RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The query "are there animals at home?" is usually administered for collecting information on anamnesis. This modality to consider exposure to pet allergens constitutes a potential bias in epidemiological studies and in clinical practice. The aim of our study was to evaluate/quantify different modalities of exposure to cat/dog in inducing allergic sensitization. METHODS: Thirty Italian Allergy units participated in this study. Each centre was required to collect the data of at least 20 consecutive outpatients sensitized to cat/dog allergens. A standardized form reported all demographic data and a particular attention was paid in relieving possible modalities of exposure to cat/dog. RESULTS: A total 723 patients sensitized to cat/dog were recorded, 359 (49.65%) reported direct pet contact, 213 patients (29.46%) were pet owners, and 146 subjects (20.19%) were exposed to pets in other settings. Other patients were sensitized by previous pet ownership (150-20.75%) or indirect contact (103-14.25%), in 111 subjects (15.35%) any contact was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Only 213 patients (29.46%) would be classified as "exposed to animals" and 510 (70.54%) as "not exposed" according to usual query. Our classification has shown that many "not-exposed" subjects (399-55.19%) were "really exposed". The magnitude of exposure to pet allergens at home is not related exclusively to pet ownership. These considerations should be taken into account during the planning of epidemiological studies and in clinical practice for the management of pet allergic individuals.
RESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of a recently developed porous calcium polyphosphate bioceramic (CPB) to function as a bone graft substitute. After six weeks, postsurgical extraction of the mandibular first and second molars, alveolar ostectomies were performed bilaterally in five dogs. The ridge forms were then restored using the CPB implant material on one side and the autogenous bone obtained from the contralateral ostectomy site on the other. The graft and implant sites were retrieved after 4 months and decalcified and undecalcified sections were prepared for special staining (modified Attwood) and subsequent light microscopy and histomorphometry. In addition, the undecalcified sections were prepared for histometry using backscattered electron imaging (BSEI). Histologically, the CPB implants showed extensive vascularization and cellularity within an "invading" loose connective tissue matrix. On the opposite side, the loose connective tissue of the autografts showed hypovascularity and hypocellularity. Neither the implants nor the autografts showed any histologic evidence of an inflammatory reaction. Using light microscopic histomorphometry, the implants showed a higher incidence of union than the autografts. On BSEI histometry, the CPB implants showed significantly greater new bone formation than the autografts. This study reveals that porous CPB possesses certain characteristics essential for the "ideal" implantable bone substitute necessary for the repair of craniofacial and other bony defects.
