Triplets versus doublets, with or without cisplatin, in the first-line treatment of stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a multicenter randomised factorial trial (FAST).

BACKGROUND: The FAST is a 2 × 2 factorial trial addressing two questions: (1) the role of replacing cisplatin (P) with a non-platinum agent, vinorelbine (N), and (2) the role of adding a third agent, ifosfamide (I), in a doublet based on gemcitabine (G). METHODS: A total of 433 stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were randomised to one of four arms: gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP), gemcitabine-vinorelbine, gemcitabine-ifosfamide-cisplatin or gemcitabine-ifosfamide-vinorelbine. Two comparisons were performed: N- vs P-containing regimens and I-triplets vs non-I doublets. RESULTS: For N- vs P-containing regimens, adjusted overall survival was 9.7 vs 11.3 months (P=0.044), progression-free survival was 4.9 vs 6.4 months (P=0.020) and response rate was 24% vs 31% (P=0.124), respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between doublets and triplets. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in P-containing therapy; grade 3-4 leucopenia was significantly more common in triplets. Concerning non-haematological toxicity, grade 3-4 nausea-vomiting was significantly increased in P-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: This trial provides evidence of a slight survival superiority of GP-containing regimens over platinum-free N-containing chemotherapy. This trial also confirms that the addition of a third chemotherapy agent (I) to a standard G-based doublet does not improve treatment outcome.

Complete spontaneous remission of non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report.

Spontaneous remission (SR) of cancer is a rare event, particularly in lung cancer. We report the case of a 68-year-old man, who came to our attention with a diagnosis of poorly differentiated pulmonary adenocarcinoma and, in absence of any active therapy, underwent a durable complete SR. Our case supports the rare occurrence of SR in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Inadequacy of the new Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: report of four cases.

Unidimensional Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) has been recently proposed in the attempt to simplify the standardized bidimensional World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The complete accord between these two measurement systems was established in a large comparative study [J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(3) (2000) 205] that demonstrated the validity and the good performance of RECIST criteria. We report four cases of inadequacy of RECIST criteria in the evaluation of response to chemotherapy in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. These four patients were enrolled in two consecutive multicenter phase II clinical trials investigating the activity of a novel chemotherapy regimen in advanced pleural mesothelioma. They were judged as having an objective response to chemotherapy according to WHO criteria. Reassessed according to both methods, we found that results obtained with RECIST criteria do not correspond to WHO underestimating response to chemotherapy. Our data raise doubts about the applicability of unidimensional RECIST response criteria to mesothelioma and, possibly, to any tumor involving the chest wall.

Study of pretreatment serum levels of HER-2/neu oncoprotein as a prognostic and predictive factor in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: HER-2/neu tissue overexpression is found in nearly 15% of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and is reported to affect prognosis adversely in surgical series. However, the prognostic role of serum HER-2/neu oncoprotein, particularly in patients with advanced lung carcinoma, remains unknown. This study was designed to assess the potential value of measuring serum levels of HER-2/neu oncoprotein in predicting response to treatment and survival in patients with locally advanced and metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Baseline serum HER-2/neu levels (fm/mL) were studied using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method in 84 patients with newly diagnosed, advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who underwent chemotherapy. RESULTS: The patients enrolled in the study included 76 males and 8 females, with a median age of 62 years (range, 36-73 years) and a median performance status of 1. Fifty patients (59.5%) had nonsquamous histology, and 34 patients (40.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-four patients (40.5%) had Stage III disease, and 50 patients (59.5%) had Stage IV disease. The mean baseline value of HER-2/neu in the whole series was 56.1 fm/mL (range, 13.0-103.8 fm/mL). HER2 immunohistochemistry on paraffin embedded tissue was performed in 18 patients. HER-2/neu tissue overexpression was found in only one patient, who also showed high serum levels (102 fm/mL). No correlation was observed between protein serum quantitation and gender, age, histology, stage, performance status, leukocyte count, or smoking. Nonresponding and responding patients exhibited similar oncoprotein levels (median, 57.6 fm/mL vs. 51.9 fm/mL, respectively). The overall survival rate was 42.5% at 1 year and 12% at 2 years, with a median survival duration of 10 months. At univariate analysis, high HER-2/neu serum levels were associated with an unfavorable survival outcome. Using a cut-off point for HER-2/neu of 73.0 fm/mL (corresponding to the 80th percentile of protein concentration), the survival of patients who had higher serum levels of HER-2/neu was significantly worse compared with patients who had lower serum levels (median, 7.1 months vs. 10.9 months; P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent predictive value of serum HER-2/neu concentration as a negative prognostic factor (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: High pretreatment levels of HER-2/neu oncoprotein are associated with an adverse prognostic impact on survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma.

Gemcitabine, Ifosfamide and Navelbine (GIN): activity and safety of a non-platinum-based triplet in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

To evaluate activity and toxicity of a non platinum-based triplet including Gemcitabine, Ifosfamide and Navelbine (GIN) in advanced NSCLC. Stage IIIB/IV NSCLC patients with WHO PS < 2 and bidimensionally measurable disease entered the study. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/sqm day 1 and 1000-800 mg/sqm day 4, Ifosfamide 3 g/sqm day 1 (with Mesna), Navelbine 25 mg/sqm day 1 and 25-20 mg/sqm day 4 were administered intravenously every 3 weeks. Objective responses (ORs) were evaluated every 2 courses: a maximum of 6 courses were administered in responding patients. According to Simon's optimal two-stage design more than 18 ORs out of 54 patients were required to establish the activity of this regimen. Fifty patients entered the study. Main characteristics of the 48 evaluated patients were: median age 63 years, ECOG performance status 0 = 65%, stage IV disease 79% and non-squamous histology 71%. The total number of courses administered was 200, median per patient 4 (range 1-6). Toxicities were evaluated according to WHO criteria: neutropenia grade 3-4 occurred in 47% of the courses; thrombocytopenia grade 3-4 in 6.6%; anaemia grade 3 in 3.5%. Twelve episodes of febrile neutropenia were reported and three patients required hospital admission. No toxic death was reported. Non-haematological toxicity, including skin rash, alopecia and fatigue, were generally. Twenty-five ORs (1 complete response and 24 partial responses) were obtained for a response rate of 52% (95% CI: 37.4-66.5%). One-year survival was 46.5%. This non-platinum-based outpatient triplet showed promising activity against NSCLC with myelosuppression, in particular neutropenia, being dose-limiting. The GIN regimen may represent a valuable alternative to standard platinum-based doublets and triplets in the treatment of advanced NSCLC and further studies with this platinum-free combination are warranted.

Phase II study of combined immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in the postoperative treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

The association of adoptive immunotherapy (AI) and radiotherapy has been shown to be effective in the control of residual intrathoracic disease, while having no systemic advantages, in patients operated on for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The potential synergy of coupling immunotherapy and chemotherapy has been emphasized in several tumors including NSCLC. The aim of this work was to determine the feasibility and activity of a combined therapeutic program, including AI, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy in patients who had undergone incomplete resections for NSCLC. In a phase II trial, 13 patients received the combined treatment. AI was given from week 4 after surgery until week 8. Concurrent chemo-(cisplatin and etoposide)-radiotherapy (60 Gy) was given from week 9 to week 14. Twenty eligible patients received chemoradiotherapy only and were used as a non-randomized concomitant group for merely descriptive purposes. At 9-month follow-up, 10 of the 13 patients had progression of disease and the study was stopped. Progression-free survival and survival were similar to those of the chemoradiotherapy group. The present study showed that the sequence of immunotherapy followed by chemotherapy is not effective as adjuvant treatment in patients operated on for stage III NSCLC, at least when used according to the adopted schedule.

Management of malignant pleural effusions.

Malignant pleural effusions (MPEs) represent a common complication of advanced malignancies. However, adequate palliation of this highly symptomatic accompaniment to cancer can be achieved in most patients by adopting the appropriate therapy. Several options are available for the treatment of MPE. Systemic therapy may control the effusion in patients whose underlying malignancy is sensitive to anti-cancer agents. Repeated thoracocentesis can be appropriate for patients with limited life expectancy or slowly recurrent effusions. In the majority of the remaining cases the treatment of choice is pleurodesis with sclerosing agents administered via tube thoracostomy. Controversy still exists as to which drug produces the best results: talc and bleomycin appear to be among the most cost-effective agents. The debate over the best agent to be used for pleurodesis refers to the difficulty in comparing results of studies using different eligibility criteria, response assessment and end-points. This article describes the various treatments which have been reported in the literature to play a role in the management of MPEs. It is also aimed at providing guidelines in allocating patients to appropriate treatments.

[Epoietin alfa in lung cancer]. / Epoetina alfa nei tumori del polmone.

There is a high frequency of hematopoietic abnormalities in patients with neoplastic disorders, anemia being one of the most common and important, especially in lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. A number of factors are able to affect the incidence and severity of chemotherapy-induced anemia: the type of chemotherapy, chemotherapy dose-intensity, chemotherapy duration, prior treatment, baseline Hb value and entity of Hb decrease during chemotherapy. An impaired erythroid marrow response to erythropoietin (EPO) and reduced EPO levels in response to anemia may contribute to the development of this form of anemia in lung cancer patients. Recombinant human EPO has been successfully used in the treatment of anemia. EPO increases the red cells mass and eliminates by approximately 50% the need for blood transfusions in patients with chronic anemia of cancer. EPO is also effective in the prevention of anemia of cancer patients. Besides increasing the levels of hemoglobin, EPO is also able to significantly improve the quality of life and performance status of anemic patients with cancer. EPO is well tolerated and the only drawbacks are represented by its cost and the need for a prolonged parenteral treatment. The use of EPO can be optimized by taking into consideration some predicting factors, by modulating the dose and by using iron support. In patients with lung cancer, the objective of EPO treatment may vary from palliation to survival improvement according to stage, type of antineoplastic treatment and prognosis. To take maximum advantage from its efficacy, EPO treatment in lung cancer patients needs to be individualized by identifying for each patient the risk of severe anemia and the objective of treatment.