Donor Lung Preservation at 10°C: Clinical and Logistical Impact.

INTRODUCTION: Cold static donor lung preservation at 10°C appears to be a promising method to safely extend the cold ischemic time (CIT) and improve lung transplant (LTx) logistics. METHODS: LTx from November 2021 to February 2023 were included in this single institution, prospective, non-randomized study comparing prolonged preservation at 10°C versus standard preservation on ice. The inclusion criteria for 10°C preservation were suitable grafts for LTx without any donor retrieval concerns. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: primary graft dysfunction (PGD) grade-3 at 72-h. Secondary endpoints: clinical outcomes, cytokine profile and logistical impact. RESULTS: Thirty-three out of fifty-seven cases were preserved at 10°C. Donor and recipient characteristics were similar across the groups. Total preservation times (h:min) were longer (p<0.001) in the 10°C group [1st lung: median 12:09 (IQR 9:23-13:29); 2nd: 14:24 (12:00-16:20)] vs. standard group [1st lung: median 5:47 (IQR 5:18-6:40); 2nd: 7:15 (6:33-7:40)]. PGD grade-3 at 72-h was 9.4% in 10°C group vs. 12.5% in standard group (p=0.440). Length of mechanical ventilation (MV), ICU and hospital stays were similar in both groups. Thirty and ninety-day mortality rates were 0% in 10°C group (vs. 4.2% in standard group). IL-8 concentration was significantly higher 6-h post-LTx in the standard group (p=0.025) and IL-10 concentration was increased 72-h post-LTx in the 10°C group (p=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Preservation at 10°C may represent a safe and feasible strategy to intentionally prolong the CIT. In our center, extending the CIT at 10°C may allow for semi-elective LTx and improve logistics with similar outcomes compared to the current standard preservation on ice.

Multidisciplinary approach for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): 2023 expert consensus of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC have led to changes in the standard of care for this disease. For the selection of the best approach strategy for each patient, it is necessary the homogenization of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, as well as the promotion of the evaluation of patients by a multidisciplinary oncology team. OBJECTIVE: Development of an expert consensus document with suggestions for the approach and treatment of locally advanced NSCLC leaded by Spanish Lung Cancer Group GECP. METHODS: Between March and July 2023, a panel of 28 experts was formed. Using a mixed technique (Delphi/nominal group) under the guidance of a coordinating group, consensus was reached in 4 phases: 1. Literature review and definition of discussion topics 2. First round of voting 3. Communicating the results and second round of voting 4. Definition of conclusions in nominal group meeting. Responses were consolidated using medians and interquartile ranges. The threshold for agreement was defined as 85% of the votes. RESULTS: New and controversial situations regarding the diagnosis and management of locally advanced NSCLC were analyzed and reconciled based on evidence and clinical experience. Discussion issues included: molecular diagnosis and biomarkers, radiologic and surgical diagnosis, mediastinal staging, role of the multidisciplinary thoracic committee, neoadjuvant treatment indications, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant treatment, postoperative evaluation, and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus clinical suggestions were generated on the most relevant scenarios such as diagnosis, staging and treatment of locally advanced lung cancer, which will serve to support decision-making in daily practice.

Outcomes after lung transplantation from selected donors older than 70 years in a single centre: time to close the debate?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of lung transplantations using grafts from donors aged over 70 years against those performed using younger donors. METHODS: This retrospective single-centre analysis includes lung transplants conducted at our institution from January 2014 to June 2022. Lung recipients were classified into 2 groups based on donor age (group A <70 years; group B ≥70 years). Variables regarding demographics, peri and postoperative outcomes and survival were included. The statistical analysis approach included univariable analysis, propensity score matching to address imbalances in donor variables (smoking status), recipient characteristics (sex, age, diagnosis and lung allocation score) and calendar period and survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 353 lung transplants were performed in this period, 47 (13.3%) using grafts from donors aged over 70 years. Donors in group B were more frequently women (70.2% vs 51.6%, P = 0.017), with less smoking history (22% vs 43%, P = 0.002) and longer mechanical ventilation time (3 vs 2 days, P = 0.025). Recipients in group B had a higher lung allocation score (37.5 vs 35, P = 0.035). Postoperative variables were comparable between both groups, except for pulmonary function tests. Group B demonstrated lower forced expiratory volume 1 s levels (2070 vs 2580 ml, P = 0.001). The propensity score matching showed a lower chance of chronic lung allograft dysfunction by 12% for group B. One-, three- and five-year survival was equal between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of selected expanded-criteria donors aged over 70 years did not result in increased postoperative morbidity, early mortality or survival in this study.

Extending the age criteria of lung transplant donors to 70+ years old does not significantly affect recipient survival.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of older donor age (70+ years) on long-term survival and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study was performed on all LTx recipients from 2002 to 2017 and a modern subgroup from 2013 to 2017. Recipients were stratified into 4 groups based on donor lung age (<18, 18-55, 56-69, ≥70 years). Donor and recipient characteristics were compared using χ2 tests for differences in proportions and analysis of variance for differences in means. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to describe differences in long-term survival and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2017, 1600 LTx were performed, 98 of which were performed from donors aged 70 years or older. Recipients of 70+ years donor lungs were significantly older with a mean age of 55.5 ± 12.9 years old (P = .001) and had more Status 3 (urgent) recipients (37.4%, P = .002). After multivariable regression, there were no significant differences in survival or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction between the 4 strata of recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation using donors 70 years old or older can be considered when all other parameters suggest excellent donor lung function without compromising short- or long-term outcomes.

Conversion in a Resectable Tumor after Denosumab Neoadjuvant in a Large Dorsal Giant Cells Tumor: A Case Report and a Literature Review.

Giant cell tumors of bone are a rare entity, usually occurring in young patients and characteristically arising in the long bones. The spinal location is rare and usually presents with pain and/or neurological symptoms. The treatment of choice is surgery. Treatment with Denosumab, a bisphosphonate inhibitor of RANK-L, which is highly expressed in these tumors, has shown extensive activity in unresectable patients or those undergoing incomplete surgery. Preoperative treatment with this drug is gaining increasing interest, as its high potency in tumor reduction in this subtype of neoplasm has allowed resectability in selected patients. We present the case of a young patient with a large spinal tumor who, after neoadjuvant Denosumab, underwent complete en bloc surgery with clean margins and a great pathological response.

Outcomes of lung and liver transplantation after simultaneous recovery using abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in donors after the circulatory determination of death versus donors after brain death.

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in controlled donation after the circulatory determination of death (cDCD) is a growing preservation technique for abdominal organs that coexists with the rapid recovery of lungs. We aimed to describe the outcomes of lung transplantation (LuTx) and liver transplantation (LiTx) when both grafts are simultaneously recovered from cDCD donors using NRP and compare them with grafts recovered from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. All LuTx and LiTx meeting these criteria during January 2015 to December 2020 in Spain were included in the study. Simultaneous recovery of lungs and livers was undertaken in 227 (17%) donors after cDCD with NRP and 1879 (21%) DBD donors (P < .001). Primary graft dysfunction grade-3 within the first 72 hours was similar in both LuTx groups (14.7% cDCD vs. 10.5% DBD; P = .139). LuTx survival at 1 and 3 years was 79.9% and 66.4% in cDCD vs. 81.9% and 69.7% in DBD (P = .403). The incidence of primary nonfunction and ischemic cholangiopathy was similar in both LiTx groups. Graft survival at 1 and 3 years was 89.7% and 80.8% in cDCD vs. 88.2% and 82.1% in DBD LiTx (P = .669). In conclusion, the simultaneous rapid recovery of lungs and preservation of abdominal organs with NRP in cDCD donors is feasible and offers similar outcomes in both LuTx and LiTx recipients to transplants using DBD grafts.

Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic tests during follow-up in lung cancer patients: an evidence-based study.

Background: Many patients with non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are cured by surgery but part of them develop recurrence. Strategies are needed to identify these relapses. Currently, there is no consensus on the follow-up schedule after curative resection for patients with NSCLC. The objective of this study is to analyze the diagnostic capacity of the tests performed during follow-up after surgery. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 392 patients with stage I-IIIA NSCLC who underwent surgery. Data were collected from patients diagnosed between January 1st, 2010 and December 31st, 2020. Demographic and clinical data were analyzed, as well as the tests performed during their follow-up. We identified as relevant in the diagnosis of relapses those tests that prompted further investigation and change of treatment. Results: The number of tests matches those included in clinical practice guidelines. A total of 2,049 clinical follow-up consultations were performed, of which 2,004 were scheduled (0.59% informative). A total of 1,796 blood tests were performed, of which 1,756 were scheduled (0.17% informative). A total of 1,940 chest computer tomography (CT) scans were performed, of which 1,905 were scheduled and 128 were informative (6.7%). A total of 144 positron emission tomography (PET)-CT scans were performed, 132 of which were scheduled, of which 64 (48%) were informative. In all cases, the tests performed by unscheduled request exceeded the informative result of the scheduled ones several fold. Conclusions: Most of the scheduled follow-up consultations were not relevant for the patients' management, and only body CT scan exceeded the threshold of 5% profitability, without reaching 10% even in stage IIIA. The profitability of the tests increased when performed in unscheduled visits. New follow-up strategies based on scientific evidence must be defined and follow-up schemes should be tailored focused on agile attention of the unscheduled demand.

Donor lungs cold preservation at 10 °C offers a potential logistic advantage in lung transplantation.

Donor lung preservation at 10 °C appears to be an innovative and promising method that may improve transplant logistics by extending the cold ischemia time with excellent outcomes. We report the case of two lung transplants from two different donors involving the use of two different preservation methods, highlighting the benefits of using 10 °C lung storage.

Ex vivo lung evaluation of single donor lungs when the contralateral lung is rejected increases safe use.

OBJECTIVE: The decision to perform a single-lung transplant (SLT) when the contralateral donor lung is rejected is a challenging scenario. The introduction of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has improved donor lung assessment, and we hypothesize that it has improved SLT outcomes in this setting. METHODS: A retrospective single-center review of all SLTs performed between 2000 and 2017 was performed in which the years 2000 to 2008 were considered the "pre-EVLP era" and 2009 to 2017 the "EVLP era." Recipients of SLT lungs when the contralateral lung was declined were classified into 3 groups: (1) Pre-EVLP era, (2a) EVLP era but EVLP not used, and (2b) EVLP era and EVLP used. The outcomes of interest were survival, time-to-extubation, and intensive care unit and hospital stay. RESULTS: Among 1692 transplants between 2000 and 2017, 244 (14%) were SLT. SLT rate was similar between eras (pre-EVLP 16% vs EVLP 15%), but more SLTs were performed where the contralateral lung was declined in the EVLP era (pre-EVLP 32% vs EVLP 45%, P = .04). Lungs evaluated on EVLP had lower procurement partial pressure of oxygen and were more often from donation after cardiac death donors. Recipients were generally also sicker, with a greater proportion of rapidly deteriorating recipients. Despite this, outcomes were similar between eras with a trend towards lower 30-day mortality in the EVLP era. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of EVLP allowed for better evaluation of marginal single lungs when the contralateral was declined. This has led to increased use rates with preserved outcomes despite use of more extended criteria organs.

Interrupted versus continuous suture for bronchial anastomosis in lung transplantation: does it matter?

OBJECTIVES: Bronchial anastomotic complications remain a major concern in lung transplantation. We aim to compare 2 different techniques, continuous suture (CS) versus interrupted suture (IS) by analysing airway complications requiring intervention. METHODS: Lung transplantations between January 2015 and December 2020 were included. Airway complications requiring intervention were classified following the 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus and analysed comparing 3 groups of patients according to surgical technique: group A, both anastomosis performed with CS; group B, both with interrupted; and group C, IS for 1 side and CS for the contralateral side. RESULTS: A total of 461 anastomoses were performed in 245 patients. The incidence of airway complications requiring intervention was 5.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-8.6] per patient (14/245) and 3.7% (95% CI: 2.0-5.4) per anastomosis (17/461). Complications that required intervention were present in 5 out of 164 (3.1%) anastomosis with interrupted technique, and in 12/240 (5%) with CS. No significant differences were found between techniques (P = 0.184). No statistical differences were found among group A, B or C in terms of incidence of anastomotic complications, demographics, transplant outcomes or overall survival (log-rank P = 0.513). In a multivariable analysis, right laterality was significantly associated to complications requiring intervention (OR 3.7 [95% CI: 1.1-12.3], P = 0.030). Endoscopic treatment was successful in 12 patients (85.7%). Retransplantation was necessary in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, although it seems that anastomotic complications requiring intervention occur more frequently with CS, there are no statistical differences compared to IS. Endoscopic treatment offers good outcomes in most of the airway complications after lung transplantation.

Evaluation of Uncontrolled Donation After Circulatory Death Lungs by Conventional In Situ Effluent Gas Analysis and Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

No disponible

Lung transplantation from uncontrolled and controlled donation after circulatory death: similar outcomes to brain death donors.

Controlled donation after circulatory death donors (cDCD) are becoming a frequent source of lungs grafts worldwide. Conversely, lung transplantations (LTx) from uncontrolled donors (uDCD) are sporadically reported. We aimed to review our institutional experience using both uDCD and cDCD and compare to LTx from brain death donors (DBD). This is a retrospective analysis of all LTx performed between January 2013 and December 2019 in our institution. Donor and recipient characteristics were collected and univariate, multivariate and survival analyses were carried out comparing the three cohorts of donors. A total of 239 (84.7%) LTx were performed from DBD, 29 (10.3%) from cDCD and 14 (5%) from uDCD. There were no statistically significant differences in primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 h, 30- and 90-day mortality, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after procedure, ICU and hospital length of stay, airway complications, CLAD incidence or survival at 1 and 3 years after transplant (DBD: 87.1% and 78.1%; cDCD: 89.7% and 89.7%; uDCD: 85.7% and 85.7% respectively; P = 0.42). Short- and mid-term outcomes are comparable between the three types of donors. These findings may encourage and reinforce all types of donation after circulatory death programmes as a valid and growing source of suitable organs for transplantation.

Effect of COVID-19 on Thoracic Oncology Surgery in Spain: A Spanish Thoracic Surgery Society (SECT) Survey.

After the first wave of COVID-19, the Spanish Society of Thoracic Surgeons (SECT) surveyed its members to assess the impact of the pandemic on thoracic oncology surgery in Spain. In May 2020, all SECT members were invited to complete an online, 40-item, multiple choice questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed by the SECT Scientific Committee and sent via email. The overall response rate was 19.2%. The respondents answered at least 91.5% of the items, with only one exception (a question about residents). Most respondents (89.3%) worked in public hospitals. The reported impact of the pandemic on routine clinical activity was considered extreme or severe by 75.5% of respondents (25.5% and 50%, respectively). Multidisciplinary tumour boards were held either with fewer members attending or through electronic platforms (44.6% and 35.9%, respectively). Surgical activity decreased by 95.7%, with 41.5% of centers performing surgery only on oncological patients and 11.7% only in emergencies. Nearly 60% of respondents reported modifying standard protocols for early-stage cancer and in the preoperative workup. Most centers (≈80%) reported using full personal protective equipment when operating on COVID-19 positive patients. The COVID-19 pandemic severely affected thoracic oncology surgery in Spain. The lack of common protocols led to a variable care delivery to lung cancer patients.

Post-transplant outcomes of standard and extended criteria donation after circulatory death donor lungs categorized by donation after brain death lung criteria.

OBJECTIVES: Most transplant centres use donation after brain death (DBD) criteria to assess the quality of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) lungs. However, research on the relationship between DBD extended criteria and cDCD lung transplantation outcomes is limited. We investigated the outcomes of using DBD extended criteria donor organs in cDCD lung transplantation, compared to the standard criteria cDCD lung transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of consecutive cDCD lung referrals to Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda from June 2013 to December 2019 was undertaken. Donors were divided into standard and extended criteria groups. Early outcomes after lung transplant were compared between these groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS: Thirty out of 91 cDCD donor lung offers were accepted for transplantation, of which 11 were from standard criteria donors and 19 were extended criteria donors. The baseline characteristics of the 2 recipient groups were similar. There were no differences in the rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 h after lung transplantation (21% vs 18%), duration of mechanical ventilation (48 h vs 36 h), total intensive care unit stay (10 days vs 7 days) and 1-year survival (89% vs 90%). CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selecting cDCD lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand the existing donor pool with no detrimental effects on lung transplantation outcomes.

Outcomes of surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in locally advanced stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: This analysis aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes of surgical resection following neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy plus nivolumab in resectable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel + carboplatin) plus nivolumab for 3 cycles. Reassessment of the tumour was carried out after treatment and patients with at least stable disease as best response underwent pulmonary resection. After surgery, patients received adjuvant treatment with nivolumab for 1 year. Surgical data were collected from the NADIM database and patient charts were reviewed for additional surgical details. RESULTS: Among 46 patients who received neoadjuvant treatment, 41 (89.1%) underwent surgery. Two patients rejected surgery and 3 did not fulfil resectability criteria. There were 35 lobectomies (85.3%), 3 of which were sleeve lobectomies (9.4%), 3 bilobectomies (7.3%) and 3 pneumonectomies (7.3%). Video-assisted thoracoscopy was the initial approach in 51.2% of cases, with a conversion rate of 19% (n = 4). There was no operative mortality at either 30 or 90 days. The most common complications were prolonged air leak (n = 8), pneumonia (n = 5) and arrhythmia (n = 4). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in all patients who underwent surgery, downstaging was observed in 37 patients (90.2%) and major pathological response in 34 patients (82.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection following induction therapy with chemotherapy plus nivolumab appears to be safe and offers appropriate oncological outcomes. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates in our study were no higher than previously reported in this setting. A minimally invasive approach is, therefore, feasible.

Deceased-donor lobar lung transplant: A successful strategy for small-sized recipients.

OBJECTIVES: Lobar lung transplantation (LLTx) from deceased donors is a potential solution for donor-recipient size mismatch for small sized recipients. We reviewed our institutional experience to compare outcomes after LLTx to standard lung transplantation (LTx). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed transplants in our institution from January 2000 to December 2017. LLTx early- and long-term outcomes were compared with LTx. Additional analysis of outcomes was performed after dividing the cohort into 2 eras (era 1, 2000-2012; era 2, 2013-2017). RESULTS: Among the entire cohort (1665), 75 were LLTx (4.5%). Compared with LTx, LLTx were more frequently bridged to transplant with extracorporeal life support or mechanical ventilation and were transplanted in a rapidly deteriorating status (respectively, 20% vs 4.4%, P = .001; 22.7% vs 7.9, P < .001; and 41.3% vs 26.5%, P = .013). LLTx had longer intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay (respectively, median 17 vs 4 days, and 45 vs 23, both P < .001), and greater 30-day mortality (13.3% vs 4.3%, P = .001) and 90-day mortality (17.3% vs 7.2%, P = .003). In era 2, despite a significantly greater 30-day mortality (10.8% vs 2.8%, P = .026), there was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between LLTx and LTx (13.5% vs 5.1%, P = .070). Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was not significantly different between LLTx and LTx (73.2% vs 84.4%, 56.9% vs 68.4% and 50.4% vs 55.8, P = .088). CONCLUSIONS: Although LLTx is a high-risk procedure, both mid- and long-term survival are comparable with LTx in all cohorts in the modern era. LLTx therefore represents a valuable surgical option for small-sized recipients.

Transplantation of a heart donated after circulatory death via thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion and results from the first Spanish case.

BACKGROUND: Controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) has emerged as one of the main strategies for increasing the organ donor pool. Because of the ischemic injury that follows the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies, hearts from cDCD donors have not been considered for transplantation until recently. The ex-situ perfusion of hearts directly procured from cDCD donors has been used to allow the continuous perfusion of the organ and the assessment of myocardial viability prior to transplantation. Based on our experience with abdominal normothermic regional perfusion in cDCD, we designed a protocol to recover and validate hearts from cDCD donors using thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion without the utilization of an ex-situ device. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe the first case of a cDCD heart transplant performed with this approach in Spain. The donor was a 43-year-old asthmatic female diagnosed with severe hypoxic encephalopathy. She was considered a potential cDCD donor and a suitable candidate for multiorgan procurement including the heart via thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion. The heart recipient was a 60-year-old male diagnosed with amyloid cardiomyopathy. Cold ischemia time was 55 min. The surgery was uneventful. CONCLUSIONS: This case report, the first of its kind in Spain, supports the feasibility of evaluating and successfully transplanting cDCD hearts without the need for ex-situ perfusion based on the use of thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion opening the way for multiorgan donation in cDCD.