Community health services in European literature: A systematic review of their features, outcomes, and nursing contribution to care.

BACKGROUND: To meet the population's needs, community care should be customized and continuous, adequately equipped, and monitored. INTRODUCTION: Considering their fragmented and heterogeneous nature, a summary of community healthcare services described in European literature is needed. The aim of this study was to summarize their organizational models, outcomes, nursing contribution to care, and nursing-related determinants of outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Embase in October 2022 and October 2023 (for updated results). Quantitative studies investigating the effects of community care, including nursing contribution, on patient outcomes were included and summarized. Reporting followed the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022383856). RESULTS: Twenty-three studies describing six types of community care services were included, which are heterogeneous in terms of target population, country, interventions, organizational characteristics, and investigated outcomes. Heterogeneous services' effects were observed for access to emergency services, satisfaction, and compliance with treatment. Services revealed a potential to reduce rehospitalizations of people with long-term conditions, frail or older persons, children, and heart failure patients. Models are mainly multidisciplinary and, although staffing and workload may also have an impact on provided care, this was not enough investigated. DISCUSSION: Community health services described in European literature in the last decade are in line with population needs and suggest different suitable models and settings according to different care needs. Community care should be strengthened in health systems, although the influence of staffing, workload, and work environment on nursing care should be investigated by developing new management models. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH POLICY: Community care models are heterogeneous across Europe, and the optimum organizational structure is not clear yet. Future policies should consider the impact of community care on both health and economic outcomes and enhance nursing contributions to care.

Telehealth care and remote monitoring strategies in heart failure patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a cardiac clinical syndrome that involves complex pathological aetiologies. It represents a growing public health issue and affects a significant number of people worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To synthesize evidence related to the impact of telemonitoring strategies on mortality and hospital readmissions of heart failure patients. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Engineering Source, and INSPEC. To be included, studies had to be in English or Italian and involve heart failure patients of any NYHA class, receiving care through any telecare, remote monitoring, telemonitoring, or telehealth programmes. Articles had to contain data on both mortality and number of patients who underwent rehospitalizations during follow-ups. To explore the effectiveness of telemonitoring strategies in reducing both one-year all-cause mortality and one-year rehospitalizations, studies were synthesized through meta-analyses, while those excluded from meta-analyses were summarized narratively. RESULTS: Sixty-one studies were included in the review. Narrative synthesis of data suggests a trend towards a reduction in deaths among monitored patients, but the number of rehospitalized patients was higher in this group. Meta-analysis of studies reporting one-year all-cause mortality outlined the protective power of care models based on telemonitoring in reducing one-year all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis of studies reporting the number of rehospitalized patients in one-year outlined that telemonitoring is effective in reducing the number of rehospitalized patients when compared with usual care strategies. CONCLUSION: Evidence from this review confirms the benefits of telemonitoring in reducing mortality and rehospitalizations of HF patients. Further research is needed to reduce the heterogeneity of the studies.

Factors influencing nurses' decision-making process on leaving in the peripheral intravascular catheter after 96 hours: a longitudinal study.

The clinical and research debate on the peripheral intravascular (PIV) catheter length of stay in situ is ongoing. The principal aim of this study was to explore the factors behind a nurse's decision to leave a PIV in place for more than 96 hours. The study focused on 7 northern Italian hospitals in 2009. A consequent sample of 269 PIV catheters was included. Direct observation and interviews were adopted. The time of the expected PIV replacement was fixed at 96 hours after its positioning, in accordance with the international guideline. Several factors were taken into account in regard to replacement of the PIV catheters by nurses, ranging from analysis based on their own clinical experience with PIV complications and analysis of the patient's clinical situation to the critical analysis of their own work situation. This clinical decision-making process is valuable: leaving the PIV in place for more than 96 hours is a complex decision and not simply a guideline violation.