Outpatient Hysteroscopic Polypectomy-A Retrospective Study Comparing Rigid and Semirigid Office Hysteroscopes.

Endometrial polyps are one of the most common pathological conditions in gynecology. Hysteroscopy is the gold standard for the diagnosis and treatment of endometrial polyps. The purpose of this multicenter, retrospective study was to compare patients' pain perception during an operative hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy in an outpatient setting with two different hysteroscopes (rigid and semirigid) and to identify some clinical and intraoperative characteristics that are related to worsening pain during the procedure. We included women that underwent, at the same time as an diagnostic hysteroscopy, the complete removal of an endometrial polyp (using the see-and-treat strategy) without any kind of analgesia. A total of 166 patients were enrolled, of which 102 patients underwent a polypectomy with a semirigid hysteroscope and 64 patients underwent the procedure with a rigid hysteroscope. No differences were found during the diagnostic step; on the contrary, after the operative procedure, a statistically significant greater degree of pain was reported when the semirigid hysteroscope was used. Cervical stenosis and menopausal status were risk factors for pain both in the diagnostic step and in the operative one. Our results confirm that operative hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy in an outpatient setting is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated procedure and indicate that it might be better tolerated if a rigid rather than semirigid instrument is used.

Percutaneous-assisted laparoscopy for ovarian tissue cryopreservation: a single-center experience.

PURPOSE: To compare surgical and post-operative outcomes of patients submitted to traditional laparoscopy and percutaneous-assisted laparoscopy for ovarian tissue explant for cryopreservation. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective comparative study conducted in IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute of Rome. Patients submitted to laparoscopic excision of ovarian tissue, before starting chemotherapy were enrolled. We compared the classic laparoscopic approach vs percutaneous-assisted laparoscopy, using the Percuvance grasping forceps. RESULTS: Fifty-nine young oncologic women were enrolled; 38 underwent a conventional laparoscopy (LAP), 21 received a percutaneous laparoscopy (PERC). The baseline characteristics were similar in both groups, furthermore no differences were found in terms of peri-operative complications, median estimated blood loss (p = 0.4), operative time (p = 0.2), recovery times (p = 0.1), median time to chemotherapy (p = 0.7), median area of collected samples (p = 0.9). The postoperative pain evaluated by VAS-score, was significantly lower in the PERC group vs LAP group, both the day of surgery (range 0-4 vs 0-2; p = 0.02) and after 1 (range 0-3 vs 0-2; p = 0.002) and 2 days (range 0-3 vs 0-1; p = 0.0001). Moreover, better aesthetic results were detected in the PERC group, 2 months after surgery (median 9 vs 10, range 7-10 vs 9-10; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous-assisted laparoscopy has proven to be an effective and safe procedure for the excision of ovarian tissue for cryopreservation, in young oncologic patients that want to preserve their fertility. The percutaneous procedure appears superior to conventional laparoscopy in terms of aesthetic outcomes and post-operative pain reduction. CLINICAL TRIAL ID: NCT05134090, 24th Nov 2021, retrospectively registered.

Contouring variability of the penile bulb on CT images: quantitative assessment using a generalized concordance index.

PURPOSE: Within a multicenter study (DUE-01) focused on the search of predictors of erectile dysfunction and urinary toxicity after radiotherapy for prostate cancer, a dummy run exercise on penile bulb (PB) contouring on computed tomography (CT) images was carried out. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess interobserver contouring variability by the application of the generalized DICE index. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen physicians from different Institutes drew the PB on CT images of 10 patients. The spread of DICE values was used to objectively select those observers who significantly disagreed with the others. The analyses were performed with a dedicated module in the VODCA software package. RESULTS: DICE values were found to significantly change among observers and patients. The mean DICE value was 0.67, ranging between 0.43 and 0.80. The statistics of DICE coefficients identified 4 of 15 observers who systematically showed a value below the average (p value range, 0.013 - 0.059): Mean DICE values were 0.62 for the 4 "bad" observers compared to 0.69 of the 11 "good" observers. For all bad observers, the main cause of the disagreement was identified. Average DICE values were significantly worse from the average in 2 of 10 patients (0.60 vs. 0.70, p < 0.05) because of the limited visibility of the PB. Excluding the bad observers and the "bad" patients," the mean DICE value increased from 0.67 to 0.70; interobserver variability, expressed in terms of standard deviation of DICE spread, was also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The obtained values of DICE around 0.7 shows an acceptable agreement, considered the small dimension of the PB. Additional strategies to improve this agreement are under consideration and include an additional tutorial of the so-called bad observers with a recontouring procedure, or the recontouring by a single observer of the PB for all patients included in the DUE-01 study.