Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Asunto principal
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 37(1): 2397538, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39198037

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In 2019 the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) issued specific recommendations for performance of antepartum fetal surveillance (AFS) based on individual risk factors. As similar recommendations were already in place at our institution, we have evaluated the impact of AFS on stillbirth (SB) occurrence in a 5-year cohort. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all deliveries between 7/1/2013 and 6/30/2018. Excluded were multiples, anomalous fetuses or newborns, and deliveries before 32 0/7 weeks' gestation. AFS was conducted from 32 weeks with a modified biophysical profile, with a complete biophysical profile as back-up for non-reactive non-stress tests. All cases of SB were prospectively identified and individually reviewed to verify the presence of risk factors, the results of fetal testing if done, and calculate the interval between last fetal test and delivery. The electronic medical records during the study period were queried to identify women who underwent AFS and those who did not. Chi-square was used to compare the rates of SB between the two groups. RESULTS: 16,827 women fulfilled the study inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5711 (34%) had risk factors which prompted AFS; 37% had 2 or more risk factors. SB occurred in 1.8‰ of them (10/5711) (3 had 1 risk factor, 5 had 2, and 2 had 3 risk factors). Rates of SB at ≥32.0 weeks were similar between women who had AFS and those who did not (1.8 vs. 2.3‰, p = 0.51, OR = 0.75, 95%CI 0.36-1.55). The false-negative rate at <7 days of a reassuring AFS among compliant women was 1.4‰ (8/5711). Rates of preterm delivery were similar in the tested vs untested population (6.5 vs. 6.0%, p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Implementation of AFS in women with risk factors similar to those recommended by the ACOG may lower the risk of SB from 32 weeks to that of low-risk pregnancies.


Asunto(s)
Mortinato , Humanos , Femenino , Embarazo , Mortinato/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Factores de Riesgo , Monitoreo Fetal/métodos , Atención Prenatal/métodos
2.
AJOG Glob Rep ; 4(1): 100297, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38283322

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia may cause maternal hypotension and changes in the fetal heart rate. The implications of such side effects on the course of labor and delivery are incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess whether the occurrence of maternal or fetal side effects associated with labor epidural analgesia increased the risk for cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cohort study of all women who underwent epidural analgesia during labor for the period October 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Excluded were cases of multiples, fetal death, noncephalic presentation, and gestational age at birth <37.0 weeks. Maternal vital signs and fetal heart rate tracings for the 1 hour before and 1 hour after epidural analgesia was administered were reviewed. The occurrence of maternal hypotension, defined as a continuous variable and dichotomized into a decrease in maternal systolic blood pressure to <90 mm Hg or a drop in systolic blood pressure by >20% below the last value before epidural analgesia was administered, was related to changes in the fetal heart rate category. The principal outcome was cesarean delivery rate; binary logistic regression analysis was used to control for confounders, and mediation model analysis was used to quantify the extent to which significant variables participated in the causation pathway to cesarean delivery (SPSS version 28 was used for the analyses). RESULTS: A total of 439 women met the study criteria. Significant adverse reactions owing to epidural occurred in 184 of 439 women (41.9%) and included severe maternal hypotension in 159 of 439 participants (36.2%) and worsening fetal heart rate category in 50 of 439 participants (11.4%). The logistic regression analysis revealed that cervical dilation at epidural (P=.03), the duration of labor after epidural (P<.001), and worsening fetal heart rate category within 60 minutes of epidural administration (P=.01) were independently associated with recourse to cesarean delivery. The mediation analysis showed that both cervical dilatation at epidural administration and worsening fetal heart rate category had significant direct and indirect effects in the pathway to cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Worsening fetal heart rate category related to labor epidural independently increased the risk for cesarean delivery.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA