Retrospective study on neonatal seizures in a tertiary center of northern Italy after ILAE classification: Incidence, seizure type, EEG and etiology.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate epidemiology, seizure type, EEG, and etiology of neonatal seizures (NS) in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: Data on infants with a neurophysiological confirmation of NS were collected between 2009 and 2022. Seizure types and epileptic syndromes were classified by the ILAE classification and EEG by the Italian Neonatal Seizure Collaborative Network (INNESCO) score. RESULTS: Out of 91,253 neonates, 145 presented with NS; 69.7 % were born at term and 30.3 % were preterm infants. The incidence of NS in neonates born at our center was 1.2 per 1,000 live newborns (96/80697 neonates) while in the entire neonatal population admitted to our center it was 1.6 per 1,000 live births, increasing with lower preterm age. Compared to previous studies, we found a lower proportion of hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) (23.4 %) and a higher rate of genetic contribution (26.2 %). The infection rate was higher in preterm (31.8 %) than in full term (9.9 %) infants. Electrographic seizures were associated with acute provoked seizures (35.9 %), preterm age (52.3 %), and HIE (52.9 %). Vascular etiology was associated with focal clonic seizures (56.8 %). Non-structural neonatal genetic epilepsy was associated with sequential seizures (68.2 %), particularly KCNQ2 and SCN2A epilepsy. Background EEG was abnormal in all HIE, infections (85.7 %) and metabolic NS (83.3 %). In genetic epilepsy, background EEG depended on the epileptic syndrome: normal in 80 % of self-limited neonatal epilepsy and abnormal in 77.8 % of developmental and epileptic encephalopathy. Electroclinical seizures were associated with focal onset, while electrographic seizures correlated with a multifocal onset. CONCLUSIONS: A low incidence of HIE and a high incidence of genetic etiology were observed in our cohort of NS. Seizure type and EEG features are fundamental to address etiology.

How Can Specialist Advice Influence the Neuroimaging Practice for Childhood Headache in Emergency Department?

Differentiating between primary and secondary headaches can be challenging, especially in the emergency department (ED). Since symptoms alone are inadequate criteria for distinguishing between primary and secondary headaches, many children with headaches undergo neuroimaging investigations, such as brain CT and MRI. In various studies, the frequency of neuroimaging utilization is influenced by several factors, including teaching status, ownership, metropolitan area, insurance status, and ethnicity of patients. However, only a few studies have considered the role of specialist consultations in ordering neuroimaging studies on childhood headaches. We report the contributions of different specialists to the evaluation of children with headaches admitted to the ED and their influence on neuroimaging decisions. We retrospectively reviewed the medical reports of paediatric patients who presented with headaches to the paediatric ED of the Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milano between January 2017 and January 2022. Overall, 890 children with headaches were evaluated (mean age: 10.0 years; range: 1 to 17 years). All patients were examined by the ED paediatricians, while specialist consultations were required for 261 patients, including 240 neurological (92.0%), 46 ophthalmological (17.6%), and 20 otorhinolaryngological (7.7%) consultations. Overall, 173 neuroimaging examinations were required, of which 51.4 and 48.6% were ordered by paediatricians and neurologists, respectively. In particular, paediatricians required 61.4% of brain CT scans, and neurologists required 92.0% of brain MRI scans. In conclusion, paediatricians were responsible for the management of most children with headaches admitted to the ED, while specialist consultations were required only in about a third of the cases. Although there was no significant difference in the number of neuroimaging studies ordered by specialists, brain CT scans were most often used by paediatricians, and MRI scans by neurologists.

Questions and Controversies in Neonatal Seizures.

Neonatal seizures are relatively common, but their diagnosis and management remain challenging. We reviewed the scientific literature on neonatal seizures from July 1973 to November 2023. Several parameters were considered, including pathophysiology, diagnostic criteria, electroencephalographic findings and treatment. Recent classification system of seizures and epilepsies in the newborn, as well as treatment recommendations of neonatal seizures, have been proposed. Nonetheless, the approach to neonatal seizures varies among clinicians and centres, including detection, investigation, treatment and follow-up of patients. There are still many issues on the diagnosis and treatment of neonatal seizures, including the meaning or relevance of some electroencephalographic findings, the precise estimation of the seizure burden, the limited efficacy and side effects risk of antiseizure medications, and the best measures to establish the outcome.