A randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial of diclofenac plus misoprostol versus acetaminophen in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial of diclofenac + misoprostol versus acetaminophen in ambulatory patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. METHODS: Patients in 12 ambulatory care settings were eligible if they were age >40 years and if they had Kellgren/Lawrence radiographic grade 2-4 osteoarthritis of the knee or hip and a score of > or =30 mm on a 100-mm visual analog pain scale. Patients were randomized to one of two groups, 75 mg diclofenac + 200 microg misoprostol twice daily or 1,000 mg acetaminophen 4 times daily (each for 6 weeks), and were then crossed over to the other treatment for 6 weeks. A placebo was included in each treatment regimen to enable double blinding. The primary outcome measures were the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the visual analog pain scale of the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire. Safety was assessed using a standard form to review adverse events. RESULTS: We enrolled 227 patients, of whom 218 provided data for the first treatment period and 181 provided data for both treatment periods. Significantly higher levels of improvement in the primary outcomes were seen for diclofenac + misoprostol than for acetaminophen (P < 0.001). Adverse events were more common when patients took diclofenac + misoprostol (P = 0.046). Diclofenac + misoprostol was rated as "better" or "much better" by 57% of the 174 patients who provided such ratings for both treatment periods, while acetaminophen was rated as "better" or "much better" by 20% of these patients, and 22% reported no difference (P < 0.001). Differences favoring diclofenac + misoprostol over acetaminophen were greater in patients with more severe osteoarthritis according to baseline pain scores, radiographs, or number of involved joints. CONCLUSION: Patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee had significantly greater improvements in pain scores over 6 weeks with diclofenac + misoprostol than with acetaminophen, although patients with mild osteoarthritis had similar improvements with both drugs. Acetaminophen was associated with fewer adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of intraarticular sodium hyaluronate in knee osteoarthritis. ORTHOVISC Study Group.

A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was conducted in 226 patients with knee osteoarthritis to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intraarticular injections of sodium hyaluronate. Patients were randomized to three weekly injections of 30 mg sodium hyaluronate or physiologic saline (control) and were observed for an additional 25 weeks. In comparison with the control group, among patients who completed at least 15 weeks of the study and whose Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score for the contralateral knee was less than 12 at baseline, sodium hyaluronate injection resulted in improvement in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score, patient and investigator global assessments, and pain on standing from Weeks 7 to 27. Fifty-eight percent of patients treated with sodium hyaluronate achieved a 5-unit or greater improvement in mean pain score from Weeks 7 through 27, compared with 40% of control patients. In addition, nearly twice as many patients treated with sodium hyaluronate as with saline (30% versus 17%, respectively) achieved a net improvement of at least 7 units. In contrast to treatment with saline, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain score for the contralateral knee was inversely related to the magnitude of improvement after treatment with sodium hyaluronate. Few side effects were attributed to treatment, and no differences between treatment groups were seen in this respect (sodium hyaluronate, nine [8%]; saline, 11 [10%]). The incidence of injection site reactions was low (sodium hyaluronate, 1.2 %; saline, 1.5%). The results indicate that sodium hyaluronate treatment is well tolerated and produces statistically and clinically significant improvement of symptoms in patients with mild to moderate knee osteoarthritis in whom pain in the contralateral knee is relatively modest.

Rofecoxib, a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2, with clinical efficacy comparable with that of diclofenac sodium: results of a one-year, randomized, clinical trial in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip. Rofecoxib Phase III Protocol 035 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of rofecoxib, a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), with that of diclofenac in patients with osteoarthritis (OA) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of rofecoxib. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled trial in 784 adults with OA of the knee or hip. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: 12.5 mg of rofecoxib once daily, 25 mg of rofecoxib once daily, and 50 mg of diclofenac 3 times daily. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated over a 1-year continuous treatment period. RESULTS: Rofecoxib at dosages of 12.5 and 25 mg demonstrated efficacy that was clinically comparable to that of diclofenac, as assessed by all 3 primary end points according to predefined comparability criteria. Results from secondary end points were consistent with those of the primary end points. There were small statistical differences favoring diclofenac for 2 of the end points. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Rofecoxib was well tolerated and provided efficacy that was clinically comparable, according to predefined statistical criteria, to that of 150 mg of diclofenac per day in this 1-year study. Specific inhibition of COX-2 provided therapeutic efficacy in OA.

Phase I/II trial of recombinant methionyl human tumor necrosis factor binding protein PEGylated dimer in patients with active refractory rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of intravenous administration of tumor necrosis factor binding protein (TNFbp) dimer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This phase I/II study was a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, ascending dose study evaluating TNFbp dimer administered by i.v. infusion. Thirty-three patients with RA divided into 3 cohorts received TNFbp dimer (30, 100, 300 microg/kg) or placebo during a 5 min infusion at baseline and at 3 and 6 weeks; patients were followed at routine intervals after each infusion through 77 days postinfusion. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using a log-linear regimen and comparisons were made between half-life after first, 2nd, and 3rd doses. Plasma TNFbp dimer concentrations and serum antibody levels were used in the measurement of pharmacokinetics. RESULTS: Administration of 30 microg/kg of TNFbp dimer was generally well tolerated; the maximum tolerated dose was 100 microg/kg. No serious adverse events were reported. A significant antibody response affected the half-life and clearance of TNFbp dimer at each dose group. Anti-TNFbp antibodies were noncytotoxic and nonagonistic. Clinical evaluations provided evidence of in vivo activity of TNFbp dimer in these patients. CONCLUSION: TNFbp dimer administered to patients with long standing RA resulted in significant antibody production to the study drug. This effect reduced the half-life and clearance of the TNFbp. This TNFbp will not be a viable option for treating patients with RA secondary to immunogenicity.

Venoms, copper, and zinc in the treatment of arthritis.

This article discusses the use of venoms, copper, and zinc in the treatment of arthritis. The author examines the history and effectiveness of viper, bee, and ant venoms in order to determine whether these natural ingredients in anti-inflammatory medications help relieve a patient's symptoms. Copper and zinc studies may offer therapeutic benefits, but there is still no solid consensus on the potential role of these elements in treating arthritis.

Trace elements in the treatment of rheumatic conditions.

The role of trace metallic elements (copper, selenium, zinc, gold) in chronic inflammatory states is of great interest because many of them are co-factors in metabolic processes involving articular tissues and immune system function. Deficiencies of several of these have been documented in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Other than for the clinically approved gold compounds, there exists only inconsistent evidence for a therapeutic role of trace metallic elements in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

The Prosorba column for treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Prosorba column as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in patients with active and treatment-resistant (refractory) disease. METHODS: A sham-controlled, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial of Prosorba versus sham apheresis was performed in patients with RA who had failed to respond to treatment with methotrexate or at least 2 other second-line drugs. Patients received 12 weekly treatments with Prosorba or sham apheresis, with efficacy evaluated 7-8 weeks after treatment ended. Patients were characterized as responders if they experienced improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria at the efficacy time point. A data safety monitoring board (DSMB) evaluated interim analyses for the possibility of early completion of the trial. RESULTS: Patients in the trial had RA for an average of 15.5 years (range 1.7-50.6) and had failed an average of 4.2 second-line drug treatments prior to entry. After the completion of treatment of 91 randomized patients, the DSMB stopped the trial early due to successful outcomes. Of the 47 patients in the Prosorba arm, 31.9% experienced ACR-defined improvement versus 11.4% of the 44 patients in the sham-treated arm (P = 0.019 after adjustment for interim analysis). When results from 8 additional patients, who had completed blinded treatments at the time of DSMB action, were added to the analysis (n = 99), results were unchanged. The most common adverse events were a short-term flare in joint pain and swelling following treatment, a side effect that occurred in most subjects at least once in both treatment arms. Other side effects, although common, occurred equally as frequently in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Apheresis with the Prosorba column is an efficacious treatment for RA in patients with active disease who have failed other treatments.

Treatment of osteoarthritis pain with controlled release oxycodone or fixed combination oxycodone plus acetaminophen added to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs: a double blind, randomized, multicenter, placebo controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of controlled release oxycodone given every 12 h around the clock with immediate release oxycodone-acetaminophen (APAP) given 4 times daily for osteoarthritis (OA) pain. METHODS: Adults (n=167) with moderate to severe OA pain despite regular use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) entered open label titration for 30 days with immediate release oxycodone qid; 107 qualified for randomization to double blind, parallel group treatment for 30 days with placebo, controlled release oxycodone, or immediate release oxycodone-APAP. RESULTS: Following titration with immediate release oxycodone, mean (SE) pain intensity (0, none to 3, severe) decreased from 2.44 (0.04) to 1.38 (0.05) (p=0.0001), and quality of sleep (1, very poor; 5, excellent) improved from 2.58 (0.08) to 3.57 (0.07) (p=0.0001). Mean dose was about 40 mg/day. Pain intensity and quality of sleep were significantly improved in both active groups compared with the placebo group (p< or =0.05) during the double blind trial. Pain intensity and sleep scores were comparable in both active groups during double blind treatment. Nausea (p=0.03) and dry mouth (p=0.09) were less common with controlled release oxycodone than immediate release oxycodone-APAP. CONCLUSION: Controlled release oxycodone q12h and immediate release oxycodone-APAP qid, added to NSAID, were superior to placebo for reducing OA pain and improving quality of sleep. The active treatments provided comparable pain control and sleep quality. Controlled release oxycodone was associated with a lower incidence of some side effects.

Flare during drug withdrawal as a method to support efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: amiprilose hydrochloride as an example in a double blind, randomized study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of a randomized, double blind, drug withdrawal design as a means to test the efficacy of longterm therapy with antirheumatic drugs. METHODS: We evaluated 286 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with amiprilose hydrochloride for 1-3 years, with response, with or without other antirheumatic therapy, in a double blind, 12 week withdrawal study that compared patients randomized to continue amiprilose therapy vs patients randomized to placebo. The primary efficacy variable was preventing a predefined degree of clinical reactivation, or flare; the statistical tests of success were a difference in the proportion of flares and in the mean time to flare. RESULTS: Thirty percent of patients taking amiprilose and 43% of placebo patients experienced flare (p = 0.026). Patients taking amiprilose had a longer flare-free interval compared to placebo patients (p = 0.027), with the time to reactivation or flare becoming statistically different 73 days after withdrawal. CONCLUSION: Placebo controlled withdrawal designs are useful as evidence to support the longterm effectiveness of therapy in a proportion of patients with RA.

Intra-articular corticosteroids. Guide to selection and indications for use.

Physicians have used intra- and periarticular corticosteroids for treating a variety of rheumatic diseases for nearly 50 years. Yet publications that have carefully examined the mechanisms of action, the pharmacokinetics and the comparative safety and efficacy of the available agents are sparse. This limits our ability to choose a drug scientifically. Similarly, we know little about the long term outcomes of joints infected with corticosteroids versus those not injected. Highly branched esters of methylprednisolone or triamcinolone are the preferred agents used by American rheumatologists. Pharmacokinetic studies reveal that triamcinolone hexacetonide, the least soluble of all the corticosteroid esters, is retained in the joint for 2 to 3 weeks. Intra-articular corticosteroids may implement their anti-inflammatory effect by down-regulating genetic expression of several pro-inflammatory proteins. A literature review suggests that judicious use of intra- and periarticular corticosteroids is very helpful in temporarily reducing pain and inflammation in musculoskeletal structures and may facilitate increased motion and function in selected cases. Their use in juvenile arthritis also appears to be safe and beneficial. Infection in or about the joint in the chief contraindication to use. Adverse effects are very few but the number of injections per joint should probably be limited to 4 or less per year.

Tenidap in rheumatoid arthritis. A 24-week double-blind comparison with hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam, and piroxicam alone.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy, effect on serum C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), and plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, and safety of tenidap with a combination of hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam, and piroxicam alone, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study in which patients with active RA were treated with tenidap 120 mg/day, hydroxychloroquine 400 mg/day and piroxicam 20 mg/day, or piroxicam alone 20 mg/day, for 24 weeks. RESULTS: At weeks 12 and 24, tenidap produced greater improvements than piroxicam based on 5 primary efficacy parameters; this improvement showed statistical significance in 4 of the 5 measures at week 12, and in 3 of the 5 measures at week 24. Clinical improvements in the hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam-treated with tenidap. Compared with piroxicam, tenidap was associated with significantly greater reductions in serum CRP concentrations at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, and significantly greater reductions in SAA concentrations at weeks 12 and 24. The decrease in SAA concentrations was also significantly greater at weeks 4 and 24 in the tenidap-treated group than in the hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam-treated group. Significant reductions in plasma IL-6 levels were observed at weeks 4, 12, and 24 within the tenidap group, and at week 24 within the hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam-treated group. The overall occurrence of side effects, including gastrointestinal side effects, was similar in all 3 treatment groups. A small proportion of tenidap-treated patients (6.4%) manifested mild, nonprogressive, reversible proteinuria of presumed renal proximal tubular origin, and 3-4% of patients had elevated transaminase levels. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of patients with RA, tenidap is as effective as the combination of hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam, and is more effective than piroxicam alone; moreover, tenidap's safety profile is comparable to that observed with piroxicam alone, and with hydroxychloroquine-plus-piroxicam. The clinical response observed in this study, as well as the prompt decreases in acute-phase protein levels of CRP and SAA, and in plasma IL-6 levels, suggest that tenidap represents a new type of antiarthritic medication, with properties similar to, but not identical to, a therapeutic combination of a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

The treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee with pulsed electrical stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The safety and effectiveness of pulsed electrical stimulation was evaluated for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. METHODS: A multicenter, double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial that enrolled 78 patients with OA of the knee incorporated 3 primary efficacy variables of patients' pain, patients' function, and physician global evaluation of patients' condition, and 6 secondary variables that included duration of morning stiffness, range of motion, knee tenderness, joint swelling, joint circumference, and walking time. Measurements were recorded at baseline and during the 4 week treatment period. RESULTS: Patients treated with the active devices showed significantly greater improvement than the placebo group for all primary efficacy variables in comparisons of mean change from baseline to the end of treatment (p < 0.05). Improvement of > or = 50% from baseline was demonstrated in at least one primary efficacy variable in 50% of the active device group, in 2 variables in 32%, and in all 3 variables in 24%. In the placebo group improvement of > or = 50% occurred in 36% for one, 6% for 2, and 6% for 3 variables. Mean morning stiffness decreased 20 min in the active device group and increased 2 min in the placebo group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed for tenderness, swelling, or walking time. CONCLUSION: The improvements in clinical measures for pain and function found in this study suggest that pulsed electrical stimulation is effective for treating OA of the knee. Studies for longterm effects are warranted.

Medical treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

The outcome of rheumatoid arthritis in a single patient is frustratingly variable and unpredictable, but the illness leads to progressive disability in the majority of sufferers. Careful and continuous follow-up, aggressive medical treatment, an individualized exercise and dietary program, constant education and training, and psychological support are all important to enable the patient to maintain independence in daily living and in sustaining a home life and career. Multiple new medical therapies and strategies are being developed. At present, combination therapy with currently available drugs seems to be the most pragmatic tactic to control the patient with otherwise refractory disease.

The effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of tenidap sodium in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis.

1. This open-label study was conducted to evaluate the effects of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics of tenidap sodium in patients with either rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA). 2. A total of 145 male and female patients, 80 with RA (aged 22-91 years) and 65 with OA (aged 45-83 years) each received a single dose of 120 mg tenidap sodium. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from individual tenidap plasma concentration-time curves determined up to 120 h post-dose. Tenidap plasma protein binding was determined in the youngest and oldest age groups for both RA and OA patients. 3. In RA patients, age and gender did not significantly affect the disposition of tenidap or the percentage of unbound tenidap in plasma. Only for tmax were statistically significant effects in the analysis of covariance observed and these were attributed to very high tmax values in two female patients. Likewise, in patients with OA, age and gender did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of tenidap, although patients with larger body weights had lower Cmax values. 4. Pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between RA and OA patients, except for t1/2, where two outlier RA patients had low values that caused the mean value to be significantly lower in RA (24 h) than in OA (26 h) patients. Pharmacokinetic parameters for pooled values from RA and OA patients were as follows: t1/2 = 25 h, AUC = 538.4 micrograms ml-1 h, Cmax = 21.9 micrograms ml-1, tmax = 3.2 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)