Clinical decision support to enhance venous thromboembolism pharmacoprophylaxis prescribing for pediatric inpatients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To design and evaluate a clinical decision support (CDS) module to improve guideline concordant venous thromboembolism (VTE) pharmacoprophylaxis prescribing for pediatric inpatients with COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The proportion of patients who met our institutional clinical practice guideline's (CPG) criteria for VTE prophylaxis was compared to those who triggered a CDS alert, indicating the patient needed VTE prophylaxis, and to those who were prescribed prophylaxis pre and post the launch of a new VTE CDS module to support VTE pharmacoprophylaxis prescribing. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, F1-score and accuracy of the tool were calculated for the pre- and post-intervention periods using the CPG recommendation as the gold standard. Accuracy was defined as the sum of the true positives and true negatives over the sum of the true positives, false positives, true negatives, and false negatives. Logistic regression was used to identify variables associated with correct thromboprophylaxis prescribing. RESULTS: A significant increase in the proportion of patients triggering a CDS alert occurred in the post-intervention period (44.3% vs. 6.9%, p < .001); however, no reciprocal increase in VTE prophylaxis prescribing was achieved (36.6% vs. 40.9%, p = .53). The updated CDS module had an improved sensitivity (55.0% vs. 13.3%), NPV (44.9% vs. 36.3%), F1-score (66.7% vs. 23.5%), and accuracy (62.5% vs. 42.0%), but an inferior specificity (78.6% vs. 100%) and PPV (84.6% vs. 100%). DISCUSSION: The updated CDS model had an improved accuracy and overall performance in correctly identifying patients requiring VTE prophylaxis. Despite an increase in correct patient identification by the CDS module, the proportion of patients receiving appropriate pharmacologic prophylaxis did not change. CONCLUSION: CDS tools to support correct VTE prophylaxis prescribing need ongoing refinement and validation to maximize clinical utility.

Effect of a Multispecialty Faculty Handoff Initiative on Safety Culture and Handoff Quality.

Structured handoffs at transitions of care are vital components of patient safety. A safety culture survey showed that "handoffs and transitions" were among the lowest scoring dimensions at our hospital. We sought to improve physician handoffs and safety culture scores by implementing standardized handoff communication across multiple divisions of an academic pediatric department. Methods: We used a modified learning collaborative model to implement an I-PASS program, including training, standardized verbal handoff processes, observation and feedback, and sustainment. The setting was the Department of Pediatrics (DoP) within a tertiary academic children's hospital encompassing 13 clinical divisions. The primary outcome was a change in the DoP staff physician "handoffs and transitions" score on the Agency for Healthcare Quality (AHRQ) Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. Process measures included handoff duration and proportion of handoffs using the complete I-PASS mnemonic. Results: Five hundred sixty-seven physicians from clinical divisions participated over 14 months. One hundred percent of eligible physicians completed an introductory online I-PASS training module. The "handoffs and transitions" score improved from 46% to 54% from 2018 to 2020. From May 2019 to February 2020, the proportion of observed handoffs with all five elements of the I-PASS mnemonic improved from 62% to 100%, and the duration of handoffs per patient did not change. Conclusions: We successfully implemented an I-PASS program across an academic department of pediatrics. The departmental staff physician safety culture "handoff and transitions" score improved. The adherence to the I-PASS mnemonic improved. The duration of handoffs did not change over the study period.