Clinical outcomes of immunoglobulin treatment for patients with secondary antibody deficiency: Data from the Ontario immunoglobulin treatment case registry.

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing number of cases of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD) and immunoglobulin (Ig) utilization, there is a paucity of data in the literature on clinical and patient-reported outcomes in this population. OBJECTIVE: To describe immunoglobulin utilization patterns, clinical and patient-reported outcomes in patients with SAD on immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT). METHODS: A cross-sectional study of patients with secondary antibody deficiency enrolled in the Ontario Immunoglobulin Treatment (ONIT) Case Registry from June 2020 to September 2022 was completed. Demographics, comorbidities, indications for immunoglobulin treatment, clinical infections at baseline and post IgRT, and patient-reported outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: There were 140 patients (58 males; 82 females; median age 68) with SAD during the study period; 131 were on subcutaneous Ig (SCIG) and 9 were on intravenous Ig (IVIG). The most common indication was chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) (N = 52). IgRT reduced the average annual number of infections by 82.6%, emergency room (ER) visits by 84.6%, and hospitalizations by 83.3%. Overall, 84.6% of patients reported their health as better compared to before IgRT. Among those patients who switched from IVIG to SCIG (N = 35), 33.3% reported their health as the same, and 62.9% reported their health as better. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that IgRT significantly improved clinical outcomes and patient-reported general health state in patients with SAD. This study also further supports the use of SCIG in patients with SAD.

TLR-4 Agonist Induces IFN-γ Production Selectively in Proinflammatory Human M1 Macrophages through the PI3K-mTOR- and JNK-MAPK-Activated p70S6K Pathway.

IFN-γ, a proinflammatory cytokine produced primarily by T cells and NK cells, activates macrophages and engages mechanisms to control pathogens. Although there is evidence of IFN-γ production by murine macrophages, IFN-γ production by normal human macrophages and their subsets remains unknown. Herein, we show that human M1 macrophages generated by IFN-γ and IL-12- and IL-18-stimulated monocyte-derived macrophages (M0) produce significant levels of IFN-γ. Further stimulation of IL-12/IL-18-primed macrophages or M1 macrophages with agonists for TLR-2, TLR-3, or TLR-4 significantly enhanced IFN-γ production in contrast to the similarly stimulated M0, M2a, M2b, and M2c macrophages. Similarly, M1 macrophages generated from COVID-19-infected patients' macrophages produced IFN-γ that was enhanced following LPS stimulation. The inhibition of M1 differentiation by Jak inhibitors reversed LPS-induced IFN-γ production, suggesting that differentiation with IFN-γ plays a key role in IFN-γ induction. We subsequently investigated the signaling pathway(s) responsible for TLR-4-induced IFN-γ production in M1 macrophages. Our results show that TLR-4-induced IFN-γ production is regulated by the ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70S6K) through the activation of PI3K, the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1/2 (mTORC1/2), and the JNK MAPK pathways. These results suggest that M1-derived IFN-γ may play a key role in inflammation that may be augmented following bacterial/viral infections. Moreover, blocking the mTORC1/2, PI3K, and JNK MAPKs in macrophages may be of potential translational significance in preventing macrophage-mediated inflammatory diseases.

A High-Throughput NanoBiT-Based Serological Assay Detects SARS-CoV-2 Seroconversion.

High-throughput detection strategies for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in patients recovering from COVID-19, or in vaccinated individuals, are urgently required during this ongoing pandemic. Serological assays are the most widely used method to measure antibody responses in patients. However, most of the current methods lack the speed, stability, sensitivity, and specificity to be selected as a test for worldwide serosurveys. Here, we demonstrate a novel NanoBiT-based serological assay for fast and sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 RBD-specific antibodies in sera of COVID-19 patients. This assay can be done in high-throughput manner at 384 samples per hour and only requires a minimum of 5 µL of serum or 10 ng of antibody. The stability of our NanoBiT reporter in various temperatures (4-42 °C) and pH (4-12) settings suggests the assay will be able to withstand imperfect shipping and handling conditions for worldwide seroepidemiologic surveillance in the post-vaccination period of the pandemic. Our newly developed rapid assay is highly accessible and may facilitate a more cost-effective solution for seroconversion screening as vaccination efforts progress.

Differential immunomodulation of T-cells by immunoglobulin replacement therapy in primary and secondary antibody deficiency.

Patients with primary or secondary antibody deficiency (PAD or SAD) are at increased risk of recurrent infections that can be alleviated by immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT). In addition to replenishing antibody levels, IRT has been suggested to modulate immune response in patients with antibody deficiency. Although both commonly treated with IRT, the underlying causes of PAD and SAD vary greatly, suggesting differential modulation of T-cell function that may lead to different responses to IRT. To explore this, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were sampled from 17 PAD and 14 SAD patients before and 2-10 months after initiation of IRT, and analyzed for changes in T-cell phenotype and function. Proportions of CD4, CD8, Treg, or memory T-cells did not significantly change post-IRT compared to pre-IRT. However, we report distinct modulation in T-cell function between PAD and SAD patients post-IRT. Upon α-CD3/CD28 stimulation, proportion of IFN-γ+ CD4 and CD8 T-cells increased in SAD (p = 0.005) but not PAD patients post-IRT compared to baseline. Interestingly, total T-cell proliferation was reduced post-IRT in both PAD and SAD patients, although the reduction in proliferation was primarily due to reduced CD4 T-cell proliferation in PAD (p = 0.025) in contrast to CD8 T-cells in SAD (p = 0.042). In summary, even though IRT provides patients with passive humoral immunity-mediated protection in PAD and SAD, our findings suggest that IRT immunomodulation of T-cells is different in T-cell subsets depending on underlying immunodeficiency.

Effectiveness of immunoglobulin prophylaxis in reducing clinical complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic immunoglobulin has been used with varying efficacy to reduce complications in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomized controlled trials that assessed clinical outcomes (overall survival, transplant-related mortality, graft-versus-host disease [GVHD], veno-occlusive disease [VOD], interstitial pneumonitis, disease relapse, cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection and disease, non-CMV infection) of immunoglobulin prophylaxis versus placebo in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. MEDLINE, EMBASE, EBM Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to June 2017. Quality of included studies and outcomes were evaluated via Risk of Bias assessment and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria, respectively. RESULTS: Of 899 citations screened, 27 studies (n = 3934) were included. Immunoglobulin prophylaxis had no impact on survival (risk ratio [RR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.01; 11 studies, n = 1962) but decreased risk of acute GVHD (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.65-0.94; eight studies, n = 1097) and CMV disease (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.97; two studies, n = 167). Meta-analysis revealed increased risk of VOD (RR, 3.04; 95% CI, 1.10-8.41; three studies, n = 384) and disease relapse (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07-1.49; seven studies, n = 1647). Other outcomes were small in sample size or nonsignificant. Results should be interpreted cautiously given the low quality of studies and evidence of outcomes. CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin prophylaxis did not have a significant effect on survival. Positive clinical effects were shown for acute GVHD and CMV disease and negative effects against VOD and disease relapse. No studies examined the effect of immunoglobulin treatment in hypogammaglobulinemic patients despite current guidelines, warranting further studies in this population.

Prevalence of Hypogammaglobulinemia in Adult Invasive Pneumococcal Disease.

Background: Patients with humoral immune deficiency are susceptible to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). This study estimates the prevalence of underlying hypogammaglobulinemia in admitted IPD cases and examines whether IPD cases had received preventative treatment. Methods: All adult IPD cases (Streptococcus pneumoniae in blood or cerebrospinal fluid) admitted to The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) from January 2013 to December 2015 were identified through the Eastern Ontario Regional Laboratory. Documented clinical demographics, S. pneumoniae serotype, serum immunoglobulins measured previously or in convalescence, and vaccination status of the cases were collected retrospectively for descriptive analyses. Results: There were 134 IPD in 133 patients (47.4% male; mean age 63, standard deviation [SD] = 15.6 years) during a 3-year observation period. All-cause mortality rate was 22.6% over a mean follow-up time of 362, SD = 345 days. Fifty-seven patients (42.9%) had serum immunoglobulin levels measured. Eighteen were either found to have hypogammaglobulinemia in convalescence (8/18) or previously known to have hypogammaglobulinemia (10/18). None of the known hypogammaglobulinemic patients had received antibiotic prophylaxis and/or immunoglobulin replacement therapy within 4 months prior to IPD. The high and low estimates of prevalence of hypogammaglobulinemia were 31.6% (of all measured) and 13.5% (of all cases). Among 18 patients with hematological malignancies in our cohort, 13 had hypogammaglobulinemia. Many isolates were vaccine serotypes; however, only 8 had documented previous pneumococcal vaccination. Conclusions: IPD has high mortality, and hypogammaglobulinemia was present in at least 13.5% of IPD cases. Secondary hypogammaglobulinemia is especially common in cases with hematological malignancy and IPD.

The effect of ß-carotene supplementation on the pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 in HIV-1-infected patients.

ß-Carotene supplements are often taken by individuals living with HIV-1. Contradictory results from in vitro studies suggest that ß-carotene may inhibit or induce cytochrome P450 enzymes and transporters. The study objective was to investigate the effect of ß-carotene on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of nelfinavir and its active metabolite M8 in HIV-1 infected individuals. Twelve hour nelfinavir pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted at baseline and after 28 days of ß-carotene supplementation (25,000 IU twice daily). Nelfinavir and M8 concentrations were measured with validated assays. Non-compartmental methods were used to calculate the pharmacokinetic parameters. Geometric mean ratios comparing day 28 to day 1 area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-12 h)), maximum (C(max)) and minimum (C(min)) concentrations of nelfinavir and M8 are presented with 90% confidence intervals. Eleven subjects completed the study and were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in nelfinavir AUC(0-12 h) and C(min) (-10%, +4%) after ß-carotene supplementation. The M8 C(min) was increased by 31% while the M8 AUC(0-12 h) and C(max) were unchanged. During the 28 day period, mean CD4+ % and CD4+:CD8+ ratio increased significantly (p < 0.01). ß-carotene supplementation increased serum carotene levels but did not cause any clinically significant difference in the nelfinavir and M8 exposure.