Prognostic and clinicopathological value of NM23 expression in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

It is hypothesized that, NM23, as a metastasis suppressor gene, may be a good indicator of patients with breast cancer in most reports. The aim of our meta-analysis was to determine the prognostic value of NM23 in patients with breast cancer synthetically, by searching 3 databases, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, for relevant articles. The inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, and the standard-of-quality assessment were used according to a previous protocol. The pooled odd ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% CI were calculated to assess the primary end point, survival data, and the secondary end point, associations between NM23 expression and clinicopathological factors. Finally, funnel plots and Egger׳s linear regression test were used to assess the potential publication bias. Overall, 792 articles were retrieved in the initial search of databases, and 4968 patients were eventually pooled from 26 available studies selected out by 2 independent reviewers. The incorporative OR showed that elevated NM23 expression was associated with better overall survival (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.52-0.74; P < 0.00001; I2 = 0%; Ph = 0.46). In disease-free survival, we also obtained a good prognosis (OR = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.18-0.48; P < 0.00001; I2 = 46%; Ph = 0.13). In addition, high-NM23 expression was correlated with well or moderate histologic grade, negative lymph node metastasis, and early tumor staging. Furthermore, publication bias was detected in overall survival but not in disease-free survival, and it could also be verified by Egger׳s test (P = 0.009 and P = 0.687, respectively). These results implied that NM23 might be an indicator of good prognosis in patients with breast cancer, although further researches need to be performed to confirm the prognostic value of NM23.

Prognostic Value of NME1 (NM23-H1) in Patients with Digestive System Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: There is a heated debate on whether the prognostic value of NME1 is favorable or unfavorable. Thus, we carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate the relationship between NME1 expression and the prognosis of patients with digestive system neoplasms. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science for relevant articles. The pooled odd ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95%CI were calculated to evaluate the prognostic value of NME1 expression in patients with digestive system neoplasms, and the association between NME1 expression and clinicopathological factors. We also performed subgroup analyses to find out the source of heterogeneity. RESULTS: 2904 patients were pooled from 28 available studies in total. Neither the incorporative OR combined by 17 studies with overall survival (OR = 0.65, 95%CI:0.41-1.03, P = 0.07) nor the pooled OR with disease-free survival (OR = 0.75, 95%CI:0.17-3.36, P = 0.71) in statistics showed any significance. Although we couldn't find any significance in TNM stage (OR = 0.78, 95%CI:0.44-1.36, P = 0.38), elevated NME1 expression was related to well tumor differentiation (OR = 0.59, 95%CI:0.47-0.73, P<0.00001), negative N status (OR = 0.54, 95%CI:0.36-0.82, P = 0.003) and Dukes' stage (OR = 0.43, 95%CI:0.24-0.77, P = 0.004). And in the subgroup analyses, we only find the "years" which might be the source of heterogeneity of overall survival in gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that statistically significant association was found between NME1 expression and the tumor differentiation, N status and Dukes' stage of patients with digestive system cancers, while no significance was found in overall survival, disease-free survival and TNM stage. More and further researches should be conducted to reveal the prognostic value of NME1.