MILIP Binding to tRNAs Promotes Protein Synthesis to Drive Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) have a poor prognosis due to the lack of effective molecular targets for therapeutic intervention. Here we found that the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) MILIP supports TNBC cell survival, proliferation, and tumorigenicity by complexing with transfer RNAs (tRNA) to promote protein production, thus representing a potential therapeutic target in TNBC. MILIP was expressed at high levels in TNBC cells that commonly harbor loss-of-function mutations of the tumor suppressor p53, and MILIP silencing suppressed TNBC cell viability and xenograft growth, indicating that MILIP functions distinctively in TNBC beyond its established role in repressing p53 in other types of cancers. Mechanistic investigations revealed that MILIP interacted with eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (eEF1α1) and formed an RNA-RNA duplex with the type II tRNAs tRNALeu and tRNASer through their variable loops, which facilitated the binding of eEF1α1 to these tRNAs. Disrupting the interaction between MILIP and eEF1α1 or tRNAs diminished protein synthesis and cell viability. Targeting MILIP inhibited TNBC growth and cooperated with the clinically available protein synthesis inhibitor omacetaxine mepesuccinate in vivo. Collectively, these results identify MILIP as an RNA translation elongation factor that promotes protein production in TNBC cells and reveal the therapeutic potential of targeting MILIP, alone and in combination with other types of protein synthesis inhibitors, for TNBC treatment. SIGNIFICANCE: LncRNA MILIP plays a key role in supporting protein production in TNBC by forming complexes with tRNAs and eEF1α1, which confers sensitivity to combined MILIP targeting and protein synthesis inhibitors.

First-line sugemalimab with chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized phase 3 study.

Although antiprogrammed death 1 antibody plus chemotherapy has recently been approved for first-line esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), antiprogrammed death-ligand 1 antibody may offer another combination option in this setting. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial a total of 540 adults (aged 18-75 years) with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic ESCC and who had not received systemic treatment were enrolled. All patients were randomized at 2:1 to receive either sugemalimab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody; 1,200 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for up to 24 months, plus chemotherapy (cisplatin 80 mg m-2 on day 1 plus 5-fluorouracil 800 mg m-2 day-1 on days 1-4) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. At the prespecified interim analysis this study had met dual primary endpoints. With a median follow-up of 15.2 months, the prolongation of progression-free survival was statistically significant with sugemalimab plus chemotherapy compared with placebo plus chemotherapy (median 6.2 versus 5.4 months, hazard ratio 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.54-0.82), P = 0.0002) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Overall survival was also superior with sugemalimab chemotherapy (median 15.3 versus 11.5 months, hazard ratio 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.55-0.90, P = 0.0076). A significantly higher objective response rate (60.1 versus 45.2%) as assessed by blinded independent central review was observed with sugemalimab chemotherapy. The incidence of grade 3 or above treatment-related adverse events (51.3 versus 48.4%) was comparable between the two groups. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in treatment-naïve patients with advanced ESCC, with no unexpected safety signal. The ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT04187352 .

Updated overall survival and circulating tumor DNA analysis of ensartinib for crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC from a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The initial phase II stuty (NCT03215693) demonstrated that ensartinib has shown clinical activity in patients with advanced crizotinib-refractory, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we reported the updated data on overall survival (OS) and molecular profiling from the initial phase II study. METHODS: In this study, 180 patients received 225 mg of ensartinib orally once daily until disease progression, death or withdrawal. OS was estimated by Kaplan‒Meier methods with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Next-generation sequencing was employed to explore prognostic biomarkers based on plasma samples collected at baseline and after initiating ensartinib. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was detected to dynamically monitor the genomic alternations during treatment and indicate the existence of molecular residual disease, facilitating improvement of clinical management. RESULTS: At the data cut-off date (August 31, 2022), with a median follow-up time of 53.2 months, 97 of 180 (53.9%) patients had died. The median OS was 42.8 months (95% CI: 29.3-53.2 months). A total of 333 plasma samples from 168 patients were included for ctDNA analysis. An inferior OS correlated significantly with baseline ALK or tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. In addition, patients with concurrent TP53 mutations had shorter OS than those without concurrent TP53 mutations. High ctDNA levels evaluated by variant allele frequency (VAF) and haploid genome equivalents per milliliter of plasma (hGE/mL) at baseline were associated with poor OS. Additionally, patients with ctDNA clearance at 6 weeks and slow ascent growth had dramatically longer OS than those with ctDNA residual and fast ascent growth, respectively. Furthermore, patients who had a lower tumor burden, as evaluated by the diameter of target lesions, had a longer OS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis further uncovered the independent prognostic values of bone metastases, higher hGE, and elevated ALK mutation abundance at 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: Ensartinib led to a favorable OS in patients with advanced, crizotinib-resistant, and ALK-positive NSCLC. Quantification of ctDNA levels also provided valuable prognostic information for risk stratification.

LINC01559 promotes lung adenocarcinoma metastasis by disrupting the ubiquitination of vimentin.

BACKGROUND: Distant metastasis is the major cause of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD)-associated mortality. However, molecular mechanisms involved in LUAD metastasis remain to be fully understood. While the role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer development, progression, and treatment resistance is being increasingly appreciated, the list of dysregulated lncRNAs that contribute to LUAD pathogenesis is also rapidly expanding. METHODS: Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to interrogate publicly available LUAD datasets. In situ hybridization and qRT-PCR assays were used to test lncRNA expression in human LUAD tissues and cell lines, respectively. Wound healing as well as transwell migration and invasion assays were employed to examine LUAD cell migration and invasion in vitro. LUAD metastasis was examined using mouse models in vivo. RNA pulldown and RNA immunoprecipitation were carried out to test RNA-protein associations. Cycloheximide-chase assays were performed to monitor protein turnover rates and Western blotting was employed to test protein expression. RESULTS: The expression of the lncRNA LINC01559 was commonly upregulated in LUADs, in particular, in those with distant metastasis. High LINC01559 expression was associated with poor outcome of LUAD patients and was potentially an independent prognostic factor. Knockdown of LINC01559 diminished the potential of LUAD cell migration and invasion in vitro and reduced the formation of LUAD metastatic lesions in vivo. Mechanistically, LINC01559 binds to vimentin and prevents its ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation, leading to promotion of LUAD cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. CONCLUSION: LINC01559 plays an important role in LUAD metastasis through stabilizing vimentin. The expression of LINC01559 is potentially an independent prognostic factor of LUAD patients, and LINC01559 targeting may represent a novel avenue for the treatment of late-stage LUAD.

Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy for Unresectable Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The ORIENT-16 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers are diagnosed in more than 1 million people worldwide annually, and few effective treatments are available. Sintilimab, a recombinant human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), in combination with chemotherapy, has demonstrated promising efficacy. Objective: To compare overall survival of patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancers who were treated with sintilimab with chemotherapy vs placebo with chemotherapy. Also compared were a subset of patients with a PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) of 5 or more (range, 1-100). Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 62 hospitals in China that enrolled 650 patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma between January 3, 2019, and August 5, 2020. Final follow-up occurred on June 20, 2021. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to either sintilimab (n = 327) or placebo (n = 323) combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin (the XELOX regimen) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles. Maintenance therapy with sintilimab or placebo plus capecitabine continued for up to 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival time from randomization. Results: Of the 650 patients (mean age, 59 years; 483 [74.3%] men), 327 were randomized to sintilimab plus chemotherapy and 323 to placebo plus chemotherapy. Among the randomized patients, 397 (61.1%) had tumors with a PD-L1 CPS of 5 or more; 563 (86.6%) discontinued study treatment and 388 (59.7%) died; 1 patient (<0.1%) was lost to follow-up. Among all randomized patients, sintilimab improved overall survival compared with placebo (median, 15.2 vs 12.3 months; stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.77 [95% CI, 0.63-0.94]; P = .009). Among patients with a CPS of 5 or more, sintilimab improved overall survival compared with placebo (median, 18.4 vs 12.9 months; HR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.50-0.86]; P = .002). The most common grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events were decreased platelet count (sintilimab, 24.7% vs placebo, 21.3%), decreased neutrophil count (sintilimab, 20.1% vs placebo, 18.8%), and anemia (sintilimab, 12.5% vs placebo, 8.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated with first-line chemotherapy, sintilimab significantly improved overall survival for all patients and for patients with a CPS of 5 or more compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03745170.

SNHG3/WISP2 Axis Promotes Hela Cell Migration and Invasion via Activating Wnt/ß-Catenin Signaling.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cervical cancer (CC) poses a significant threat to women's health and has a relatively poor prognosis due to local invasion and metastasis. It is, therefore, crucial to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of CC metastasis. SNHG3 has been implicated in various tumor metastasis processes, but its involvement in CC has not been thoroughly studied. Our study aimed to investigate the role of SNHG3 in metastasis and elucidate its underlying mechanisms in CC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: LncRNA SNHG3 expression in CC tissues was analyzed using TCGA and GSE27469 databases. Normal cervical epithelial cells and CC cell lines were used to detect mRNA expression of SNHG3 via quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). With RNA interference (RNAi) technology, antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) can act on HeLa cells to knockdown target gene expression. The influence of SNHG3 on cell migration and invasion were determined by wound healing and transwell assays. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) was used to seek abnormally expressed genes between SNHG3 knockdown cells and control cells. The expressions of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and Wnt/ß-catenin signaling related proteins were detected using western blot. RESULTS: SNHG3 was obviously up-regulated in CC tissues and cell lines, and ectopic expression of SNHG3 was associated with lymph node metastasis of CC. Knockdown of SNHG3 significantly inhibited cell migration and invasion in CC. Further molecular mechanism studies showed that SNHG3 knockdown could down-regulate the expression of WNT1 Inducible Signaling Pathway Protein 2 (WISP2) so as to inhibit the activation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway, and regulated the expression of EMT-related markers, that promoted the protein expression of E-cadherin, as well as decreased the expression of N-cadherin and vimentin. CONCLUSION: SNHG3 appears to exert a pro-metastatic effect in CC, as evidenced by inhibition of cell migration and invasion upon SNHG3 knockdown. EMT also appears to be attenuated. Of interest is the down-regulation of WISP2 following SNHG3 knockdown leads to the inactivation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway.

First-line pyrotinib in advanced HER2-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a patient-centric phase 2 trial.

To explore targeted treatment options in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with rare genetic mutations in the context of a patient-centric clinical trial, we initiated, in parallel, a phase 2 adaptive umbrella trial consisting of a criteria-fulfilled (CF) cohort and a compassionate use (CU) cohort under expanded eligibility criteria, and a prospective real-world study (RWS). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from 48 patients with treatment-naive, advanced HER2-mutant NSCLC treated with the pan-HER receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor pyrotinib (CF and CU cohorts) or physician's therapy of choice (RWS cohort). In the phase 2 trial CF cohort (n = 28), the primary endpoint was reached with an objective response rate of 35.7% after pyrotinib treatment. Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (89.3%), median progression-free survival (PFS) (7.3 months), median overall survival (OS) (14.3 months) and toxicity, which was acceptable, with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurring in three patients (10.7%). The phase 2 trial CU cohort (n = 12) showed an objective response rate of 16.7%, disease control rate of 83.4%, median PFS of 4.7 months and median OS of 14.2 months after pyrotinib treatment. The RWS cohort (n = 8) had no responses to physician's therapy of choice, while median PFS and OS were 3.0 and 12.2 months, respectively. Phase 2 umbrella trial, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03574402 . RWS, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03605602 .

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Unecritinib (TQ-B3101) for patients with ROS1 positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Phase I/II Trial.

This phase I/II trial characterized the tolerability, safety, and antitumor activities of unecritinib, a novel derivative of crizotinib and a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting ROS1, ALK, and c-MET, in advanced tumors and ROS1 inhibitor-naive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring ROS1 rearrangements. Eligible patients received unecritinib 100, 200, and 300 mg QD, and 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg BID in a 3 + 3 design during dose escalation and 300 and 350 mg BID during expansion. Phase II trial patients received unecritinib 300 mg BID in continuous 28-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per independent review committee (IRC). Key secondary endpoints included intracranial ORR and safety. The ORR of 36 efficacy evaluable patients in the phase I trial was 63.9% (95% CI 46.2%, 79.2%). In the phase II trial, 111 eligible patients in the main study cohort received unecritinib. The ORR per IRC was 80.2% (95% CI 71.5%, 87.1%) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) per IRC was 16.5 months (95% CI 10.2, 27.0). Additionally, 46.9% of the patients who received recommended phase II dose of 300 mg BID experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events. Treatment-related ocular disorders and neurotoxicity occurred in 28.1% and 34.4% of patients, respectively, but none was grade 3 or higher. Unecritinib is efficacious and safe for ROS1 inhibitor-naive patients with ROS1-positive advanced NSCLC, particularly patients with brain metastases at baseline, strongly supporting that unecritinib should become one of the standards of care for ROS1-positive NSCLC.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03019276 and NCT03972189.

MiR-138-5p inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation and chemoresistance by targeting APOBEC3B.

Docetaxel is one of the most commonly used drugs in prostate cancer (PCa) chemotherapy, but its therapeutic effect in PCa is usually limited due to its drug resistance. APOBEC3B is a DNA cytosine deaminase that can alter biological processes, including chemoresistance. APOBEC3B is upregulated in various cancers. However, the biological function and underlying regulation of APOBEC3B in PCa remain unclear. In this study, we explored the role of APOBEC3B in PCa chemoresistance and the molecular mechanism of its dysregulated expression. Our results revealed that APOBEC3B was upregulated in PCa docetaxel-resistant cells, while its knockdown significantly repressed cell proliferation and docetaxel resistance of PCa cells. Bioinformatics and luciferase report analysis showed that miR-138-5p targeted APOBEC3B. In addition, miR-138-5p overexpression impeded cell proliferation and docetaxel resistance in PCa, while miR-138-5p inhibitors reversed this process. Further studies showed that upregulation of APOBEC3B expression in docetaxel-resistant cells overexpressing miR-138-5p could desensitize PCa cells to docetaxel treatment. Taken together, miR-138-5p regulates PCa cell proliferation and chemoresistance by targeting the 3'-UTR of APOBEC3B, which may provide novel insights and therapeutic targets for the treatment of PCa.

Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer with disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy (ORIENT-31): second interim analysis from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the first interim analysis of the ORIENT-31 trial, compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed and cisplatin) significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the benefit of anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody added to chemotherapy in this patient population remains unclear, with no prospective evidence from phase 3 trials globally. We report the results from the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival between sintilimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, the updated results of sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy, and preliminary overall survival results. METHODS: This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 52 centres across China and included patients aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition) EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC, disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1]), and at least one measurable lesion (according to RECIST 1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using an interactive web response system, to receive sintilimab (200 mg) plus IBI305 (15 mg/kg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), sintilimab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy of sintilimab, IBI305, and pemetrexed. All study drugs were administered intravenously. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population assessed by an independent radiographic review committee. Data cutoff was March 31, 2022, unless otherwise specified. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03802240 (ongoing). FINDINGS: Between July 11, 2019, and March 31, 2022, 1011 patients were screened and 476 were randomly assigned (158 to the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 158 to the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 160 to the chemotherapy alone group). The median follow-up duration for progression-free survival was 12·9 months (IQR 8·2-17·8) in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 15·1 months (8·0-19·5) in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 14·4 months (9·8-23·8) in the chemotherapy alone group. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone (median 5·5 months [95% CI 4·5-6·1] vs 4·3 months [4·1-5·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·55-0·94]; two-sided p=0·016). Significant progression-free survival benefit was sustained with sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (median 7·2 months [95% CI 6·6-9·3]; HR: 0·51 [0·39-0·67]; two-sided p<0·0001). As of data cutoff (July 4, 2022), the median overall survival was 21·1 months (95% CI 17·5-23·9) for sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy (HR 0·98 [0·72-1·34]) and 20·5 months (15·8-25·3) for sintilimab plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·97 [0·71-1·32]) versus 19·2 months (15·8-22·4) for chemotherapy alone; after adjusting for crossover, the HR for sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone ranged from 0·79 (0·57-1·09) to 0·84 (0·61-1·15) and the HR for sintilimab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone ranged from 0·78 (0·57-1·08) to 0·84 (0·61-1·16). The safety results were generally consistent with those in the first interim analysis; in particular, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 88 (56%) of 158 patients in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 64 (41%) of 156 patients in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 79 (49%) of 160 patients in the chemotherapy alone group. INTERPRETATION: This is the first prospective phase 3 trial to show the benefit of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on treatment with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin showed significant and clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free survival with an optimal safety profile. Sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy continued to show progression-free survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in this second interim analysis with an additional 8-month follow-up. FUNDING: National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Science & Technology Commission Research Project, and Innovent Biologics. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Central nervous system efficacy of rezivertinib (BPI-7711) in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation: A pooled analysis of two clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Rezivertinib (BPI-7711) is a novel third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which revealed the systematic and central nervous system (CNS) antitumor activities for EGFR T790M-mutated advanced NSCLC in previous clinical studies and is further analyzed here. METHODS: Eligible patients from the previous phase I and phase IIb studies of rezivertinib were included for pooled analysis. Post-progressive patients who received a prescribed dosage (≥180 mg) of rezivertinib orally once daily were included in full analysis set (FAS), while those with stable, asymptomatic CNS lesions, including measurable and non-measurable ones at baseline were included in CNS full analysis set (cFAS). Patients with measurable CNS lesions were included in CNS evaluable for response set (cEFR). BICR-assessed CNS objective response rate (CNS-ORR), CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR), CNS duration of response (CNS-DoR), CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS), and CNS depth of response (CNS-DepOR) were evaluated. RESULTS: 355 patients were included in FAS, among whom 150 and 45 patients were included in cFAS and cEFR. This pooled analysis showed the CNS-ORR was 32.0% (48/150; 95% CI: 24.6-40.1%) and the CNS-DCR was 42.0% (63/150; 95% CI: 34.0-50.3%) in cFAS, while that in cEFR were 68.9% (31/45; 95% CI: 53.4-81.8%) and 100% (45/45; 95% CI: 92.1-100.0%). In cEFR, the median CNS-DepOR and the mean of CNS-DepOR were -52.0% (range: -100.0 to 16.1%) and -46.8% (95% CI: -55.5 to -38.1%). In cFAS, the median CNS-DoR and CNS-PFS were 13.8 (95% CI: 9.6-not calculable [NC]) and 16.5 (95% CI: 13.7-NC) months. CONCLUSIONS: Rezivertinib demonstrated encouraging clinical CNS efficacy among advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation and CNS metastases.

Caspase-3 in glioma indicates an unfavorable prognosis by involving surrounding angiogenesis and tumor cell repopulation.

AIM: Effective biomarkers for estimating glioma prognosis are deficient. Canonically, caspase-3 acts as an "apoptosis executioner". However, its prognostic role in glioma and mechanistic effects on prognosis remain unclear. METHODS: With glioma tissue microarrays, the prognostic roles of cleaved caspase-3 and its association with angiogenesis were explored. Next, by analyzing the mRNA microarray data from the CGGA, the prognostic role of CASP3 expression and correlations between CASP3 and markers of glioma angiogenesis and proliferation were investigated. To biologically interpret the prognostic role of caspase-3 in glioma, the influence of caspase-3 on surrounding angiogenesis and glioma cell repopulation was investigated with an in vitro cell co-culture model, which comprises irradiated U87 cells and un-irradiated firefly luciferase (Fluc)-labeled HUVEC (HUVEC-Fluc) or U87 (U87-Fluc) cells. The over-expressed dominant-negative caspase-3 was used to suppress normal caspase-3 activity. RESULTS: High levels of cleaved caspase-3 expression were associated with poor survival outcomes in glioma patients. Higher microvessel density was observed in patients with high levels of cleaved caspase-3 expression. By mining the microarray data in CGGA, it was revealed that higher CASP3 expression was found in glioma patients with lower Karnofsky Performance score, higher WHO grade, malignant histological subtype, wild-type IDH. Higher CASP3 expression indicated a worse survival rate in glioma patients. Patients with high CASP3 expression and negative IDH mutation showed the worst survival rate. Positive correlations were found between CASP3 and markers of tumor angiogenesis and proliferation. Subsequent data based on an in vitro cell co-culture model revealed that caspase-3 in irradiated glioma cells mediated pro-angiogenic and repopulation-promoting effects via regulating COX-2 signaling. With glioma tissue microarrays, high levels of COX-2 expression showed inferior survival outcomes in glioma patients. Glioma patients with high levels of cleaved caspase-3 and COX-2 expression showed the worst survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study innovatively identified an unfavorable prognostic role of caspase-3 in glioma. The pro-angiogenic and repopulation-prompting effects of caspase-3/COX-2 signaling may explain its unfavorable prognostic role and offer novel insights into therapy sensitization and curative effect prediction of glioma.

Befotertinib (D-0316) versus icotinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, selective oral third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of befotertinib with icotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study at 39 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC, and had confirmed exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system to receive either oral befotertinib (75-100 mg once daily) or oral icotinib (125 mg three times per day) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by type of EGFR mutation, CNS metastasis status, and gender, and participants, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomly assigned patients. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in safety analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04206072, and the overall survival follow-up is still in progress. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2019, and Dec 18, 2020, 568 patients were screened, of whom 362 were randomly assigned to the befotertinib (n=182) or icotinib (n=180) group; all 362 patients were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 10·2-23·5) in the befotertinib group and 19·4 months (10·3-23·5) in the icotinib group. Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 17·9-not estimable) in the befotertinib group and 13·8 months (12·4-15·2) in the icotinib group (hazard ratio 0·49 [95% CI 0·36-0·68], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55 (30%) of 182 patients in the befotertinib group and in 14 (8%) of 180 patients in the icotinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 37 (20%) patients in the befotertinib group and in five (3%) patients in the icotinib group. Two (1%) patients in the befotertinib group and one (1%) patient in the icotinib group died due to treatment-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Befotertinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared with icotinib in first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Although serious adverse events were more common in the befotertinib than the icotinib arm, the safety profile of befotertinib was manageable overall. FUNDING: Betta Pharmaceuticals (China). TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

LncRNA ADAMTS9-AS1 inhibits the stemness of lung adenocarcinoma cells by regulating miR-5009-3p/NPNT axis.

We sought to extend our observation of LncRNA ADAMTS9-AS1 and to specifically uncover its role on the stemness of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cancer cells. ADAMTS9-AS1 was poorly expressed in LUAD. The high ADAMTS9-AS1 expression was positively associated with overall survival. ADAMTS9-AS1 overexpression attenuated the colony-forming capacity and reduced stem cell-like population of LUAD cancer stem cells (CSCs). Furthermore, ADAMTS9-AS1 overexpression increased E-cadherin expression in addition to the downregulated expressions of Fibronectin and Vimentin in LUAD spheres. In vitro results also confirmed the ADAMTS9-AS1's inhibitory effect on the growth of LUAD cells. Moreover, the antagonistic repression of miR-5009-3p levels with the expression of ADAMTS9-AS1 and NPNT was confirmed. Finally, ADAMTS9-AS1 overexpression curbed the increasing stemness of LUDA-CSC caused by NPNT silencing, thus leading to the suppression of LUAD progression in vitro. Conclusively, ADAMTS9-AS1 negatively controls the LUAD cancer cell stemness progression through regulating miR-5009-3p/NPNT axis.

D-1553 (Garsorasib), a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of KRASG12C in Patients With NSCLC: Phase 1 Study Results.

INTRODUCTION: D-1553 (garsorasib) is a potent and selective oral KRASG12C inhibitor. We report results from a phase I dose-escalation and dose-expansion study of D-1553 in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC in multiple sites in the People's Republic of China. METHODS: Patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC have administrated D-1553 600 mg orally once daily, 800 mg once daily, 1200 mg once daily, 400 mg twice a day, or 600 mg twice a day in dose escalation. In dose-expansion, all patients received 600 mg twice a day. The safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of D-1553 were evaluated. RESULTS: Among a total of 79 treated patients, 75 patients (94.9%) reported treatment-related adverse events with 30 patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 events (38.0%). Most of the adverse events were manageable and the patients tolerated the study treatment well. Among 74 patients assessable for efficacy analysis, 30 patients had a partial response and 38 had stable disease with a confirmed objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of 40.5% and 91.9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 8.2 months, and the median duration of response was 7.1 months. Among 62 patients assessable for response at the recommended phase 2 dose, partial response occurred in 24 patients (ORR, 38.7%) and stable disease in 32 patients (DCR, 90.3%). The median progression-free survival and duration of response were 7.6 months and 6.9 months, respectively. In patients with brain metastasis, ORR and DCR were 17% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: D-1553 represents a promising therapeutic option for patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC with a well-tolerated safety profile and encouraging antitumor activity.

KIF14 mediates cabazitaxel-docetaxel cross-resistance in advanced prostate cancer by promoting AKT phosphorylation.

Docetaxel is a first-line chemotherapy drug for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC); yet, some CRPC patients develop docetaxel drug resistance. Cabazitaxel is approved in the post-docetaxel treatment setting. However, recent studies suggested cross-resistance between the development of drug resistance and current treatments. In this study, we used docetaxel-resistant cell lines DU145/DTX50 and PC-3/DTX30 to measure the responses to cabazitaxel. Our findings demonstrated that docetaxel resistance could lead to cross-resistance to cabazitaxel. After docetaxel-resistant cells were treated with cabazitaxel, transcriptome analysis was performed, and the results were analyzed in combination with survival analysis and correlation analysis with Gleason score to screen the cross-resistance genes. The continuously increased expression of kinesin family member 14 (KIF14) was identified as the main cause of cross-resistance to cabazitaxel in docetaxel-resistant cells. Silencing the expression of KIF14 could restore the sensitivity of resistant PCa cells to docetaxel and cabazitaxel, attenuate proliferation and promote apoptosis of the resistant PCa cells. Notably, the depressed expression of KIF14 inhibited the phosphorylation of Akt located downstream. In summary, KIF14 mediates the cross-resistance between docetaxel and cabazitaxel, and targeting KIF14 could be an effective measurement for reversing docetaxel or cabazitaxel chemotherapy failure or enhancing the anti-tumor effects of docetaxel or cabazitaxel.

Genome-wide DNA methylation profile analysis identifies an individualized predictive signature for melanoma immune response.

PURPOSE: The current evaluation methods for tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), particularly CD8 + TILs, mainly rely on semiquantitative immunohistochemistry with high variability. We aimed to construct an individualized DNA methylation-based signature for CD8 + TILs (CD8 + MeTIL) that may characterize melanoma immune microenvironment and guide therapeutic selection. METHODS: The transcriptome profiles and DNA methylation data of 457 melanoma patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were analyzed. Differential methylation analysis between groups with high and low CD8 + TILs was performed to select differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and define CD8 + MeTIL. The prognostic value of CD8 + MeTIL and its predictive value for immunotherapy response were investigated using multiple melanoma cohorts. RESULTS: We successfully constructed the CD8 + MeTIL signature based on four DMPs. The survival analyses showed that higher CD8 + MeTIL score was associated with worse survival outcomes in TCGA-SKCM and GSE144487 cohorts. The ROC curve for the predictive analysis revealed that the survival prediction of CD8 + MeTIL score was superior compared with CD8 + TILs (CIBERSORT) and CD8B mRNA expression. Furthermore, we founded that tumors with higher CD8 + MeTIL score were marked with immunosuppressive characteristics, including low immune score and downregulated immune-related pathways. More importantly, the CD8 + MeTIL score showed a potential predictive value for the benefit from immunotherapy in two published cohorts. When combined CD8 + MeTIL with PD-L1 expression, the patient classification showed significantly different immunotherapy response rates and long-term survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The CD8 + MeTIL signature might be as a novel method to evaluate CD8 + TILs and guide immunotherapy approaches.

Impact of TP53 Mutations on EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Efficacy and Potential Treatment Strategy.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the impact of factors that influence TP53 mutations on the efficacy of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors and potential treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Tumor samples were collected to screen gene mutations by next-generation sequencing, as well as the patients' baseline characteristics. The overall response to treatment with TKIs was evaluated based on interval computed tomography scans at each follow-up time point. A Fisher's exact test and log-rank test were used to determine the statistical differences in this study. RESULTS: A total of 1134 clinical samples were collected from NSCLC patients, and TP53mut was identified in 644 cases and EGFRmut in 622 cases. A low frequency of TP53mut or more than 50% EGFR co-mutation rate were related to the prognosis of TKI-treated patients. In addition, TP53mut in the region outside of the DB domain had the strongest correlation with TKI resistance, whereas various types of mutations in the DB domain only had an impact on PFS. A grouping study of EGFR-TKI-based treatment revealed that EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy were associated with more significant survival benefits for patients with prognostic TP53mut, whereas EGFR-TKI therapy was favorable for TP53wt patients. Furthermore, TP53mut could shorten the time to the relapse of postoperative patients, who will also likely respond well to EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Various characteristics of TP53mut affect the prognosis of TKI-treated patients to varying degrees. EGFR-TKIs with chemotherapy were benefit for patients' survival with prognostic TP53mut, which provides an important reference for treatment management of EGFRmut patients.

DNA damage response-related immune activation signature predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from gastrointestinal cancer analysis to pan-cancer validation.

OBJECTIVE: DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has emerged as a prominent determinant of tumor immunogenicity. This study aimed to construct a DDR-related immune activation (DRIA) signature and evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DRIA signature for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: A DRIA signature was established based on two previously reported DNA damage immune response assays. Clinical and gene expression data from two published GI cancer cohorts were used to assess and validate the association between the DRIA score and response to ICI therapy. The predictive accuracy of the DRIA score was validated based on one ICI-treated melanoma and three pan-cancer published cohorts. RESULTS: The DRIA signature includes three genes (CXCL10, IDO1, and IFI44L). In the discovery cancer cohort, DRIA-high patients with gastric cancer achieved a higher response rate to ICI therapy than DRIA-low patients (81.8% vs. 8.8%; P < 0.001), and the predictive accuracy of the DRIA score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.845] was superior to the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and Epstein-Barr virus status. The validation cohort demonstrated that the DRIA score identified responders with microsatellite-stable colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade with radiation therapy. Furthermore, the predictive performance of the DRIA score was shown to be robust through an extended validation in melanoma, urothelial cancer, and pan-cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The DRIA signature has superior and robust predictive accuracy for the efficacy of ICI therapy in GI cancer and pan-cancer, indicating that the DRIA signature may serve as a powerful biomarker for guiding ICI therapy decisions.