Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 58(6): 831-838, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31615695

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: At 12 months follow up of the PLIANT study, clinical success and efficacy of the E-liac Stent Graft System (JOTEC GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) were evaluated. Clinical success was defined as aneurysm exclusion (no type I, III, IV endoleak) with primary patency of the internal iliac artery (IIA) and external iliac artery (EIA) on the E-liac implantation side. METHODS: In this prospective multicentre European observational study, clinical and morphological data of 45 patients (93% male, mean age 72 y) were prospectively collected in 11 European centres between July 2014 and June 2016. Forty patients underwent an aorto-iliac (three patients bilaterally) treatment and five an isolated iliac treatment. RESULTS: At 12 months follow up, data were available for 42 patients. Overall clinical success at 12 months was 90%, with a survival rate of 100%. Four patients (10%) did not achieve clinical success, one with an internal iliac artery (IIA) occlusion on the E-liac implantation side, one with an infrarenal type Ia endoleak, and two with type Ib endoleaks in IIA. At 12 months the primary patency rate in the internal iliac artery on the iliac side branch implantation side was 98%. Two patients (5%) received E-liac related re-interventions: one caused by an edge stenosis at the distal end of the graft limb in the external iliac artery (EIA) and one caused by thrombo-embolism in the external iliac artery. Thus, for the EIA, primary and secondary patency rates were 98% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The low device related re-intervention rate of 5%, the high survival rate of 100%, and the high primary patency rates of 98% for the IIA and EIA at 12 month follow up demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the E-liac Stent Graft System. Long term 36 month results are awaited to confirm the efficacy and durability.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Endofuga/epidemiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/instrumentación , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/epidemiología , Aneurisma Ilíaco/cirugía , Stents Metálicos Autoexpandibles/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Endofuga/diagnóstico por imagen , Endofuga/etiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc ; 18(2): 99-104, 2011.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23560269

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The clinical utility of monitoring by Doppler ultrasound patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy is not clearly established. Our goal is to evaluate by echo-Doppler the progress of contralateral stenosis in a real environment, in order to assess its usefulness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study with Doppler ultrasound monitoring in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for a period of 3 years. We included cases with Doppler echography before and at least one post-surgery. We excluded patients with contralateral thrombosis, contralateral stenosis, established surgical indication or prior carotid surgery. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to estimate the rate of patients free of progression and / or surgery, as well as an analysis of risk factors for progression of contralateral stenosis. RESULTS: We included 119 patients (41.2% symptomatic) age 68.3 +/- 8.41 years. The follow-up was 40.5 +/- 23.2 months, with a mean of 2.64 +/- 1.58 scans per patient. The likelihood of progression of contralateral carotid stenosis was estimated at 91, 86, 81 and 79% at one, two, three and four years respectively. The only significant risk factor for progression was the presence of moderate or greater contralateral stenosis (30% or more) at the time of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of the contralateral carotid atherosclerosis is relatively common. The degree of stenosis correlates with early progression, the study by echo-Doppler plays an important role in monitoring these patients.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Ultrasonografía Doppler , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Anciano , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...