Acceptability and feasibility of video-based firearm safety education in a Colorado emergency department for caregivers of adolescents in firearm-owning households.

BACKGROUND: Easy firearm access increases injury risk among adolescents. We evaluated the acceptability and feasibility of improving knowledge of a 3 min safe firearm storage education video in the paediatric emergency department. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre block trial in a large paediatric emergency department (August 2020-2022). Participants were caregivers of adolescents (10-17 years) in firearm-owning households. First block participants (control) completed a baseline survey about child safety behaviours (including firearms). Second block participants (intervention) completed a baseline survey, watched the safe firearm storage video and evaluated acceptability. Participants completed a 3-month follow-up survey about firearm safety behaviours and knowledge recall. Demographic and clinical variables were compared between the intervention and control groups using Fisher's exact and χ2 tests. McNemar's test was used to compare firearm storage behaviours at the initial and 3-month visit within each group. RESULTS: Research staff approached 1264 caregivers; 371 consented to participate (29.4%) and 144 (38.8%) endorsed firearm ownership. There were 95 participants in the control group and 62 in the intervention group. Follow-up was lower in the intervention group (53.7% vs 37.1%, p=0.04). Among participants viewing the video, 80.3% liked the video and 50.0% felt they learnt something new from the video. CONCLUSIONS: Video-based firearm education in a paediatric emergency department is acceptable among a population of caregivers of adolescents with household firearms. This is a higher-risk group that may uniquely benefit from consistent education in the paediatric emergency department. Further study with larger populations is needed to evaluate intervention effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05168878).

Children and Adolescents With Suicidal Ideation and the Emergency Department.

This Viewpoint discusses the need for formal training in suicide prevention for frontline emergency clinicians and staff, including standardized screening practices, assessment and targeted interventions, and increased connection to outpatient mental health services after discharge from the emergency department.

Follow-up After Pediatric Mental Health Emergency Visits.

OBJECTIVES: To examine how outpatient mental health (MH) follow-up after a pediatric MH emergency department (ED) discharge varies by patient characteristics and to evaluate the association between timely follow-up and return encounters. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 28 551 children aged 6 to 17 years with MH ED discharges from January 2018 to June 2019, using the IBM Watson MarketScan Medicaid database. Odds of nonemergent outpatient follow-up, adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, were estimated using logistic regression. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between timely follow-up and risk of return MH acute care encounters (ED visits and hospitalizations). RESULTS: Following MH ED discharge, 31.2% and 55.8% of children had an outpatient MH visit within 7 and 30 days, respectively. The return rate was 26.5% within 6 months. Compared with children with no past-year outpatient MH visits, those with ≥14 past-year MH visits had 9.53 odds of accessing follow-up care within 30 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.75-10.38). Timely follow-up within 30 days was associated with a 26% decreased risk of return within 5 days of the index ED discharge (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.91), followed by an increased risk of return thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Connection to outpatient care within 7 and 30 days of a MH ED discharge remains poor, and children without prior MH outpatient care are at highest risk for poor access to care. Interventions to link to outpatient MH care should prioritize follow-up within 5 days of an MH ED discharge.

Evaluating Provider Documentation of Suicide Risk Factors Among Youth Screening Positive for Suicide Risk in a Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for suicidal ideation in the pediatric emergency department (ED) enhances recognition of suicidality among patients presenting with a nonmental health complaint. Little is known about the assessment of suicide risk factors and disposition among these patients. This study aimed to evaluate pediatric ED providers' documentation of suicide risk factors in this population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients screening at risk for suicide on the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions tool. Demographic variables and risk factors for youth suicide were extracted from the electronic health record for eligible patients each month from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019. We compared risk factors using χ2 or Fisher exact test. RESULTS: In 2019, of the 7484 patients screened for suicide, 524 (7%) had a positive screen. Of 220 patient charts reviewed, no suicide risk factors were documented in 53.6% of encounters, and only 1 risk factor was documented in 18.2% of encounters. Substance use was the most frequently discussed risk factor, documented in 33.6% of encounters. History of nonsuicidal self-injury was documented in 11.8% of visits. Other risk factors were documented in fewer than 10% of at-risk patients. CONCLUSION: Pediatric ED providers do not routinely document risk factors for suicide in medical patients screening at risk. Although the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions is an important initial screen, a standardized secondary risk factor assessment is necessary for a more complete risk stratification for patients with suicidal ideation.

Adolescent Pride Festival Attendees-Assessing Their Interactions With Primary Care Physicians.

PURPOSE: Pride festivals celebrate the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) community. This study aimed to describe adolescent Pride festival attendees, determine rates of accessing health care via their primary care physician (PCP), and assess if providers are discussing sex and offering screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) to these adolescents. METHODS: Adolescents, aged 13-17 years, attending the 2017 Minnesota Pride Festival were invited to complete an 18-question survey regarding gender identity, sexual orientation, access to a physician the preceding year, and whether sexual activity was discussed and/or STI screening provided at these encounters. RESULTS: A total of 490 surveys were evaluated. Sixty-nine percent of respondents identified as having nonheterosexual orientation. Rural participants were significantly more likely to identify as LGBT than urban or suburban participants. The majority (90%) of adolescents had been seen in the past year by a physician. Of these, 68% had been asked a sexual history, and 29% were offered STI testing. Older adolescents were more likely to be asked about sex and offered STI testing by a physician. Identifying as LGBT was not associated with rate of sexual history taken or STI screening offered but was associated with perceived need for STI testing. CONCLUSIONS: LGBT youth attending Minnesota Pride are accessing a PCP with the same regularity as cisgender, heterosexual peers but are infrequently offered STI testing, despite knowledge of increased STI rates in this population. Taking a sexual history and screening for STIs is something all physicians can do and represents an important first step in any STI reduction initiative.

Safety of weekly adalimumab in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and pediatric chronic uveitis.

Weekly adalimumab dosing is used to treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), uveitis, and other pediatric rheumatic diseases, but the safety of such dosing has not previously been studied. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assess the safety of weekly adalimumab. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Basic descriptive analysis was performed to assess for adverse events from weekly adalimumab. Sixty-nine patients at the University of Minnesota or Gillette Children's Hospital were identified as treated with weekly adalimumab. Sixty (87%) were eligible for the chart review. Weekly adalimumab was used most commonly to treat uveitis (28%, 17/60) and rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular JIA (25%, 15/60). Mean age at the start of weekly dosing was 13.9 years. The majority of patients were concurrently treated with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and methotrexate. Fifty-three (90%) patients continued weekly dosing for greater than 3 months. The mean duration of weekly adalimumab was 2 years. Throughout the duration of weekly dosing, 24/60 (40%) patients had documented minor infections not requiring antimicrobials and 24/60 (40%) had documented infections requiring antimicrobial treatment. Only three patients (5%) had an infection requiring hospitalization. Two patients (3%) developed autoimmune disease. Laboratory abnormalities and injection site reactions were rare. Weekly adalimumab was used most commonly to treat uveitis and rheumatoid factor-negative polyarticular JIA, and mean duration of weekly dosing was 2 years. Serious adverse events were rare.

Chemotherapy Options for Poor Responders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Orbital Granulocytic Sarcoma.

OPINION STATEMENT: Granulocytic sarcoma (GS) is a rare manifestation of myeloid proliferation, characterized by formation of a mass comprised of immature cells of myeloid origin. Orbital granulocytic sarcoma is rarer still, with only a small fraction of GS patients having orbital involvement. Given the rarity of orbital GS, no unified therapy plan has been identified, as large prospective trials are not feasible, but it is widely accepted that patients with GS ought to be treated with systemic intensive chemotherapy consistent with standard of care regimens for acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) or chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Development of a treatment plan for GS in poor responders involves a systemic leukemia plan as novel therapeutics have not been investigated for treatment GS per se, but used more widely for AML. GS is most commonly associated with AML and thus will be addressed in that context in this review. Patients with GS associated with CML should receive CML-specific therapy. When conventional and traditional cytotoxic GS/AML chemotherapy regimens are insufficient, patients often require a combination of novel therapeutics, stem cell transplantation (SCT), and radiation. Much of the recent advancement in AML therapy, as well as in AML translational research, has been in targeting molecular facets of the disease and enabling more specificity with treatment. The aim of treating patients for whom conventional treatment was unsuccessful with personalized therapy has not yet been realized, but many of the novel therapeutics reviewed below have demonstrated promise and are cause for optimism. In our center, when a GS/AML patient is refractory to frontline therapy, we rely on novel chemotherapy therapeutic options as outlined below.