What is the role of chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer?

Most breast tumors depend on female sex hormones for development and growth, thus being amenable to endocrine therapies. In the management of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, advanced breast cancer, conventional wisdom dictates the use of endocrine therapy for patients with good prognostic features, whereas chemotherapy is recommended for the treatment of visceral crisis. There is, however, considerable uncertainty regarding the best initial strategy for patients with poor prognostic features other than visceral crisis, such as small-volume visceral involvement and a short disease-free interval after adjuvant therapy. In this article, we examine the role of chemotherapy in ER-positive, advanced breast cancer. Our review of the literature suggests that, in the absence of visceral crisis, endocrine agents should always be considered a major option for the initial treatment of ER-positive, metastatic breast cancer due to their proven efficacy and favorable toxicity profile. Although certain chemotherapy agents can induce higher response rates and more rapid responses, which are desirable effects in particular situations, the up-front use of chemotherapy does not seem to influence the overall outcome of the disease. In the subset of patients with epidermal growth factor type 2-positive disease, on the other hand, current data still do not support the use of endocrine agents alone.

A phase II trial of fractionated vinorelbine/doxorubicin as first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer.

In western countries breast cancer is still the leading cause of death of women. Very promising results have been obtained by combining vinorelbine and doxorubicin, two of the most active drugs in metastatic breast cancer. However, despite the activity reported, this combination has shown a 10% rate of grade 2-4 cardiac toxicity, mainly due to the total cumulative doses of anthracycline delivered. The aim of this study was to divide the total dose of doxorubicin into two administrations on days 1 and 8, in order to cut down its toxicity while maintaining the same activity. Fifty-two chemotherapy naïve patients with metastatic breast cancer entered into the study and were treated with vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 plus doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 both on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. Fifty-one patients were eligible and evaluable for toxicity while 47 of them were evaluable for activity. Haematological toxicity was predominantly related to neutropenia, with grade 3/4 in 16% of cycles. Non-haematological toxicity was represented by alopecia grade 3 (which affected 65% of the patients), local phlebitis and severe constipation. No clinically significant cases of neuropathy or cardiac dysfunction were seen. With regard to activity, 38 out of 47 patients (80%) responded to therapy, nine of them achieving complete responses (19%). Median response duration was 16 months and the median overall survival was 22.7 months. We conclude that the fractionated administration of vinorelbine and doxorubicin is associated with excellent haematological and non-haematological tolerability (especially as regards cardiac toxicity), coupled with high levels of activity comparable to those observed using regimens based on unfractionated administration of treatment.