The Role of Olive Tree Polyphenols In The Prevention of COVID-19: A Scoping Review Part 2.

Abstract: The recent COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 affected hundreds of millions of people and caused millions of deaths. There are few effective medications against SARS-CoV-2, and several studies attempted to make drugs based on natural components, such as olive leaves. Olive leaves are rich in polyphenolic compounds, which were proposed as a viable co-therapy supplement to treat and improve clinical symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Polyphenols have renown anti-inflammatory and multitarget antiviral effects on several virus families, which could be among the reasons of the beneficial effects of the Mediterranean diet against COVID-19. This scoping review is focused on the effect of olive tree polyphenols as a natural remedy to inhibit SARS-CoV-2, mainly discussing their influence on the process of viral entry into host cells by endocytosis.

The role of cetuximab in pre-treated refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: outcome study in clinical practice.

We carried out a multicentric retrospective study on cetuximab + chemotherapy in pre-treated refractory patients outside clinical protocols, by registering the main clinical and pathological parameters. We evaluated 144 pre-treated patients. Cetuximab was administered usually in combination with irinotecan (93.8%). A 45% disease control rate (complete plus partial responses plus stable disease) was obtained in 55 patients and was related to absence of weight loss (p<0.0001) and high grade (> or =2) skin toxicity (p<0.0001). Median time to progression (TTP) was 4 months (95%CI 2.7-5.3) and median overall survival (OS) was 11.8 months (95%CI 8.5-15.1). Performance status << or =1, no weight loss and high grade (>or =22) skin toxicity were related both to a longer TTP (p=0.035, p=0.035, p=0.0017) and OS (p<0.0001, p<0.0001, p=0.006). According to multivariate analysis, the absence of weight loss was related to longer TTP (HR 0.331, p=0.004) and OS (HR 0.176, p<0.0001), and EGFR over-expression (3+) to longer TTP (HR 0.402, p=0.020).

EGFR FISH assay predicts for response to cetuximab in chemotherapy refractory colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Standardized conditions to distinguish subpopulations of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients more and less sensitive to cetuximab therapy remain undefined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from 85 chemorefractory CRC patients treated with cetuximab. Results were analyzed according to different score systems previously reported in colorectal and lung cancers. The primary end point of the study was identification of the EGFR FISH score that best associates with response rate (RR). RESULTS: Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the cut-off that best discriminated responders versus nonresponders to cetuximab was a mean of 2.92 EGFR gene copies per cell. This model showed sensitivity of 58.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 47.1-70.1) and specificity of 93.3% (95% CI = 80.6-100). EGFR FISH-positive patients (N = 43, 50.6%) had significantly higher RR (P = 0.0001) and significantly longer time to disease progression (P = 0.02) than EGFR FISH negative (N = 42, 49.4%). Other scoring systems resulted less accurate in discriminating patients with the highest likelihood of response to cetuximab therapy. CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients with high EGFR gene copy number have an increased likelihood to respond to cetuximab therapy. Prospective clinical trials with a careful standardization of assay conditions and pattern interpretation are urgently needed.

Efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib in pretreated elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

The activity and toxicity profile of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged 70 years or older has been only partially evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the response rate and safety of gefitinib in elderly NSCLC patients. Elderly NSCLC patients pretreated with chemotherapy and with at least one measurable lesion received gefitinib at the daily dose of 250 mg until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or refusal. From August 2001 to May 2003, 40 consecutive elderly patients have been enrolled onto the study in three Italian institutions. We observed one complete (2.5%) and one partial response (2.5%), 18 disease stabilisations (NC: 45%) lasting at least 2 months, including six patients (15%) who had disease stabilisation of 6 months or longer, for an overall disease control rate of 50% (95% CI: 34.5-65.5%). The median duration of response was 4.4 months (range 1.7-9.2). The side effects were generally mild and consisted of diarrhoea and skin toxicity. Grade 1-2 diarrhoea occurred in 23.6%, and one patient experienced grade 4 diarrhoea, requiring hospitalisation. Grade 1-2 skin toxicity, including rash, pruritus, dry skin, and acne, occurred in 20 patients (52.6%). Gefitinib is safe and well tolerated in elderly pretreated NSCLC patients. The disease-control rate achieved suggests that this drug could represent a valid option in the management of this unfavourable subgroup of patients.

ZD 1839 in patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): report of four cases.

The activity of ZD 1839 on brain metastases (BM) from Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. We report four cases of BM responding to ZD 1839 theraphy.

Gemcitabine-associated CD8+ CD30+ pseudolymphoma.

We describe a 69-year-old man with a non-small cell carcinoma of the lung, stage III B, who developed bilateral multiple erythematous lesions in the abdominal-inguinal area following treatment with gemcitabine. Histologically, the lesion was characterized by a heavy lymphocytic infiltrate with large CD30+ cells. The lesion was highly suggestive of cutaneous involvement by malignant lymphoma, but complete regression was observed after cessation of gemcitabine. Although rarely reported, gemcitabine therapy can induce skin lesions. Pathologists should be aware of this possibility in order to avoid a misdiagnosis.

Gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II trial.

The 5-year survival for pancreatic cancer is usually less than 5%, and no treatment has demonstrated consistent effect on patient survival and disease-related symptoms. Early studies with gemcitabine suggested a modest antitumor activity with significant improvement in disease-related symptoms. This phase II study reports the activity of gemcitabine on 33 consecutive patients with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Twenty-three patients had metastatic and 10 locally advanced unresectable disease. Twenty-six patients had not received any previous treatment and seven had received first-line chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously in 30 minutes in the first cycle once weekly for up to 7 weeks followed by 1 week rest; then in subsequent cycles, once weekly for 3 of every 4-week cycle. Four patients obtained partial response (12%). Fifteen patients (45%) had stable disease with a median duration of 32 weeks (range: 16-75 weeks), and 14 patients experienced progressive disease. Median duration of response was 34.5 weeks (range: 19-50 weeks). Median survival was 33 weeks (range: 2-91 weeks). All 4 responding patients and 14 of 15 (93%) patients with stable disease had improvement in performance status and decrease in daily analgesic requirement. Toxicity was mild and mainly consisted of moderate and rapidly reversible myelosuppression. We conclude that gemcitabine chemotherapy was very well tolerated and determined a significant clinical improvement with modest antitumoral activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

[Medical treatment of pulmonary neoplasms]. / Terapia medica delle neoplasie polmonari.

Over the past 20 years, the treatment of lung cancer has improved significantly: platinum-based chemotherapy represents the standard treatment in locally advanced and metastatic non-small cell lung cancer disease because of its impact on survival and quality of life. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy may also play an important role in the betterment of the outcome of earlier stages of disease. New drugs have become part of the therapeutic armamentarium in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Gemcitabine, taxanes, irinotecan, and vinorelbine have been shown, alone or in combination with platinum derivatives, to interfere with the natural history of disease. As far as small cell lung cancer is concerned, the combination of chemotherapy (cisplatin and etoposide) and radiation therapy has yielded long term survivals in excess of 20%. The role of non-platinum combinations, particularly in the elderly and in patients with poor performance status as well as salvage therapy in patients relapsed after platinum treatment, will be the object of ongoing and future studies. Also the significance of newer agents, such as anti-angiogenesis factors and growth factor receptor inhibitors, used either alone or in combination with standard cytotoxic regimens, will have to be evaluated.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin combination in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

A number of randomized clinical trials now support the conclusion that the combined-modality regimen that includes gemcitabine (Gemzar) and cisplatin (Platinol) may improve survival in disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer. Cisplatin is considered to be the "backbone" of this combination chemotherapy due to its proven activity. The regimen of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been tested and is now considered among the most active combinations in the treatment of disseminated non-small-cell lung cancer.

A three-week schedule of gemcitabine-cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with two different cisplatin dose levels: a phase II randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: To explore a new schedule of gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) combination therapy using two different cisplatin doses in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From May to December 1997, 92 chemonaive patients entered the study and 88 (28 with locally advanced and 60 with disseminated NSCLC) were evaluable for response and toxicity (45 in arm A and 43 in arm B). Patients were randomly assigned to arm A or arm B. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 was given on days 1-8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 in arm A and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 in arm B on day 2 of every 21-day cycle. RESULTS: The overall response rates in arms A and B were 42% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.8%-56.7%) and 47% (95% CI: 31.6%-61.5%), respectively. Median duration of response was 9.7 months (range 1.8 to 30.9 months; 13.1 and 9.5 months for arm A and B, respectively), and median survival was 12 months (range 0.2 to 31.1 months; 15.4 and 11.5 months for arm A and B, respectively). Major WHO grade 3-4 toxicities in arm A vs. arm B included: thrombocytopenia (23% vs. 17% of courses), leukopenia (15%, vs. 4% of courses), anemia (7% vs. 6% of courses), and nausea-vomiting (20% vs. 7% of patients). Grade 1-2 nephrotoxicity occurred in 20% of patients in arm A and in 7% of patients in arm B, with one grade 4 episode in arm A. Six patients discontinued treatment because of toxicities, 5 in arm A and I in arm B. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this trial indicate that both schedules are feasible and active, with a milder toxicity in the arm with the lower cisplatin dose.

Medical treatment of brain metastases from solid tumours.

Brain metastases (BrM) are estimated to occur in 20% to 40% of cancer patients, and two-thirds of them become symptomatic during their lifetime. Although every solid tumour may spread to the brain, the risk of developing BrM is higher in lung cancer, breast cancer and melanoma patients. Several findings suggest that the incidence of BrM is rising as a result of advances in imaging procedures and improvements in therapy, which leaves more cancer patients at risk as survival increases. The prognosis of patients with BrM is dependent on the type of the primary tumour. Breast cancer patients have better prognosis than those with BrM from lung, melanoma or colorectal cancer. Patients with BrM from renal cell carcinoma tend to have a poor prognosis. The optimal treatment of patients with BrM continues to evolve. Several factors interfere with the therapeutic strategy, such as histology of primary tumour, patient compliance, localisation, size and number of BrM, and outcome of extracranial disease. Generally, surgery or stereotactic radiotherapy followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) are indicated in patients with controlled extracranial disease and good performance status presenting an isolated BrM. Adding chemotherapy in this subset of patients is controversial. Supportive care associated with WBRT remains the standard treatment for all patients with multiple symptomatic BrM or with isolated symptomatic BrM in the presence of uncontrolled extracranial disease. For potentially chemosensitive patients with asymptomatic multiple or isolated BrM with disseminated disease, chemotherapy represents the optimal starting therapy.

Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To investigate the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine as a single agent in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after recurrence or failure of previous treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1995 to October 1997, 83 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) once a week for 3 weeks every 28 days. Responses were assessed every two treatment courses. The median age of the patients was 63 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0 to 1 in 62 patients and 2 in 21 patients. The predominant histology was squamous (39 patients); 49 patients had stage IV disease and 34 patients had stage III disease (33 stage IIIB and one stage IIIA). RESULTS: Sixteen patients (19%) achieved a partial response to treatment; the median duration of response was 29 weeks (range, 6 to 50 weeks). Treatment was well tolerated: grade 2 to 3 (World Health Organization standardized response criteria) leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% and 20% of patients, respectively. Mild asthenia was observed in 16% of patients, and peripheral edema in 5% of patients. Nausea and vomiting were present in 16% of patients. CONCLUSION: In this experience, gemcitabine showed significant activity without relevant toxicity, mainly in patients who were previously responsive to chemotherapy. This suggests a possible role for gemcitabine as a second-line treatment in patients who had a previous response or achieved stable disease with a platinum-containing regimen.

Gemcitabine as second-line treatment for relapsing or refractory advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial.

We investigated the activity and toxicity of gemcitabine as a single agent in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after recurrence or failure of previous treatment with a platinum-containing regimen. From November 1995 to October 1997, 83 patients (73 men and 10 women) with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on a weekly x 3 every 4 weeks schedule. Responses were assessed every two treatment courses. The median age of the patients was 63 years. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status was 0-1 in 62 patients; 2 in 21 patients. The predominant histology was squamous (39 patients); 49 patients had stage IV disease and 34 patients had stage III disease (33 stage IIIB and I stage IIIA). Sixteen patients (19%) achieved a partial response to treatment; the median duration of response was 29 weeks (range, 6 to 50 weeks). Treatment was well-tolerated: leukopenia and thrombocytopenia World Health Organization grade 2-3 occurred in 23% and 20% of patients, respectively. Mild asthenia was observed in 16% of patients and peripheral edema was observed in 5% of patients. Nausea and vomiting were present in 16% of patients. In this study, gemcitabine showed significant activity in a patient population usually associated with poor prognosis. This finding suggests a possible role for gemcitabine as second-line treatment in patients who have recurring disease or who have failed a platinum-containing regimen, and in the absence of significant toxicity.

Antiphospholipid antibodies accelerate plasma coagulation by inhibiting annexin-V binding to phospholipids: a "lupus procoagulant" phenomenon.

The antiphospholipid syndrome is a thrombophilic condition marked by antibodies that recognize anionic phospholipid-protein cofactor complexes. We recently reported that exposure to IgG fractions from antiphospholipid patients reduces the level of annexin-V, a phospholipid-binding anticoagulant protein, on cultured trophoblasts and endothelial cells and accelerates coagulation of plasma exposed to these cells. Therefore, we asked whether antiphospholipid antibodies might directly reduce annexin-V binding to noncellular phospholipid substrates. Using ellipsometry, we found that antiphospholipid IgGs reduce the quantity of annexin-V bound to phospholipid bilayers; this reduction is dependent on the presence of beta2-glycoprotein I. Also, exposure to plasmas containing antiphospholipid antibodies reduces annexin-V binding to phosphatidyl serine-coated microtiter plates, frozen thawed washed platelets, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagent and prothrombin time reagent and reduces the anticoagulant effect of the protein. These studies show that antiphospholipid antibodies interfere with the binding of annexin-V to anionic phospholipid and with its anticoagulant activity. This acceleration of coagulation, due to reduced binding of annexin V, stands in marked contrast to the "lupus anticoagulant effect" previously described in these patients. These results are the first direct demonstration of the displacement of annexin-V and the consequent acceleration of coagulation on noncellular phospholipid surfaces by antiphospholipid antibodies.

The expression of the placental anticoagulant protein, annexin V, by villous trophoblasts: immunolocalization and in vitro regulation.

We evaluated the histological and ultrastructural localization of the potent anticoagulant protein, annexin V, at the light and electron microscopic levels, using immunohistochemistry and an immunogold method. Annexin V was found to localize to the microvillar surface of the villous syncytiotrophoblasts. Isolated villous-derived trophoblasts were then utilized to evaluate the expression of annexin 1 protein mRNA in response to syncytialization in vitro, as well as to exposure to adenylate cyclase and protein kinase C agonists. Levels of immunoreactive annexin V released into the conditioned media and associated with cell protein were assessed by ELISA while levels of annexin V mRNA were evaluated by Northern analysis. No significant change in either media or cell-associated annexin V concentrations were detected over time in culture or in response to 1.5 mM 8-bromo-cyclic-adenosine-monophosphate (8-b-cAMP) or 0.15 nM phorbol ester myristic acid (PMA). These results indicate that annexin V is ideally positioned to inhibit intervillous thrombosis and maintain the fluidity of the intervillous circulation. Moreover, the absence of trophoblast annexin V regulation by intracellular second messenger regulators suggests that this crucial placental anticoagulant factor is constitutively produced.

von Willebrand factor binding to collagen in patients with end-stage renal disease.

Bleeding abnormalities are common in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Although von Willebrand factor (vWF) abnormalities have been suspected in patients with ESRD, none have been clearly defined. Because vWF function is related to its collagen-binding capacity, we investigated whether this parameter might be altered in patients with ESRD. We measured vWF binding to type III collagen and levels of vWF antigen and ristocetin cofactor in 20 patients undergoing hemodialysis before and after routine hemodialysis sessions, in 10 patients with ESRD who had not previously undergone dialysis, and in 22 healthy, nonsmoking persons who served as controls. We found significant increases of vWF antigen levels in all patients with ESRD (undialyzed: mean, 6.4 +/- 3.0 U/ml, p < 0.001; before dialysis: mean, 5.1 +/- 4.0 U/ml, p < 0.001; after dialysis: mean, 4.8 +/- 3.4 U/ml, versus 0.81 +/- 0.26 U/ml in controls, p < 0.001). The ristocetin cofactor levels were increased in the patients who had not undergone dialysis (mean, 1.30 +/- 1.26 U/ml, p = 0.04), whereas both before and after hemodialysis groups (means, 0.71 U/ml and 0.75 U/ml, respectively) were not significantly different from controls (mean, 0.72 +/- 0.30 U/ml, p = 0.96 and p = 0.8, respectively). Patients with ESRD who had not undergone dialysis showed no difference in vWF binding to collagen (mean, 1.21 +/- 0.63 U/ml) compared with the control group (mean, 1.16 +/- 0.13).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)