Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Clin Imaging ; 77: 213-218, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33992882

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To assess the potential role of low monoenergetic images in the evaluation of acute appendicitis. METHODS: A retrospective study of 42 patients with pathology proven acute appendicitis underwent contrast-enhanced-CT conducted on a single-source-DECT before surgery. Attenuation, SNR, and CNR were calculated on both monoenergetic and conventional images and compared to 24 abdominal CT-scans with normal appendix. Representative conventional and monoenergetic images were randomized and presented side-by-side to three abdominal radiologists to determine preferred images for detecting inflammation. Additionally, six individual acute inflammatory characteristics were graded on a 1-5 scale to determine factors contributing to differences between conventional and monoenergetic images by 2 abdominal radiologists. Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon and McNemar tests, and intra-observer error statistics were performed. RESULTS: For the inflamed appendixes monoenergetic images had overall increased attenuation (average ratio 1.7; P < 0.05), signal-to-noise-ratio (6.7 ± 3.1 vs 4.2 ± 1.6; P < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise-ratio (12.1 ± 3 vs 9 ± 2.1; P < 0.001). Moreover, this increase was not found in normal appendixes (P < 0.001 vs p = 0.28-0.44). Subjectively, radiologists showed significant preferences towards monoenergetic images (P < 0.001), with inter-reader agreement of 0.84. Two parameters, diffuse bowel wall and mucosal enhancement, received significantly higher scores on monoenergetic images (average 4.3 vs. 3.0; P < 0.001 and 2.8 vs. 2.3 P < 0.03 respectively, with interobserver agreements of 62% and 52%). CONCLUSION: Increased bowel wall conspicuity from enhanced attenuation, SNR, and CNR on low monenergetic CT images results in a significant preference by radiologists for these images when assessing acute inflamed appendixes. Thus, close inspection of low monoenergetic images may improve the visualization of acute inflammatory bowel processes.


Asunto(s)
Apendicitis , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Relación Señal-Ruido , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
4.
Eur Radiol ; 31(7): 4710-4719, 2021 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33404695

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether imaging features and severity indices using low monoenergetic DECT images improve diagnostic conspicuity and outcome prediction in acute pancreatitis compared to conventional images. METHODS: A retrospective study of patients with clinical and radiographic signs of acute pancreatitis who underwent 50 contrast-enhanced CT exams conducted on a single-source DECT was performed. Representative conventional and 50 keV-monoenergetic images were randomized and presented to four abdominal radiologists to determine preferred imaging for detecting fat stranding and parenchymal inflammation. Contrast and signal-to-noise ratios were constructed for necrotic, hypoattenuated, inflamed, and healthy parenchyma. These parameters and the CT severity index (CTSI) were compared between conventional and low monoenergetic images using paired t tests and correlated to clinical outcome. RESULTS: Although preference for conventional images was noted for subtle peri-pancreatic fat stranding (169/200 (85%) reads), there was clear preference for low monoenergetic images among all readers for pancreatic inflammation evaluation (188/200 (94%) reads). Moreover, identification of small, hypoattenuating inflammatory foci on monoenergetic images alone in 13/50 (26%) cases resulted in upstaged CTSI from mild to moderate in 7/50 (14%), associated with longer hospitalization (16 ± 17 days vs. 5 ± 2 days; p < 0.05), ICU admission, and drainage. Quantitatively, a twofold difference between normal and inflamed parenchyma attenuation was identified for monoenergetic (44.8 ± 27.6) vs. conventional (25.1 ± 14.7) images (p < 0.05). Significant increases were seen in the monoenergetic SNR and CNR compared to the conventional images (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DECT low monoenergetic images afford better tissue assessment and demarcation of inflamed pancreatic parenchyma. Additionally, they provide improved characterization of the extent parenchymal necrosis, enabling better classification that may better predict severe clinical outcomes. KEY POINTS: • DECT low monoenergetic images afford better tissue assessment and demarcation of inflamed pancreatic parenchyma and provide improved characterization of the extent parenchymal necrosis. • Qualitatively, low monoenergetic images were preferred over conventional DECT images for the evaluation of pancreatic inflammation; and quantitatively, there is a twofold difference between normal and inflamed parenchyma attenuation, SNR, and CNR between monoenergetic vs. conventional images. • Monoenergetic imaging identified additional small, hypoattenuating inflammatory foci in 26% resulting in an upstaged CT severity index in 14% associated with longer hospitalization, ICU admission, and drainage, thereby enabling better classification and better prediction of severe clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Pancreatitis , Imagen Radiográfica por Emisión de Doble Fotón , Enfermedad Aguda , Humanos , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Relación Señal-Ruido , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Front Oncol ; 10: 70, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32117727

RESUMEN

Melanoma survival increased with targeted- and immunotherapy agents, yet most patients ultimately progress and require salvage therapy. In our experience, some progressive disease patients on immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) demonstrate deep and sustained responses to chemotherapy. We hypothesized that ICIs improve the response to subsequent chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of chemotherapy given with prior immunotherapy, to its efficacy given without it. We measured progression free survival (PFS), overall survival, and response rate. Immune-monitoring was performed on sequential peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples taken from a chemotherapy-responsive patient. The chemotherapy post-immunotherapy group (CpI) included 11 patients, the chemotherapy without prior immunotherapy (CNPI) group included 24 patients. Median PFS was 5.2 months in the CpI vs. 2.5 months in the CNPI groups; HR 0.37 [95% Confidence interval (CI) 0.144-0.983], P = 0.046. Immune-monitoring showed an increased proportion of CD8+ cells, with elevated PD-1 and CD69 expression, while on chemotherapy, as compared with all-time points on ICIs, suggesting immune-activation. Immunotherapy potentiates the effect of chemotherapy in metastatic melanoma possibly through activation of CD8+ T cells.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA