Biophysics of frequency-dependent variation in paresthesia and pain relief during spinal cord stimulation.

The neurophysiological effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for chronic pain are poorly understood, resulting in inefficient failure-prone programming protocols and inadequate pain relief. Nonetheless, novel stimulation patterns are regularly introduced and adopted clinically. Traditionally, paresthetic sensation is considered necessary for pain relief, although novel paradigms provide analgesia without paresthesia. However, like pain relief, the neurophysiological underpinnings of SCS-induced paresthesia are unknown. Here, we paired biophysical modeling with clinical paresthesia thresholds (of both sexes) to investigate how stimulation frequency affects the neural response to SCS relevant to paresthesia and analgesia. Specifically, we modeled the dorsal column (DC) axonal response, dorsal column nucleus (DCN) synaptic transmission, conduction failure within DC fiber collaterals, and dorsal horn network output. Importantly, we found that high-frequency stimulation reduces DC fiber activation thresholds, which in turn accurately predicts clinical paresthesia perception thresholds. Furthermore, we show that high-frequency SCS produces asynchronous DC fiber spiking and ultimately asynchronous DCN output, offering a plausible biophysical basis for why high-frequency SCS is less comfortable and produces qualitatively different sensation than low-frequency stimulation. Finally, we demonstrate that model dorsal horn network output is sensitive to SCS-inherent variations in spike timing, which could contribute to heterogeneous pain relief across patients. Importantly, we show that model DC fiber collaterals cannot reliably follow high-frequency stimulation, strongly affecting network output and typically producing anti-nociceptive effects at high frequencies. Altogether, these findings clarify how SCS affects the nervous system and provide insight into the biophysics of paresthesia generation and pain relief.Significance Statement The effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on the nervous system are poorly understood, resulting in inadequate clinical success rates. Here, we use a biophysical modeling approach to investigate the neural response to SCS. We demonstrate that low- and high-frequency stimulation produce contrasting responses in the dorsal columns, brainstem, and dorsal horn. Importantly, our modeling approach was able to accurately predict clinical paresthesia thresholds as a function of frequency, as well as provide plausible biophysical explanations for frequency-dependent effects on paresthesia quality and pain relief. Overall, our results greatly enhance our understanding of the neural response to SCS, thereby offering context for interpreting clinical observations and crucial insight for development of future SCS systems.

Does high-frequency stimulation of sensory axons break the causal link between pain relief and paresthesia?

Neurostimulation produces unnatural cutaneous sensations with potent analgesic effects in pain syndromes. In this issue of Neuron, Sagalajev et al.1 demonstrate that these sensations are an epiphenomenon and explain how high-frequency stimulation can provide analgesia without these unnecessary sensations.

Neural population dynamics reveals disruption of spinal circuits' responses to proprioceptive input during electrical stimulation of sensory afferents.

While neurostimulation technologies are rapidly approaching clinical applications for sensorimotor disorders, the impact of electrical stimulation on network dynamics is still unknown. Given the high degree of shared processing in neural structures, it is critical to understand if neurostimulation affects functions that are related to, but not targeted by, the intervention. Here, we approach this question by studying the effects of electrical stimulation of cutaneous afferents on unrelated processing of proprioceptive inputs. We recorded intraspinal neural activity in four monkeys while generating proprioceptive inputs from the radial nerve. We then applied continuous stimulation to the radial nerve cutaneous branch and quantified the impact of the stimulation on spinal processing of proprioceptive inputs via neural population dynamics. Proprioceptive pulses consistently produce neural trajectories that are disrupted by concurrent cutaneous stimulation. This disruption propagates to the somatosensory cortex, suggesting that electrical stimulation can perturb natural information processing across the neural axis.

Supraspinal control of motoneurons after paralysis enabled by spinal cord stimulation.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) restores motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. This evidence led to the hypothesis that SCS facilitates residual supraspinal inputs to spinal motoneurons. Instead, here we show that SCS does not facilitate residual supraspinal inputs but directly triggers motoneurons action potentials. However, supraspinal inputs can shape SCS-mediated activity, mimicking volitional control of motoneuron firing. Specifically, by combining simulations, intraspinal electrophysiology in monkeys and single motor unit recordings in humans with motor paralysis, we found that residual supraspinal inputs transform subthreshold SCS-induced excitatory postsynaptic potentials into suprathreshold events. We then demonstrated that only a restricted set of stimulation parameters enables volitional control of motoneuron firing and that lesion severity further restricts the set of effective parameters. Our results explain the facilitation of voluntary motor control during SCS while predicting the limitations of this neurotechnology in cases of severe loss of supraspinal axons.

SUPRASPINAL CONTROL OF MOTONEURONS AFTER PARALYSIS ENABLED BY SPINAL CORD STIMULATION.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) restores motor control after spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. This evidence led to the hypothesis that SCS facilitates residual supraspinal inputs to spinal motoneurons. Instead, here we show that SCS does not facilitate residual supraspinal inputs but directly triggers motoneurons action potentials. However, supraspinal inputs can shape SCS-mediated activity, mimicking volitional control of motoneuron firing. Specifically, by combining simulations, intraspinal electrophysiology in monkeys and single motor unit recordings in humans with motor paralysis, we found that residual supraspinal inputs transform subthreshold SCS-induced excitatory postsynaptic potentials into suprathreshold events. We then demonstrated that only a restricted set of stimulation parameters enables volitional control of motoneuron firing and that lesion severity further restricts the set of effective parameters. Our results explain the facilitation of voluntary motor control during SCS while predicting the limitations of this neurotechnology in cases of severe loss of supraspinal axons.

Restoration of sensory feedback from the foot and reduction of phantom limb pain via closed-loop spinal cord stimulation.

Restoring somatosensory feedback in individuals with lower-limb amputations would reduce the risk of falls and alleviate phantom limb pain. Here we show, in three individuals with transtibial amputation (one traumatic and two owing to diabetic peripheral neuropathy), that sensations from the missing foot, with control over their location and intensity, can be evoked via lateral lumbosacral spinal cord stimulation with commercially available electrodes and by modulating the intensity of stimulation in real time on the basis of signals from a wireless pressure-sensitive shoe insole. The restored somatosensation via closed-loop stimulation improved balance control (with a 19-point improvement in the composite score of the Sensory Organization Test in one individual) and gait stability (with a 5-point improvement in the Functional Gait Assessment in one individual). And over the implantation period of the stimulation leads, the three individuals experienced a clinically meaningful decrease in phantom limb pain (with an average reduction of nearly 70% on a visual analogue scale). Our findings support the further clinical assessment of lower-limb neuroprostheses providing somatosensory feedback.

A spinal cord neuroprosthesis for locomotor deficits due to Parkinson's disease.

People with late-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) often suffer from debilitating locomotor deficits that are resistant to currently available therapies. To alleviate these deficits, we developed a neuroprosthesis operating in closed loop that targets the dorsal root entry zones innervating lumbosacral segments to reproduce the natural spatiotemporal activation of the lumbosacral spinal cord during walking. We first developed this neuroprosthesis in a non-human primate model that replicates locomotor deficits due to PD. This neuroprosthesis not only alleviated locomotor deficits but also restored skilled walking in this model. We then implanted the neuroprosthesis in a 62-year-old male with a 30-year history of PD who presented with severe gait impairments and frequent falls that were medically refractory to currently available therapies. We found that the neuroprosthesis interacted synergistically with deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus and dopaminergic replacement therapies to alleviate asymmetry and promote longer steps, improve balance and reduce freezing of gait. This neuroprosthesis opens new perspectives to reduce the severity of locomotor deficits in people with PD.

POTENTIATION OF CORTICO-SPINAL OUTPUT VIA TARGETED ELECTRICAL STIMULATION OF THE MOTOR THALAMUS.

Cerebral white matter lesions prevent cortico-spinal descending inputs from effectively activating spinal motoneurons, leading to loss of motor control. However, in most cases, the damage to cortico-spinal axons is incomplete offering a potential target for new therapies aimed at improving volitional muscle activation. Here we hypothesized that, by engaging direct excitatory connections to cortico-spinal motoneurons, stimulation of the motor thalamus could facilitate activation of surviving cortico-spinal fibers thereby potentiating motor output. To test this hypothesis, we identified optimal thalamic targets and stimulation parameters that enhanced upper-limb motor evoked potentials and grip forces in anesthetized monkeys. This potentiation persisted after white matter lesions. We replicated these results in humans during intra-operative testing. We then designed a stimulation protocol that immediately improved voluntary grip force control in a patient with a chronic white matter lesion. Our results show that electrical stimulation targeting surviving neural pathways can improve motor control after white matter lesions.

Epidural stimulation of the cervical spinal cord for post-stroke upper-limb paresis.

Cerebral strokes can disrupt descending commands from motor cortical areas to the spinal cord, which can result in permanent motor deficits of the arm and hand. However, below the lesion, the spinal circuits that control movement remain intact and could be targeted by neurotechnologies to restore movement. Here we report results from two participants in a first-in-human study using electrical stimulation of cervical spinal circuits to facilitate arm and hand motor control in chronic post-stroke hemiparesis ( NCT04512690 ). Participants were implanted for 29 d with two linear leads in the dorsolateral epidural space targeting spinal roots C3 to T1 to increase excitation of arm and hand motoneurons. We found that continuous stimulation through selected contacts improved strength (for example, grip force +40% SCS01; +108% SCS02), kinematics (for example, +30% to +40% speed) and functional movements, thereby enabling participants to perform movements that they could not perform without spinal cord stimulation. Both participants retained some of these improvements even without stimulation and no serious adverse events were reported. While we cannot conclusively evaluate safety and efficacy from two participants, our data provide promising, albeit preliminary, evidence that spinal cord stimulation could be an assistive as well as a restorative approach for upper-limb recovery after stroke.

Using a high-frequency carrier does not improve comfort of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation.

Objective.Spinal cord neuromodulation has gained much attention for demonstrating improved motor recovery in people with spinal cord injury, motivating the development of clinically applicable technologies. Among them, transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is attractive because of its non-invasive profile. Many tSCS studies employ a high-frequency (10 kHz) carrier, which has been reported to reduce stimulation discomfort. However, these claims have come under scrutiny in recent years. The purpose of this study was to determine whether using a high-frequency carrier for tSCS is more comfortable at therapeutic amplitudes, which evoke posterior root-muscle (PRM) reflexes.Approach.In 16 neurologically intact participants, tSCS was delivered using a 1 ms long monophasic pulse with and without a high-frequency carrier. Stimulation amplitude and pulse duration were varied and PRM reflexes were recorded from the soleus, gastrocnemius, and tibialis anterior muscles. Participants rated their discomfort during stimulation from 0 to 10 at PRM reflex threshold.Main Results.At PRM reflex threshold, the addition of a high-frequency carrier (0.87 ± 0.2) was equally comfortable as conventional stimulation (1.03 ± 0.18) but required approximately double the charge to evoke the PRM reflex (conventional: 32.4 ± 9.2µC; high-frequency carrier: 62.5 ± 11.1µC). Strength-duration curves for tSCS with a high-frequency carrier had a rheobase that was 4.8× greater and a chronaxie that was 5.7× narrower than the conventional monophasic pulse, indicating that the addition of a high-frequency carrier makes stimulation less efficient in recruiting neural activity in spinal roots.Significance.Using a high-frequency carrier for tSCS is equally as comfortable and less efficient as conventional stimulation at amplitudes required to stimulate spinal dorsal roots.

A systematic review of computational models for the design of spinal cord stimulation therapies: from neural circuits to patient-specific simulations.

Seventy years ago, Hodgkin and Huxley published the first mathematical model to describe action potential generation, laying the foundation for modern computational neuroscience. Since then, the field has evolved enormously, with studies spanning from basic neuroscience to clinical applications for neuromodulation. Computer models of neuromodulation have evolved in complexity and personalization, advancing clinical practice and novel neurostimulation therapies, such as spinal cord stimulation. Spinal cord stimulation is a therapy widely used to treat chronic pain, with rapidly expanding indications, such as restoring motor function. In general, simulations contributed dramatically to improve lead designs, stimulation configurations, waveform parameters and programming procedures and provided insight into potential mechanisms of action of electrical stimulation. Although the implementation of neural models are relentlessly increasing in number and complexity, it is reasonable to ask whether this observed increase in complexity is necessary for improved accuracy and, ultimately, for clinical efficacy. With this aim, we performed a systematic literature review and a qualitative meta-synthesis of the evolution of computational models, with a focus on complexity, personalization and the use of medical imaging to capture realistic anatomy. Our review showed that increased model complexity and personalization improved both mechanistic and translational studies. More specifically, the use of medical imaging enabled the development of patient-specific models that can help to transform clinical practice in spinal cord stimulation. Finally, we combined our results to provide clear guidelines for standardization and expansion of computational models for spinal cord stimulation.

GABA Increases Sensory Transmission In Monkeys.

Sensory input flow is central to voluntary movements. For almost a century, GABA was believed to modulate this flow by inhibiting sensory axons in the spinal cord to sculpt neural inputs into skilled motor output. Instead, here we show that GABA can also facilitate sensory transmission in monkeys and consequently increase spinal and cortical neural responses to sensory inputs challenging our understanding of generation and perception of movement.

Robot Assisted Neurosurgery for High-Accuracy, Minimally-Invasive Deep Brain Electrophysiology in Monkeys.

Traditional methods to access subcortical structures involve the use of anatomical atlases and high precision stereotaxic frames but suffer from significant variations in implantation accuracy. Here, we leveraged the use of the ROSA One(R) Robot Assistance Platform in non-human primates to study electrophysiological interactions of the corticospinal tract with spinal cord circuits. We were able to target and stimulate the corticospinal tract within the internal capsule with high accuracy and efficiency while recording spinal local field potentials and multi-unit spikes. Our method can be extended to any subcortical structure and allows implantation of multiple deep brain stimulation probes at the same time. Clinical Relevance- Our method will allow us to elucidate further roles of the corticospinal tract and its interactions with other processing centers in intact animals and in motor syndromes in the future.

An Open-source Computational Model of Neurostimulation of the Spinal Pudendo-Vesical Reflex for the Recovery of Bladder Control After Spinal Cord Injury.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) could be used to restore control of the bladder after spinal cord injury, but substantial development is still required to tailor this technology for bladder function. Computational models could be utilized to accelerate these efforts enabling in-silico optimization of stimulation parameters. However, no model of the spinal pudendo-vesical reflex can simulate the effect of stimulation amplitude on neuron recruitment. This limitation hinders accurate prediction of bladder pressure changes for different stimulation configurations. Here., we implemented an open-source realistic spiking neural network model of the pudendo-vesical reflex enabling exploration of the impact of stimulation amplitude and frequency on bladder pressure changes. We used the o2S2 PARC platform to design a parallel implementation of the bladder reflex circuits with NEURON. Our model successfully reproduced and expanded previous studies., producing a decrease in bladder pressure at low stimulation frequency (10 Hz) and excitation at high stimulation frequency (≥33 Hz) in isovolumetric experiments. We then explored the effect of mixed nerve recruitment., simulating a common case of poorly selective spinal cord stimulation. We found that high recruitments of pudendal nerve axons are necessary to maintain this bi-modal behavior., regardless of stimulation specificity. Our framework is fully open-source and can be used to simulate any type of axon stimulations such as SCS and peripheral nerve stimulation.

A Computational Study of Lower Urinary Tract Nerve Recruitment with Epidural Stimulation of the Lumbosacral Spinal Cord.

Bladder dysfunction is a major health risk for people with spinal cord injury. Recently, we have demonstrated that epidural sacral spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can be used to activate lower urinary tract nerves and provide both major components of bladder control: voiding and continence. To effectively control these functions, it is necessary to selectively recruit the afferents of the pudendal nerve that evoke these distinct bladder reflexes. Translation of this innovation to clinical practice requires an understanding of optimal electrode placements and stimulation parameters to guide surgical practice and therapy design. Computational modeling is an important tool to address many of these experimentally intractable stimulation optimization questions. Here, we built a realistic MRI-based finite element computational model of the feline sacral spinal cord which included realistic axon trajectories in the dorsal and ventral roots. We coupled the model with biophysical simulations of membrane dynamics of afferent and efferent axons that project to the lower urinary tract through the pelvic and pudendal nerves. We simulated the electromagnetic fields arising from stimulation through SCS electrodes and calculated the expected recruitment of pelvic and pudendal fibers. We found that SCS can selectively recruit pudendal afferents, in agreement with our experimental data in cats. Our results suggest that SCS is a promising technology to improve bladder function after spinal cord injury, and computational modeling unlocks the potential for highly optimized, selective stimulation. Clinical Relevance - This model provides a method to non-invasively establish electrode placement and stimulation parameters for improving bladder function with epidural spinal cord stimulation.

Optimizing sensory fiber activation during cervical transcutaneous spinal stimulation using different electrode configurations: A computational analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a rehabilitation tool which has been used to promote upper-limb motor recovery after spinal cord injury. Importantly, optimizing sensory fiber activation at specific spinal segments could enable activity-dependent neuromodulation during rehabilitation. METHODS: An anatomically realistic cervical tSCS computational model was used to analyze the activation of α-motor and Aα-sensory fibers at C7 and C8 spinal segments using nine cathode electrode configurations. Specifically, the cathode was simulated at three vertebral level positions: C6, C7, and T1; and in three sizes: 5.0 × 5.0, 3.5 × 3.5, and 2.5 × 2.5 cm2 , while the anode was on the anterior neck. Finite element method was used to estimate the electric potential distribution along α-motor and Aα-sensory fibers, and computational models were applied to simulate the fiber membrane dynamics during tSCS. The minimum stimulation intensity necessary to activate the fibers (activation threshold) was estimated and compared across cathode configurations in an effort to optimize sensory fiber activation. RESULTS: Our results showed that nerve fibers at both C7 and C8 spinal segments were recruited at lower stimulation intensities when the cathode was positioned over the C7 or T1 vertebra compared with the C6 position. Sensory fibers were activated at lower stimulation intensities using smaller electrodes, which could also affect the degree of nerve fiber activation across different positions. Importantly, Aα-sensory fibers were consistently recruited before α-motor fibers. CONCLUSIONS: These results imply that cathode positioning could help optimize preferential activation of hand muscles during cervical tSCS.

Epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical dorsal roots restores voluntary upper limb control in paralyzed monkeys.

Regaining arm control is a top priority for people with paralysis. Unfortunately, the complexity of the neural mechanisms underlying arm control has limited the effectiveness of neurotechnology approaches. Here, we exploited the neural function of surviving spinal circuits to restore voluntary arm and hand control in three monkeys with spinal cord injury, using spinal cord stimulation. Our neural interface leverages the functional organization of the dorsal roots to convey artificial excitation via electrical stimulation to relevant spinal segments at appropriate movement phases. Stimulation bursts targeting specific spinal segments produced sustained arm movements, enabling monkeys with arm paralysis to perform an unconstrained reach-and-grasp task. Stimulation specifically improved strength, task performances and movement quality. Electrophysiology suggested that residual descending inputs were necessary to produce coordinated movements. The efficacy and reliability of our approach hold realistic promises of clinical translation.

Poststroke arm and hand paresis: should we target the cervical spinal cord?

Despite advances in understanding of corticospinal motor control and stroke pathophysiology, current rehabilitation therapies for poststroke upper limb paresis have limited efficacy at the level of impairment. To address this problem, we make the conceptual case for a new treatment approach. We first summarize current understanding of motor control deficits in the arm and hand after stroke and their shared physiological mechanisms with spinal cord injury (SCI). We then review studies of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for recovery of locomotion after SCI, which provide convincing evidence for enhancement of residual corticospinal function. By extrapolation, we argue for using cervical SCS to restore upper limb motor control after stroke.

Preferential activation of proprioceptive and cutaneous sensory fibers compared to motor fibers during cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation: a computational study.

Objective. Cervical transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a promising technology that can support motor function recovery of upper-limbs after spinal cord injury. Its efficacy may depend on the ability to recruit sensory afferents, conveying excitatory inputs onto motoneurons. Therefore, understanding its physiological mechanisms is critical to accelerate its development towards clinical applications. In this study, we used an anatomically realistic cervical tSCS computational model to compare α-motor, Aα-sensory, and Aß-sensory fiber activation thresholds and activation sites.Approach. We developed a 3D geometry of the cervical body and tSCS electrodes with a cathode centred at the C7 spinous process and an anode placed over the anterior neck. The geometrical model was used to estimate the electric potential distributions along motor and sensory fiber trajectories at the C7 spinal level using a finite element method. We implemented dedicated motor and sensory fiber models to simulate the α-motor and Aα-sensory fibers using 12, 16, and 20 µm diameter fibers, and Aß-sensory fibers using 6, 9, and 12 µm diameter fibers. We estimated nerve fiber activation thresholds and sites for a 2 ms monophasic stimulating pulse and compared them across the fiber groups.Main results. Our results showed lower activation thresholds of Aα- and Aß-sensory fibers compared with α-motor fibers, suggesting preferential sensory fiber activation. We also found no differences between activation thresholds of Aα-sensory and large Aß-sensory fibers, implying their co-activation. The activation sites were located at the dorsal and ventral root levels.Significance. Using a realistic computational model, we demonstrated preferential activation of dorsal root Aα- and Aß-sensory fibers compared with ventral root α-motor fibers during cervical tSCS. These findings suggest high proprioceptive and cutaneous contributions to neural activations during cervical tSCS, which inform the underlying mechanisms of upper-limb functional motor recovery.