Evaluation of the All Right? Campaign for tangata whaiora/mental health service users in Canterbury, New Zealand.

All Right? is a wellbeing campaign developed in response to the devastating Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. Vulnerable groups post-disaster include people with a prior history of or unresolved mental illness. This research focussed on the reach and impact of All Right? specifically for tangata whaiora/mental health service users. Evaluation objectives were primarily focussed on assessing the extent which mental health service users engaged with All Right? and to determine the impact of this interaction. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used to gather data. Findings indicated that mental health service users responded to All Right? to a greater extent than the general target population, e.g. about one-third (37%) of respondents to a population based Christchurch survey agreed that they had done activities as a result of what they had seen or heard of the All Right? campaign compared with approximately two-thirds (68%) of respondents to the mental health service users' survey. One of the key factors facilitating mental health service users' engagement with All Right? appears to be that the campaign was directed at whole-of-population level, therefore engagement was not defined by being a mental health service user. Engagement was also likely to be facilitated by the campaigns perceived impact of reducing mental illness-related stigma. This research concluded that population-wide wellbeing campaigns in the post-disaster context, when done well, can positively impact the wellbeing of the overall population, including mental health service users.

Evaluation of the All Right? Campaign's Facebook intervention post-disaster in Canterbury, New Zealand.

The All Right? campaign was developed as a mental health promotion campaign following the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquakes. One aspect of the overall campaign was the utilisation of social media as a means of promoting wellbeing messages. This research evaluates the use of the All Right? Facebook page as a means of promoting wellbeing after a major natural disaster. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used to gather data about the social media component of the All Right? campaign. Findings indicate that the All Right? Facebook page has become a valued source of consistent wellbeing tips and advice -'the place that I go'. Wellbeing reminders posted on the page were especially valued following earthquake aftershocks. High proportions of respondents to a survey (n = 212) linked from the All Right? Facebook page agreed that the page was helpful (98%), gave people ideas of things that they can do to help themselves (96%), and made people think about their wellbeing (93%). Over four fifths (85%) of respondents had done activities as a result of what they saw on the All Right? Facebook page. Success factors for the Facebook page often mirrored those for the campaign itself, including: local research to inform the use of appropriate language for translating evidence-based wellbeing messages into a local setting; not being marketed as a government message; and effectively combining public health and communications expertise. Success factors specific to the Facebook page included: regular posts with a focus on issues that affect everyone in Canterbury post-disaster; timely posts, especially immediately following aftershocks; a consistent tone for the All Right? Facebook page; and balancing wellbeing facts and tips with other content that was relevant to the Canterbury population. The overall success of the All Right? Facebook page was reliant on being part of a trusted population-wide mental health promotion campaign.

Education setting-based health promotion in New Zealand: evaluating the wellbeing and vitality in education (WAVE) programme.

Wellbeing and vitality in education (WAVE) is an education setting based health promotion initiative in South Canterbury, New Zealand. A mixed method approach was used for assessing change over time. Over ninety percent of education settings (94%) were participating in WAVE (n = 95). A total of 73 education settings completed the questionnaire at both baseline and follow-up. Evaluation of the WAVE programme shows that a robust partnership between health and education sectors can provide the basis for high levels of participation and significant changes in practice across all levels of education and a whole province. Evaluation results included that professional development for staff in some health related topics had improved. There was evidence of increasing partnerships between schools and community. Teachers had become role models for health messages and students had taken on leadership roles. Although the approach was based on health promoting schools literature, early engagement with education settings allowed the development of a local programme and branding. The overall outcome of WAVE has been a culture change in South Canterbury, where promoting the health of students, staff and families is becoming part of normal business for education settings. The results provide reason for optimism regarding the careful use of a health promoting schools framework, working in partnership with a range of stakeholders towards improving the health and subsequent life chances of young people.

Evaluation of the Canterbury under-18 seasonal influenza vaccination programme.

AIM: To evaluate the performance of the 2013 Canterbury under-18 seasonal influenza vaccination programme (Christchurch, New Zealand). METHODS: Routinely collected under 18 influenza vaccination uptake data were analysed to determine levels of vaccination uptake and equity of uptake across ethnic groups (NZ European, Maori and Pacific) and by level of deprivation. Qualitative data were collected to identify strategies that helped to achieve high uptake in primary care practices and schools. RESULTS: Overall uptake of influenza vaccination in 2013 was 32.9%, (compared to 18.5% in 2012), close to the target of 40%. Overall uptake in primary care was higher than in the school-based programme (29.2% versus 19.7%). Maori students had higher uptake than NZ European students in the school-based programme. In primary care, uptake for both Maori and Pacific children was lower than overall uptake and there was a marked gradient in uptake by socioeconomic quintile, with 30.2% uptake in the least deprived quintile compared to 21.9% uptake in the most deprived quintile. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative effect of 3 years' consistency in offering the under-18 influenza vaccination in primary care practices, assisted by a timely media campaign and additional awareness generated by the school-based programme, has resulted in a marked increase in uptake of the vaccine in primary care in 2013. However, this was not equitably distributed. The school-based programme achieved better equity of uptake by deprivation and ethnicity. The challenge is to achieve both high and equitable uptake.

Comparison of high specificity with standard versions of a quantitative latex D-dimer test in the assessment of community pulmonary embolism: HaemosIL D-dimer HS and pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: D-dimer assays are sensitive but have poor specificity. False positive results lead to extra imaging and hospital admissions. OBJECTIVES: To make a pilot comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the standard quantitative latex HemosIL D-dimer assay with a newer HemosIL D-dimer HS version designed to have improved specificity. PATIENTS / METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting from the community to an Emergency Department that were investigated for suspected pulmonary embolism using a D-dimer test were included in the study. Standard and D-dimer HS tests were performed. Pulmonary Embolism was diagnosed on the basis of imaging studies or post-mortem at any time from presentation to 90 days thereafter. RESULTS: The prevalence of Pulmonary Embolism was 4.5% (18/402). The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for the standard quantitative D-dimer test was 100% (81.5 - 100.0), 49.2% (44.1 - 54.3),100% (98.1 - 100.0), and 8.5% (5.1 - 13.0), respectively, and 100% (81.5 - 100.0), 58.3% (53.2 - 63.3),100% (98.4 - 100.0), and 10.1% (6.1 - 15.5), for the D-dimer HS test. There were 35 (16%) fewer 'false positives' using the D-dimer HS assay compared with the standard assay. CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer HS has superior specificity to the standard quantitative D-dimer test without any loss of sensitivity. The generation of fewer false positive results should lead to less unnecessary diagnostic imaging; the use of which is associated with increased hospital admissions and length of stay. The HS assay may therefore have significant health economic benefits.