoemulsification. In the overall population of the study, the mean IOP was significantly reduced from 22.03±0.7 mm Hg at baseline to 12.7±0.4 mm Hg at the final visit, P <0.0001 (mean follow-up: 11±1.4 mo). The IOP was significantly reduced in both groups ( P <0.0001). Ocular hypotensive medication was reduced significantly from 2.7±0.7 to 0.2±0.5 ( P <0.0001). No significant differences were found in IOP-lowering medication between groups (PSM alone, 0.2±0.08; PSM+phacoemulsification, 0.1±0.1; P =0.2). At the final visit, 70.3% were considered as complete success and 12.5% as qualified success. The most common adverse event was clinical hypotony (7.8%) followed by hyphema (4.7%), and anterior chamber reformation (1.6%). Overall, 1.6% required needling and 15.6% surgical revision to restore the flow. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma surgery with the PSM and mitomycin C was efficacious and safe in the short term, either alone or in combination with cataract surgery, and may be considered a surgical option for lowering IOP in primary open angle glaucoma.

Correction of Ocular Aberrations with Prismatic Rigid Gas-permeable Contact Lenses in Keratoconic Eyes.

SIGNIFICANCE: A base-down prism was incorporated on the anterior surface of rigid gas-permeable (RGP) contact lenses to explore potential effects on the residual ocular aberrations after contact lens fitting in keratoconic eyes. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the correction of ocular aberrations with corneal prismatic RGP contact lenses in keratoconic eyes and their impact on visual function. METHODS: A cross-sectional and randomized study was performed. Seventeen eyes of 17 keratoconus patients (34.6 ± 11.1 years) were evaluated. Two designs (standard and prismatic) of a corneal RGP contact lens (KAKC; Conoptica, Barcelona, Spain) were fitted to the same eye of each patient in a random order: a standard RGP contact lens as control and a prismatic RGP contact lens with a base-down prism of 1.6 prism diopters. Ocular aberrations were measured for a pupil diameter of 3 mm with and without both contact lenses, whereas high-contrast distance visual acuity, low-contrast distance visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity were measured under photopic and mesopic conditions. RESULTS: Both contact lenses improved oblique primary astigmatism, defocus, vertical coma, coma-like, and root-mean-square higher-order aberrations compared with the unaided eyes (P < .05). Furthermore, the prismatic RGP contact lenses offered lower values of vertical coma and root-mean-square higher-order aberrations than the standard RGP contact lenses (P < .05). Both designs (standard and prismatic) produced a positive vertical coma of lower magnitude than the negative vertical coma of the unaided eyes. On the other hand, the improvement achieved in all visual function variables was the same for both contact lens designs (P ≥ .05). CONCLUSIONS: The prismatic RGP contact lenses corrected higher levels of higher-order aberrations compared with the standard RGP contact lenses. However, both contact lens designs with the same refractive power were equally efficient at improving visual function.