Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Geriatr Med ; 12(4): 741-748, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33786747

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyse data obtained from the multi-domain assessment of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, to describe their health status at discharge, and to investigate whether subgroups of patients, more specific ICU patients and older adults (> 70 years), had more (or less) risk to experience specific impairments. METHODS: Retrospective case series in the University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium of confirmed COVID-19 patients 'after surviving an ICU-stay', 'aged ≥ 70 years', or 'aged < 70 years with a length of hospitalization > 7 days'. Exclusion criteria were 'unwilling to cooperate', 'medically unstable', or 'palliative care policy'. Following tests were used: 'Five Times Sit To Stand Test', 'hand grip dynamometry', 'Barthel index', 'Swallowing screening', 'Montreal Cognitive Assessment', 'Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale', and 'Nutritional Risk Screening 2002'. RESULTS: One or more tests were obtained in 135/163 patients (83.3%). Physical impairments were present in 43.2-82.8% of the patients. Median BI was 10/20 indicating limited self-dependency. Swallow impairments were present in 3/53 (5.7%) and 24/76 (31.6%) had risk of malnutrition. Impaired memory was seen in 26/43 (60.5%) and 22/47 (46.8%) had elevated anxiety/depression scores. Older adults had more physical, functional, and cognitive impairments. ICU patients had a lower hand grip force. CONCLUSION(S): The high prevalence of physical, cognitive, psychological, and functional impairments in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, both ICU and non-ICU patients, indicates that assessment of impairments is imperative. These results imply that rehabilitation and follow-up is essential for these patients. This paper proposes a short, workable assessment composed with known outcome measures to assess different domains of COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Disfunción Cognitiva/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crítica , Desnutrición/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bélgica , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Fuerza de la Mano , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Evaluación Nutricional , Recuperación de la Función , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 26(1): 357-363, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31222915

RESUMEN

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is a landmark for physiotherapy to describe the full spectrum of human functioning, but ICF patient record completion could improve. In this study, we examine the effect of supervised teaching and personalized feedback on physiotherapists' completion and reporting of ICF in electronic patient records. METHOD: In this proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial, the intervention group (10 physiotherapists) received supervised teaching and four rounds of personalized feedback on reporting of ICF components in electronic patient records. In the intervention group, review on patient record completion (n = 670 records) was performed at baseline, after teaching, after each of four feedback rounds, and at long-term follow-up. In the control group (five physiotherapists), which received no supervised teaching nor personalized feedback, review (n = 140 records) was performed at baseline, after the third feedback round of the intervention group, and at follow-up. RESULTS: After the third round of feedback (95% vs 72% completion; ß, 2.68; 95% CI, 0.62-4.74), patient record completion was significantly higher in the intervention group. This was also true for following ICF components: "activity" (93% versus 64% completion; ß, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.52-4.54), "participation" (50% versus 14% completion; ß, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.79-5.55), and "personal factors" (35% versus 20% completion; ß, 2.10; 95% CI, 0.63-3.57). These statistically significant and clinically relevant effects persisted at long-term follow-up. For "environmental factors," effects after the third round of feedback (75% vs 30% completion; ß, 1.88; 95% CI, 0.63-3.13) disappeared at follow-up. Reporting of "body functions and structures" improved similarly across groups. CONCLUSIONS: Supervised teaching and personalized feedback are active ingredients of an intervention to improve reporting of ICF components in physiotherapeutic patient records.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Fisioterapeutas , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA