Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 23(8): 1593-1600, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534078

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The administration of a dose boost to the tumor bed after breast-conserving surgery has proven to reduce local recurrence. Intra-operative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) offers an alternative method to deliver a boost with several advantages, such as direct visualization of the tumor bed, less inter- and intrafraction motion and a reduction in the number of medical appointments. The objective of our study is to assess chronic toxicity and long-term outcome for our patients after IOERT boost. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six patients treated at our institution between July 2013 and June 2020 with IOERT boost during Breast-Conserving Surgery and consecutive whole breast irradiation were prospectively analyzed. A 10-12 Gy boost was prescribed to 42 patients and 4 patients received a 20 Gy boost. An analysis for overall survival, local relapse and distant progression was performed. Acute and chronic toxicity was assessed by CTCAE 4.0. RESULTS: The median age was 64.5 years (40-90). The median follow-up was 62 months (4-86). We had no local recurrences but 2 patients (4.3%) presented a distant recurrence. Mean pathological tumor size was 16 mm (6-52). 84.8% (39) of the patients had invasive ductal carcinoma. 52.2% (24) presented histological grade II. 52.2% (24) were Luminal A like, 21.7% (10) Luminal B like, 13% (6) HER2 positive, 13% (6) triple negative. No Grade 3-4 chronic toxicity was observed. Grade 1-2 fibrosis was evidenced in 13% (6) of the patients, 4.3% (2) patients presented fat necrosis, 6.5% (3) presented seroma, 4.3% (2) had localized pain, 2.2% (1) presented localized hematoma and 2.2% (1) presented localized edema. CONCLUSIONS: IOERT boost in breast cancer treatment during BCS is a safe option with low chronic toxicity. The recurrence rates are comparable to published data and emphasize that IOERT as boost is an effective treatment.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/radioterapia , Mama/efectos de la radiación , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Electrones/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/mortalidad , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/secundario , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Femenino , Fibrosis/patología , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Mastectomía Segmentaria , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/patología , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 10(8): 505-511, ago. 2008. tab, ilus
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-123488

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to evaluate different surgical treatments and radiotherapy on patterns of recurrence and overall survival in patients with endometrioid-type endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective records of 162 patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer were collected. Patients were surgically treated from 1997 to 2002. Recurrence and survival were analyzed according to patient age, surgical procedure, lymphadenectomy, externalbeam irradiation, brachytherapy, surgical stage, myometrial invasion, and tumor grade. Standard statistical calculations were used. RESULTS: Median age was 64 years. Median follow-up was 44 months. Overall, ten patients (5.6%) experienced recurrence and 14 (8.6%) died. With univariate analysis, statistical significance for survival was found for age older than 70 years, tumor grade, myometrial invasion, and stage. Multivariate analysis, however, found only age, stage, and grade to be significant. With univariate analysis, statistical significance for recurrence was found for tumor grade, stage, and external-beam radiotherapy as risk factors. Multivariate analysis found only radiotherapy and brachytherapy to be significant, but in an inverted sense, with brachytherapy having a protective effect. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that brachytherapy protects against recurrence and that neither a surgical approach nor a lymphadenectomy appear to affect recurrence or survival in patients with surgically treated endometrioid endometrial cancer (AU)


No disponible


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Endometriales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Carcinoma Endometrioide/mortalidad , Carcinoma Endometrioide/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Neoplasias Endometriales/radioterapia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/métodos , Pronóstico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tasa de Supervivencia
3.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 18(3): 584-9, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18476952

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and morbidity of laparoscopic ovarian transposition on the preservation of hormonal function in patients younger than 45 years operated for early cervical cancer. According to risk factors on pathologic evaluation of the specimen, some of them will receive postoperative pelvic radiotherapy. This subset of patients could benefit from taking the ovaries away from the irradiation field in an effort to preserve their functionality. This prospective study included 28 FIGO stage IB1 cervical cancer patients, 45 years old or younger, maintaining menstrual cycles, who were considered suitable for conservation of the ovaries. The ovarian transposition was performed by laparoscopy as a part of the same celio-Schauta operation. Twelve patients underwent adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy. No intraoperative or postoperative morbidity related to the ovarian transposition was observed, and the procedure only entailed a minimum delay of the operative time. There were no cases of ovarian metastasis. At a mean follow-up of 44 months, 63.6% of patients receiving radiotherapy and 93% of those who nonirradiated maintained normal ovarian function. Two patients developed benign ovarian cysts, requiring oophorectomy, but no other long-term adverse effects of the transposition were identified. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest series of the laparoscopic procedure reported to date in this setting. According to our results, laparoscopic ovarian transposition is a safe and effective procedure for the preservation of ovarian function in young patients with early cervical cancer undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina/prevención & control , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ovario/cirugía , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/radioterapia , Adulto , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Ovario/fisiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...