New Trends in Neurosurgery: Toward a Future of Integration and Equity Among Male and Female Neurosurgeons.

The gradual rise of women in medical schools and residencies, surpassing men in medical school applications, contrasts with the male dominance in surgical fields, including neurosurgery (only 18% women). Reasons include concerns about work-life balance, traditional childcare roles, and gender biases. In response, Women in Neurosurgery (WINs) was founded in 1989 to address gender disparities. However, WINs sessions at conferences evolved into segregated scientific sessions, deviating from their original purpose. This contradicts the ideal of a unified neurosurgical community. While some support segregated spaces, many advocate against gender-based divisions. Today WINs' existence is deemed outdated, with a call for integration, inclusivity, and equality in the modern era of neurosurgery.

Computerized Three-Dimensional Analysis: A Novel Method to Assess the Effect of Open-Door Laminoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The three-dimensional elaboration of morphological data derived from computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans generates virtual anatomical reconstructions. Here, we propose a novel protocol to analyze the postoperative results of open-door laminoplasty to evaluate differences in the volume of the spinal canal. The protocol uses geometric models in patients with cervical degenerative myelopathy before versus after cervical laminoplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mimics and 3-Matic software (Materialise, Leuven, BE) programs were used to segment anatomical structures and create polygon meshes of spines. Patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were enrolled. The models obtained before and after laminoplasty were superimposed by using a global registration function. The magnitude of divergence was quantified by using the root-mean-square error (RMSE). RESULTS: Using this novel protocol, we were able to map the differences in the volume of the spinal canal before laminoplasty and after laminoplasty and to quantify its magnitude and calculate the volumes. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The development of a procedure to measure the space within the cervical bone walls using geometric parameters represents a new, powerful method to verify the results obtained by cervical laminoplasty. Further research horizons may include the routine use of virtual models in surgical planning for this procedure.

Limits and usefulness of intraoperative evoked potentials during laminoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 10 years, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been widely performed during surgery for treating spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Our study considers the predictive value of IONM during laminoplasty, regarding, first, the adequacy of spinal cord decompression and, second, the long-term neuro-functional outcome. METHODS: We considered 38 patients with the diagnosis of degenerative cervical myelopathy who underwent an open-door laminoplasty. All patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at three and 12 months postoperatively, with the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) point scale. Upper and lower limb somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (SSEPs and MEPs) were recorded preoperatively and intraoperatively. RESULTS: During surgery, three of 38 patients showed a deterioration of SSEPs and MEPs compared to baseline values. Surgery was then converted from laminoplasty to laminectomy, resulting in the gradual restoration of the evoked potentials. The neurophysiological parameter significantly associated with a better clinical outcome was the latency of lower limbs MEPs. The 12 patients who had a more prominent reduction of the MEPs latency at the end of surgery showed a higher post-surgical JOA score, increasing ≥30% compared to baseline values at the 3- and 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Though not a predictor of clinical outcome, the IONM was essential to evaluate the effectiveness of spinal cord decompression. Reduced latency of lower limbs MEPs may predict a better clinical outcome. We suggest that IONM in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy should be routine. It is necessary to conduct larger studies to clarify the predictive value of IONM.

Telemedicine in practice: Patient selection and strategies adopted in spinal care during the COVID-19 era and beyond.

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a substantial effect on health-care systems around the world. To deal with this challenge, we developed a prospectus design and test a teleconsultation procedure suitable for both diagnostic and therapeutic needs of outpatients in our Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery Units. Methods: (1) The first 15 patients received in-person and telemedicine visits: Our pilot began with screening protocol that involved 15 patients who received an in-person assessment and a telemedicine consult. The 15 patients who were selected were already known to our unit after having had at least one previous in-person visit. Further, they had to be neurologically intact or have a stable neurological examination. The secondary teleconsultation took place as a synchronous face-to-face communication between the doctor and the patient through a video interface (Lifesize Video Conferencing, Austin, Texas). If the patient demonstrated worsening of symptoms or of their condition, they were rescheduled for an immediate/timely in-person revisit with a spinal physician. (2) Fifty patients were offered telemedicine visits alone: 35 accepted: Next, from 2020 to 2021, we provided a questionnaire to 50 patients, we deemed eligible for teleconsultations: 35 agreed to the teleconsultations, while 15 refused (i.e., selecting direct in-person assessments). Results: We found a comparable quality for the clinical consultations/assessments provided in-person versus through telemedicine. Further, the additional 35 patients who were positively impressed with the quality of the medical care provided utilizing the telemedicine/remote visits alone. Conclusion: When pandemic conditions worsen, telemedicine appears to be a viable and important tool/ alternative for spinal surgeons to screen potential patients for treatment/surgery. This preliminary study suggests that a remote examination may be effective, particularly in patients who have previously undergone prior in-person evaluations.

Long versus short segment with intermediate screw fixation for burst fractures of thoracolumbar junction: radiological and clinical results.

BACKGROUND: Long segment fixation has been frequently used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. In our study we want to compare the long and short segment with intermediate screw fixation of thoracolumbar junction burst fractures in relation to radiological and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We collected the data of 115 patients, with thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) burst fracture A3 or A4, according to AO classification. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated by long segment fixation. Group B was treated by short segment fixation. At admission, after surgery, and at 12-month follow-up the patients were radiographically assessed for local kyphotic angle using the Cobb method. Patients were clinically evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain. RESULTS: The mean difference of the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle was significant in both groups (p = 0.018). The mean difference of the preoperative and immediate postoperative Cobb angle, Δ1, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (p = 0.038), indicating that the Cobb angle correction immediately postoperative was better in patients with double level fixation. The mean difference of the immediate postoperative and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle, Δ2, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (p = 0.007), indicating that the maintenance of local Cobb angle correction was better in patients with double level, long fixation. There was no difference in VAS values between Group B (single) and Group A (double) segment fixation immediately post operatively (p = 0.356) or after 12 months (p = 0.147). CONCLUSIONS: In A3 and A4 thoracolumbar junction fractures, long segment fixation can correct the local kyphosis Cobb angle and maintain the correction at 12-month follow-up better than short segment fixation with intermediate screws in the fractured vertebra. The radiological difference, however, was not predictive of clinical results.

Multidisciplinary Approach to Patients With Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression: A Diagnostic Therapeutic Algorithm to Improve the Neurological Outcome.

Introduction: The morbidity associated with metastatic spinal disease is significant because of spinal cord and/or nerve root compression. The purpose of this paper is to define a diagnostic-therapeutic path for patients with vertebral metastases and from this path to build an algorithm to reduce the devastating consequences of spinal cord compression. Materials and Methods: The algorithm is born from the experience of a primary care center. A spine surgeon, an emergency room (ER) physician, a neuroradiologist, a radiation oncologist, and an oncologist form the multidisciplinary team. The ER physician or the oncologist intercept the patient with symptoms and signs of a metastatic spinal cord compression. Once the suspicion is confirmed, the following steps of the flow-chart must be triggered. The spine surgeon takes charge of the patient and, on the base of the anamnestic data and neurological examination, defines the appropriate timing for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in collaboration with the neuroradiologist. From the MRI outcome, the spine surgeon and the radiation oncologist consult each other to define further therapeutic alternatives. If indicated, surgical treatment should precede radiation therapy. The oncologist gets involved after surgery for systemic therapy. Results: In 2021, the Spine and Spinal Cord Surgery department evaluated 257 patients with vertebral metastasis. Fifty-three patients presented with actual or incipient spinal cord compression. Among these, 27 were admitted due to rapid progression of symptoms, neurological deficits and/or spine instability signs. The level was thoracic in 21 cases, lumbar in 4 cases, cervical in 1 case, sacral in 1 case. Fifteen were operated on, 10 of these programmed and 5 in emergency. Discussion: Patients with a history of malignancy can present to the ER or to the oncology department with symptoms that must be correctly framed in the context of a metastatic involvement. Even when there is no previous cancer history, the patient's pain characteristics and clinical signs must be interpreted to yield the correct diagnosis of vertebral metastasis with incipient or current spinal cord compression. The awareness of the alert symptoms and the application of an integrated paradigm consent to frame the patients with spinal cord compression, obtaining the benefits of a homogeneous step-by-step diagnostic and therapeutic path. Early surgical or radiation therapy treatment gives the best hope for preventing the worsening, or even improving, the deficits. Conclusions: Metastatic spinal cord compression can cause neurological deficits compromising quality of life. Treatment strategies should be planned comprehensively. A multidisciplinary approach and the application of the proposed algorithm is of paramount importance to optimize the outcomes of these patients.

Perioperative management of spinal cord injury: the anesthesiologist's point of view.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is one of the most devastating events a person can experience. It may be life-threatening or result in long-term disability. This narrative review aims to delineate a systematic step-wise airways, breathing, circulation and disability (ABCD) approach to perioperative patient management during spinal cord surgery in order to fill some of the gaps in our current knowledge. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding the perioperative management of traumatic spinal injuries from May 15, 2020, to December 13, 2020. We consulted the PubMed and Embase database libraries. RESULTS: Videolaryngoscopy supplements the armamentarium available for airway management. Optical fiberscope use should be evaluated when intubating awake patients. Respiratory complications are frequent in the acute phase of traumatic spinal injury, with an estimated incidence of 36-83%. Early tracheostomy can be considered for expected difficult weaning from mechanical ventilation. Careful intraoperative management of administered fluids should be pursued to avoid complications from volume overload. Neuromonitoring requires investments in staff training and cooperation, but better outcomes have been obtained in centers where it is routinely applied. The prone position can cause rare but devastating complications, such as ischemic optic neuropathy; thus, the anesthetist should take the utmost care in positioning the patient. CONCLUSIONS: A one-size fit all approach to spinal surgery patients is not applicable due to patient heterogeneity and the complexity of the procedures involved. The neurologic outcome of spinal surgery can be improved, and the incidence of complications reduced with better knowledge of patient-specific aspects and individualized perioperative management.

Spine Surgery in Italy in the COVID-19 Era: Proposal for Assessing and Responding to the Regional State of Emergency.

In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was discovered in Wuhan, Hubei province, from where it spread rapidly worldwide. COVID-19 characteristics (increased infectivity, rapid spread, and general population susceptibility) pose a great challenge to hospitals. Infectious disease, pulmonology, and intensive care units have been strengthened and expanded. All other specialties have been compelled to suspend or reduce clinical and elective surgical activities. The profound effects on spine surgery call for systematic approaches to optimizing the diagnosis and treatment of spinal diseases. Based on the experience of one Italian region, we draw an archetype for assessing the current and predicted level of stress in the health care system, with the aim of enabling hospitals to make better decisions during the pandemic. Further, we provide a framework that may help guide strategies for adapting surgical spine care to the conditions of epidemic surge.

Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis Consensus Conference: the Italian job. Recommendations of the Spinal Section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery.

In the modern era evidence-based medicine, guidelines and recommendations represent a key-point of daily activity. The Spinal Section of the Italian Society of Neurosurgery introduced some recommendations regarding Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis based on those of the Spine Committee of World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies, revising them on the basis of Italian common practice. In June 2019, a Committee of 21 spine surgeons met in Rome to validate the recommendations of the WFNS. Furthermore, they decided to review the ones that did not reach a consensus to create Italian Recommendations on Degenerative Lumbar Spine Stenosis. A literature review of the last ten years was performed and the statements were voted using the Delphi method. Forty-one statements were discussed, and 7 statements were voted again to reach a consensus with respect to those of the WFNS. A total of 40 statements reached a consensus, of which 36 reached a positive consensus and 4 a negative consensus, while no consensus was reached in 1 case. Conservative multimodal therapy, tailored on the patient, is a reasonable and effective first option choice for the treatment of LSS patients with tolerable moderate symptoms. Surgical treatment is reserved for symptomatic patients non-responding to conservative treatment or with neurological deficits. The best surgical technique to use depends on personal experience; modern MISS techniques are equivalent to open decompressive surgery with some advantages and higher cost-effectiveness. Fusion surgery and mobility preserving surgery only have a marginal role in the treatment of DLSS without instability.

Evaluation of the effectiveness of expandable cages for reconstruction of the anterior column of the spine.

PURPOSE: For anterior spine column reconstruction after corpectomy, expandable cages offer solid anterior support and allow correction of deformity, providing excellent primary stability. To provide a larger body of clinical observations concerning the effectiveness of the approach, this retrospective study examines patients treated by corpectomy and reconstruction with an expandable cage for different pathologies. METHODS: Across 5 years, 39 patients underwent vertebral reconstruction with expandable cages after single (n = 34), double (n = 4), or triple (n = 1) corpectomy. Pathologies were tumors (n = 21), fractures, or deformities in traumatic injuries (n = 14), degenerative pathology (n = 2), and infection (n = 2). Levels were cervical (n = 10), thoracic (n = 14), and lumbar (n = 15). All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically. RESULTS: There were no cases of neurologic deterioration. Nurick grade showed significant improvement at 3 months postoperative versus preoperative (p < 0.01). Visual analog scale significantly improved preoperatively versus 3 and 12 months postoperatively (both p = 0). Regional angulation was significantly corrected, from preoperative to 3 and 12 months postoperative, at cervical, thoracic, and lumbar levels. We achieved reconstruction of the normal local anatomy with full recovery of the height of the vertebral body. Six patients (15.4%) had complications and two (5.1%) underwent revision surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, expandable cages confer stable anterior support, providing significant improvement of the segmental kyphosis angle and restoration of the original somatic height. Our clinical results are favorable, and the low rate of complications and revision accentuates the expandable cage as a valuable tool to replace the vertebral body in diverse pathologies and different spine levels.

Disc prosthesis replacement and interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: comparative analysis of 176 consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to determine whether disc prosthesis replacement can be equivalent or superior compared with the disc interbody fusion. METHODS: Between January, 2005 and June, 2011 we performed microdiscetomy by the anterior approach in 176 patients. We subdivided the total set of patients into two groups. Group A is made up of 84 patients in whom the prosthetic disc was implanted; Group B is made up of 92 patients in whom disc fusion was performed. RESULTS: In both groups, the radicular pain disappeared and the signs of spinal cord compression improved or remained stable. Patients of Group A required significantly fewer days of hospitalization and shorter absence from work, and had significant lower scores in the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates that the use of disc prosthesis is a safe and effective alternative to interbody fusion.