Ipsilateral Prominent Thalamostriate Vein on Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging Predicts Poor Outcome after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The impact of deep cerebral veins on neurologic outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke is unclear. We investigated the relationship between the appearance of deep cerebral veins on susceptibility-weighted imaging and neurologic outcome in patients who underwent thrombolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 109 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who had pretreatment SWI and received intravenous thrombolysis within 6 hours. We calculated the signal difference ratio (defined as the relative difference in signal intensity between the ipsilateral and contralateral veins) of the thalamostriate vein, septal vein, and internal cerebral vein on pretreatment SWI. RESULTS: Only the signal difference ratio of the thalamostriate vein was significantly associated with poor outcome (3-month modified Rankin Scale score > 2, P = .008). The optimal threshold was relative hypointensity of the ipsilateral vein of >4.8% (sensitivity of 53.7% and specificity of 80.9%). We defined a signal difference ratio of the thalamostriate vein of ≥5% as an ipsilateral prominent thalamostriate vein. Patients with an ipsilateral prominent thalamostriate vein were more likely to have poor outcome (OR = 3.66; 95% CI, 1.25-10.68; P = .02) and a lower rate of successful reperfusion (reperfusion rate of ≥70%; OR = 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.92; P = .03), compared with those without an ipsilateral prominent thalamostriate vein. However, patients with an ipsilateral prominent thalamostriate vein were still less likely to experience poor outcome when reperfusion was achieved compared with when reperfusion did not occur (80.0% versus 44.4%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: A pretreatment ipsilateral prominent thalamostriate vein was associated with reduced reperfusion after thrombolysis and poor outcome. More intensive reperfusion approaches may be required for patients with an ipsilateral prominent thalamostriate vein.

Relative filling time delay based on CT perfusion source imaging: a simple method to predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Collateral vessel status is strongly associated with clinical outcome in ischemic stroke but can be challenging to assess. The aim of this study was to develop a tomography perfusion source imaging-based assessment of collateral vessel status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with ischemic stroke who received intravenous thrombolysis or intra-arterial reperfusion therapy after CTP were retrospectively analyzed. In those with middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusion, CT perfusion source imaging was used to identify the relative filling time delay between the normal MCA Sylvian branches and those in the affected hemisphere. Receiver operating characteristic analysis and logistic regression were used to assess the association of the relative filling time delay with the 24-hour Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score based on noncontrast CT and the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. RESULTS: There were 217 patients treated in 2009-2011 who had CTP data, of whom 60 had MCA or ICA occlusion and 55 had 90-day mRS data. The intraclass correlation coefficient for relative filling time delay was 0.95. Relative filling time delay was correlated with 24-hour ASPECTS (Spearman ρ=-0.674; P<.001) and 90-day mRS score (ρ=0.516, P<.01). Increased relative filling time delay was associated with poor radiologic outcome (ASPECTS, 0-7) (area under the curve=0.79, P<.001) and poor functional outcome (mRS score, 3-6) (area under the curve=0.77, P=.001). In multivariate logistic regression, the association of longer relative filling time delay with poor outcome remained significant, independent of age, sex, and baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. CONCLUSIONS: Relative filling time delay is a useful independent predictor of clinical outcome after ischemic stroke.

DWI reversal is associated with small infarct volume in patients with TIA and minor stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: More than half of patients with TIA/minor stroke have ischemic lesions on early DWI, which represent irreversibly damaged tissue. The presence and volume of DWI lesions predict early deterioration in this population. We aimed to study the rate and implications of DWI reversal in patients with TIA/minor stroke. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with TIA/minor stroke were prospectively enrolled and imaged within 24 hours of onset. Patients were followed for 3 months with repeat MR imaging either at day 30 or 90. Baseline DWI/PWI and follow-up FLAIR final infarct volumes were measured. RESULTS: Of 418 patients included, 55.5% had DWI and 37% had PWI (time-to-peak of the impulse response ≥2 seconds' delay) lesions at baseline. The median time from symptom onset to baseline and follow-up imaging was 13.4 (interquartile range, 12.7) and 78.73 hours (interquartile range, 60.2), respectively. DWI reversal occurred in 5.7% of patients. The median DWI lesion volume was significantly smaller in those with reversal (0.26 mL, interquartile range = 0.58 mL) compared with those without (1.29 mL, interquartile range = 3.6 mL, P = .002); 72.7% of DWI reversal occurred in cortically based lesions. Concurrent tissue hypoperfusion (time-to-peak of the impulse response ≥2 seconds) was seen in 36.4% of those with DWI reversal versus 62.4% without (P = .08). DWI reversal occurred in 3.3% of patients with penumbral patterns (time-to-peak of the impulse response ≥6 seconds - DWI) > 0 and in 6.8% of those without penumbral patterns (P = .3). The severity of hypoperfusion, defined as greater prolongation of time-to-peak of the impulse response (≥2, ≥4, ≥6, ≥8 seconds), did not affect the likelihood of DWI reversal (linear trend, P = .147). No patient with DWI reversal had an mRS score of ≥2 at 90 days versus 18.2% of those without reversal (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: DWI reversal is uncommon in patients with TIA/minor stroke and is more likely to occur in those with smaller baseline lesions. DWI reversal should not have a significant effect on the accuracy of penumbra definition.

Early infarct FLAIR hyperintensity is associated with increased hemorrhagic transformation after thrombolysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Absence of FLAIR hyperintensity within an acute infarct is associated with stroke onset <4.5 h. However, some patients rapidly develop FLAIR hyperintensity within this timeframe. We hypothesized that development of early infarct FLAIR hyperintensity would predict hemorrhagic transformation (HT) in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) < 4.5 h after onset. METHODS: Consecutive acute stroke patients treated with intravenous tPA <4.5 h after onset who had MRI before and 1 day after thrombolysis were included. Two raters (blind to HT) independently identified FLAIR hyperintensity with reference to the diffusion-weighted image (DWI) lesion. HT was assessed using T2* MRI at 24 h. Hemorrhagic infarction (HI) was defined as petechial HT without mass effect, and parenchymal hematoma (PH) as HT with mass effect. Multivariable logistic regression analysis for HT included FLAIR status, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and DWI lesion volume, leukoaraiosis (Wahlund score), serum glucose and reperfusion. RESULTS: Of 109 patients, 33 (30%) had acute FLAIR hyperintensity. HT occurred in 17 patients (15.6%; 15 HI, 2 PH). HT was more common in FLAIR-positive patients than FLAIR-negative patients (33.3% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.009). Median time-to-scan and median time-to-thrombolysis did not differ significantly between patients with HT and without [97 IQR(68, 155) vs. 90 IQR(73, 119), P = 0.5; 120 IQR(99, 185) vs. 125 IQR(95, 150), P = 0.6, respectively]. In multivariable analysis, only FLAIR hyperintensity was independently associated with HT after thrombolysis (OR 18; 95% CI 2-175, P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Early development of FLAIR hyperintensity within the area of diffusion restriction is associated with increased risk of HT after thrombolysis in acute stroke patients.

Age over 80 years is not associated with increased hemorrhagic transformation after stroke thrombolysis.

Thrombolysis trials have recruited few patients aged ≥80 years, which has led to uncertainty about the likely risk-to-benefit profile in the elderly. Leukoaraiosis (LA) has been associated with hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and increases with advanced age. We tested whether there were any independent associations between age, LA and HT. Consecutive patients treated with intravenous (IV) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) were identified from a prospective database. LA on baseline CT scans was assessed by two independent raters using the modified Van Swieten Score (mVSS) (maximum score 8, severe >4). HT was assessed on routine 24 hour to 48 hour CT /MRI scans using the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study criteria for hemorrhagic infarct (HI) or parenchymal hematoma (PH) and judged symptomatic by the treating neurologist as per Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke criteria. There were 206 patients treated with IV tPA (mean age: 71.0 years; range: 24-92 years), of whom 65/206 (32%) were aged ≥80 years. Overall, HT occurred in 41/206 patients (20%), HI in 31, PH1 in four (one symptomatic) and PH2 in six (three symptomatic). Age was not associated with HT (any HT: odds ratio [OR]=1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.5-2.08; p=0.99; PH: OR=0.53; 95% CI=0.12-2.3; p=0.51). There was one patient with PH1 and one patient with PH2 in 65 patients ≥80 years, both asymptomatic. LA was present in 112/208 (54%), and severe in 16.5%. LA increased with age (p<0.001) but was not associated with PH (any LA: OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.25-2.8; p=0.99; severe LA: OR=0.54, 95% CI=0.09-3.5; p=0.99). Age ≥80 years or LA did not increase the risk of HT (including PH) after thrombolysis, although LA increased with age. Neither factor should exclude otherwise eligible patients from tPA treatment.

Ischemic diffusion lesion reversal is uncommon and rarely alters perfusion-diffusion mismatch.

OBJECTIVE: The use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to define irreversibly damaged infarct core is challenged by data suggesting potential partial reversal of DWI abnormalities. However, previous studies have not considered infarct involution. We investigated the prevalence of DWI lesion reversal in the EPITHET Trial. METHODS: EPITHET randomized patients 3-6 hours from onset of acute ischemic stroke to tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) or placebo. Pretreatment DWI and day 90 T2-weighted images were coregistered. Apparent reversal of the acute ischemic lesion was defined as DWI lesion not incorporated into the final infarct. Voxels of CSF at follow-up were subtracted from regions of apparent DWI lesion reversal to adjust for infarct atrophy. All cases were visually cross-checked to exclude volume loss and coregistration inaccuracies. RESULTS: In 60 patients, apparent reversal involved a median 46% of the baseline DWI lesion (median volume 4.9 mL, interquartile range 2.6-9.5 mL) and was associated with less severe baseline hypoperfusion (p < 0.001). Apparent reversal was increased by reperfusion, regardless of the severity of baseline hypoperfusion (p = 0.02). However, the median volume of apparent reversal was reduced by 45% when CSF voxels were subtracted (2.7 mL, interquartile range 1.6-6.2 mL, p < 0.001). Perfusion-diffusion mismatch classification only rarely altered after adjusting the baseline DWI volume for apparent reversal. Visual comparison of acute DWI to subacute DWI or day 90 T2 identified minor regions of true DWI lesion reversal in only 6 of 93 patients. CONCLUSIONS: True DWI lesion reversal is uncommon in ischemic stroke patients. The volume of apparent lesion reversal is small and would rarely affect treatment decisions based on perfusion-diffusion mismatch.