Alprazolam misuse: Analysis of French Addictovigilance Network data from 2011 to 2020.

OBJECTIVES: Alprazolam, a high-potency and short-acting anxiolytic benzodiazepine, is one of the most misused benzodiazepines in France. In the context of various reports on alprazolam misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic, the objective of this study was to assess alprazolam abuse potential by analyzing French addictovigilance and international data. METHODS: Data collected from 2011 to 2020 using the following epidemiological tools of the French Addictovigilance Network were analyzed: spontaneous reports (SRs), OPPIDUM (addiction care center data), OSIAP (falsified prescriptions), DRAMES (substance-related deaths), and chemical submission surveys. Moreover, the VigiBase™ database was analyzed to evaluate alprazolam abuse liability worldwide. RESULTS: During the study period, 675 SRs concerning alprazolam misuse were recorded (sex ratio: Ì´1; median age: 39 years). The desired effects were intensification of the therapeutic anxiolytic effect, euphoric effect, and management of substance withdrawal. Alprazolam was the third and first benzodiazepine listed in OPPIDUM and OSIAP surveys. Analysis of the SR and OPPIDUM data showed a recent increase in the alprazolam-opioid combination. In DRAMES data, alprazolam was directly linked to 11 deaths (associated with opioids in 10/11). VigiBase™ data analysis highlighted that France was the third country with the most cases of alprazolam misuse. The disproportionality analysis showed that in France, alprazolam was associated with higher risk of misuse and dependence compared with other benzodiazepines: reporting odds ratio=1.43, (95% CI: 1.04-1.95) and=1.97 (95% CI:1.50-2.59), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted an increase in various signals of alprazolam abuse in France, and an increased use of the alprazolam-opioid combination that was also linked to most of the recorded alprazolam-linked deaths. These signals have been reported also in the international literature, and should be thoroughly investigated.

Myeloneuropathy induced by recreational nitrous oxide use with variable exposure levels.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although several case series have described nitrous-oxide-associated neurological disorders, a comprehensive assessment of exposure characteristics (e.g., time to onset, level of exposure) in substance abusers has not been performed. The aim of this study was to describe the onset patterns of recreational use of nitrous-oxide-induced neurological disorders. METHODS: All cases of neurological disorders related to nitrous oxide recreational use reported to the Hauts-de-France addictovigilance center between January 2019 and August 2020 were selected. Only cases requiring hospitalization with informative data to perform the nitrous oxide causality assessment were included. RESULTS: A total of 20 cases from five hospitals were included. The male-to-female ratio was 6:1 and the median age was 19 years (range 16-34). The neurological presentation (myeloneuropathy 64%, 7/11; sensorimotor neuropathy 36%, 4/11) included for all patients gait disorders due to proprioceptive ataxia and limb hypoesthesia. The median dose used per occasion was 100 cartridges (range 5-960; n = 19). The median time from the start of nitrous oxide use to the onset of neurological symptoms was 6 months (range 0.7-54; n = 16). The cumulative dose was significantly higher in patients with damage to all four limbs than in patients with lower limb symptoms only (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: A low intermittent exposure may be sufficient to cause neurological damage in some subjects, suggesting that, at the population level, there is no safe exposure to nitrous oxide in recreational settings. The severity of neurological impairment could increase once used at high doses and for prolonged durations of nitrous oxide.

Pharmaceutical cognitive doping in students: A chimeric way to get-a-head?

For students, the pressing demands for memorization, top-level performance, and peer competition create an environment favorable for pharmaceutical cognitive doping behavior. We aimed to describe recent practices and the benefit/risk ratio of such behavior and to discuss the issues at stake. The prevalence of pharmaceutical cognitive doping among students has been reported from 1.3% to 33% across studies, with variations depending on country and definition of pharmaceutical cognitive doping. The therapeutic classes most frequently cited as being diverted for doping purposes are psychostimulants and nootropics (methylphenidate, modafinil, piracetam), corticosteroids, sedative drugs and beta-blockers. Some illegal substances such as cannabis, amphetamines and cocaine are also consumed in order to boost mental function. Finally, over-the-counter products, such as caffeine-based tablets or energy drinks, or alcohol, are also widely used by students whose motivations involve enhanced performance, concentration, memory, and staying awake during the revision and exam period. However, the expected (often fantasized) effectiveness of these products does not correspond to the reality of a modest controversial impact on cognitive performance. There appears to be an emerging profile of the student more inclined to doping behavior. Cognitive doping thus raises the question of its regulation, opening a debate opposing, on one hand, individual freedom and supposed collective benefits and, on the other hand, health consequences, educational (in)equality, and the risk of tarnished academic success. Strengthening school and university medicine, through prevention campaigns and the identification of subjects at risk, is essential to limit the extent, risk, and damages associated with such practices.

[Pharmaceutical cognitive doping in students: a chimeric way to get-a-head?] / Dopage cognitif chez les étudiants : un moyen chim(ér)ique de s'en mettre plein la tête ?

For students, the pressing demands for memorization, top-level performance, and peer competition create an environment favorable for pharmaceutical cognitive doping behavior. We aimed to describe recent practices and the benefit / risk ratio of such behavior and to discuss the issues at stake. The prevalence of pharmaceutical cognitive doping among students has been reported from 1.3% to 33% across studies, with variations depending on country and definition of pharmaceutical cognitive doping. The therapeutic classes most frequently cited as being diverted for doping purposes are psychostimulants and nootropics (methylphenidate, modafinil, piracetam), corticosteroids, sedative drugs and beta-blockers. Some illegal substances such as cannabis, amphetamines and cocaine are also consumed in order to boost mental function. Finally, over-the-counter products, such as caffeine-based tablets or energy drinks, or alcohol, are also widely used by students whose motivations involve enhanced performance, concentration, memory, and staying awake during the revision and exam period. However, the expected (often fantasized) effectiveness of these products does not correspond to the reality of a modest controversial impact on cognitive performance. There appears to be an emerging profile of the student more inclined to doping behavior. Cognitive doping thus raises the question of its regulation, opening a debate opposing, on one hand, individual freedom and supposed collective benefits and, on the other hand, health consequences, educational (in)equality, and the risk of tarnished academic success. Strengthening school and university medicine, through prevention campaigns and the identification of subjects at risk, is essential to limit the extent, risk, and damages associated with such practices.

On-the-ground application of the 'temporary recommendation for use' regulatory measure on off-label use of baclofen for alcohol dependence in France: a regional survey of community pharmacies.

The 'temporary recommendation for use' (TRU) is a French novel regulatory measure for off-label drug. The first TRU to be issued by the French drug agency (in March 2014) pertained to the off-label use of baclofen for alcohol dependence (AD). We performed a questionnaire-based survey of the on-the-ground application of the baclofen TRU among community pharmacies in northern France. A pharmacist from 70 of the 219 pharmacies contacted (response rate: 32.0%) completed the questionnaire. The mean ± standard deviation number of off-label baclofen prescriptions for AD was 2.3 ± 2.2 per pharmacy per month. 65.2% of these prescriptions were issued by primary care physicians. 65.7% of the pharmacists had never seen 'TRU' written on the prescription, and 80.3% delivered a prescription without checking whether the patient had been included by the prescriber in the TRU. The main criterion used to identify off-label prescribing was the patient's medical history (according to 74.6% of pharmacists) and the prescription of an above-threshold dose (73.1%). 87.1% of the pharmacists were aware of the baclofen TRU, and 42.9% had actually read the document. 17.9% of the pharmacists estimated that the TRU had changed their attitude to off-label baclofen prescription, and 29.9% (20 out of 67) of them wanted to be more involved in the TRU process. Community pharmacists were well informed about the off-label use of baclofen for AD and the TRU. However, a majority of baclofen prescribers did not fulfill the TRU requirements while a majority of pharmacists did not exert any control over these off-label prescriptions. In practice, in 2015 the TRU measure had thus a limited impact on both the baclofen prescribing and delivery practices.

[Surveillance system on drug abuse: Interest of the French national OPPIDUM program of French addictovigilance network]. / Dispositif pharmacoépidémiologique de surveillance des substances psychoactives : intérêts du programme national OPPIDUM du Réseau français d'addictovigilance.

It is important to assess drug abuse liability in 'real life' using different surveillance systems. OPPIDUM ('Observation of illegal drugs and misuse of psychotropic medications') surveillance system anonymously collects information on drug abuse and dependence observed in patients recruited in specialized care centers dedicated to drug dependence. The aim of this article is to demonstrate the utility of OPPIDUM system using 2015 data. OPPIDUM is a cross-sectional survey repeated each year since 1995. In 2015, 5003 patients described the modality of use of 10,159 psychoactive drugs. Among them, 77% received an opiate maintenance treatment: 68% methadone (half of them consumed capsule form) and 27% buprenorphine (39% consumed generic form). Brand-name buprenorphine is more often injected than generic buprenorphine (10% vs. 2%) and among methadone consumers 7% of methadone capsule consumers have illegally obtained methadone (vs. 9% for syrup form). The proportion of medications among psychoactive drugs injected is important (42%), with morphine representing 21% of the total psychoactive drugs injected and buprenorphine, 16%. OPPIDUM highlighted emergent behaviors of abuse with some analgesic opioids (like tramadol, oxycodone or fentanyl), pregabalin, or quetiapine. OPPIDUM highlighted variations of drugs use regarding geographic approaches or by drug dependence care centers (like in harm reduction centers). OPPIDUM clearly demonstrated that collection of valid and useful data on drug abuse is possible, these data have an interest at regional, national and international levels.

Attitudes of community pharmacists to off-label prescribing of baclofen in Northern France.

BACKGROUND: Community pharmacists' liability is involved when they dispense off-label prescriptions (OLPs). However, their attitudes to off-label prescribing are little known, while in France off-label baclofen use for alcohol dependence is increasing. OBJECTIVE: To determine community pharmacists' attitudes to off-label prescribing of baclofen. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to 219 community pharmacies in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais region, France, previously identified as delivering at least five boxes of oral baclofen monthly. The questionnaire examined whether pharmacists delivered baclofen for alcohol dependence, how pharmacists detected off-label prescribing of baclofen, who were the most frequent prescribers (general practitioners or specialists), and pharmacists' attitudes to OLPs. RESULTS: Eighty pharmacies responded (36.5 %). Detection criteria for OLPs were supra-threshold dose (77.3 %) and "off-label" written on prescription (52.5 %). General practitioners were the most frequent prescribers of off-label baclofen. Pharmacists were more likely to refuse to fill prescriptions not marked "off-label" (6.0 %) than correctly marked prescriptions (1.5 %). 85 % of respondents considered they lacked information on off-label use. CONCLUSION: Although community pharmacists felt they were poorly informed on off-label baclofen, the majority nevertheless delivered the drug. Since our survey, off-label baclofen prescribing has been strictly controlled in France. Pharmacists' current attitudes will need further evaluation.