Fluorescent Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and the Use in Pediatric Patients.

Background: Common bile duct (CBD) injury is one of the most serious complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and carries an incidence of 0.3%-0.7%. Recently indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography (FC) has been used as an adjunct to identify the biliary tract during adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy, allowing intraoperative identification of biliary anatomy. The objective of this article is to show its successful use in pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Method: From July 1, 2017, to November 30, 2018, surgeons at John R. Oishei Children's Hospital and Women and Children's Hospital of Buffalo have been utilizing ICG-FC as an adjunct in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Thirty-one patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy had 1 mL of dilute ICG (2.5 mg) injected intravenously in the operating room (OR) before trocar placement. Demographics, intraoperative details, and subjective surgeon data were recorded for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy cases involving ICG. We hypothesize that use of ICG-FC in the pediatric and adolescent patient population is a safe, reliable, and reproducible adjunct for identification of the biliary tree. Secondary outcomes were to identify rate of biliary anatomy identification, utilization ease, and operative times while using ICG technology in pediatric patients. Results: ICG-FC was used in 31 pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed by 5 surgeons at our institution. Ages ranged from 6 to 18 years. In all cases, the cystic duct-CBD junction was visualized while performing dissection of the triangle of Calot. No intraoperative complications occurred. Conclusions: ICG-FC provides a noninvasive real-time visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree in children and adolescents. We demonstrate that ICG-FC can successfully be used as an adjunct in pediatric patients and has the potential to facilitate with the dissection and minimize risk of bile duct injuries during pediatric laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

Variation in postoperative narcotic prescribing after pediatric appendectomy.

BACKGROUND: Overuse of prescription opioids by both pediatric and adult patients has garnered significant attention in recent years. Educational interventions have been shown to decrease prescription opioids post-operatively in the adult population; similar data have not previously been reported in pediatrics. METHODS: Educational interventions included staff education, institution of opioid standardization protocol, and distribution of educational materials to families. Chart review was performed pre- and post-intervention to compare prescribing practices following appendectomy in patients less than 19 years of age. Follow-up phone calls were used to assess patient satisfaction and pain control. RESULTS: Three hundred thirteen cases were identified pre-intervention [PRE] and compared to 119 cases postintervention [POST]. 84.3% of patients were given a prescription for opioids at time of discharge in the PRE cohort compared to 6.7% (p < 0.001) POST. There was a significant increase in non-opioid analgesia (p < 0.001) POST. There was no significant variability in opioid usage by type of surgery performed, attending provider, or patients' gender or age. Of the patients in the POST cohort, 60.5% were available for telephone follow-up. More than 80% of patients were given acetaminophen and/or ibuprofen POST and 94.4% reported adequate pain control; 88.9% reported that they would agree to avoid opioids again in the future. On follow-up survey, there was no increase in emergency department visits or phone calls for poorly controlled pain following the intervention. CONCLUSION: Low-fidelity educational interventions and creation of a standardized pathway is an effective tool to reduce opioid prescribing and promote alternative means of analgesia without an increase in readmissions or presentation for pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Trends in hospital length of stay and 30-day morbidity in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection, 2012-2016.

PURPOSE: To examine postoperative length of stay (LOS), hospital readmission, and 30-day complications in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: Retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Project, Pediatric (NSQIP-P) 2012-2016 participant user files for patients <19 years old who underwent laparoscopic ileocecal resection. Mean postoperative LOS, hospital readmission and both wound-specific and composite complications were calculated and compared by year of operation. RESULTS: 348 patients were identified (range, 46-96 per year); 55.2-69.8% of these were admitted the day of operation, with a nonsignificant increase in frequency over the study period. Postoperative LOS ranged from 5.4 ±â€¯2.9 days to 7.3 ±â€¯9.1 days (p = 0.24). In subset analysis of only those patients admitted on the day of operation, postoperative LOS remained relatively long, ranging from 5.0 ±â€¯3.0 days to 5.7 ±â€¯4.0 days (p = 0.89). 30-day hospital readmission proportions rose insignificantly, from 6.9% in 2012 to 15.5% in 2016 (p = 0.41). Wound complication rates (including superficial, deep, and deep organ space infections, as well as wound dehiscence) ranged from 0.0% to 8.6%, but did not vary in a statistically significant manner. Nonwound complication rates were vanishingly small. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative LOS in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic ileocecal resection in a select group of patients cared for in hospitals participating in NSQIP-P has not decreased in the past 5 years despite emerging evidence of the safety and relevance of enhanced recovery after surgery programs. Opportunities for shortening LOS without compromising patient safety may still exist. LEVEL-OF-EVIDENCE: III Retrospective comparative study.

Importance of patient and family satisfaction in perioperative care.

As healthcare systems increasingly shift focus toward providing high-quality and high-value care to patients, there has been a simultaneous growth in assessing the patient's experience through patient-reported outcomes. Along with well-known patient reported outcomes such as health-related quality of life and current health state, patient satisfaction can be a valuable assessment of quality. Patient and family satisfaction measures not only affect a patient's clinical course and influence overall patient compliance, but are increasingly used to gauge physician performance and guide reimbursement. The paucity of standardized measures and the subjective nature of patient and family satisfaction impairs a surgeon's ability to internalize this feedback and institute actions to optimize clinical care. This review seeks to identify areas to improve patient and family satisfaction with the perioperative experience.