Adult diagnosis of Townes-Brocks syndrome with renal failure: Two related cases and review of literature.

Townes-Brocks syndrome (TBS) is a rare autosomal dominant syndrome, resulting from heterozygous variant in SALL1 gene and initially characterized by the triad of anorectal, thumb, and ear malformations. Essentially described in children, adult case reports are uncommon. Renal involvement has already been reported in adults and children but poorly described. Structural abnormalities such as hypodysplasia, unilateral renal agenesis or multicystic kidneys have been described, as well as functional impairment (with or without structural abnormalities) that may progress to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We report two adult cases (mother and daughter) which exhibited kidney hypoplasia (focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis for the mother) and ESRD. The mother had unilateral polydactyly. TBS was suggested after physical examination. TBS diagnosis was confirmed by identification of a SALL1 variant. We conducted a literature review to evaluate the renal anomalies in TBS cases diagnosed in adulthood. Among 44 adult cases of TBS with genetic confirmation (including our two cases), 10 had kidney disease. The circumstances of renal failure diagnosis were incidental findings (2/5), gout (2/5), or repeated episodes of pyelonephritis (1/5). The median age of kidney disease diagnosis was 30 years old and of renal transplant 49 years old. The most frequent renal malformation was bilateral kidney hypoplasia. TBS is probably underestimated in adulthood and this report highlights that less obvious elements of morphology such as dysplasic ears can facilitate the diagnosis of TBS. As long-term prognosis of renal involvement in TBS patients remains largely unknown, a regular evaluation is required throughout life for patients.

Risk factors for severity of COVID-19 in chronic dialysis patients from a multicentre French cohort.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease, related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. Few data are available in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). METHODS: We conducted an observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients at 11 dialysis centres in two distinct districts of France to examine the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in this population, and to determine risk factors of disease severity (defined as a composite outcome including intensive care unit admission or death) and mortality. RESULTS: Among the 2336 patients enrolled, 5.5% had confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Of the 122 patients with a follow-up superior to 28 days, 37% reached the composite outcome and 28% died. Multivariate analysis showed that oxygen therapy on diagnosis and a decrease in lymphocyte count were independent risk factors associated with disease severity and with mortality. Chronic use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) (18% of patients) was associated with a protective effect on mortality. Treatment with azithromycin and hydroxychloroquine (AZT/HCQ) (46% of patients) were not associated with the composite outcome and with death in univariate and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is a severe disease with poor prognosis in patients with ESRD. Usual treatment with ARBs seems to be protective of critical evolution and mortality. There is no evidence of clinical benefit with the combination of AZT/HCQ.

Outcome of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patients on peritoneal dialysis: a national retrospective study based on two French registries (the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry and the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network).

Background: Pathological features of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) include enlarged kidney volume, higher frequency of digestive diverticulitis and abdominal wall hernias. Therefore, many nephrologists have concerns about the use of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in ADPKD patients. We aimed to analyse survival and technique failure in ADPKD patients treated with PD. Methods: We conducted two retrospective studies on patients starting dialysis between 2000 and 2010. We used two French registries: the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) and the French language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry (RDPLF). Using the REIN registry, we compared the clinical features and outcomes of ADPKD patients on PD (n = 638) with those of ADPKD patients on haemodialysis (HD) (n = 4653); with the RDPLF registry, those same parameters were determined for ADPKD patients on PD (n = 797) and compared with those of non-ADPKD patients on PD (n = 12 059). Results: A total of 5291 ADPKD patients and 12 059 non-ADPKD patients were included. Analysis of the REIN registry found that ADPKD patients treated with PD represented 10.91% of the ADPKD population. During the study period, PD was used for 11.2% of the non-ADPKD population. Compared with ADPKD patients on HD, ADPKD patients on PD had higher serum albumin levels (38.8 ± 5.3 versus 36.8 ± 5.7 g/dL, P < 0.0001) and were less frequently diabetic (5.31 versus 7.71%, P < 0.03). The use of PD in ADPKD patients was positively associated with the occurrence of a kidney transplantation but not with death [hazard ratio 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.84-1.58)]. Analysis of the RDPLF registry found that compared with non-ADPKD patients on PD, ADPKD patients on PD were younger and had fewer comorbidities and better survival. ADPKD status was not associated with an increased risk of technique failure or an increased risk of peritonitis. Conclusions: According to our results, PD is proposed to a selected population of ADPKD patients, PD does not have a negative impact on ADPKD patients' overall survival and PD technique failure is not influenced by ADPKD status. Therefore PD is a reasonable option for ADPKD patients.

[Anemia management in French hemodialysis patients: DiaNE study results at 3 years (DiaNE2)]. / Prise en charge de l'anémie des patients hémodialysés en France : résultats de l'étude DiaNE à trois ans (DiaNE 2).

The observational study DiaNE provides a current state of anemia management with Epoetine bêta in hemodialysis patients regarding European recommendations over a 3-year period in France. Patients still treated with Epoetine bêta twelve months after their inclusion in DiaNE were eligible for a 24-month extension phase entitled DiaNE 2. Data regarding 439 patients followed during three years, from M0 to M36, were analyzed. Hemoglobin (Hb) level of the cohort remained over the target value of 11g/dL during the study (M0: 11.3±1.2g/dL; M36: 11.8±1.3g/dL). The anemia management had evolved with European recommendations updates and was in accordance with the last recommended target range (11-12g/dL) in a third of patients. During the follow-up, the majority of patients (97%) had at least one modification of treatment with Epoetine bêta (change in frequency of injections, adjustment of doses) mainly justified by excursion of Hb level out of the target range. However, the median dose of Epoetine bêta was relatively stable. The number of patients with iron treatment remained stable (60%). In spite of undertaken efforts, anemia management of hemodialysed patients in France still needs optimization for maintaining Hb level in the recommended target range.

[Is the management of anemia in hemodialysis patients improving in France? Results of the DiaNE study]. / La prise en charge de l'anémie du patient hémodialysé en France s'améliore-t-elle? Résultats de l'étude DiaNE.

French and international clinical practice guidelines recommend a minimum hemoglobin level of 11 g/dl in patients with chronic kidney disease. Previous studies implemented between 1996 and 2003 showed that only 35 to 55% the patients reach this target. Dialysis NeoRecormon Epidemiology (DiaNE) is a one-year French multicentric observational study designed to follow a cohort of 1200 patients with ESRD treated with epoetin beta to assess the management of anemia in routine nephrologic practice. From December 2003 to September 2004, 1241 hemodialysis patients were recruited by 229 centers. At baseline, 64.4% of patients had hemoglobin levels greater than 11 g/dl. The proportion of patients with hemoglobin levels greater than 11 g/dl at the end of the study was 71.6%. These results could be partly explained by iron deficiency: 46% of patients had a serum ferritin between 200 and 500 microg/l and about one third of patients had a transferrin-iron saturation percentage greater or equal to 30% at baseline and at the end of the study. Epoetin beta was administrated by subcutaneous route in 65.5% of patients with similar efficacy and with less mean doses than intravenous route (114.6+/-81.5 IU/kg versus 146.5+/-124.3 IU/kg at the end of the study). In conclusion, the management of anemia in hemodialysis patients is not optimal but is slightly better than the management observed between 1996 and 2003. Iron and inflammatory status should be taken into account to improve the efficacy of anemia therapy using erythropoietin-stimulating agents.

Icodextrin-induced peritonitis: study of five cases and comparison with bacterial peritonitis.

BACKGROUND: An epidemic of aseptic peritonitis related to the presence of peptidoglycan contaminant in some batches of icodextrin solution (Extraneal, Baxter Healthcare Corporation) occurred in Europe in the first six months of 2002. METHODS: By case-control study we examined the clinical and biologic features of 5 patients with icodextrin-induced peritonitis (group AP) and compared them with 7 patients with bacterial peritonitis (group BP) recruited in our clinical center between January and June 2002. RESULTS: Diagnosis of icodextrin-induced peritonitis was confirmed in all cases by a positive reintroduction test with contaminated batches of icodextrin. No recurrence was observed on re-exposure to icodextrin free of peptidoglycan. Skin tests were positive with contaminated icodextrin in 2 of 5 patients, while they were negative with icodextrin solution free of peptidoglycan (<0.6 ng/mL). During peritonitis, serum level of C-reactive protein (CRP) was lower in group AP (42.4 +/- 34 mg/L) than in group BP (135 +/- 59 mg/L) (P= 0.01). Leukocyte number in peritoneal dialysis effluent was lower in group AP (284 +/- 101/mm3), with a lower neutrophil/monocyte ratio (N/M = 0.67) than in group BP (1410 +/- 973/mm3; N/M = 4) (P < 0.05). A low number of peritoneal fluid eosinophilia (11 +/- 8%) was detected in group AP. CONCLUSION: Icodextrin-induced peritonitis was associated with a burst of intraperitoneal cytokines. The phenotype of peritoneal neutrophils was different between aseptic and bacterial peritonitis, indicating that inflammatory stimuli that activate neutrophils in both types of peritonitis are clearly distinct. Finally, peritoneal injury measured by weight gain, peritoneal permeability, and CA125 concentration seemed to be less severe during icodextrin-induced peritonitis than during bacterial peritonitis.

Optimal anticoagulation strategy in haemodialysis with heparin-coated polyacrylonitrile membrane.

BACKGROUND: Binding of polycationic unfractionated heparin onto the modified AN69 polyacrylonitrile membrane, whose surface electronegativity has been neutralized by layering polyethyleneimine (AN69ST), produces stable coating. We investigated whether the heparin-coated membrane was suitable for regular haemodialysis with low heparin doses. METHODS: Sheep were instrumented for extracorporeal circulation perfusing a dialyser equipped with either the AN69ST or the original AN69 membrane. Dialysis sessions were performed after priming the dialyser with heparinized saline. The session was conducted without systemic administration of heparin. In chronic haemodialysis patients, the AN69ST membrane was tested for safety, clotting and thrombin generation according to protocols of 4-h haemodialysis sessions with tapered heparin doses. The goal was to define optimal heparin requirements with the heparin-coated membrane in the setting of continuous or intermittent administration of heparin. Both unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (enoxaparin) were tested. RESULTS: In sheep, systemic heparin-free haemodialysis was conducted for 6 h without clotting using the heparin-coated dialyser. In the same conditions, massive clotting was observed within 90 min of dialysis with the native AN69 membrane. In man, through kinetic measurements of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), heparin anti-Xa concentration and thrombin-anti-thrombin complexes levels (TAT), significant dialyser clotting was avoided when APTT and anti-Xa concentration at 180 min of dialysis, were maintained at >40 s and >0.2 IU/ml, respectively. With the AN69ST heparin-coated membrane, thrombin generation was reduced then suppressed, as compared with the original AN69, primed in the same conditions. Safety of haemodialysis conducted with the AN69ST heparin-coated membrane and low doses of unfractionated heparin (50% reduction of the reference dose) was validated by a survey of 2590 sessions in 32 patients. Doses of LMWH were also safely reduced by 50%. In addition, haemodialysis without systemic administration of heparin was possible with minor risk of clotting. CONCLUSION: During the rinsing phase, the ionic interactions between the new AN69ST polyacrylonitrile membrane and unfractionated heparin induce stable heparin coating. This allows a significant reduction of systemic anticoagulant requirements without increasing the risk of clotting, both in the experimental setting and in the chronic haemodialysis patients. Further studies are required to assess this advantage in patients with acute renal failure and at risk of bleeding and to reduce the metabolic consequences of long-term treatment with heparin.