Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Perinatol ; 41(6): 1412-1418, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33911186

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Preterm infants frequently receive red cell transfusions; however, the effect of transfusions on cognition is unclear. We evaluated the relationship between transfusions and cognitive outcomes in preterm infants enrolled in a randomized trial of erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs). STUDY DESIGN: Preterm infants were randomized to ESAs or placebo during initial hospitalization, and transfusions recorded. Children were evaluated using standard developmental tests of cognition at 18-22 months (56 ESA, 24 placebo) and 3.5-4 years (39 ESA, 14 placebo). RESULTS: Cognitive scores at 18-22 months were inversely correlated with transfusion volume (p = 0.02). Among those receiving ≥1 transfusion, cognitive scores were significantly higher in the ESA-treated group (p = 0.003). At 3.5-4 years, transfusions were not correlated with cognitive scores. CONCLUSIONS: In the placebo group, transfused children had lower cognitive scores than did non-transfused children at 18-22 months. In the ESA group, cognitive scores did not differ by transfusion status, suggesting ESAs might provide neuroprotection.


Asunto(s)
Recien Nacido Prematuro , Recién Nacido de muy Bajo Peso , Transfusión Sanguínea , Cognición , Humanos , Recién Nacido
2.
JMIR Ment Health ; 8(4): e24522, 2021 Apr 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688834

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Incomplete suicidality coding in administrative claims data is a known obstacle for observational studies. With most of the negative outcomes missing from the data, it is challenging to assess the evidence on treatment strategies for the prevention of self-harm in bipolar disorder (BD), including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. There are conflicting data from studies on the drug-dependent risk of self-harm, and there is major uncertainty regarding the preventive effect of monotherapy and drug combinations. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare all commonly used BD pharmacotherapies, as well as psychotherapy for the risk of self-harm, in a large population of commercially insured individuals, using self-harm imputation to overcome the known limitations of this outcome being underrecorded within US electronic health care records. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan administrative claims database was used to compare self-harm risk in patients with BD following 65 drug regimens and drug-free periods. Probable but uncoded self-harm events were imputed via machine learning, with different probability thresholds examined in a sensitivity analysis. Comparators included lithium, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants (MSAs), second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), and five classes of antidepressants. Cox regression models with time-varying covariates were built for individual treatment regimens and for any pharmacotherapy with or without psychosocial interventions ("psychotherapy"). RESULTS: Among 529,359 patients, 1.66% (n=8813 events) had imputed and/or coded self-harm following the exposure of interest. A higher self-harm risk was observed during adolescence. After multiple testing adjustment (P≤.012), the following six regimens had higher risk of self-harm than lithium: tri/tetracyclic antidepressants + SGA, FGA + MSA, FGA, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) + SGA, lithium + MSA, and lithium + SGA (hazard ratios [HRs] 1.44-2.29), and the following nine had lower risk: lamotrigine, valproate, risperidone, aripiprazole, SNRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), "no drug," bupropion, and bupropion + SSRI (HRs 0.28-0.74). Psychotherapy alone (without medication) had a lower self-harm risk than no treatment (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.52-0.60; P=8.76×10-58). The sensitivity analysis showed that the direction of drug-outcome associations did not change as a function of the self-harm probability threshold. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support evidence on the effectiveness of antidepressants, MSAs, and psychotherapy for self-harm prevention in BD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02893371; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02893371.

3.
Psychoneuroendocrinology ; 112: 104511, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31744781

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the largest set of bipolar disorder pharmacotherapies to date (102 drugs and drug combinations) for risk of diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: The IBM MarketScan® database was used to retrospectively analyze data on 565,253 adults with bipolar disorder without prior glucose metabolism-related diagnoses. The pharmacotherapies compared were lithium, mood-stabilizing anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, and antidepressants (monotherapy and multi-class polypharmacy). Cox regression modeling included fixed pre-treatment covariates and time-varying drug exposure covariates to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of each treatment versus "No drug". RESULTS: The annual incidence of new-onset diabetes during the exposure period was 3.09 % (22,951 patients). The HR of drug-dependent DM ranged from 0.79 to 2.37. One-third of the studied pharmacotherapies, including most of the antipsychotic-containing regimens, had a significantly higher risk of DM compared to "No drug". A significantly lower DM risk was associated with lithium, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and bupropion monotherapies, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) mono-class therapy and several drug combinations containing bupropion and an SSRI. As additional drugs were combined in more complex polypharmacy, higher HRs were consistently observed. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of diabetes mellitus associated with antipsychotic and psychotropic polypharmacy use in bipolar disorder. The evidence of a lower-than-baseline risk of DM with lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, lithium, and bupropion monotherapy should be further investigated.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/inducido químicamente , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Litio/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno Bipolar/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polifarmacia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
4.
J Affect Disord ; 252: 201-211, 2019 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30986735

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study compared the largest set of bipolar disorder pharmacotherapies to date (71 drugs and drug combinations) for risk of kidney disorders (KDs). METHODS: This retrospective observational study used the IBM MarketScan® database to analyze data on 591,052 adults with bipolar disorder without prior nephropathy, for onset of KDs (of "moderate" or "high" severity) following psychopharmacotherapy (lithium, mood stabilizing anticonvulsants [MSAs], antipsychotics, antidepressants), or "No drug". Cox regression models included fixed pre-treatment covariates and time-varying drug exposure covariates to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of each treatment versus "No drug". RESULTS: Newly observed KD occurred in 14,713 patients. No regimen had significantly lower risk of KDs than "No drug". The HR estimates ranged 0.86-2.66 for "all" KDs and 0.87-5.30 for "severe" KDs. As additional drugs were combined to compare more complex polypharmacies, higher HRs were consistently observed. Most regimens containing lithium, MSAs, or antipsychotics had a higher risk than "No drug" (p < 0.05). The risk for "all" and "severe" KDs was highest respectively on monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) (HR = 2.66, p = 5.73 × 10-5), and a lithium-containing four-class combination (HR = 5.30, p = 2.46 × 10-9). The HR for lithium monotherapy was 1.82 (p = 4.73 × 10-17) for "severe" KDs. LIMITATIONS: The limitations inherent for an observational study were non-randomized assignment of patients to treatment groups, non-standardization of diagnostic decisions, and non-uniform quality of data collection. No correction was made for medication dosage. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support literature concerns about lithium nephrotoxicity and highlight the potential risks of MAOIs, MSAs, antipsychotics and psychotropic polypharmacy.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Polifarmacia , Psicotrópicos/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Antidepresivos/efectos adversos , Antimaníacos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
5.
Pediatr Res ; 82(4): 685-690, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28553989

RESUMEN

BackgroundIn premature children, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may improve developmental outcome. It is not clear which of the several potential mechanisms are responsible for this improvement. High-resolution MRI and diffusion tensor imaging characterize brain structure and white matter organization, offering possible insight into the long-term effect of ESAs on brain development.MethodsMRI scans were performed at 3.5-4 years of age on former preterm infants treated with ESAs or placebo, and on healthy term controls. Mean cortical thickness, surface area, and fractional anisotropy (FA) were compared across study groups, and were correlated with general IQ measures.ResultsUnivariate analysis found no significant effect of ESAs on cortical thickness (P=0.366), surface area (P=0.940), or FA (P=0.150); however, there was a greater increase in FA among ESA-treated girls. Group analysis found significant correlations between FA and Full-Scale IQ (P=0.044) and Verbal IQ (P=0.036), although there was no significant relationship between Full-Scale IQ and FA among just the preterm children.ConclusionESA treatment may have a preferential effect on white matter development in girls, although factors other than just whole-brain FA are involved in mediating cognitive outcome.


Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/efectos de los fármacos , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Desarrollo Infantil , Darbepoetina alfa/uso terapéutico , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Recien Nacido Prematuro/sangre , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Factores de Edad , Anisotropía , Encéfalo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Conducta Infantil , Preescolar , Cognición , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Masculino , New Mexico , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Utah , Sustancia Blanca/diagnóstico por imagen , Sustancia Blanca/efectos de los fármacos , Sustancia Blanca/crecimiento & desarrollo
6.
Bioinformatics ; 33(16): 2601-2603, 2017 Aug 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28398460

RESUMEN

MOTIVATION: The increasing amount of peer-reviewed manuscripts requires the development of specific mining tools to facilitate the visual exploration of evidence linking diseases and proteins. RESULTS: We developed TIN-X, the Target Importance and Novelty eXplorer, to visualize the association between proteins and diseases, based on text mining data processed from scientific literature. In the current implementation, TIN-X supports exploration of data for G-protein coupled receptors, kinases, ion channels, and nuclear receptors. TIN-X supports browsing and navigating across proteins and diseases based on ontology classes, and displays a scatter plot with two proposed new bibliometric statistics: Importance and Novelty. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://www.newdrugtargets.org. CONTACT: cbologa@salud.unm.edu.


Asunto(s)
Minería de Datos/métodos , Enfermedad/etiología , Programas Informáticos , Ontologías Biológicas , Gráficos por Computador , Humanos , Canales Iónicos/metabolismo , Fosfotransferasas/metabolismo , Receptores Citoplasmáticos y Nucleares/metabolismo , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas G/metabolismo
7.
Pediatrics ; 137(3): e20153859, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26908704

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We previously reported improved neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years among infants treated with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) darbepoetin alfa (darbepoetin) or erythropoietin. Here we characterize 4-year outcomes. METHODS: Former preterm infants randomly assigned to receive darbepoetin (10 µg/kg, once per week), erythropoietin (400 U/kg, 3 times/week), or placebo through 35 weeks' postconceptual age were evaluated at 3.5 to 4 years of age. For comparison, healthy children formerly delivered full term (term controls [TCs]) were also recruited. All participants were assessed by using measures of full-scale IQ (FSIQ) and general language from the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence, Third Edition, and an overall measure of executive function, on the basis of tests evaluating inhibitory control and spatial working memory. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment were compared across groups. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of variance compared children randomly assigned to ESAs (n = 39), placebo (n =14), and TCs (n = 24). FSIQ and performance IQ were significantly higher in the ESA group than in the placebo group (FSIQ: 91.1 ± 17.5 vs 79.2 ± 18.5, P = .036; performance IQ: 93.0 ± 17.0 vs 79.5 ± 19.5, P = .018). Follow-up analyses revealed that the children receiving ESAs performed better than those who received placebo on executive function tasks. The ESA group's performance was below that of TCs, but the results did not reach significance on executive function. The incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment was greater in the placebo group than in the ESA group. CONCLUSIONS: ESA-treated infants had better cognitive outcomes and less developmental impairment at 3.5 to 4 years of age compared with placebo-treated infants. ESAs show promise in improving long-term cognitive outcomes of infants born prematurely.


Asunto(s)
Desarrollo Infantil/efectos de los fármacos , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Darbepoetina alfa/administración & dosificación , Eritropoyetina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades del Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/tratamiento farmacológico , Preescolar , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hematínicos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/etiología , Trastornos del Neurodesarrollo/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Pediatrics ; 133(6): 1023-30, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24819566

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We previously reported decreased transfusions and donor exposures in preterm infants randomized to Darbepoetin (Darbe) or erythropoietin (Epo) compared with placebo. As these erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have shown promise as neuroprotective agents, we hypothesized improved neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months among infants randomized to receive ESAs. METHODS: We performed a randomized, masked, multicenter study comparing Darbe (10 µg/kg, 1×/week subcutaneously), Epo (400 U/kg, 3×/week subcutaneously), and placebo (sham dosing 3×/week) given through 35 weeks' postconceptual age, with transfusions administered according to a standardized protocol. Surviving infants were evaluated at 18 to 22 months' corrected age using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III. The primary outcome was composite cognitive score. Assessments of object permanence, anthropometrics, cerebral palsy, vision, and hearing were performed. RESULTS: Of the original 102 infants (946 ± 196 g, 27.7 ± 1.8 weeks' gestation), 80 (29 Epo, 27 Darbe, 24 placebo) returned for follow-up. The 3 groups were comparable for age at testing, birth weight, and gestational age. After adjustment for gender, analysis of covariance revealed significantly higher cognitive scores among Darbe (96.2 ± 7.3; mean ± SD) and Epo recipients (97.9 ± 14.3) compared with placebo recipients (88.7 ± 13.5; P = .01 vs ESA recipients) as was object permanence (P = .05). No ESA recipients had cerebral palsy, compared with 5 in the placebo group (P < .001). No differences among groups were found in visual or hearing impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Infants randomized to receive ESAs had better cognitive outcomes, compared with placebo recipients, at 18 to 22 months. Darbe and Epo may prove beneficial in improving long-term cognitive outcomes of preterm infants.


Asunto(s)
Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/tratamiento farmacológico , Eritropoyetina/análogos & derivados , Eritropoyetina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/tratamiento farmacológico , Transfusión Sanguínea , Formación de Concepto/efectos de los fármacos , Darbepoetina alfa , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/psicología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Enfermedades del Prematuro/diagnóstico , Enfermedades del Prematuro/psicología , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Memoria a Corto Plazo/efectos de los fármacos , Examen Neurológico/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Solución de Problemas/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...