Comparison of time-efficiency of individually wrapped screws and sterile screw racks in distal radius fracture treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Time-efficiency of individually wrapped screws versus screws in a screw rack is not well established. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective single-center clinical study timing the interval between the surgeon asking and receiving a screw during plate and screw osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures. Patients were randomized for individually wrapped screws or screws in a screw rack. The study was conducted in a Level 1 Trauma Center and surgeries were performed between March and June 2023. RESULTS: Average handling time for screws from a screw rack was 9 s (SD 5.5; range 3-28) and 22 s for individually wrapped screws (SD 6.1; range 6-38). This average difference of 13 s is significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant increase in handling time using individually wrapped screws over using a screw rack. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I (therapeutic, randomized controlled trial).

Polyethylene liner fracture in dual mobility trapeziometacarpal total joint replacement: how to make a timely diagnosis?

We present a case of fracture of the polyethylene liner of a dual-mobility trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty. Standard radiographic imaging was normal. This case highlights the importance of dynamic radiographic imaging to make a timely diagnosis.

Does trapezium remodeling correlate with cup shape?

We investigated whether trapezium bone reaction was different following implantation of a trapeziometacarpal total joint replacement with a hemispheric or a conical cup. Fifty-three Keri Medical Touch implants with hemispheric cup and 53 with conical cup were prospectively followed up radiographically. We compared radiographs taken immediately and one year after surgery for cup subsidence, tilt, heterotopic ossification and loosening. Cup subsidence of at least 1 mm was detected in 4% of cases for both cup types. Additive bone reaction around the cup of more than 1 mm was present in 62% of conical cups and 47% of hemispheric cups. These were minor and there were no large ossifications with risk of impingement. Minor radiolucency was seen superficially at the implant-bone interface of 13% of the hemispheric cups and 9% of the conical cups. None of these bone reactions differed significantly according to cup design.

Radial tuberosity anatomy in intramedullar repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. A radiological study.

The aim of this study was to measure cortex thickness and medullar canal width of the bicipital tuberosity, to evaluate the accessibility of a intramedullar fixation device and the resistance to pullout strengths of the anterior cortex. The final objective was to determine the length of tendon ingrowth size that will be expected when using this surgical technique. A total of 144 computer tomography images of the proximal radius were used. Bone thickness of the anterior and posterior cortex and medullar canal size were measured. The possible ingrowth of the tendon was measured both for an anatomical and non- anatomical reinsertion. Statistical and concordance analyses of results were performed. The average width of the medullar canal was 8,7mm proximal, 7,9mm distal and 7,7mm at the tuberosity. The average posterior and anterior cortex measured respectively 2,5mm and 2,9mm proximal, 3,2mm and 3,2mm distal and 2,8mm and 1,9mm at the radial tuberosity. The possible non-anatomical ingrowth was 7,6 mm on average and the possible anatomical ingrowth was 7,6mm on average. The radial tuberosity anatomy can accommodate the new distal biceps fixation device. The anterior cortex on which the new device relies for support has a similar thickness as the posterior cortex used in bicortical fixation devices which may suggest similar resistance to pull-out strengths. The availability for intra-osseous fixation of the tendon stump may avoids tendon gapping. The intra-osseous length for the tendon stump surpassed reported tendon slippage during mobilization and active contraction of the distal biceps tendon.

Anatomical intramedullary distal biceps tendon fixation. Our first experience.

Background: Intramedullary fixatiovn in distal biceps tendon repair has been proposed to address specific shortcomings of current fixation techniques. Previous studies described a nonanatomical repair. Hypothesis: The purpose of the present study is to report the short-term outcomes of an anatomic intramedullary fixation. Study Design: We evaluated functional and radiographic outcomes up to 6 months of follow-up. Methods: Patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture eligible for surgical repair were invited to take part in the study. Eleven patients were included in the final analysis. All patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographically at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes were recorded using the visual analog scale score for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. The radiographic evaluation comprised X-ray and CT evaluation. Results: There were no failures of fixation in the patient group examined. Elbow mobility was symmetric for all patients from 6 months onward. Supination strength was similar uninjured side at final follow-up. Mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score at final follow-up were 0 and 100, respectively. Computed tomography images showed no signs of button migration, cortical thinning due to button pressure or button breakout. The tendon could be followed to the button in all cases. One case of heterotopic ossification was seen. Conclusions: Anatomical intramedullary fixation of the DBT has excellent functional outcomes at 6 months. The anatomical repair resulted in a restoration of supination strength. This technique allows the anatomical reinsertion of the distal biceps tendon while minimizing the risk of PIN injury. The intraosseous position of the tendon avoids gap formation. No adverse reactions of the button on the bone were seen.

Evaluation of MRI Signal Changes of the Distal Biceps Tendon in Asymptomatic Patients.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used widely for complete ruptures of the distal biceps tendon. The validity of this investigation for bicipital bursitis and tendinosis is unknown. The purpose of present study was to assess the prevalence of incidental (asymptomatic) signal changes in the distal biceps tendon in patients who underwent MRI including the elbow. Our null hypothesis was that signal changes of the distal biceps tendon do not occur in asymptomatic patients. This would empower MRI as a diagnostic tool for bicipital bursitis and tendinosis as well as complete and partial distal biceps tendon ruptures. METHODS: We evaluated 1,191 elbow MRI scans including the distal biceps tendon insertion. The prevalence of incidental findings was calculated and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, false positive probability, and false negative probability were calculated. RESULTS: Signal changes of the distal biceps tendon or bursitis were identified in 8 of 1,191 asymptomatic patients (prevalence 0.6%). The sensitivity of MRI for distal biceps pathology was 97% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93%-99%), specificity 99% (95% CI, 98%-99%), positive predictive value 94% (95% CI, 89%-97%), negative predictive value 99% (95% CI, 99%-99%), false positive probability 6% (95% CI, 3%-10%), and false negative probability 0.3% (95% CI, 0.1%-0.9%). There was no correlation between explanatory variables, including age, sex, race, occupation, and inflammatory disease and incidental distal biceps tendon signal changes. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of distal biceps tendon signal changes on MRI in asymptomatic patients is very low. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The negative predictive value of 99% shows that patients without signal changes on MRI may be assumed to have no distal biceps tendon pathology. MRI investigation of distal biceps tendon is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of tendinosis and bicipital bursitis.

Motor-Sparing Nerve Blocks Can Improve the Results of Digit Tendon Surgery: A Case Report.

A 56-year-old woman presented with flexion dysfunction of the fifth digit 6 weeks after surgical repair of a flexor digitorum profundus laceration. She was scheduled for surgical adhesiolysis and restoration of the functionality of the finger. Intraoperative monitoring of the range of motion by active flexion was deemed important to prevent incomplete release of the tendon and residual dysfunction. Distal median and ulnar nerve blocks were used for anesthesia with the patient's ability to flex the finger. This case suggests that motor-sparing peripheral nerve blocks can improve functional outcome in certain hand surgeries.

Reconstruction of flexor pollicis longus tendon with palmaris longus interposition graft: results in 14 patients.

The flexor pollicis longus tendon is prone to attritive rupture and retraction. Direct repair is often not possible. Interposition grafting is a treatment option to restore tendon continuity, although the surgical technique and postoperative results have not been well defined. We report our experience with this procedure. 14 patients were prospectively followed for a minimum of 10 months after surgery. There was one postoperative failure of the tendon reconstruction. Postoperative strength was comparable to the contralateral side, but thumb range of motion was significantly reduced. In general, patients reported excellent postoperative hand function. This procedure seems a viable treatment option with lower donor site morbidity than tendon transfer surgery.

Evaluation of clinical tests for partial distal biceps tendon ruptures and tendinitis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon ruptures or tendinosis can be challenging. Three clinical tests have been described to aid in an accurate and timely diagnosis: biceps provocation test, tilt sign, and resisted hook test. However, not much is known about the sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability as the available evaluations are based on small groups or are case based. Furthermore, these tests have not been compared together in the same patient group. METHODS: Two dedicated elbow surgeons each included 20 consecutive patients in whom distal biceps tendon pathology was suspected. Patients with a complete distal biceps tendon tear were excluded. As a control, the same number of consecutive patients with various elbow pathologies other than distal biceps tendon problems was included. All 3 tests were performed both in control patients and in patients with suspected biceps tendon pathology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the flexion-abduction-supination view and/or surgical exploration was performed in both groups. The findings of the clinical tests were determined before the results of MRI and other technical investigations were analyzed. The values of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. RESULTS: The combined sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values for the biceps provocation test were 95%, 97%, and 96%, respectively. For the resisted hook test, the combined values were 78%, 76%, and 77%, respectively. The combined values for the tilt sign were 58%, 55%, and 56%, respectively. When the biceps provocation test and the resisted hook test were combined in a parallel testing setup, the sensitivity increased to 98% whereas the specificity was 73%. The sensitivity and specificity of the biceps provocation test and the tilt sign in a parallel testing setup were 97% and 53%, respectively. Finally, the sensitivity and specificity of the tilt sign and the resisted hook test in a parallel testing setup were 90% and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The biceps provocation test yielded higher accuracy than the resisted hook test and the tilt sign. When the biceps provocation test and the resisted hook test were combined, the sensitivity increased to 98%. We advise integration of these tests in daily practice to minimize delays in the diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon ruptures, distal biceps tendon bursitis, or tendinosis. MRI in the flexion-abduction-supination view is still advised to distinguish between a partial biceps tendon rupture and tendinosis or bursitis at the distal biceps tendon insertion as this may influence further treatment.

Acute complete and partial distal biceps tendon ruptures: what have we learned? A review.

Acute distal biceps tendon (DBT) pathology includes bicipitoradial bursitis, tendinosis, partial and complete tears.Diagnosis of complete DBT tears is mainly clinical, whereas in partial tears medical imaging is a valuable addition to the clinical diagnosis.New insights in clinical and medical imaging of partial tears may reduce time to diagnosis and may guide the treatment plan.Most complete tears are best treated with primary repair using either a single-incision or double-incision approach with good clinical outcome.The double-incision technique has a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, whereas a single-incision technique carries a higher risk of nerve-related complications.Intramedullary fixation may be a viable solution to negate the risk of posterior interosseus nerve lesions in single-incision repairs.DBT endoscopy can be used to treat low-grade partial tears and tendinosis. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:956-965. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200145.

Postoperative rehabilitation in elbow surgery.

Postoperative rehabilitation plays a crucial role in the treatment of elbow pathology. Depending on the type of surgery, the elbow may need to be protected. As a general rule, the elbow should not be immobilized for a prolonged period after surgery. A removable splint can be used to protect the soft-tissues immediately postoperative and the patient is encouraged to remove the splint several times daily to mobilize the elbow. Dynamic articulated braces can be used to encourage movement while ligament or tendon repairs are being protected. Literature on postoperative elbow rehab is scarce. In this paper we provide practical guidelines for specific surgical procedures.

In vivo evaluation of a new intramedullary distal biceps tendon fixation device.

BACKGROUND: Intramedullary fixation in distal biceps tendon repair may be a solution to address specific shortcomings of current fixation techniques. Most investigations are limited to biomechanical evaluation. The purpose of this study was to report the short-term outcomes of an intramedullary fixation device. METHODS: We evaluated functional and radiographic outcomes at up to 6 months of follow-up. Patients with an acute distal biceps tendon rupture eligible for surgical repair were invited to take part in the study. Ten patients were included in the final analysis. All patients were evaluated both clinically and radiographically at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Outcomes were recorded using a visual analog scale score for pain, the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. Radiographic evaluation comprised radiographic and computed tomography evaluation. RESULTS: There were no failures of fixation in the patient group examined. Elbow mobility was symmetrical for all patients from 3 months onward. Supination strength was 86% of the uninjured side at final follow-up. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score at final follow-up were 0 and 100, respectively. Computed tomography images showed no signs of button migration, cortical thinning due to button pressure, or button breakout. The tendon could be followed to the button in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: The intramedullary fixation button technique to repair the distal biceps tendon has excellent functional outcomes at 6 months. No adverse reactions of the button on the bone were seen. As this technique minimizes the risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury and has a sufficient bone tunnel to avoid gap formation, this may be a promising new technique for distal biceps tendon rupture refixation.

In vitro Biomechanical Analysis of Proximal Phalangeal Osteotomy Fixation.

Background Corrective osteotomies of the proximal phalanx are typically stabilized with plate and screws. Although intramedullary headless screws form an alternative fixation method in the treatment of acute phalangeal fractures, reports about fixation of opening wedge corrective osteotomies with these implants are lacking. Objective The goal of the present study was to biomechanically compare the failure force of both fixation methods for this specific indication. Methods Twenty-four cadaver phalanges were equally distributed between apex volar and apex lateral opening wedge osteotomy groups. In each group, half of the osteotomies were fixed with a 1.3-mm dorsal locking plate, the other half with a 2.4-mm intramedullary headless screw. A three-point bending test was performed. Results The mean maximal failure force after apex lateral osteotomy was 178.4 N for the plate-screw construct and 144.0 N after intramedullary headless screw fixation. After apex volar osteotomy, mean maximal force was 237.6 N in the plate-screw group and 160.9 N in the intramedullary headless screw group. Mean stiffness after apex lateral osteotomy was 63.3 N/mm in the plate-screw group, and 55.9 N/mm in the intramedullary headless screw group. Mean stiffness after apex volar osteotomy was 197.5 N/mm and 60.0 N/mm for the plate-screw and intramedullary headless screw group, respectively. Conclusion For apex volar osteotomies, dorsally applied angular stable plate and screws provide significantly stronger fixation than intramedullary headless screws. For apex lateral osteotomies, fixation force is comparable. Clinical relevance These data are useful when considering fixation of opening wedge osteotomies with intramedullary screws.

Distal Biceps Provocation Test.

PURPOSE: To describe and study a test for distal biceps tendon pathology other than complete tears. METHODS: In this prospective study, the biceps provocation test (BPT) was performed in a cohort of 30 patients with suspected distal biceps tendon pathology and 30 patients with another elbow pathology. Patients with a complete tear were excluded. Diagnosis was confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging or from surgical findings. The BPT is a 2-part test. The elbow is flexed to 70° with the forearm supinated. The examiner's hands are placed on the patient's forearm and the patient is asked to flex the elbow against resistance (BPTs). The forearm is then pronated and the test is repeated (BPTp). Pain is documented for both supination and pronation using a visual analog scale from 0 to 10. The test is positive when the patient indicates an increase in pain with BPTp compared with BPTs. RESULTS: The BPT was positive in all patients with distal biceps tendon pathology. The average visual analog scale score in this group was 1 (range, 0-7) for the supinated part of the test (BPTs) and 7 (range, 4-10) with the forearm in pronation (BPTp), with an average increase of 5 points (range, 2-8). This difference was significant. No significant difference was found in the control group. Among the controls, BPTp and BPTs were rated as equally painful by 27 patients, and BPTp was less painful than BPTs in 3. Sensitivity and specificity were both 100% in this small group of 60 patients, with a high prevalence of distal biceps tendon pathology. CONCLUSIONS: The BPT appears to be highly sensitive and specific for distal biceps partial injury or tendinitis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic II.

Scaphoidectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis with headless compression screws: results, complications and their treatment.

Scaphoidectomy and 4-corner arthrodesis is a common salvage surgery for degenerative wrist pathology. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of this procedure performed with headless compression screws, with a special focus on postoperative complications and their treatment. We assessed 36 wrists in 31 patients that were treated between 2009 and 2017. Mean follow-up was 5.2 years (range 2.9- 9.4). Pain was expressed on a Visual Analog Scale. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and hand (qDASH) questionnaire and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ) were used to assess patient functionality and satisfaction. Range of motion and grip strength of both wrists were measured. Radiographs of the operated wrist were evaluated. Mean pain score was 1.5 ± 2.3 with 19% of patients being completely free of pain also during activity. Mean qDASH was 44 ± 20 and mean MHOQ was 10 ± 5. Mean flexion-extension arc of the operated wrist was 69° and 61% of the contralateral wrist. Mean grip strength was 35kg and 89% of the opposite wrist. Non-union was observed in two patients. Two patients required hardware removal and in three patients a pisiformectomy was performed. Conversion to total wrist arthrodesis was needed in one patient. We observed postoperative complications in 28% of our patients. Most complications can successfully be treated with additional surgery. The presence of pisotriquetral arthritis should be assessed before surgery and treated with pisiform excision.

Minimally Invasive Corrective Osteotomy for Metacarpal Malrotation.

Metacarpal fractures can be complicated by malrotation. This can cause functional problems with overriding or underriding of the fingers with flexion. Surgical treatment consists of corrective osteotomy and derotation. This is typically performed open and different techniques for osteotomy and fixation have been described. Postoperative complications include finger stiffness and hardware irritation. We propose a technique for minimally invasive corrective osteotomy of malunited metacarpal fractures with rotational malalignement. Advantages are quick rehabilitation and no prominent hardware.

Is the flexion-abduction-supination magnetic resonance imaging view more accurate than standard magnetic resonance imaging in detecting distal biceps pathology?

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Partial biceps tendon pathology is difficult to diagnose. The flexion-abduction-supination (FABS) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) view has been advocated to improve the accuracy of MRI investigation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the FABS view MRI in the diagnosis of distal biceps tendon pathology. METHODS: The study included 50 patients with surgically confirmed distal biceps tendon pathology and 50 patients with other elbow disorders. In both groups, standard elbow MRI (retrospective review of previously obtained MRI data) was performed in half of the patients whereas FABS views MRI were obtained in the other half. These were evaluated by 2 independent musculoskeletal radiologists. The sensitivity and specificity of both MRI views were determined. Tendinosis and grade of rupture were reported from MRI and then compared with surgical findings. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in sensitivity and specificity in detecting partial distal biceps injuries when the FABS view MRI (sensitivity, 84%; specificity, 86%) and standard MRI (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 98%) were compared. The interobserver reliability was 92% for the FABS view MRI with biceps pathology and 68% for standard MRI. In the control group, the interobserver reliability was 88% for the FABS view MRI and 96% for standard MRI. FABS MRI was significantly better regarding grade of injury. CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in sensitivity and specificity were found between the FABS view and standard elbow MRI in the diagnosis of partial distal biceps tendon injuries, with high sensitivity and specificity for both views. Inter-rater reliability was better for FABS views, and FABS views were significantly more accurate than surgical findings in grading the extent of pathology.

Can a ratio between medial and lateral meniscal volumes be calculated to determine critical meniscal volume in view of post-meniscectomy symptoms?

Partial meniscectomy is a frequently performed treatment strategy for non-suturable meniscal tears. However, the meniscal volume which can be resected without compromising the load-bearing, shock-absorbing function of the meniscus remains a topic of ongoing research. The aim of this study was to calculate the medio-lateral meniscal volume ratio to estimate this volume. In 90 patients (98 pairs of menisci) without meniscal injury, medial and lateral menisci were segmented on MRI imaging and 3D surface models were created to calculate volume. The mean medial meniscal volume was 1928,9mm3 and the mean lateral meniscal volume was 1681,7mm3. A fixed ratio of the medial over the lateral meniscal volume was calculated to be 1,16. The standard deviation of the prediction errors based on this ratio equals 217mm3. This ratio seems a useful parameter in follow-up research to determine whether there is a critical volume which can be resected without post-operative pain and osteoarthritis.