Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Am Heart J ; 161(6): 1078-87.e3, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21641354

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell (ABMMNC) therapy has shown promise in patients with heart failure (HF). Cell function analysis may be important in interpreting trial results. METHODS: In this prospective study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of the transendocardial delivery of ABMMNCs in no-option patients with chronic HF. Efficacy was assessed by maximal myocardial oxygen consumption, single photon emission computed tomography, 2-dimensional echocardiography, and quality-of-life assessment (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and Short Form 36). We also characterized patients' bone marrow cells by flow cytometry, colony-forming unit, and proliferative assays. RESULTS: Cell-treated (n = 20) and control patients (n = 10) were similar at baseline. The procedure was safe; adverse events were similar in both groups. Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina score improved significantly (P = .001) in cell-treated patients, but function was not affected. Quality-of-life scores improved significantly at 6 months (P = .009 Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and P = .002 physical component of Short Form 36) over baseline in cell-treated but not control patients. Single photon emission computed tomography data suggested a trend toward improved perfusion in cell-treated patients. The proportion of fixed defects significantly increased in control (P = .02) but not in treated patients (P = .16). Function of patients' bone marrow mononuclear cells was severely impaired. Stratifying cell results by age showed that younger patients (≤60 years) had significantly more mesenchymal progenitor cells (colony-forming unit fibroblasts) than patients >60 years (20.16 ± 14.6 vs 10.92 ± 7.8, P = .04). Furthermore, cell-treated younger patients had significantly improved maximal myocardial oxygen consumption (15 ± 5.8, 18.6 ± 2.7, and 17 ± 3.7 mL/kg per minute at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months, respectively) compared with similarly aged control patients (14.3 ± 2.5, 13.7 ± 3.7, and 14.6 ± 4.7 mL/kg per minute, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: ABMMNC therapy is safe and improves symptoms, quality of life, and possibly perfusion in patients with chronic HF.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Anciano , Tomografía Computarizada por Emisión de Fotón Único Sincronizada Cardíaca , Proliferación Celular , Ensayo de Unidades Formadoras de Colonias , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Humanos , Masculino , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Isquemia Miocárdica/complicaciones , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Método Simple Ciego
3.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 78(7): 1060-7, 2011 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21594960

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The safety and efficacy of direct intramuscular injections of aldehyde dehydrogenase bright (ALDH(br)) cells isolated from autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells (ABMMNCs) and ABMMNCs were studied in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) who were not eligible for percutaneous or surgical revascularization. BACKGROUND: Many CLI patients are not candidates for current revascularization procedures, and amputation rates are high in these patients. Cell therapy may be a viable option for CLI patients. METHODS: Safety was the primary objective and was evaluated by occurrence of adverse events. Efficacy, the secondary objective, was evaluated by assessment of Rutherford category, ankle-brachial index (ABI), transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen (TcPO(2)), quality of life, and pain. RESULTS: ALDH(br) cells and ABMMNCs were successfully administered to all patients. No therapy-related serious adverse events occurred. Patients treated with ALDH(br) cells (n = 11) showed significant improvements in Rutherford category from baseline to 12 weeks (mean, 4.09 ± 0.30 to 3.46 ± 1.04; P = 0.05) and in ABI at 6 (mean, 0.22 ± 0.19 to 0.30 ± 0.24; P = 0.02), and 12 weeks (mean, 0.36 ± 0.18; P = 0.03) compared with baseline. Patients in the ABMMNC group (n = 10) showed no significant improvements at 6 or 12 weeks in Rutherford category but did show improvement in ABI from baseline to 12 weeks (0.38 ± 0.06 to 0.52 ± 0.16; P = 0.03). No significant changes from baseline were noted in ischemic ulcer grade or TcPO(2) in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of autologous ALDH(br) cells appears to be safe and warrants further study in patients with CLI.


Asunto(s)
Aldehído Deshidrogenasa/metabolismo , Células de la Médula Ósea/enzimología , Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Extremidades/irrigación sanguínea , Isquemia/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice Tobillo Braquial , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/efectos adversos , Separación Celular/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Citometría de Flujo , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Isquemia/enzimología , Isquemia/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recuperación de la Función , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Factores de Tiempo , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...