Perioperative management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency-evidence-based proposal for a paradigm shift in pancreatic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) being a significant consequence of pancreatic surgery, there is still no consensus on its perioperative management. This study aimed to evaluate unselective pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). METHODS: A prospective, observational study of patients undergoing partial pancreatectomy was conducted. EPI status was assessed pre- and postoperatively, based on three fecal-elastase measurements each. Characteristic symptoms were evaluated by questionnaire. In 85 post-surgical patients, the subjective burden of PERT was measured. RESULTS: 101 patients were followed prospectively. Preoperative EPI screening was available for 83 patients, of which 48% were diagnosed with preexisting EPI. Of those patients with regular exocrine function, 54% developed EPI de novo; this rate being higher following pancreatic head resections (72%) compared to left-sided pancreatectomies (LP) (20%) (p = 0.016). Overall postoperative EPI prevalence was significantly greater following pancreatic head resections (86%) than LP (33%) (p < 0.001). Only young and female patients described a significant burden related to PERT. CONCLUSION: For all patients undergoing pancreatic head resection PERT should be considered beginning prior to surgery, due to the subgroup's high EPI rate and the comparatively low burden of PERT. Patients with LP are at lower risk and should be pre- and postoperatively screened and supplemented accordingly.

Transabdominal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results of an Observational Retrospective Single-Center Study.

Purpose Transabdominal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are used to assess disease activity and extent in IBD, but their impact on therapeutic decisions is unclear. Therefore, our study has two goals: to compare the usefulness of US and MRE in assessing disease extent and activity in the small and large bowel, and to determine the relevance for clinical decisions in IBD. Materials and Methods We included 54 IBD patients who had undergone both MRE and US within three months. We used the construct reference standard model to compare MRE and US for detecting inflammation and examined the impact on clinical decisions in IBD patients. Results In 54 IBD patients (44 patients Crohn's disease (CD), 5 ulcerative colitis (UC), 5 indeterminate colitis (IC)), 42 patients (77.8%) showed inflammation either in the small or large bowel. Small bowel disease was present in 34 patients (77.3%). Complications were found in 19 patients (35.2%). MRE and US both showed high sensitivity (90.5 and 88.1%) and moderate specificity (50% in MRE and US) for detecting inflammation. MRE revealed higher sensitivity than US for detecting conglomerate tumors without statistical significance (85.7 vs. 71.4%, p=1.0) and equal specificity (97.9 vs 97.7, p=1.0). Therapeutic decisions included steroids in 20 patients (47.6%) and surgery/percutaneous drainage in six patients (14.3%), these decisions were triggered by results of US or MRE in equal distribution. Conclusion US and MRE have comparable sensitivity and specificity for detecting intestinal inflammation and complications in IBD patients. Therefore, both methods are sufficient for making clinical decisions.

Pancreatic stump closure techniques and pancreatic fistula formation after distal pancreatectomy: Meta-analysis and single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula/PF is the most frequent and feared complication after distal pancreatectomy/DP. However, the safest technique of pancreatic stump closure remains an ongoing debate. Here, we aimed to compare the safety of different pancreatic stump closure techniques for preventing PF during DP. METHODS: We performed a PRISMA-based meta-analysis of all relevant studies that compared at least two techniques of stump closure during DP with regard to PF rates/PFR. We further performed a retrospective analysis of our institutional PFR in correlation with stump closure techniques. RESULTS: 8301 studies were initially identified. From these, ten randomized controlled trials/RCTs, eleven prospective and 59 retrospective studies were eligible. Stapler closure (26%vs.31%, OR:0.73, p = 0.02), combination of stapler and suture (30%vs.33%, OR:0.70, p = 0.05), or stump anastomosis (14%vs.28%, OR:0.51, p = 0.02) were associated with lower PFR than suture closure alone. Spleen preservation/splenectomy, or laparoscopic/open DP, TachoSil®, fibrin-like glue-application, or bioabsorbable-stapler-reinforcements (Seamguard®) did not influence PFR after DP. In contrast, autologous patches (falciform ligament/seromuscular patches) resulted in lower PFR than no patch application (21.9%vs.25,8%, OR:0.60, p = 0.006). In our institution, the major three techniques of stump closure resulted in comparable PFR (suture:27%, stapler:29%, or combination:24%). However, selective suturing/clipping of the main pancreatic duct during pancreatic stump closure prevented severe PF (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: After DP, stapler closure, pancreatic anastomosis, or falciform/seromuscular patches lead to lower PFR than suture closure alone. However, the differences are rather small, and further RCTs are needed to test these effects. Selective closure of the main pancreatic duct during stump closure may prevent severe PF.

R0 Versus R1 Resection Matters after Pancreaticoduodenectomy, and Less after Distal or Total Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to decipher the true importance of R0 versus R1 resection for survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PDAC is characterized by poor survival, even after curative resection. In many studies, R0 versus R1 does not result in different prognosis and does not affect the postoperative management. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened for prognostic studies on the association between resection status and survival. Hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Furthermore, our prospective database was retrospectively screened for curative PDAC resections according to inclusion criteria (n = 254 patients) between July 2007 and October 2014. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis, R1 was associated with a decreased overall survival [HR 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.37-1.52)] and disease-free survival [HR 1.44 (1.30-1.59)] in PDAC when compared with R0. Importantly, this effect held true only for pancreatic head resection both in the meta-analysis [R0 ≥0 mm: HR 1.21 (1.05-1.39) vs R0 ≥1 mm: HR 1.66 (1.46-1.89)] and in our cohort (R0 ≥0 mm: 31.8 vs 14.5 months, P < 0.001; R0 ≥1 mm, 41.2 vs 16.8 months; P < 0.001). Moreover, R1 resections were associated with advanced tumor disease, that is, larger tumor size, lymph node metastases, and extended resections. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model suggested G3, pN1, tumor size, and R1 (0 mm/1 mm) as independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSION: Resection margin is not a valid prognostic marker in publications before 2010 due to heterogeneity of cohorts and lack of standardized histopathological examination. Within standardized pathology protocols, R-status' prognostic validity may be primarily confined to pancreatic head cancers.

Aortopulmonary collateral flow quantification by MR at rest and during continuous submaximal exercise in patients with total cavopulmonary connection.

BACKGROUND: Aortopulmonary collateral flow is considered to have significant impact on the outcome of patients with single ventricle circulation and total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). There is little information on collateral flow during exercise. PURPOSE: To quantify aortopulmonary collateral flow at rest and during continuous submaximal exercise in clinical patients doing well with TCPC. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, case controlled. POPULATION: Thirteen patients with TCPC (17 (11-37) years) and 13 age and sex-matched healthy controls (18 (11-38) years). FIELD STRENGTH: 1.5T; free breathing; phase sensitive gradient echo sequence. ASSESSMENT: Blood flow in the ascending and descending aorta and superior vena cava were measured at rest and during continuous submaximal physical exercise in patients and controls. Systemic blood flow (Qs ) was assumed to be represented by the sum of flow in the superior caval vein (Qsvc ) and the descending aorta (QAoD ) at the diaphragm level. Aortopulmonary collateral flow (Qcoll ) was calculated by subtracting Qs from flow in the ascending aorta (QAoA ). STATISTICS: Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon test for comparison between groups and between rest and exercise. RESULTS: Absolute collateral flow in TCPC patients at rest was 0.4 l/min/m2 (-0.1-1.2), corresponding to 14% (-2-42) of Qs . Collateral flow did not change during exercise (difference -0.01 (-0.7-1.0) l/min/m2 , P = 0.97). TCPC patients had significantly lower Qs at rest (2.5 (1.6-4.1) vs. 3.5 (2.6-4.8) l/min/m2 , P = 0.001) and during submaximal exercise (3.2 (2.0-6.0) vs. 4.8 (3.3-6.9) l/min/m2 , P = 0.001), compared to healthy controls. The increase in Qs with exercise was also significantly lower in patients than in healthy controls (median 0.6 vs. 1.2 l/min/m2 , P < 0.02). DATA CONCLUSION: Clinical patients doing well with TCPC have significant aortopulmonary collateral flow at rest (14% of Qs ) compared to healthy controls, which does not change during submaximal exercise. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:1509-1516.

Cap Assisted Upper Endoscopy for Examination of the Major Duodenal Papilla: A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Crossover Study (CAPPA Study).

OBJECTIVE: Examination of major duodenal papilla (MDP) by standard forward-viewing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (S-EGD) is limited. Cap assisted esophagogastroduodenoscopy (CA-EGD) utilizes a cap fitted to the tip of the endoscope that can depress the mucosal folds and thus might improve visualization of MDP. The aim of this study was to compare CA-EGD to S-EGD for complete examination of the MDP. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled crossover study. Subjects scheduled for elective EGD were randomized to undergo S-EGD (group A) or CA-EGD (group B) before undergoing a second examination by the alternate method. Images of the MDP were evaluated by three blinded multicenter-experts. Our primary outcome measure was complete examination of the papilla. Secondary outcome measures were duration and overall diagnostic yield. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were randomized and completed the study. Complete examination of MDP was achieved in 98 patients using CA-EGD compared to 24 patients using S-EGD (97 vs. 24%, P<0.001). Median duration from intubation of the esophagus until localization of the MDP was shorter with CA-EGD (46. vs. 96 s., P<0.001). In group A, 11 extra lesions and 12 additional incidental findings were detected by secondary CA-EGD, whereas neither were detected by secondary S-EGD in group B (22 vs. 0% and 24 vs. 0%, P<0.001 and P<0.001). CONCLUSION: CA-EGD enabled complete examination of MDP in almost all cases compared to a low success rate of S-EGD. CA-EGD detected a significant amount of lesions and incidental findings when added to S-EGD. CA-EGD is a safe and effective method for examination of MDP.

Preoperative biliary stenting versus operation first in jaundiced patients due to malignant lesions in the pancreatic head: A meta-analysis of current literature.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive jaundice is a common presenting symptom among patients with pancreatic cancer. While benefits of preoperative biliary drainage have been suggested by previous studies, recent evidence has shown no significant improvements of preoperative biliary drainage on the postoperative outcome but rather an increase of complications. There is no clear consensus on whether to treat malignant obstructive jaundice with preoperative biliary drainage prior to operative intervention or to proceed directly to resection. Thus, our aim was to elucidate the impact of preoperative biliary drainage of obstructive jaundice due to malignant pancreatic head tumors on postoperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and carried out a systematic search of medical databases. The results were analyzed according to predefined criteria. We pooled the incidence of overall complications, wound infection, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, and death within the perioperative time period. RESULTS: We initially identified 1,816 studies, and 25 of these (22 retrospective studies, 3 randomized controlled trials) were finally included in the analysis with a total number of 6,214 patients. Analysis revealed an increased incidence of overall complications (odds ratio: 1.40; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-1.72; P = .002) and wound infections (odds ratio: 1.94; 95% confidence interval: 1.48-2.53; P < .00001) in patients receiving preoperative biliary drainage compared to operative intervention first. Mortality, incidence of pancreatic fistula, or intra-abdominal abscess formation were not affected by preoperative biliary drainage. CONCLUSION: Preoperative biliary drainage does not have a beneficial effect on postoperative outcome. The increase of postoperative overall complications and wound infections urges for precise indications for preoperative biliary drainage and against routine preoperative biliary decompression.