Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36881342

RESUMEN

Childhood trauma exposure is prevalent among incarcerated youth and associated with antisocial traits and behavior. It has been proposed as a risk factor for the development of sadistic traits, which has been shown to predict future violence in youth. Using regression analyses, we examined the association between self-report and expert-rated measures of childhood trauma, sadistic traits (i.e., verbal, physical, vicarious sadism), and violence (i.e., homicide and non-homicide violent acts) in 54 incarcerated juveniles. Expert-rated (but not self-report) severity of physical abuse was associated with physical and vicarious sadistic traits. Other trauma types (e.g., emotional or sexual abuse) were not significantly associated with sadistic traits. Physical abuse coupled with vicarious sadistic traits conferred the highest risk of non-homicide violence. The findings support and clarify links between childhood trauma, sadistic traits, and violent behavior in youth, and are distinct from those found in other antisocial profiles.

2.
Neuroimage Clin ; 4: 800-7, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24936430

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Violence that leads to homicide results in an extreme financial and emotional burden on society. Juveniles who commit homicide are often tried in adult court and typically spend the majority of their lives in prison. Despite the enormous costs associated with homicidal behavior, there have been no serious neuroscientific studies examining youth who commit homicide. METHODS: Here we use neuroimaging and voxel-based morphometry to examine brain gray matter in incarcerated male adolescents who committed homicide (n = 20) compared with incarcerated offenders who did not commit homicide (n = 135). Two additional control groups were used to understand further the nature of gray matter differences: incarcerated offenders who did not commit homicide matched on important demographic and psychometric variables (n = 20) and healthy participants from the community (n = 21). RESULTS: Compared with incarcerated adolescents who did not commit homicide (n = 135), incarcerated homicide offenders had reduced gray matter volumes in the medial and lateral temporal lobes, including the hippocampus and posterior insula. Feature selection and support vector machine learning classified offenders into the homicide and non-homicide groups with 81% overall accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that brain structural differences may help identify those at the highest risk for committing serious violent offenses.


Asunto(s)
Mapeo Encefálico , Encéfalo/patología , Homicidio/psicología , Adolescente , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Máquina de Vectores de Soporte , Adulto Joven
3.
Allergy ; 62(9): 1071-7, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17686110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate is a novel-enhanced affinity glucocorticoid and its long-term safety must be assessed. This study was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of 12-month intranasal administration of fluticasone furoate in adult and adolescent patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 806 patients with PAR were randomized to once daily (od) fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 microg (n = 605) or vehicle placebo nasal spray (n = 201) for 12 months, following a 7- to 14-day screening period. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events (AEs), 24-h urinary cortisol excretion, nasal and ophthalmic examinations, electrocardiograms and clinical laboratory tests. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone furoate were determined from blood samples. RESULTS: Fluticasone furoate was well tolerated. The incidence of most AEs was similar to that observed with placebo, with the exception of epistaxis, which was more frequently reported on active treatment. There were no clinically meaningful differences between fluticasone furoate and placebo in terms of safety assessments, including mean changes in ophthalmic parameters and 24-h urine cortisol excretion. Plasma concentrations of fluticasone furoate were not quantifiable in the majority of patients following intranasal administration. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term (12-month) administration of fluticasone furoate 110 microg od revealed an AE profile typical of the intranasal corticosteroid class in both adult and adolescent patients with PAR, with no evidence of clinically relevant systemic corticosteroid exposure.


Asunto(s)
Androstadienos/administración & dosificación , Androstadienos/efectos adversos , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Androstadienos/farmacocinética , Antialérgicos/farmacocinética , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/orina , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Rinitis Alérgica Perenne/orina
4.
Allergy ; 62(9): 1078-84, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17686111

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Fluticasone furoate is a new enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid with a unique combination of pharmacodynamic and physicochemical properties suitable for topical activity. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients [adults and adolescents >or=12 years of age with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR)] received once-daily (od) treatment for 2 weeks with either fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 microg (n = 141) or placebo nasal spray (n = 144) administered in a unique, side-actuated device. Efficacy measures included total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and total ocular symptom score (TOSS). Patients also reported their overall response to therapy and rated their quality of life using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). RESULTS: Fluticasone furoate significantly improved the mean change from baseline in daily reflective TNSS compared with placebo (treatment difference of -1.757; P < 0.001). Fluticasone furoate was also significantly more effective in improving the morning predose instantaneous TNSS (treatment difference of -1.898; P < 0.001) and daily reflective TOSS (treatment difference of -0.741; P = 0.001). A significant treatment effect was observed as early as day 1. Compared with placebo-treated patients, fluticasone furoate-treated patients showed significantly greater improvements in overall evaluation of response to therapy (P < 0.001), as well as in overall RQLQ score (P < 0.001). Fluticasone furoate was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone furoate nasal spray 110 mug od was effective in improving the nasal symptoms of SAR. It also produced significant improvements in ocular symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Androstadienos/uso terapéutico , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Androstadienos/administración & dosificación , Androstadienos/efectos adversos , Antialérgicos/administración & dosificación , Antialérgicos/efectos adversos , Niño , Método Doble Ciego , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Fluticasona , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Poaceae/efectos adversos , Polen/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Hosp Community Psychiatry ; 45(6): 597-600, 1994 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8088741

RESUMEN

Interventions based on the philosophy of social constructionism can be used for the treatment of patients who are intractably aggressive. The interventions are aimed at disrupting common interactive patterns between the patient and treaters in the treatment milieu and replacing them with patterns that do not allow the intractable symptoms to disrupt treatment efforts. Two case examples illustrate the use of this approach with extremely violent inpatients with long histories of unsuccessful interventions. In both cases the treatment included discontinuing certain therapeutic or prosocial interventions; one case involved determining the patient's daily privilege level randomly. The author discusses the advantages and difficulties of such approaches, including the need for staff to reframe their own logical structure and to overcome resistance from different levels of the treatment system.


Asunto(s)
Agresión/psicología , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/rehabilitación , Hospitalización , Terapia Socioambiental , Violencia , Actuación (Psicología) , Adulto , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/psicología , Terapia Conductista , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Aislamiento de Pacientes/psicología , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente
7.
J Med Assoc State Ala ; 35(11): 884-904, 1966 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5931923

Asunto(s)
Gobierno , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA