Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts?

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Current society guidelines recommend antibiotic prophylaxis for 3 to 5 days after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs). The overall quality of the evidence supporting this recommendation is low. In this study, we aimed to assess cyst infection and adverse event rates after EUS-FNA of PCLs among patients treated with or without postprocedural prophylactic antibiotics. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent EUS-FNA of PCLs between 2015 and 2019 at two large-volume academic medical centers with different practice patterns of postprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis. Data on patient demographics, cyst characteristics, fine-needle aspiration technique, periprocedural and postprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis, and adverse events were retrospectively extracted. RESULTS: A total of 470 EUS-FNA procedures were performed by experienced endosonographers for the evaluation of PCLs in 448 patients, 58.7% of whom were women. The mean age was 66.3±12.8 years. The mean cyst size was 25.7±16.9 mm. Postprocedural antibiotics were administered in 274 cases (POSTAB+ group, 58.3%) but not in 196 cases (POSTAB- group, 41.7%). None of the patients in either group developed systemic or localized infection within the 30-day follow-up period. Procedure-related adverse events included mild abdominal pain (8 patients), intra-abdominal hematoma (1 patient), mild pancreatitis (1 patient), and perforation (1 patient). One additional case of pancreatitis was recorded; however, the patient also underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. CONCLUSION: The incidence of infection after EUS-FNA of PCLs is negligible. Routine use of postprocedural antibiotics does not add a significant benefit.

A Statistically Significant Reduction in Length of Stay and Hospital Costs with Equivalent Quality of Care Metrics for ERCPs Performed During the Weekend Versus Postponed to Weekdays: A 6-Year Study of 533 ERCPs at Four Teaching Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic/therapeutic endoscopic procedure for numerous pancreaticobiliary diseases. Data regarding performing ERCP on weekend (WE; Saturday/Sunday) versus postponing ERCP to first two available weekdays (WD; Monday/Tuesday) are scarce. ERCP requires costly resources including specialized nurses, endoscopy room equipped with fluoroscopy, anesthesia services, and highly trained therapeutic endoscopists. Hospitals frequently do not have these resources readily available during WE, leading to postponing ERCPs to WD. AIMS: This study analyzes the effect of performing ERCP on WE versus postponement to WD on hospital efficiency, and on patient safety/outcomes. METHODS: A computerized search of electronic medical records, January 2011-December 2016, at four Beaumont Hospitals retrospectively identified all gastroenterology consults performed on Friday or Saturday before 12:00 noon, which resulted in ERCP performed for any indication on WE versus postponing ERCP to WD. Length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, hospital charges, and hospital reimbursements were compared between both groups, as were quality of care measures. RESULTS: Among 5196 patients undergoing ERCPs, 533 patients were identified, including 315 patients in the WE group and 218 patients in the WD group. Comparing WE versus WD groups, median LOS was shorter (4.5 days vs. 6.9 days, p < 0.0001); median hospital costs were less ($9208 vs. $11,657, p < 0.0001); and median hospital charges were less ($28,026 vs. $37,899, p < 0.0001). Median hospital reimbursements were not significantly different in WE versus WD groups ($10,277 vs. $10,362, p = 0.65). Median hospital charges were lower than median hospital reimbursements (net profit) in WE but not in WD. WE versus WD had no significant differences in morbidity, mortality, ≤ 30-day readmission rates, need for repeat ERCP ≤ 30 days, or post-ERCP complications. LIMITATIONS: This is a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Performing ERCPs during weekends significantly reduced LOS, hospital costs, and hospital charges compared to postponing ERCP to WD and resulted in net hospital profits, without impairing quality of medical care.

Endoscopic management of early upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH) is an infrequent complication (1-3.8%) following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The safety and efficacy of endoscopic management of immediate postoperative bleeding is unknown. We sought to determine how frequently UGIH complicates LRYGB and whether endoscopic management is successful in controlling hemorrhage. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients who developed UGIH following LRYGB from November 2001 to July 2005 at a large suburban teaching hospital. RESULTS: Of 933 patients who underwent LRYGB, 30 (3.2%) developed postoperative UGIH. An endoscopic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed in 27/30 patients (90%). All were found to have bleeding emanating from the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) staple line. Endoscopic intervention was performed in 24/30 (80%) with epinephrine injection and heater probe cautery being used most commonly. Endoscopic therapy was ultimately successful in controlling all hemorrhage, with 5 patients (17%) requiring a second EGD for rebleeding. No patient required surgery to control hemorrhage. One patient aspirated during the endoscopic procedure with subsequent anoxic encephalopathy and died 5 days postoperatively. Twenty-one patients (70%) developed UGIH in the intraoperative or immediate postoperative period (<4 h postoperative). The mean length of stay was significantly longer in these patients (2.84 vs 4.1, P= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: (a) UGIH complicates LRYGB in a small but significant number of patients. (b) Bleeding usually occurs at the GJ site. (c) EGD is safe and effective in controlling hemorrhage with standard endoscopic techniques. (d) UGIH occurs most commonly in the immediate postoperative period and may be best managed in the operating room with the patient intubated to prevent aspiration.